Mitral Valve Replacement Research Articles

Left ventricle outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement with a transatrial approach.

Left ventricle outflow tract obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement with a transatrial approach.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valve or Dedicated Devices: Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a novel and evolving field dedicated to addressing the therapeutic challenges posed by patients at high surgical risk with mitral valve disease. TMVR can be categorized into two distinct fields based on the type of device and its specific indications: TMVR with transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) and TMVR with dedicated devices. Similar to aortic stenosis, TMVR with TAV requires a rigid support structure to secure the valve in place. As a result, it is indicated for patients with failing bioprothesis or surgical rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), which furnishes the necessary foundation for valve anchoring. While TMVR with TAV has shown promising outcomes in valve-in-valve procedures, its effectiveness remains more contentious in valve-in-ring or valve-in-MAC procedures. Conversely, TMVR with dedicated devices seeks to address native mitral regurgitation, whether accompanied by MAC or not, providing an alternative to Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) when TEER is not feasible or expected to yield unsatisfactory results. This emerging field is gradually surmounting technical challenges, including anchoring a valve in a non-calcified annulus and transitioning from the transapical route to the transeptal approach. Numerous devices are presently undergoing clinical trials. This review aims to furnish an overview of the supporting evidence for TMVR using TAV in each specific indication (valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, valve-in-MAC). Subsequently, we will discuss the anticipated benefits of TMVR with dedicated devices over TEER, summarize the characteristics and clinical results of TMVR systems currently under investigation, and outline future prospects in this field.

1-Year Outcomes Following Transfemoral Transseptal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study Results

BackgroundHigh surgical risk may preclude mitral valve replacement in many patients. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transfemoral transseptal access is a novel technology for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk surgical patients. ObjectivesThis analysis evaluates 30-day and 1-year outcomes of the Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study in patients with ≥moderate-severe MR. MethodsThe Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study. Clinical events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee; endpoints were defined according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. ResultsA total of 33 patients, enrolled at 9 U.S. sites between February 2020 and August 2022, were included. The median age was 80 years, 63.6% of patients were men, and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality for mitral valve replacement was 5.3%. Thirty-one (93.9%) patients were successfully implanted. Median postprocedural hospitalization length of stay was 5 days, and 87.9% of patients were discharged to home. At 30 days, there were no deaths or strokes, 8 (24.2%) patients had major vascular complications and none required surgical intervention, there were 4 cases of venous thromboembolism all successfully treated without sequelae, and 1 patient had mitral valve reintervention for severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. At 1 year, the Kaplan-Meier all-cause mortality rate was 6.7%, echocardiography showed ≤mild valvular MR, there was no/trace paravalvular leak in all patients, median mitral valve mean gradient was 4.6 mm Hg (Q1-Q3: 3.9-5.3 mm Hg), and 91.7% of survivors were in NYHA functional class I/II with a median 11.4-point improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary scores. ConclusionsThe early benefits of the Intrepid transfemoral transseptal TMVR system were maintained up to 1 year with low mortality, low reintervention, and near complete elimination of MR, demonstrating a favorable safety profile and durable valve function.

Cardiac Reoperation or Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Patients With Failed Mitral Prostheses

BackgroundEvidence is limited regarding patient outcomes comparing redo surgical mitral valve replacement (redo SMVR) vs transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for failed prostheses. ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of redo SMVR vs TMVR in patients with failed prostheses, as well as evaluate the association between case volume and outcomes. MethodsMedicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent redo SMVR or TMVR for failed mitral prostheses between 2016 and 2020 were included. The primary endpoint was mid-term (up to 3 years) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, heart failure rehospitalization, stroke, or reintervention. Propensity score–matched analysis was used. ResultsA total of 4,293 patients were included (redo SMVR: 64%; TMVR: 36%). TMVR recipients were older, with a higher comorbidity burden. In matched cohort (n = 1,317 in each group), mid-term risk of MACE was similar (adjusted HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.80-1.04; P = 0.2). However, landmark analysis revealed a lower risk of MACE with TMVR in the first 6 months (adjusted HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.88; P < 0.001) albeit with a higher risk beyond 6 months (adjusted HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.04-1.58; P = 0.02). Increasing procedural volume was associated with decreased risk of mid-term MACE after redo SMVR (P = 0.001) but not after TMVR (P = 0.3). ConclusionsIn this large cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with failed mitral prostheses, outcomes were similar between redo SMVR and TMVR at 3 years, with TMVR showing a lower initial risk but a higher risk of MACE after 6 months. These findings highlight the importance of striking a balance between surgical risk, anticipated longevity, and hospital expertise when selecting interventions.

Contemporary surgical techniques for mitral valve replacement in extensive mitral annular calcification

ObjectivesMitral annular calcification remains a formidable lesion in cardiac surgery with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly when en bloc annular decalcification is implemented. Respect strategies and hybrid approaches have provided safe alternatives. We report the short-term results of our institution's experience with mitral valve replacement in patients with extensive annular calcification. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 72 consecutive patients with extensive annular calcification who underwent open surgical mitral valve replacement from January 1, 2013, to September 31, 2022. Degree of annular calcification was graded as partial, horseshoe, or circumferential. We excluded patients with calcification involving less than one-third of the annulus and patients with rheumatic heart disease. ResultsMean patient age was 71.6 ± 10.9 years, and 50 (69.4%) were female. There were 51 patients (70.8%) with New York Heart Association class 3 or greater and 47 patients (65.3%) with pulmonary hypertension. There were 41 patients (56.9%) with partial, 12 patients (16.7%) with horseshoe, and 19 patients (26.4%) with circumferential calcification. Fifty-six patients (77.8%) underwent conventional valve replacement. Sixteen patients underwent a hybrid procedure using balloon-expandable devices. Concomitant procedures were performed in 61 patients (84.7%). In-hospital mortality and 1-year survival were 3.57% and 82.8% in the standard valve replacement cohort and 25.0% and 54.7% in the hybrid cohort, respectively. ConclusionsConventional mitral valve replacement using respect strategies is safe and associated with good outcomes in patients with extensive annular calcification. Hybrid approaches using novel devices should remain as a bailout in select patients because of higher perioperative risks and poor short-term outcomes.

Preemptive alcohol septal ablation prior to transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been shown to increase the neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area before transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) but there is little literature on its success and use with dedicated devices. To describe our experience with preemptive ASA to increase the predicted neo-LVOT area and its utility with both dedicated TMVR devices and balloon-expandable valves. All patients who underwent ASA for TMVR candidacy in our center between May 2018 and October 2022 and had computed tomography(CT) scans done before and after ASA were included. Each CT was assessed for the minimum predicted neo-LVOT area at end-systole, using a virtual valve of the desired TMVR device for each patient. The primary outcome was an increase in the predicted neo-LVOT area after ASA that was deemed sufficient for safe implantation of the desired TMVR device. The secondary outcome was the absence of acute LVOT obstruction after TMVR. A total of 12 patients underwent ASA and all but 1 (n = 11, 91.6%) achieved the primary outcome of having sufficient predicted neo-LVOT area to proceed with TMVR. The mean increase in neo-LVOT area after ASA was 126 ± 64 mm2 (median 119.5, interquartile range: 65.0-163.5 mm2 ). Two patients (16.7%) required a permanent pacemaker after ASA. Nine patients went on and underwent TMVR with their respective devices and none had LVOT obstruction after the procedure. Among the remaining three patients, one had insufficient neo-LVOT clearance after ASA, one had unrelated mortality before TMVR, and one had advanced heart failure before TMVR. In appropriately selected patients and at centers experienced with ASA, preemptive ASA can achieve sufficient neo-LVOT clearance for TMVR with a variety of devices in approximately 90% of patients.

Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue in cardiac surgery

ObjectiveThe study objective was to examine the association between hospital processes of care and failure to rescue in a diverse, multi-institutional cardiac surgery network. MethodsFailure to rescue was defined as an operative mortality after 1 or more of 4 complications: prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure, and unplanned reoperation. Society of Thoracic Surgeons data from 20,950 consecutive patients in the Columbia HeartSource network who underwent 1 of 7 cardiac operations—coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve repair or replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting—were analyzed to calculate failure to rescue rates. Hospital-specific characteristics were ascertained by survey method. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic models assessed the association of these hospital characteristics with failure to rescue while adjusting for patient-related factors known to be associated with mortality. ResultsFailure to rescue rates at affiliate hospitals ranged from 5.45% to 21.74% (median, 12.5%; interquartile range, 6.9%). When controlling for Society of Thoracic Surgeons–predicted risk of mortality with hospital as a random effect, 4 hospital characteristics were found to be associated with lower failure to rescue rates; the presence of cardiac-trained anesthesiologists (odds ratio, 0.41; CI, 0.31-0.55, P < .001), availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio, 0.41; CI, 0.31-0.54, P < .001), ratio of intensive care unit beds to intensivists (odds ratio, 0.87; CI, 0.76-0.99, P = .039), and total number of intensive care unit beds (odds ratio, 0.97; CI, 0.96-0.99, P = .002) ConclusionsIn a diverse multi-institutional cardiac surgical network, we were able to identify specific hospital processes of care associated with failure to rescue, even when adjusting for patient-related predictors of operative mortality.

Early and long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve in rheumatic heart disease.

Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease is endemic in India. Mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve is the commonest surgical procedure performed in rheumatic heart disease (RHD). However, there are no studies reporting the long-term outcomes of mechanical mitral valve replacement in rheumatic heart disease from India. The primary objective of the study was to look at the long-term survival following mechanical mitral valve replacement in RHD. The secondary objectives included follow up complications and event-free survival. For this study, 238 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with TTK Chitra™ valve from 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2018 for RHD were included for analysis and reporting. The median follow-up period was 3371.50 days (9.3 years). Total follow-up was 2044 patient-years. The mean age of the study population was 39.72 ± 10.48 years (range: 18-68 years). Out of 238 patients operated, 155 patients (65.12%) were alive and 69 patients (28.99%) were dead, and 14 patients (5.88%) were lost to follow-up. The operative mortality was 6 (2.52%) and the follow-up mortality was 63 (26.47%). The reasons for follow-up mortality were cardiac complications in 22 (34.9%) patients, valve-related complications in 18 (28.5%) patients, sudden unexplained death in 13 (20.6%) patients, and non-valve/ non-cardiac death in 10patients (15.8%). The one-year survival was 94.0%, five-year survival was 83.6%, ten-year survival was 70.6% and 15-year survival was 62.9%. During follow-up, valve-related events occurred in 123(52%) patients. The 15-year event-free survival was 33.0%. The long term outcome of mechanical valve replacement of the mitral valve in RHD patients was less than favorable. Both cardiac complications and mechanical valve related complications reduced their survival.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Endocarditis Surgically Treated

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Endocarditis Surgically Treated

A Review of Cardiac Surgical Procedures and Their Outcomes for Paediatric Rheumatic Heart Disease in Western Australia

Surgical intervention is an important treatment modality for advanced rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This study aimed to describe patient characteristics and outcomes from cardiac surgery for RHD in patients referred to the only tertiary paediatric hospital in Western Australia. An analysis of patient characteristics and cardiac surgery outcomes in patients with RHD was undertaken, using data from clinical cardiac databases, medical notes, and correspondence from rural outreach clinics. 29 patients (59% female, 97% Aboriginal, Māori or Pacific Islander) underwent 41 valve interventions over 34 cardiac surgeries for RHD between 2000-2018. Median age at first surgery was 12.2 (range 4-16) years. Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) was the most common indication for primary surgery (62%), followed by mixed mitral regurgitation/aortic regurgitation (21%) and severe aortic regurgitation (17%). Mitral valve repair was the most common valve intervention (56%). Two patients had mitral valve replacement (MVR) at first operation, two patients had MVR at second operation and two had MVR at third operation. There was no early mortality. One patient required early (<30 days) reoperation for aortic valve repair failure. Two patients had late reoperations at 3.3 and 6.1 months after the first procedure for MR. Four (14%) patients experienced documented ARF recurrences. Late mortality occurred in 3 (10%) patients, all due to cardiac causes. On last follow-up echocardiogram 5 patients (17%) had moderate MR and none had severe MR. This is the first study to describe characteristics and outcomes in WA paediatric patients having surgery for RHD. Outcomes are comparable to similar studies, with favourable long-term survival.

Outcomes of mitral valve replacement with complete annular decalcification.

This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) who required extensive decalcification and mitral annular reconstruction. We reviewed 15 patients with severe MAC who underwent MVR between January 2016 and May 2022. In all cases, the calcified mitral annulus was resected completely using a Cavitron Ultrasound Surgical Aspirator, and a new annulus was created using bovine pericardium. In the acute postoperative phase, strict afterload reduction therapy using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was administered. The mean age of patients was 73 ± 8 years, and 13 (86.7%) were women. Concomitant aortic valve replacement was performed in 11 (73.3%) patients, tricuspid annuloplasty in 9 (60.0%), coronary artery bypass grafting in 1 (6.7%), and arrhythmia surgery in 7 (46.7%). The mean aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 143 ± 32 min and 175 ± 34 min, respectively. In 13 patients, an IABP was used for 2 or 3 days postoperatively. There were no in-hospital deaths, left ventricular ruptures, or other MAC-related complications. Postoperative echocardiography revealed no paravalvular leakages. Our strategy for managing severe MAC is safe and reproducible even in relatively high-risk patients. Afterload reduction using an IABP in the acute postoperative phase may reduce the risk of fatal complications after extensive decalcification and mitral annular reconstruction.

Diversifying cardiac intensive care unit models: Successful example of an operating surgeon-led unit

ObjectiveThe intensivist-led cardiovascular intensive care unit model is the standard of care in cardiac surgery. This study examines whether a cardiovascular intensive care unit model that uses operating cardiac surgeons, cardiothoracic surgery residents, and advanced practice providers is associated with comparable outcomes. MethodsThis is a single-institution review of the first 400 cardiac surgery patients admitted to an operating surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit from 2020 to 2022. Inclusion criteria are elective status and operations managed by both cardiovascular intensive care unit models (aortic operations, valve operations, coronary operations, septal myectomy). Patients from the surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit were exact matched by operation type and 1:1 propensity score matched with controls from the traditional cardiovascular intensive care unit using a logistic regression model that included age, sex, preoperative mortality risk, incision type, and use of cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Primary outcome was total postoperative length of stay. Secondary outcomes included postoperative intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day mortality, 30-day Society of Thoracic Surgeons–defined morbidity (permanent stroke, renal failure, cardiac reoperation, prolonged intubation, deep sternal infection), packed red cell transfusions, and vasopressor use. Outcomes between the 2 groups were compared using chi-square, Fisher exact test, or 2-sample t test as appropriate. ResultsA total of 400 patients from the surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit (mean age 61.2 ± 12.8 years, 131 female patients [33%], 346 patients [86.5%] with European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II <2%) and their matched controls were included. The most common operations across both units were coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 318, 39.8%) and mitral valve repair or replacement (n = 238, 29.8%). Approximately half of the operations were performed via sternotomy (n = 462, 57.8%). There were 3 (0.2%) in-hospital deaths, and 47 patients (5.9%) had a 30-day complication. The total length of stay was significantly shorter for the surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit patients (6.3 vs 7.0 days, P = .028), and intensive care unit length of stay trended in the same direction (2.5 vs 2.9 days, P = .16). Intensive care unit readmission rates, 30-day mortality, and 30-day morbidity were not significantly different between cardiovascular intensive care unit models. The surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit was associated with fewer postoperative red blood cell transfusions in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (P = .002) and decreased vasopressor use (P = .001). ConclusionsIn its first 2 years, the surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit demonstrated comparable outcomes to the traditional cardiovascular intensive care unit with significant improvements in total length of stay, postoperative transfusions in the cardiovascular intensive care unit, and vasopressor use. This early success exemplifies how an operating surgeon-led cardiovascular intensive care unit can provide similar outcomes to the standard-of-care model for patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Advent of severe mitral regurgitation in surgical ventricular restoration and ventricular septal rupture repair

BackgroundPer-procedural severe mitral regurgitation is a rare complication in concomitant surgical ventricular restoration and postinfarction ventricular septal rupture repair. It is challenging to discover the underlying etiology and adopt an appropriate strategy, in particular, in a high-risk patient.Case presentationSemi-emergent surgical ventricular restoration combined with ventricular septal rupture closure and coronary artery bypassing was performed in a 67-year-old male patient. Severe mitral regurgitation was detected after the weaning of cardiopulmonary bypass. Two key questions arose in the management of this condition: did the regurgitation exist previously and was dissimulated by significant left-to-right shunt, or it occurred secondarily to the Dor procedure? Which was the better management strategy, chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement or mitral plasty? We believed that severe mitral regurgitation was under-estimated pre-operatively and we performed an downsizing annuloplasty to treat mitral regurgitation. The outcomes were promising and the patient did well in follow-up.ConclusionsOur case brought out an open discussion on the etiology and therapeutic strategies of this complicated condition.

Reoperation after failure of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: A single surgeon experience

BackgroundWith an increasing number of patients undergoing mitral valve repair, more patients are presenting for reoperation. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing mortality and survival of patients undergoing reoperation for mitral valve surgery after previous mitral valve repair under a single surgeon. MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 117 patients who underwent reoperation after previous mitral valve repair between 2010 and 2022. We aimed to identify preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors affecting outcomes. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcomes included prolonged hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. The mean follow-up was 9.13 ± 10.36 years (median, 6.50 years). ResultsOut of 117 patients, 85 underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 32 underwent mitral valve repair (MVr). The mean age was 64.7 ± 12.7 years (65.5 ± 12.2 years in the MVR group and 62.7 ± 14.0 years in the MVr group), and 66 (56.4%) were men. On a standard multivariate analysis of the overall factors influencing mortality, advanced age was associated with a higher risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], f1.03-1.12; P = .001). The urgency of surgical intervention also played a role, with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing emergency reoperation (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.60-149.05; P = .02). Furthermore, the presence of mixed lesions, encompassing both mitral regurgitation and stenosis, was strongly linked to increased overall mortality (HR, 17.09; 95% CI, 4.06-71.94; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 15.83-1925.61; P < .001). Infective endocarditis emerged as a prominent risk factor for overall mortality (HR, 992.08; 95% CI, 85.74-11,479.08; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (HR, 5.83; 95% CI, 514.81-65,932.99; P < .001). Additionally, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall mortality (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.24-14.97; P = .02) ConclusionsOur single surgeon experience demonstrates that mitral valve reoperation after a previous repair is associated with good outcomes and survival.

Anticoagulant Management of Mechanical Heart Valve Patients During Perioperative Surgery: A Case Report

Background: Patients with mechanical heart valves require lifelong oral anticoagulation. It will be a dilemma if a patient with a mechanical heart valve has surgery. This case report aims to discuss how to interrupt oral anticoagulants and bridging therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves who will be undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Case Report: A 26-year-old pregnant woman, G1P0A0, aterm with a mechanical mitral valve, will have elective Sectio Caesarian Transperitonealis (SCTP) surgery and Intra Uterine Device (IUD) insertion. The patient had a history of mitral valve replacement surgery (MVR) in 2014 and was routinely treated with 4 mg of warfarin at night. From the examination, blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg, heart rate was 90 beats per minute, and pulse rate was 90 beats per minute. The ECG examination found sinus rhythm with 1st-degree atrioventricular block, right axis deviation, 90 beats per minute, and left atrial enlargement. We decided to have oral anticoagulant interruption and bridging therapy by stopping warfarin three days before surgery. When the international normalized ratio (INR) falls &lt;2, patients are given heparin injections (UFH) with an APTT target of 1.5-2.0 times from basic APTT. When the patient was about to be operated on, UFH was stopped 6 hours before surgery and resumed 12 hours after surgery. Warfarin was given one day postoperatively. Patients were adjusted to the dose of UFH according to the target. This patient had no thromboembolic events or bleeding before, during, or after surgery. The patient was allowed to be an outpatient and was given home therapy with Warfarin 5 mg at night. Results: We report a case of a 26-year-old female patient with a mechanical mitral valve who was going to undergo elective SCTP surgery and an IUD insertion. Patients at high risk of thrombo¬embolism due to surgery with a high risk of bleeding. Bridging therapy was performed using UFH. In the perioperative period, the patient did not experience thromboembolic events, and bleeding before, during, and after surgery could be well controlled. Conclusion: Perioperative management of patients with mechanical heart valves must be done carefully. Interruption of oral anticoagulants should be carefully considered considering the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding during the perioperative period. Guidelines recommend that in patients with mechanical heart valves, anticoagulation interruption for minor surgeries is avoided. Whereas in patients with major surgery, it is necessary to do bridging therapy with fast-acting anticoagulants such as UFH or LMWH. Keywords: mechanical heart valve, anticoagulant interruption, perioperative, bridging therapy Correspondence: Trisulo Wasyanto. Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University / Dr. Moewardi Hospital. Jl. Kol. Sutarto 132, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: trisulo.wasyanto@staff.uns.ac.id. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9900-0497. Mobile: +62811294225.

A tilted prosthetic mitral valve decade after mitral valve replacement.

A tilted prosthetic mitral valve decade after mitral valve replacement.

An alternating QRS: How does it go even though it's pretty slow?

We present the case of a 42 year old patient with a history of childhood lymphoma treated with chemotherapy and radiation who underwent combined aortic and mitral valve replacements and who postoperatively developed an interesting ECG which showed complete heart block and an alternating left bundle branch and narrow complex QRS pattern at a heart rate of 69 beats per minute (bpm). We discuss potential mechanisms for this interesting pattern.

Redo mitral valve replacement in an adult with severe pulmonary hypertension resulting from structural valve deterioration and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and a history of atrioventricular septal defect repair: a case report

BackgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH)-associated with left heart disease (Nice PH classification group II) improves when the latter is treated; however, the treatment of PH concomitant with group I PH due to congenital heart disease is difficult, and the optimal pharmacotherapy is controversial. Intervention strategies for the left-sided atrioventricular valve in partial atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) are problematic.Case presentationA 37-year-old woman who had undergone patch closure for a partial AVSD and mitral valve replacement with a rather large bioprosthesis at the juxta-annular position for mitral regurgitation 12 years earlier was referred to our institute because of severe PH. Echocardiography revealed calcification resulting in severe stenosis of the bioprosthesis and protrusion of its stent post into the left ventricular outflow tract; therefore, redo mitral valve replacement at the supra-annular position was performed using a mechanical valve. Combined group I and II PH gradually improved with meticulous postoperative medical management.ConclusionsSevere PH due to stent post protrusion and structural valve deterioration in AVSD was successfully treated with redo mitral valve replacement. The present case was complicated with group I and II PH, for which medical therapy in conjunction with surgical treatment yielded an optimal therapeutic effect.

Neurological outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: risk factors analysis from the Mini-Mitral International Registry.

The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and predictors of stroke after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVS) and to assess the role of preoperative CT scan on surgical management and neurological outcomes in the large cohort of Mini-Mitral International Registry. Clinical, operative and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing mini-MVS between 2015 and 2021 were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of stroke. Finally, the impact of preoperative CT scan on surgical management and neurological outcomes was assessed. Data from 7343 patients were collected. The incidence of stroke was 1.3% (n = 95/7343). Stroke was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001) and longer intubation time, ICU and hospital stay (median 26 vs 7 h, 120 vs 24 h and 14 vs 8 days, respectively). On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio 1.039, 95% confidence interval 1.019-1.060, P < 0.001) and mitral valve replacement (odds ratio 2.167, 95% confidence interval 1.401-3.354, P < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors of stroke. Preoperative CT scan was made in 31.1% of cases. These patients had a higher risk profile and EuroSCORE II (median 1.58 vs 1.1, P < 0.001). CT scan influenced the choice of cannulation site, being ascending aorta (18.5% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001) more frequent in the CT group and femoral artery more frequent in the no CT group (97.8% vs 79.7%, P < 0.001). No difference was found in the incidence of postoperative stroke (CT group 1.5, no CT group 1.4%, P = 0.7). Mini-MVS is associated with a low incidence of stroke, but when it occurs it has an ominous impact on mortality. Preoperative CT scan affected surgical cannulation strategy but did not led to improved neurological outcomes.

Optimizing transcatheter mitral valve replacement with direct, continuous transvalvular haemodynamic evaluation: first-in-man.

Optimizing transcatheter mitral valve replacement with direct, continuous transvalvular haemodynamic evaluation: first-in-man.