Mitosis In Animal Cells Research Articles

Centriole-less pericentriolar material serves as a microtubule organizing center at the base of C. elegans sensory cilia

During mitosis in animal cells, the centrosome acts as a microtubule organizing center (MTOC) to assemble the mitotic spindle. MTOC function at the centrosome is driven by proteins within the pericentriolar material (PCM), however the molecular complexity of the PCM makes it difficult to differentiate the proteins required for MTOC activity from other centrosomal functions. We used the natural spatial separation of PCM proteins during mitotic exit to identify a minimal module of proteins required for centrosomal MTOC function in C.elegans. Using tissue-specific degradation, we show that SPD-5, the functional homolog of CDK5RAP2, is essential for embryonic mitosis, while SPD-2/CEP192 and PCMD-1, which are essential in the one-cell embryo, are dispensable. Surprisingly, although the centriole is known to be degraded in the ciliated sensory neurons in C.elegans,1-3 we find evidence for "centriole-less PCM" at the base of cilia and use this structure as a minimal testbed to dissect centrosomal MTOC function. Super-resolution imaging revealed that this PCM inserts inside the lumen of the ciliary axoneme and directly nucleates the assembly of dendritic microtubules toward the cell body. Tissue-specific degradation in ciliated sensory neurons revealed a role for SPD-5 and the conserved microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC, but not SPD-2 or PCMD-1, in MTOC function at centriole-less PCM. This MTOC function was in the absence of regulation by mitotic kinases, highlighting the intrinsic ability of these proteins to drive microtubule growth and organization and further supporting a model that SPD-5 is the primary driver of MTOC function at the PCM.

Centriole-Less Pericentriolar Material Serves as a Microtubule Organizing Center at the Base of C. elegans Sensory Cilia

During mitosis in animal cells, the centrosome acts as a microtubule organizing center (MTOC) to assemble the mitotic spindle. MTOC function at the centrosome is driven by proteins within the pericentriolar material (PCM), however the molecular complexity of the PCM makes it difficult to differentiate the proteins required for MTOC activity from other centrosomal functions. We used the natural spatial separation of PCM proteins during mitotic exit to identify a minimal module of proteins required for centrosomal MTOC function in C. elegans. Using tissue specific degradation, we show that SPD-5, the functional homolog of CDK5RAP2, is essential for embryonic mitosis while SPD-2/CEP192 and PCMD-1, which are essential in the zygote, are dispensable. Surprisingly, although the centriole is known to be degraded in the ciliated sensory neurons in C. elegans , we find evidence for “centriole-less PCM” at the base of cilia and use this structure as a minimal testbed to dissect centrosomal MTOC function. Super-resolution imaging revealed that this PCM inserts inside the lumen of the ciliary axoneme and directly nucleates the assembly of dendritic microtubules towards the cell body. Tissue-specific degradation in ciliated sensory neurons revealed a role for SPD-5 and the conserved microtubule nucleator [[EQUATION]] -TuRC, but not SPD-2 or PCMD-1, in MTOC function at centriole-less PCM. This MTOC function was in the absence of regulation by mitotic kinases, highlighting the intrinsic ability of these proteins to drive microtubule growth and organization and further supporting a model that SPD-5 is the primary driver of MTOC function at the PCM.

A liquid crystal model for mitotic cell division - and the enigma of centriole involvement in mitosis in animals but not plants

ABSTRACTThere is a strategic difference between the process of cell division by mitosis in animal cells and that in cells of higher plants. One particularly puzzling feature is the absence of centrioles in plant cells, when they appear to be of central importance in the control of the process in animal cells. It is argued that in both cases the dividing cell uses the versatility of the liquid crystalline state of the mitotic cytoplasm created by the wide-scale assembly of microtubules prior to mitosis. It is not the centrioles per se which are vital – it is the director field of the mesophase which is crucial – and alternative procedures have been developed by plants and animals to create this. In both cases, they can be related to known spontaneous alignment states of liquid crystalline systems.

A unified view of spatio-temporal control of mitotic entry: Polo kinase as the key.

The Polo kinase is an essential regulator of cell division. Its ability to regulate multiple events at distinct subcellular locations and times during mitosis is remarkable. In the last few years, a much clearer mechanistic understanding of the functions and regulation of Polo in cell division has emerged. In this regard, the importance of coupling changes in activity with changes in localization is striking, both for Polo itself and for its upstream regulators. This review brings together several new pieces of the puzzle that are gradually revealing how Polo is regulated, in space and time, to enable its functions in the early stages of mitosis in animal cells. As a result, a unified view of how mitotic entry is spatio-temporally regulated is emerging.

Fluorescent Labeling of the Nuclear Envelope by Localizing Green Fluorescent Protein on the Inner Nuclear Membrane.

The nuclear envelope (NE) is a double membrane that segregates nuclear components from the cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. It is well-known that the NE undergoes a breakdown and reformation during mitosis in animal cells. However, the detailed mechanisms of the NE dynamics are not yet fully understood. Here, we propose a method for the fluorescent labeling of the NE in living cells, which enables the tracing of the NE dynamics during cell division under physiological conditions. In our method, labeling of the NE is accomplished by fixing green fluorescent protein carrying the nuclear localization signal on the inner nuclear membrane based on a unique biotinylation reaction from the archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii. With this method, we observed HeLa cells during mitosis by confocal laser scanning microscopy and succeeded in clearly visualizing the difference in the timing of the formation of the NE and the nuclear lamina.

SPD-2/CEP192 and CDK Are Limiting for Microtubule-Organizing Center Function at the Centrosome

The centrosome acts as the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) during mitosis in animal cells. Microtubules are nucleated and anchored by γ-tubulin ring complexes (γ-TuRCs) embedded within the centrosome's pericentriolar material (PCM). The PCM is required for the localization of γ-TuRCs, and both are steadily recruited to the centrosome, culminating in a peak in MTOC function in metaphase. In differentiated cells, the centrosome is often attenuated as an MTOC and MTOC function is reassigned to non-centrosomal sites such as the apical membrane in epithelial cells, the nuclear envelope in skeletal muscle, and down the lengths of axons and dendrites in neurons. Hyperactive MTOC function at the centrosome is associated with epithelial cancers and with invasive behavior in tumor cells. Little is known about the mechanisms that limit MTOC activation at the centrosome. Here, we find that MTOC function at the centrosome is completely inactivated during cell differentiation in C. elegans embryonic intestinal cells and MTOC function is reassigned to the apical membrane. In cells that divide after differentiation, the cellular MTOC state switches between the membrane and the centrosome. Using cell fusion experiments in live embryos, we find that the centrosome MTOC state is dominant and that the inactive MTOC state of the centrosome is malleable; fusion of a mitotic cell to a differentiated or interphase cell results in rapid reactivation of the centrosome MTOC. We show that conversion of MTOC state involves the conserved centrosome protein SPD-2/CEP192 and CDK activity from the mitotic cell.

One to only two: a short history of the centrosome and its duplication.

This review discusses some of the history of the fundamental, but not fully solved problem of how the centrosome duplicates from one to only two as the cell prepares for mitosis. We start with some of the early descriptions of the centrosome and the remarkably prescient but then controversial inferences drawn concerning its function in the cell. For more than 100 years, one of the most difficult issues for the concept of the centrosome has been to integrate observations that centrosomes appear to be important for spindle assembly in animal cells yet are not evident in higher plant cells and some animal cells. This stirred debate over the existence of centrosomes and their importance. A parallel debate concerned the role of the centrioles in organizing centrosomes. The relatively recent elucidation of bipolar spindle assembly around chromatin allows a re-examination of the role of centrioles in controlling centrosome duplication in animal cells. The problem of how centrosomes precisely double in preparation for mitosis in animal cells has now moved to the mystery of how only one procentriole is assembled at each mother centriole.

S. cerevisiae Chromosomes Biorient via Gradual Resolution of Syntely between S Phase and Anaphase

Following DNA replication, eukaryotic cells must biorient all sister chromatids prior to cohesion cleavage at anaphase. In animal cells, sister chromatids gradually biorient during prometaphase, but current models of mitosis in S.cerevisiae assume that biorientation is established shortly after S phase. This assumption is based on the observation of a bilobed distribution of yeast kinetochores early in mitosis and suggests fundamental differences between yeast mitosis and mitosis in animal cells. By applying super-resolution imaging methods, we show that yeast and animal cells share the key property of gradual and stochastic chromosome biorientation. The characteristic bilobed distribution of yeast kinetochores, hitherto considered synonymous for biorientation, arises from kinetochores in mixed attachment states to microtubules, the length of which discriminates bioriented from syntelic attachments. Our results offer a revised view of mitotic progression in S.cerevisiae that augments the relevance of mechanistic information obtained in this powerful genetic system for mammalian mitosis.

How protein kinases co-ordinate mitosis in animal cells

Mitosis is associated with profound changes in cell physiology and a spectacular surge in protein phosphorylation. To accomplish these, a remarkably large portion of the kinome is involved in the process. In the present review, we will focus on classic mitotic kinases, such as cyclin-dependent kinases, Polo-like kinases and Aurora kinases, as well as more recently characterized players such as NIMA (never in mitosis in Aspergillus nidulans)-related kinases, Greatwall and Haspin. Together, these kinases co-ordinate the proper timing and fidelity of processes including centrosomal functions, spindle assembly and microtubule-kinetochore attachment, as well as sister chromatid separation and cytokinesis. A recurrent theme of the mitotic kinase network is the prevalence of elaborated feedback loops that ensure bistable conditions. Sequential phosphorylation and priming phosphorylation on substrates are also frequently employed. Another important concept is the role of scaffolds, such as centrosomes for protein kinases during mitosis. Elucidating the entire repertoire of mitotic kinases, their functions, regulation and interactions is critical for our understanding of normal cell growth and in diseases such as cancers.

The Expanded Kinesin-13 Repertoire of Trypanosomes Contains Only One Mitotic Kinesin Indicating Multiple Extra-Nuclear Roles

BackgroundKinesin-13 proteins have a critical role in animal cell mitosis, during which they regulate spindle microtubule dynamics through their depolymerisation activity. Much of what is known about Kinesin-13 function emanates from a relatively small sub-family of proteins containing MCAK and Kif2A/B. However, recent work on kinesins from the much more widely distributed, ancestral Kinesin-13 family, which includes human Kif24, have identified a second function in flagellum length regulation that may exist either alongside or instead of the mitotic role.Methodology/Principal FindingsThe African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei encodes 7 distinct Kinesin-13 proteins, allowing scope for extensive specialisation of roles. Here, we show that of all the trypanosomal Kinesin-13 proteins, only one is nuclear. This protein, TbKIN13-1, is present in the nucleoplasm throughout the cell cycle, but associates with the spindle during mitosis, which in trypanosomes is closed. TbKIN13-1 is necessary for the segregation of both large and mini-chromosomes in this organism and reduction in TbKIN13-1 levels mediated by RNA interference causes deflects in spindle disassembly with spindle-like structures persisting in non-mitotic cells. A second Kinesin-13 is localised to the flagellum tip, but the majority of the Kinesin-13 family members are in neither of these cellular locations.Conclusions/SignificanceThese data show that the expanded Kinesin-13 repertoire of trypanosomes is not associated with diversification of spindle-associated roles. TbKIN13-1 is required for correct spindle function, but the extra-nuclear localisation of the remaining paralogues suggests that the biological roles of the Kinesin-13 family is wider than previously thought.

The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics

Motility is a fundamentally important property of most members of the kinesin superfamily, but a rare subset of kinesins are also able to alter microtubule dynamics. At kinetochore-microtubule plus ends, the kinesin-8 family member Kif18A is essential to align mitotic chromosomes at the spindle equator during cell division, but how it accomplishes this function is unclear. We report here that Kif18A is a plus-end-directed motor that inhibits the polymerization dynamics of microtubule plus ends without destabilizing them, distinguishing Kif18A from the budding yeast ortholog Kip3. In interphase cells, Kif18A uses this activity to reduce the overall dynamicity of microtubule plus ends and effectively constrains the distance over which plus ends grow and shrink. Our findings suggest that kinesin-8 family members have developed biochemically distinct activities throughout evolution and have implications for how Kif18A affects kinetochore-microtubule plus-end dynamics during mitosis in animal cells.

Moesin Controls Cortical Rigidity, Cell Rounding, and Spindle Morphogenesis during Mitosis

During mitosis, animal cells undergo a complex sequence of morphological changes, from retraction of the cell margin and cell rounding at the onset of mitosis to axial elongation and cytokinesis at mitotic exit. The molecular mechanisms driving the early changes in mitotic cell form and their functional significance, however, remain unknown. Here we identify Moesin as a key player. Moesin is the sole Drosophila member of the ERM proteins, which, once activated via phosphorylation, crosslink actin filaments to the cytoplasmic tails of plasma membrane proteins. We find that the Moesin is activated upon entry into mitosis, is necessary for the accompanying increase in cortical rigidity and cell rounding and, when artificially activated, is sufficient to induce both processes in interphase cells, independently of Myosin II. This phospho-Moesin-induced increase in cortical rigidity plays an important role during mitotic progression, because spindle morphogenesis and chromosome alignment are compromised in Moesin RNAi cells. Significantly, however, the spindle defects observed in soft metaphase cells can be rescued by the re-establishment of cortical tension from outside the cell. These data show that changes in the activity and localization of Moesin that accompany mitotic progression contribute to the establishment of a stiff, rounded cortex at metaphase and to polar relaxation at anaphase and reveal the importance of this Moesin-induced increase in cortical rigidity for spindle morphogenesis and orderly chromosome segregation. In doing so, they help to explain why dynamic changes in cortical architecture are a universal feature of mitosis in animal cells.

Spindle orientation in animal cell mitosis: Roles of integrin in the control of spindle axis

The orientation of mitotic spindles, which determines the plane of cell division, is tightly regulated in polarized cells such as epithelial cells, but it has been unclear whether there is a mechanism regulating spindle orientation in non-polarized cultured cells. In adherent cultured cells, spindles are positioned at the center of the cells and the axis of the spindle lies in the longest axis of the cell. Thus, cell geometry is thought to be one of cues for spindle orientation and positioning in cultured cells because this defines the center and the long axis of the cell. Recent work provides a new insight into the spindle orientation in cultured cells; spindles are aligned along the axis parallel to the cell-substrate adhesion plane. Concomitantly, integrin-mediated cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM), rather than gravitation, cell-cell adhesion or cell geometry, has shown to be essential for this mechanism of spindle orientation. Several independent lines of evidence confirm the involvement of cell-ECM adhesion in spindle orientation in both cultured cells and in developing organisms. The important future challenge is to identify a molecular mechanism(s) that links integrin and spindles in the control of spindle axis.

Aurora A activates D-TACC–Msps complexes exclusively at centrosomes to stabilize centrosomal microtubules

Centrosomes are the dominant sites of microtubule (MT) assembly during mitosis in animal cells, but it is unclear how this is achieved. Transforming acidic coiled coil (TACC) proteins stabilize MTs during mitosis by recruiting Minispindles (Msps)/XMAP215 proteins to centrosomes. TACC proteins can be phosphorylated in vitro by Aurora A kinases, but the significance of this remains unclear. We show that Drosophila melanogaster TACC (D-TACC) is phosphorylated on Ser863 exclusively at centrosomes during mitosis in an Aurora A–dependent manner. In embryos expressing only a mutant form of D-TACC that cannot be phosphorylated on Ser863 (GFP-S863L), spindle MTs are partially destabilized, whereas astral MTs are dramatically destabilized. GFP-S863L is concentrated at centrosomes and recruits Msps there but cannot associate with the minus ends of MTs. We propose that the centrosomal phosphorylation of D-TACC on Ser863 allows D-TACC–Msps complexes to stabilize the minus ends of centrosome-associated MTs. This may explain why centrosomes are such dominant sites of MT assembly during mitosis.

Endoplasmic reticulum positioning and partitioning in mitotic HeLa cells.

Cell division serves to distribute chromosomes and organelles into two daughter cells, but the mechanism of rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) segregation in animal cell mitosis is poorly understood. Here we study the distribution of RER in mitotic HeLa cells and its relation to the cytoskeleton. At metaphase, the RER was located in the cell cortex and was most concentrated in two locations. Close to the plasma membrane the RER was closely associated with cortical actin, and after treatment with Latrunculin A RER elements retracted to the deep cortex and became more tubular. Positioning was therefore dependent on cortical F-actin. Deeper in the cortex cisternae were wrapped tightly around the contours of the spindle body and orientated along microtubules close the spindle poles. Stereology revealed a close correlation between RER volume and cell volume in telophase daughter cells. These results suggest that the RER is positioned at the outer and inner regions of metaphase cortex by association with cytoskeleton. This arrangement combined with a disposition in concentric layers, deep to the plasma membrane, appears to distribute the RER evenly in the cortex and may help to couple quantities of RER and cell constituents.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport and nuclear envelope integrity in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

The nuclear envelope is essential for compartmentalizing the nucleus from the cytoplasm in all eukaryotic cells. There is a tremendous flux of both RNA and proteins across the nuclear envelope, which is intact throughout the entire cell cycle of yeasts but breaks down during mitosis of animal cells. Transport across the nuclear envelope requires the recognition of cargo molecules by receptors, docking at the nuclear pore, transit through the nuclear pore, and then dissociation of the cargo from the receptor. This process depends on the RanGTPase system, transport receptors, and the nuclear pore complex. We provide an overview of the nuclear transport process, with particular emphasis on the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, including strategies for predicting and experimentally verifying the signals that determine the sub-cellular localization of a protein of interest. We also describe a variety of reagents and experimental strategies, including the use of mutants and chemical inhibitors, to study nuclear protein import, nuclear protein export, nucleocytoplasmic protein shuttling, and mRNA export in fission yeast. The RanGTPase and its regulators also play an essential transport independent role in nuclear envelope re-assembly after mitosis in animal cells and in the maintenance of nuclear envelope integrity at mitosis in S. pombe. Several experimental strategies and reagents for studying nuclear size, nuclear shape, the localization of nuclear pores, and the integrity of the nuclear envelope in living fission yeast cells are described.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport and nuclear envelope integrity in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

The nuclear envelope is essential for compartmentalizing the nucleus from the cytoplasm in all eukaryotic cells. There is a tremendous flux of both RNA and proteins across the nuclear envelope, which is intact throughout the entire cell cycle of yeasts but breaks down during mitosis of animal cells. Transport across the nuclear envelope requires the recognition of cargo molecules by receptors, docking at the nuclear pore, transit through the nuclear pore, and then dissociation of the cargo from the receptor. This process depends on the RanGTPase system, transport receptors, and the nuclear pore complex. We provide an overview of the nuclear transport process, with particular emphasis on the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, including strategies for predicting and experimentally verifying the signals that determine the sub-cellular localization of a protein of interest. We also describe a variety of reagents and experimental strategies, including the use of mutants and chemical inhibitors, to study nuclear protein import, nuclear protein export, nucleocytoplasmic protein shuttling, and mRNA export in fission yeast. The RanGTPase and its regulators also play an essential transport independent role in nuclear envelope re-assembly after mitosis in animal cells and in the maintenance of nuclear envelope integrity at mitosis in S. pombe. Several experimental strategies and reagents for studying nuclear size, nuclear shape, the localization of nuclear pores, and the integrity of the nuclear envelope in living fission yeast cells are described.

Polo-like kinase 3 is Golgi localized and involved in regulating Golgi fragmentation during the cell cycle

The Golgi apparatus undergoes extensive fragmentation during mitosis in animal cells. Protein kinases play a critical role during fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus. We reported here that Polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3) may be an important mediator during Golgi breakdown. Specifically, Plk3 was concentrated at the Golgi apparatus in HeLa and A549 cells during interphase. At the onset of mitosis, Plk3 signals disintegrated and redistributed in a manner similar to those of Golgi stacks. Nocodazole activated Plk3 kinase activity, correlating with redistribution of Plk3 signals and Golgi fragmentation. In addition, treatment with brefeldin A (BFA), a Golgi-specific poison, also resulted in disappearance of concentrated Plk3 signals. Plk3 interacted with giantin, a Golgi-specific protein. Expression of Plk3, but not the kinase-defective Plk3 (Plk3 K52R), resulted in significant Golgi breakdown. Given its role in cell cycle progression, Plk3 may be a protein kinase involved in regulation of Golgi fragmentation during the cell cycle.

A time for cytokinesis

![Graphic][1] Furrows form in cells stuck in anaphase (top) but not metaphase. Burgess/ElsevierThink of cell division, and you probably imagine two phases occurring in successive order: first mitosis, then cytokinesis. But unlike in yeast, mitosis in animal cells does not have to

Translational Control of the Embryonic Cell Cycle

The synthesis and destruction of cyclin B drives mitosis in eukaryotic cells. Cell cycle progression is also regulated at the level of cyclin B translation. In cycling extracts from Xenopus embryos, progression into M phase requires the polyadenylation-induced translation of cyclin B1 mRNA. Polyadenylation is mediated by the phosphorylation of CPEB by Aurora, a kinase whose activity oscillates with the cell cycle. Exit from M phase seems to require deadenylation and subsequent translational silencing of cyclin B1 mRNA by Maskin, a CPEB and eIF4E binding factor, whose expression is cell cycle regulated. These observations suggest that regulated cyclin B1 mRNA translation is essential for the embryonic cell cycle. Mammalian cells also display a cell cycle-dependent cytoplasmic polyadenylation, suggesting that translational control by polyadenylation might be a general feature of mitosis in animal cells.