woman had severe arthritis and she needed a new knee. Dr Atul Gawande, writer, surgeon and Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School, tells the story in the matter-of-fact tone of someone who has seen way too many examples of the error he's about describe. She was given an antibiotic and wheeled into the OR [operating room], where she was anaesthetized. The surgeon, for whom a knee replacement was a routine procedure, was about make the first incision. But then he was told stop. A mistake had been made. It wasn't life-threatening, but it would have made it impossible operate successfully and could have resulted in complications--the kind that, according the World Alliance for Patient Safety (WAPS), a World Health Organization (WHO) initiative launched in 2004, result in around seven million people disabled every year. There are roughly 234 million interventions every year--one intervention for every 25 people on the planet, says Dr Gerald Dziekan, who is WAPS safe surgery project manager in Geneva. And while there is a clear correlation between economic standing and the number of interventions per capita (for example, in the United Kingdom the ratio is one operation for every eight people) globally speaking, there are no countries without a high rate of mistakes by operating teams. Whether it's a matter of leaving a sponge inside a patient or failing ensure sterility, more than 60% of patients worldwide have one of six key safety measures missed during surgery. In the words of Gawande, who leads the work develop this initiative, what almost happened the lady with the bad knee could have happened in Amman or London. Mistakes occur partly because of developments in surgical procedure and the technology that supports it. Medicine is becoming more complex, says Dr Cyrus Engineer, a member of the WAPS team. You can have the best of technology, but if you fail calibrate an instrument that is supposed tell you the blood sugar level, you are going get a wrong result which is going send you down the wrong path. Engineer compares the situation faced by operating room teams with that confronting pilots civil and military aviation in the 1930s. answer was introduce checklists, he says, to break down complex tasks their component parts, and ensure that nothing was left out. It was a process that eventually brought about standardization within the cockpit. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] WAPS launched its Second Global Patient Safety Challenge, Safe Surgery Saves Lives, on 25 June in Washington and it does exactly the same thing--introducing checklists into the operating room in the hope that nothing gets forgotten. A simple one-page surgery checklist, developed in consultation with international experts in surgery, anaesthesiology, nursing and patient safety over a period of 18 months, divides surgical procedures into three phases. In the first phase, the period before anaesthesia, a designated checklist coordinator confirms basics such as the patient's identity, the type of procedure planned, and whether or not consent has been given. In the second phase, the period after anaesthesia and before surgical incision, the coordinator reviews issues such as anticipated critical events--blood loss, for example--and makes sure basics such as prophylactic antibiotics have been given within an hour before surgery. In the third phase, which occurs during or immediately after wound closure, but before removing the patient from the operating room, the coordinator checks, among other things, that all instruments are accounted for and that pathological specimens have been properly labelled. The one-page checklist is currently in its first edition, and is being field-tested in eight hospitals in developed and developing countries spread over the six WHO regions, before being disseminated as a part of a set of WHO guidelines. …