Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry Research Articles

Both MLH1 deficiency and BRAFV600E mutation are a unique characteristic of colorectal medullary carcinoma: An observational study.

Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MMR IHC) is used to identify DNA MMR status, universal screening of all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) using a combination of both MMR IHC and genetic testing for the BRAFV600E mutation is limited in Japan. This study aimed to better understand the histopathological characteristics of CRCs, which exhibit both deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and BRAFV600E mutation. MMR IHC of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from tumor areas obtained from 651 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection at Hamamatsu University Hospital (Hamamatsu, Japan) between August 2016 and March 2022 were used to evaluate MMR status, which was determined by staining for the expression of 4 MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6). All dMMR tumors were additionally evaluated for BRAFV600 mutation status via Sanger sequencing. Patient clinical characteristics (age, sex, tumor location, size, and tumor pathology) were then classified using their dMMR and BRAFV600 mutation statuses. Among the 651 patients with CRC, 58 carried tumors with dMMR, of which 52 were deficiency in MLH1 (dMLH1). Interestingly, all 16 medullary carcinomas that were analyzed showed characteristics corresponding to the presence of both dMLH1 and BRAFV600E mutation (P = .01). These results suggest that colorectal medullary carcinomas can be diagnosed based on their unique characteristics of harboring the BRAFV600E mutation and exhibiting dMLH1 expression.

Adoption of Universal Testing in Endometrial Cancers for Microsatellite Instability Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

To assess implementation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect microsatellite instability (MSI) as a screen for Lynch syndrome (LS) in endometrial cancer (EC), while determining and comparing characteristics of the four molecular subtypes. A retrospective review was performed of 408 total patients with newly diagnosed EC: 140 patients who underwent universal screening with NGS and 268 patients who underwent screening via mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR IHC) as part of a historical screening paradigm. In the NGS cohort, incidental POLE and TP53 mutations along with MSI were identified and used to characterize EC into molecular subtypes: POLE-ultramutated, MSI high (MSI-H), TP53-mutated, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). In historical cohorts, age- and/or family history-directed screening was performed with MMR IHC. Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. In the NGS cohort, 38 subjects (27%) had MSI-H EC, 100 (71%) had microsatellite stable EC, and two (1%) had an indeterminate result. LS was diagnosed in two subjects (1%), and all but five patients completed genetic screening (96%). Molecular subtypes were ascertained: eight had POLE-ultramutated EC, 28 had TP53-mutated EC (20%), and 66 (47%) had NSMP. MSI-H and TP53-mutated EC had worse prognostic features compared with NSMP EC. Comparison with historical cohorts demonstrated a significant increase in follow-up testing after an initial positive genetic screen in the MSI NGS cohort (56% v 89%; P = .001). MSI by NGS allowed for simultaneous screening for LS and categorization of EC into molecular subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Endometrial Cancer: Assessing Concordance and Unveiling Pitfalls in Two Different Immunohistochemistry Assays.

This study aimed to compare the concordance and interchangeability of the Dako/Agilent and Ventana/Roche mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays commonly used in pathology. It also aimed to provide diagnostic insights by examining the frequency and characteristics of the dot-like artifact observed in MLH1 M1 clone staining in endometrial cancer. Fifty endometrial cancer cases with MMR deficiency, excised between 2011 and 2018, were included in the study. IHC was performed using primary antibody clones from Ventana/Roche (MLH1, clone M1; MSH2, G219-1129; MSH6, SP93; PMS2, A16-4) and Dako/Agilent (MLH1, ES05; MSH2, FE11; MSH6, EP49; PMS2, EP51). Both assays were conducted using respective autostainers. The Dako/Agilent assay showed a loss of MLH1 in 26 cases, MSH2 in 12 cases, MSH6 in 23 cases, and PMS2 in 28 cases. The two assays had a complete agreement in MMR protein expression or loss. The dot-like artifact in MLH1 M1 clone staining was observed in 77% (20/26) of cases, predominantly in the surface area of the tumor, ranging from 5% to 40% (median: 10%). These findings highlight the high concordance between the MMR-IHC assays and emphasize the importance of considering the dot-like artifact in MLH1 M1 clone staining when diagnosing endometrial cancer with MMR deficiency.

Harmonized molecular classification; assessment of a single-test ProMisE NGS tool

ObjectivesDespite recommendations for integrating molecular classification of endometrial cancers (EC) into pathology reporting and clinical management, uptake is inconsistent. To assign ProMisE subtype, all molecular components must be available (POLE mutation status, mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC)) and often these are assessed at different stages of care and/or at different centres resulting in delays in treatment. We assessed a single-test DNA-based targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) molecular classifier (ProMisE NGS), comparing concordance and prognostic value to the original ProMisE classifier. MethodsDNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) ECs that had previously undergone ProMisE molecular classification (POLE sequencing, IHC for p53 and MMR). DNA was sequenced using the clinically validated Imagia Canexia Health Find It™ amplicon-based NGS gene panel assay to assess for pathogenic POLE mutations (unchanged from original ProMisE), TP53 mutations (in lieu of p53 IHC), and microsatellite instability (MSI) (in lieu of MMR IHC),with the same order of segregation as original ProMisE used for subtype assignment. Molecular subtype assignment of both classifiers was compared by concordance metrics and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. ResultsThe new DNA-based NGS molecular classifier (ProMisE NGS) was used to determine the molecular subtype in 164 ECs previously classified with ProMisE. 159/164 cases were concordant with a kappa statistic of 0.96 and an overall accuracy of 0.97. Prognostic differences in progression-free, disease-specific and overall survival between the four molecular subtypes were observed for the new NGS classifier, recapitulating the survival curves of the original ProMisE classifier. ProMisE NGS was 100% concordant between matched biopsy and hysterectomy samples. ConclusionProMisE NGS is feasible on standard FFPE material, demonstrates high concordance with the original ProMisE classifier and maintains prognostic value in EC. This test has the potential to facilitate implementation of molecular classification of EC at the time of first diagnosis.

Improving genetic testing following abnormal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry results in endometrial cancer

ObjectivesAlthough universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endometrial cancer began at our institution in July 2015, not all eligible patients were referred for genetic testing (GT). In April 2017, genetic counselors obtained IHC data and contacted physicians to approve genetic counseling referrals (GCRs) for Lynch Syndrome (LS) in eligible patients. We assessed if this protocol increased frequency of GCRs and GT in patients with abnormal MMR IHC. MethodsWe retrospectively (7/2015–5/2022) identified patients with abnormal MMR IHC at a large urban hospital. GCRs and GT were compared between cases from 7/2015–4/2017 (pre-protocol) and 5/2017–5/2022 (post-protocol) with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. ResultsOf 794 patients with IHC testing, 177 (22.3%) had abnormal MMR results with 46 (26.0%) meeting criteria for LS screening with GT. Of 46 patients, 16 (34.8%) were identified prior to and 30 (65.2%) after the protocol initiation. GCRs significantly increased from 11/16 (68.8%) to 29/30 (96.7%) in the pre-protocol versus post-protocol groups, p = 0.02. There was no statistically significant difference in GT between groups (10/16, 62.5% vs 26/30, 86.7%, p = 0.07). Of 36 patients who underwent GT, 16 (44.4%) had LS: MSH6, 9; MSH2, 4; PMS2, 2; MLH1, 1. ConclusionsIncreased frequency of GCRs was observed following the change in protocol, which is important as LS screening has clinical implications for patients and their families. Despite this additional effort, approximately 15% who met criteria did not undergo GT; further efforts such as universal germline testing in patients with endometrial cancer should be considered.

Lynch screening and genetic testing in endometrial cancer in a diverse population.

e17619 Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for most of the inherited endometrial cancers. Universal screening of endometrial tumors for defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is recommended using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify which patients qualify for genetic counseling and testing. We report Lynch screening and genetic testing rates at a New York City tertiary care center with a large minority population, while investigating any potential disparities. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer between January 2014 and June 2022. Data were obtained from pathology and chemotherapy databases at the NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital. Variables including age, race, ethnicity, BMI, insurance, language, family history of cancer, date of diagnosis, stage, MMR IHC, and genetic counseling/testing status were manually extracted. Descriptive statistics were used. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests were used to examine the association between genetic counseling/testing and categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank-sum/t-tests were used for continuous factors. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to determine the significance of time trends. Results: 373 patients were identified. 45% identified as white, 42% black, 1.3% Asian, 12% other/unknown; 8.3% were of Hispanic ethnicity and 18% were non-English speaking. Mean age at diagnosis was 66 years (SD:10). 207 (55%) patients were screened using MMR IHC. 82 (40%) of these patients had MMR deficiencies on IHC. Of these, 63 (77%) received genetic counseling. 62 (98%) of those counseled subsequently underwent genetic testing, and ultimately 7 (11%) were diagnosed with LS. The overall rate of LS detected was 1.9% in the study population. The rate of MMR IHC testing has been increasing, reaching 95% in 2021 and 100% in 2022. It was associated with significant differences in mean age at diagnosis (p < 0.01) and insurance type (p = 0.04). 45% of patients that received MMR IHC had private insurance, compared to 34% of patients that did not. The rate was not influenced by race, language, BMI, family history of cancer, or stage. The proportion of patients that received genetic counseling and testing for endometrial cancer also showed a significant upwards trend over time (p < 0.01). Genetic counseling and testing rates were significantly different by ethnicity (p = 0.03), with only 3.0% of patients receiving genetic counseling/testing identifying as Hispanic. 98% of genetic counseling was performed by a gynecologic oncologist, as opposed to a genetic counselor. Conclusions: There were no disparities in access to initial IHC screening in this diverse patient population, however more work must be done to reach all ethnicities for genetic counseling and testing. The rate of LS detected was less than the known prevalence in endometrial cancer, possibly indicating demographic differences or gaps in screening.

Integration of clinical sequencing and immunohistochemistry for the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma

PurposeUsing next generation sequencing (NGS), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) found that endometrial carcinomas (ECs) fall under one of four molecular subtypes, and a POLE mutation status, mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based surrogate has been developed. We sought to retrospectively classify and characterize a large series of unselected ECs that were prospectively subjected to clinical sequencing by utilizing clinical molecular and IHC data. Experimental designAll patients with EC with clinical tumor-normal MSK-IMPACT NGS from 2014 to 2020 (n = 2115) were classified by integrating molecular data (i.e., POLE mutation, TP53 mutation, MSIsensor score) and MMR and p53 IHC results. Survival analysis was performed for primary EC patients with upfront surgery at our institution. ResultsUtilizing our integrated approach, significantly more ECs were molecularly classified (1834/2115, 87%) as compared to the surrogate (1387/2115, 66%, p < 0.001), with an almost perfect agreement for classifiable cases (Kappa 0.962, 95% CI 0.949–0.975). Discrepancies were primarily due to TP53 mutations in p53-IHC-normal ECs. Of the 1834 ECs, most were of copy number (CN)-high molecular subtype (40%), followed by CN-low (32%), MSI-high (23%) and POLE (5%). Histologic and genomic variability was present amongst all molecular subtypes. Molecular classification was prognostic in early- and advanced-stage disease, including early-stage endometrioid EC. ConclusionsThe integration of clinical NGS and IHC data allows for an algorithmic approach to molecularly classifying newly diagnosed EC, while overcoming issues of IHC-based genetic alteration detection. Such integrated approach will be important moving forward given the prognostic and potentially predictive information afforded by this classification.

Mutation-specific Mismatch Repair-deficient Benign Endometrial Glands in Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings Are a Biomarker of Lynch Syndrome and Associate With Endometrial Carcinoma Development.

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common extraintestinal cancer in Lynch syndrome (LS). Recent studies have demonstrated mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency can be detected in benign endometrial glands in LS. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry in benign endometrium from endometrial biopsies and curettings (EMCs) from a study group of 34 confirmed LS patients and a control group of 38 patients without LS who subsequently developed sporadic MLH1-deficient or MMR-proficient endometrial carcinoma. MMR-deficient benign glands were only identified in patients with LS (19/34, 56%) and were not identified in any control group patient (0/38, 0%) ( P < 0.001). MMR-deficient benign glands were identified as large, contiguous groups in 18 of 19 cases (95%). MMR-deficient benign glands were identified in patients with germline pathogenic variants in MLH1 (6/8, 75%), MSH6 (7/10, 70%), and MSH2 (6/11, 55%) but not in patients with variants in PMS2 (0/4). MMR-deficient benign glands were seen in all EMC samples (100%) but in only 46% of endometrial biopsy samples ( P =0.02). Patients with MMR-deficient benign glands were significantly more likely to have endometrial carcinoma (53%) compared with LS patients with only MMR-proficient glands (13%) ( P =0.03). In conclusion, we demonstrated that MMR-deficient benign endometrial glands are frequently identified in EMB/EMC in women with LS and are a specific marker for LS. Women with LS with MMR-deficient benign glands were more likely to have endometrial carcinoma suggesting that MMR-deficient benign glands may be a biomarker of increased risk of endometrial carcinoma development in LS.

Clinical predominance of whole-exome sequencing to evaluate microsatellite instability status.

The microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status is one of the critical genomic biomarkers for predicting patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the concordance among the MSIsensor score obtained from whole-exome sequencing (WES), which could be a futuristic clinical cancer sequencing method, using only tumor tissues, MSI-PCR results, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results to analyze various solid cancer types. We first endeavored to set the cut-off value of MSIsensor to determine functional deficient mismatch repair (f-dMMR) status. The MSI status of 1054 patients analyzed using WES was evaluated using MSIsensor. In addition, 87 of these patients were further analyzed using MSI-PCR and MMR IHC to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the MSIsensor cut-off score. Our results showed that score 12.5 was an adequate cut-off score equivalent to PCR-confirmed MSS/MSI-low and MSI-high statuses, with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of 95.2%, 100%, and 0.998, respectively. Moreover, we identified false-positive cases of tumors with high mutational burden with an MSIsensor score <12.5, and optional IHC examination could rescue these cases. In conclusion, the MSIsensor score obtained using WES with tumor tissue showed a high clinical validity, with a cut-off value of 12.5 for f-dMMR detection, in combination with optional IHC analysis for MMR. Our novel algorithm will provide insights into the development of ICIs for cancer treatment, particularly when WES becomes a more common cancer genomic test in the near future.

A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome

Routine screening of tumors for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and sebaceous skin (SST) tumors leads to a significant proportion of unresolved cases classified as suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS). SLS cases (n = 135) were recruited from Family Cancer Clinics across Australia and New Zealand. Targeted panel sequencing was performed on tumor (n = 137; 80×CRCs, 33×ECs and 24xSSTs) and matched blood-derived DNA to assess for microsatellite instability status, tumor mutation burden, COSMIC tumor mutational signatures and to identify germline and somatic MMR gene variants. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 promoter methylation were repeated. In total, 86.9% of the 137 SLS tumors could be resolved into established subtypes. For 22.6% of these resolved SLS cases, primary MLH1 epimutations (2.2%) as well as previously undetected germline MMR pathogenic variants (1.5%), tumor MLH1 methylation (13.1%) or false positive dMMR IHC (5.8%) results were identified. Double somatic MMR gene mutations were the major cause of dMMR identified across each tumor type (73.9% of resolved cases, 64.2% overall, 70% of CRC, 45.5% of ECs and 70.8% of SSTs). The unresolved SLS tumors (13.1%) comprised tumors with only a single somatic (7.3%) or no somatic (5.8%) MMR gene mutations. A tumor-focused testing approach reclassified 86.9% of SLS into Lynch syndrome, sporadic dMMR or MMR-proficient cases. These findings support the incorporation of tumor sequencing and alternate MLH1 methylation assays into clinical diagnostics to reduce the number of SLS patients and provide more appropriate surveillance and screening recommendations.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor molecular testing in stage III endometrial cancer

BackgroundStandard of care for adjuvant treatment of stage III endometrial cancer includes chemotherapy and radiation. In addition to stage, tumor molecular profiles may predict treatment outcomes, and prospective clinical trials are ongoing. However, tumor molecular testing is costly and time-consuming. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tumor molecular testing in stage III endometrial cancer. MethodsA Markov decision model compared two strategies for stage III endometrial cancer: Tumor Molecular Testing (TMT) versus No TMT. TMT included sequential POLE next generation sequencing, mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (IHC), and p53 IHC. POLE-mutated patients were assigned to adjuvant radiation therapy; all others including controls were assigned to adjuvant chemoradiation. First recurrences were treated with 6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Second recurrences were treated with pembrolizumab alone for mismatch repair deficient patients and both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for other patients. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. ResultsCompared to No TMT, TMT was cost saving with equivalent effectiveness. On one-way sensitivity analysis, TMT remained cost saving over all parameter ranges. TMT was also favored on probabilistic sensitivity analysis in 80% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. However, when TMT was compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT cost $182,798/QALY gained. ConclusionsIn this model of patients with stage III endometrial cancer, TMT was cost saving compared to No TMT. However, when compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT was economically unfavorable.

Mismatch repair deficiency testing in Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial tumors.

Lynch syndrome-associated cancer develops due to germline pathogenic variants in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2. Somatic second hits in tumors cause MMR deficiency, testing for which is used to screen for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer and to guide selection for immunotherapy. Both MMR protein immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis can be used. However, concordance between methods can vary for different tumor types. Therefore, we aimed to compare methods of MMR deficiency testing in Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial cancers. Ninety-seven urothelial (61 upper tract and 28 bladder) tumors diagnosed from 1980 to 2017 in carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated pathogenic MMR variants and their first-degree relatives (FDR) were analyzed by MMR protein immunohistochemistry, the MSI Analysis System v1.2 (Promega), and an amplicon sequencing-based MSI assay. Two sets of MSI markers were used in sequencing-based MSI analysis: a panel of 24 and 54 markers developed for colorectal cancer and blood MSI analysis, respectively. Among the 97 urothelial tumors, 86 (88.7%) showed immunohistochemical MMR loss and 68 were successfully analyzed by the Promega MSI assay, of which 48 (70.6%) were MSI-high and 20 (29.4%) were MSI-low/microsatellite stable. Seventy-two samples had sufficient DNA for the sequencing-based MSI assay, of which 55 (76.4%) and 61 (84.7%) scored as MSI-high using the 24-marker and 54-marker panels, respectively. The concordance between the MSI assays and immunohistochemistry was 70.6% (p = 0.003), 87.5% (p = 0.039), and 90.3% (p = 1.00) for the Promega assay, the 24-marker assay, and the 54-marker assay, respectively. Of the 11 tumors with retained MMR protein expression, four were MSI-low/MSI-high or MSI-high by the Promega assay or one of the sequencing-based assays. Our results show that Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial cancers frequently had loss of MMR protein expression. The Promega MSI assay was significantly less sensitive, but the 54-marker sequencing-based MSI analysis showed no significant difference compared to immunohistochemistry. Data from this study alongside previous studies, suggest that universal MMR deficiency testing of newly diagnosed urothelial cancers, using immunohistochemistry and/or sequencing-based MSI analysis of sensitive markers, offer a potentially useful approach to identification of Lynch syndrome cases.

Epigenetic MMR defect identifies a risk group not accounted for through traditional risk stratification algorithms in endometrial cancer.

We sought to evaluate the contribution of mismatch repair (MMR) status to traditional risk stratification algorithms used to predict nodal involvement and recurrence in a large single-institution cohort. Endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2014-2020 were evaluated. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed universally. Uterine factors assessed in the Mayo criteria were used to retrospectively classify patients as low or high risk for lymphatic spread. Patients were classified according to risk for recurrence using GOG 99 and PORTEC criteria. Associations were evaluated using chi-square and t-tests and contributing factors assessed using logistic regression models. 1,514 endometrioid EC were evaluated; 392 (25.9%) were MMR (MMR) deficient of which 80.4% of MMR defects were associated with epigenetic silencing of MLH1. Epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be high risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis based on Mayo criteria (74.9% vs 60.6%, p=<0.001) and with the presence of LN metastasis (20.3 vs 10.5%, p=0.003) compared to MMR proficient tumors. Tumors with epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be classified as high or high intermediate risk using GOG99 and PORTEC criteria. Furthermore, cases with epigenetic MMR defects classified as low or low intermediate risk were significantly more likely to recur (GOG99 p=0.013; PORTEC p=0.008) and independently associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS). MMR status was found to be independently associated with worse DFS (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.34-2.70; p=0.003) but not overall survival. While MMR deficient EC has been associated with poor prognostic features in prior reports; we demonstrate that only epigenetic MMR defects have poorer outcomes. Epigenetic MMR defect were independently associated with lymph node metastasis after controlling for risk criteria. Epigenetic MMR deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence beyond the factors considered in traditional risk stratification algorithms. Traditional uterine-based risk stratification algorithms may not fully reflect the risk for recurrence in MMR deficient tumors. Consideration should be given to implementing MMR status and MLH1 hypermethylation alongside traditional risk stratification algorithms. Performing MMR IHC on preoperative pathologic specimens may aid in risk stratification and patient counseling.

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: Comparison Between Mismatch Repair Protein Immunostaining and Microsatellite Instability Testing.

The utility of mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) has seldom been reported. This study aimed to compare MMR IHC and MSI testing in uterine MLA. We analyzed the MMR protein expression of 25 patients with MLA and compared the results with the MSI status. Of the cases, one (4.0%) was initially interpreted to have a loss of mutS homolog 2 (MSH2) and mutS homolog 6 (MSH6) expression, and eight (32.0%) to have a loss of MSH6 immunoreactivity. Upon re-evaluation of the slides and repeat IHC, all cases were revealed to demonstrate at least focal (5-20%) immunoreactivity for MSH2 or MSH6. MSI testing revealed all cases to be microsatellite stable (MSS). Uterine MLA is an MSS/MMR-proficient tumor. We observed complete concordance between MMR IHC and MSI testing. MMR IHC should be carefully interpreted, and discordant cases must be thoroughly reviewed. Repeat IHC and confirmatory MSI testing may be beneficial in resolving uncertain cases.

Highly Sensitive Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry Assessment in Endometrial Aspirates as a Tool for Cancer Risk Individualization in Lynch Syndrome

Women with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at increased risk of endometrial cancer (EC), among other tumors, and are characterized by mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI). While risk-reducing gynecologic surgeries effectively decrease EC incidence, doubts arise regarding the appropriate timing of the surgery. We explored the usefulness of highly sensitive MSI (hs-MSI) assessment in endometrial aspirates for individualizing gynecologic surveillance in LS carriers. Ninety-three women with LS, 25 sporadic EC patients (9 MMR-proficient and 16 MMR-deficient), and 30 women with benign gynecologic disease were included in this study. hs-MSI was assessed in prospectively collected endometrial aspirates in 67 LS carriers, EC cases, and controls. MMR, PTEN, ARID1A, and PAX2 protein expression patterns were evaluated in the LS samples. Follow-up aspirates from 8 LS carriers were also analyzed. Elevated hs-MSI scores were detected in all aspirates from MMR-deficient EC cases (3 LS and 16 sporadic) and negative in aspirates from controls and MMR-proficient EC cases. Positive hs-MSI scores were also detected in all 4 LS aspirates reported as complex hyperplasia. High hs-MSI was also present in 10 of 49 aspirates (20%) from LS carriers presenting a morphologically normal endometrium, where MMR protein expression loss was detected in 69% of the samples. Interestingly, the hs-MSI score was positively correlated with MMR-deficient gland density and the presence of MMR-deficient clusters, colocalizing PTEN and ARID1A expression loss. High hs-MSI scores and clonality were evidenced in 2 samples collected up to 4 months before EC diagnosis; hs-MSI scores increased over time in 5 LS carriers, whereas they decreased in a patient with endometrial hyperplasia after progestin therapy. In LS carriers, elevated hs-MSI scores were detected in aspirates from premalignant and malignant lesions and normal endometrium, correlating with MMR protein loss. hs-MSI assessment and MMR immunohistochemistry may help individualize EC risk assessment in women with LS.

Endometrial Carcinomas With Subclonal Loss of Mismatch Repair Proteins: A Clinicopathologic and Genomic Study.

Subclonal loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins has been described in a small subset of endometrial carcinomas (ECs), but the genomic basis for this phenomenon has received limited attention. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated all ECs with MMR immunohistochemistry (n=285) for subclonal loss, and in those (n=6), performed a detailed clinicopathologic and genomic comparison of the MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient components. Three tumors were FIGO stage IA, and one each stage IB, II, and IIIC2. Patterns of subclonal loss were as follows: (1) 3 FIGO grade 1 endometrioid carcinomas with subclonal MLH1/PMS2, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, and no MMR gene mutations; (2) POLE -mutated FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma with subclonal PMS2, and PMS2 and MSH6 mutations limited to the MMR-deficient component; (3) dedifferentiated carcinoma with subclonal MSH2/MSH6, as well as complete loss of MLH1/PMS2, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, and PMS2 and MSH6 mutations in both components; (4) dedifferentiated carcinoma with subclonal MSH6, and somatic and germline MSH6 mutations in both components, but with a higher allele frequency in MMR-deficient foci. Recurrences occurred in 2 patients, one consisted of the MMR-proficient component from a FIGO 1 endometrioid carcinoma, while the other was from the MSH6 -mutated dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinoma. At the last follow-up (median: 44mo), 4 patients were alive and disease-free and 2 were alive with disease. In summary, subclonal MMR loss reflects subclonal and often complex genomic and epigenetic alterations, which may have therapeutic implications and therefore must be reported when present. In addition, subclonal loss can occur in both POLE -mutated and Lynch syndrome-associated ECs.

Deep learning–assisted colonoscopy images for prediction of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer.

24 Background: Deficient mismatch repair (or microsatellite instability) is a major predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors of colorectal cancer. However, routine testing is time-consuming and incur substantial costs. We developed and validated a deep learning-based classifiers (MMR-Scopy) to detect mismatch repair-deficient status from routine colonoscopy images. Methods: We retrospectively obtained the colonoscopy images from the imaging database at Endoscopic Center of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Colorectal cancer images from patients that had undergone colonoscopy procedures, surgery and the mismatch repair immunohistochemistry test were eligible for this study. Colonoscopy images from a prospective trial (Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade by toripalimab with or without celecoxib in mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high locally advanced colorectal cancer, PICC) were used to test MMR-Scopy. The primary outcome was dMMR status. The primary performance metrics were accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: A total of 5226 eligible images from 892 tumors from the consecutive patients were utilized to develop and validate the deep learning model. 2105 CRC images from 306 tumors were randomly selected to form model development dataset with a class-balanced approach. 3121 images of 488 pMMR tumors and 98 dMMR tumors were used to form the independent dataset. The MMR-Scopy model achieved an AUROC of 0.948 (95% CI 0.919- 0.977) on the test dataset. On the independent validation dataset, the AUROC was 0.807 (0.760- 0.854), and the NPV in was 94.2% (95% CI 0.918-0.967). On the PICC dataset, the model identified 29 tumors among the 33 dMMR tumors (87.88%). Conclusions: MMR-Scopy achieved a high NPV in detecting dMMR colorectal cancers. This model might serve as an automatic screening tool, one that might potentially assist doctors in determining a new treatment strategy. [Table: see text]

Prognostic value of mismatch repair deficiency in patients receiving first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer.

461 Background: In localized gastric cancer (GC), deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors reportedly have a favorable prognosis. However, a potentially detrimental effect of the dMMR status was suggested in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. It remains unclear whether the mismatch repair (MMR) status can impact clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic GC (mGC) receiving palliative chemotherapy. We examined the impact of the MMR status on survival outcomes of patients with HER2-negative mGC receiving first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed patients with histologically confirmed metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced unresectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction receiving first-line FP chemotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018 at Asan Medical Center, Korea. MMR status was correlated with clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for patients with available MMR immunohistochemistry results. Results: Of 895 patients, we analyzed 543 with available MMR protein expression results, and dMMR was detected in 4.4% (n=24). Patients with dMMR exhibited a significantly higher median age than those with proficient MMR (pMMR) (64 vs. 58 years, p=0.044). No signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) was detected among dMMR tumors, whereas SRCC was found in 17.5% of pMMR tumors. Based on our prognostic model (Koo DH et al, 2011), only 4.2% of patients with dMMR were classified as the poor-risk group (vs. 16.8% of patients with pMMR, p=0.097). No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was noted between patients with dMMR and pMMR tumors (median, 5.6 vs. 5.8 months, p=0.266). Patients with dMMR tumors tended to have better overall survival than those with pMMR tumors; this difference was not statistically significant (median, 17.9 vs. 12.2 months, p=0.183). In the good-risk subgroup, patients with dMMR tumors had a significantly worse PFS than those with pMMR tumors (median, 5.6 vs. 9.2 months, p=0.009); multivariate analysis revealed that MMR status was an independent factor for poor PFS in this subgroup. Conclusions: Survival outcomes of dMMR mGC did not differ from pMMR in patients who received first-line FP chemotherapy. However, in the good-risk subgroup, patients with dMMR tumors had a significantly shorter PFS than those with pMMR, suggesting a potentially reduced efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in these patients.

Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Endorsement of College of American Pathologists Guideline

The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has developed a guideline on testing for mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) for patients considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. The CAP guideline was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the CAP guideline, published on August 3, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer. Within the guideline, MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI polymerase chain reaction, and MSI next-generation sequencing are all recommended testing options for colorectal cancer, MMR-IHC and MSI-polymerase chain reaction for gastroesophageal and small bowel cancer, and only MMR-IHC for endometrial cancer. No recommendation in favor of any testing method over another could be made for any other cancer. Tumor mutational burden was not recommended as a surrogate for DNA MMR deficiency. If MMR deficiency consistent with Lynch syndrome is detected, it should be communicated to the treating physician.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

Comprehensive Study of Microsatellite Instability Testing and Its Comparison With Immunohistochemistry in Gastric Cancers.

In this study, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was comprehensively analyzed and compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in patients with gastric cancer (GC). In 5,676 GC cases, PCR-based MSI testing using five microsatellites (BAT-26, BAT-25, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250) and IHC for MLH1 were performed. Re-evaluation of MSI testing/MLH1 IHC and additional IHC for MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were performed in discordant/indeterminate cases. Of the 5,676 cases, microsatellite stable (MSS)/MSI-low and intact MLH1 were observed in 5,082 cases (89.5%), whereas MSI-high (MSI-H) and loss of MLH1 expression were observed in 502 cases (8.8%). We re-evaluated the remaining 92 cases (1.6%) with a discordant/indeterminate status. Re-evaluation showed 1) 37 concordant cases (0.7%) (18 and 19 cases of MSI-H/MMR-deficient (dMMR) and MSS/MMR-proficient (pMMR), respectively), 2) 6 discordant cases (0.1%) (3 cases each of MSI-H/pMMR and MSS/dMMR), 3) 14 MSI indeterminate cases (0.2%) (1 case of dMMR and 13 cases of pMMR), and 4) 35 IHC indeterminate cases (0.6%) (22 and 13 cases of MSI-H and MSS, respectively). Finally, MSI-H or dMMR was observed in 549 cases (9.7%), of which 47 (0.8%) were additionally confirmed as MSI-H or dMMR by re-evaluation. Sensitivity was 99.3% for MSI testing and 95.4% for MMR IHC. Considering the low incidence of MSI-H or dMMR, discordant/indeterminate results were occasionally identified in GCs, in which case complementary testing is required. These findings could help improve the accuracy of MSI/MMR testing in daily practice.