Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: A two-year institutional experience.

179 Background: MMRd is a tumour agnostic biomarker predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Given the poor response to 5-FU based chemotherapy, ICIs are now being explored in early MSI-H CRC. The outcomes on this strategy are limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated early outcomes for patients receiving neoadjuvant ICIs for unresectable locally advanced/oligometastatic MMRd colorectal cancer (CRC), where intention of treatment was downstaging to permit curative resection. Following discussion at regional MDT, suitable patients were administered a PD-1 inhibitor 6-weekly until disease progression or improvement rendering suitability for surgical resection (to max of 2 years). Results: From October 2022-September 2024, ten patients with MMRd CRC were commenced on neoadjuvant ICIs. These comprised six right, one left sided colonic and three rectal tumours. Median age at diagnosis was 59 (IQR54–68). Four patients had family history of CRC. One patient had clinical stage II, seven stage III and two patients oligometastatic stage IV disease. All were patients with initially unresectable disease, with potential for curative resection pending response to ICI. Histologically, two tumours were poorly differentiated, two mucinous phenotype and six moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas. BRAF mutation was identified in three patients. None had KRAS mutation. Three rectal cancers received radiotherapy in addition to immunotherapy. Five required a defunctioning stoma either prior to or on ICI. Median follow-up was 12.5 months (IQR7-17). Objective response rate by RECIST 1.1 was 100%, with significant downstaging in 9 of 10 patients. The remaining patient is early in treatment course with no reimaging. To date, complete clinical response (cCR) has been observed in three patients (33%). All 10 patients are alive. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in two patients (20%) who developed treatment-related strictures (one also had tumour perforation). This was successfully managed with defunctioning ileostomy and antibiotics, with subsequent cCR. Conclusions: We report impressive early outcomes of immunotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic MMRd CRC, with excellent downstaging and high predicted cCR. This highlights the importance of screening all CRC for MSI-H/MMRd. In the setting of initially unresectable CRC, an ICI-first approach can render patients eligible for surgery, however deep responses can result in local effects including strictures and/or perforation.

Prognostic Features and Potential for Immune Therapy in Metastatic Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Consecutive Population-Based Patient Series.

Immune checkpoint inhibition therapies have provided remarkable results in numerous metastatic cancers, including mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). To evaluate the potential for PD-1 blockade therapy in a large population-based cohort, we analyzed the tumor microenvironment and reviewed the clinical data and actualized treatment of all dMMR CRCs in Central Finland province between 2000 and 2015. Of 1343 CRC patients, 171 dMMR tumors were identified through immunohistochemical screening. Histological tumor parameters were evaluated from hematoxylin- and eosin-stained whole-slide samples. CD3 and CD8 immunohistochemistry were analyzed to calculate T-cell densities in the tumor center and invasive margin, and G-cross function values to estimate cancer cell-T-cell co-localization. Multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to identify CD68+PD-L1+ and CD3+PD-1+ immune cells and PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. A total of 35 (20%) patients with dMMR tumors were diagnosed as having a metastatic disease. Twelve patients (34%) were fit enough to be offered oncological treatments at the onset of non-curable metastatic disease. High proportions of necrosis and stroma were common in metastatic tumors and were associated with worse survival. Crohn's-like reaction, T-cell proximity score, and CD68+/PD-L1+ on the tumor center and invasive margin were independent prognostic immune factors. As dMMR CRC patients are generally older, with often significant comorbidities, only a limited portion of patients with metastatic dMMR tumors ended up in oncological treatments. Many of the metastatic tumors presented features that may impair response to PD-1 blockade therapy.

Reducing colorectal cancer mortality in South Africa: experiences and progress from the South African National Cancer Prevention Services

Aim The incidence rates of colorectal cancer are rapidly increasing in South Africa. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of inherited colorectal cancer in South Africa is 3-5 times higher than in high-income countries. Targeted screening and surveillance programmes for individuals with known colorectal cancer-causing mutations have resulted in increased life expectancy. The South African National Cancer Prevention Services (SANCaPS), was established to implement national systems for identifying individuals with inherited cancers, improving their clinical management, and reducing the overall disease burden. Methods Using colorectal cancer as an example, SANCaPS aimed to extend surveillance and management practices from the Western Cape to a national level. The goals included improving the quality of pathology reporting, establishing counselling systems for at-risk individuals, developing cost-effective mutation detection protocols, identifying and counselling at-risk family members, providing mutation testing, organising endoscopic surveillance programmes for high-risk individuals, setting ethical frameworks for research, and extrapolating learnings from the inherited colorectal cancers surveillance programme to other cancers with known hereditary predispositions. Results SANCaPS initiated the standardisation of national pathology reporting for colorectal cancers. Currently, a minimum core pathology dataset collection is being piloted in the National Health Laboratory Service’s TrakCare system. Subsequently, SANCaPS aims for broader adoption through stakeholder engagements. This will help to identify patients with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers, facilitate research, and improve reporting. Conclusions To improve patient outcomes, this consultative process and framework will be replicated to introduce standardised management workflows for other common cancers, including breast, prostate, uterine, and others.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.

580P Impact of RAS and BRAFV600E mutations on tumor immune microenvironment and associated genomic alterations in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers

580P Impact of RAS and BRAFV600E mutations on tumor immune microenvironment and associated genomic alterations in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers

Distinct Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Sporadic Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Cancer

Distinct Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Sporadic Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Cancer

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of sporadic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 120 cases of sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer from July 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Patients with Lynch syndrome; synchronous multiple colorectal cancers; preoperative anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and those with incomplete follow-up information were excluded based on family history and next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results. Immunohistochemical stains were used to detect the expression of mismatch repair proteins, methylation-specific PCR for methylation testing, and fluorescent PCR for BRAF V600E gene mutation detection. The clinical and pathological data, and gene mutation status were analyzed. Follow-up was done to assess survival and prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival rate. Results: Sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer occurred more frequently in the right side of the colon, in females, and in the elderly. Morphologically, it was mostly moderately-differentiated, and most patients had low-grade tumor budding. In terms of immunohistochemical expression, MLH1 and PMS2 loss were dominant, and there were age and location-specificities in protein expression. MLH1 methylation was commonly detected in elderly female patients and rare in young male patients; while MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency, and BRAF V600E mutation occurred more often on the right side (P<0.05). The 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 90.7% and 88.7% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.8% and 90.7% respectively. Tumor budding status was an independent risk factor affecting patient recurrence (hazard ratio=3.375, 95% confidence interval: 1.060-10.741, P=0.039), patients with low-grade tumor budding had better prognosis, and those with medium or high-grade tumor budding had poor prognosis. Conclusion: For dMMR colorectal cancer patients, tumor budding status is an independent risk factor for recurrence.

Preclinical study and parallel phase II trial evaluating antisense STAT3 oligonucleotide and checkpoint blockade for advanced pancreatic, non-small cell lung cancer and mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

ObjectiveTo evaluate signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) inhibition we conducted a co-clinical trial testing danvatirsen, a STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and checkpoint inhibition in conjunction with preclinical...

Homopolymer switches mediate adaptive mutability in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

Mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer evolves through the stepwise erosion of coding homopolymers in target genes. Curiously, the MMR genes MutS homolog 6 (MSH6) and MutS homolog 3 (MSH3) also contain coding homopolymers, and these are frequent mutational targets in MMR-deficient cancers. The impact of incremental MMR mutations on MMR-deficient cancer evolution is unknown. Here we show that microsatellite instability modulates DNA repair by toggling hypermutable mononucleotide homopolymer runs in MSH6 and MSH3 through stochastic frameshift switching. Spontaneous mutation and reversion modulate subclonal mutation rate, mutation bias and HLA and neoantigen diversity. Patient-derived organoids corroborate these observations and show that MMR homopolymer sequences drift back into reading frame in the absence of immune selection, suggesting a fitness cost of elevated mutation rates. Combined experimental and simulation studies demonstrate that subclonal immune selection favors incremental MMR mutations. Overall, our data demonstrate that MMR-deficient colorectal cancers fuel intratumor heterogeneity by adapting subclonal mutation rate and diversity to immune selection.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib for locally advanced microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer (NEOCAP): a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study

PD-1 blockade is highly efficacious for mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer in both metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. We aimed to explore the activity and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 blockade plus an angiogenesis inhibitor and the feasibility of organ preservation in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. We initiated a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial (NEOCAP) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. Patients aged 18-75 years with untreated mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high or POLE/POLD1-mutated locally advanced colorectal cancer (cT3 or N+ for rectal cancer, and T3 with invasion ≥5mm or T4, with or without N+ for colon cancer) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1 were enrolled and given 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously on day 1 and 250 mg apatinib orally from day 1-14, every 3 weeks for 3 months followed by surgery or 6 months if patients did not have surgery. Patients who had a clinical complete response did not undergo surgery and proceeded with a watch-and-wait approach. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a pathological or clinical complete response. Eligible enrolled patients who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant treatment and had at least one tumour response assessment following the baseline assessment were included in the activity analysis, and patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04715633) and is ongoing. Between Sept 29, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 53 patients were enrolled; one patient was excluded from the activity analysis because they were found to be mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable. 23 (44%) patients were female and 29 (56%) were male. The median follow-up was 16·4 (IQR 10·5-23·5) months. 28 (54%; 95% CI 35-68) patients had a clinical complete response and 24 of these patients were managed with a watch-and-wait approach, including 20 patients with colon cancer and multiple primary colorectal cancer. 23 (44%) of 52 patients underwent surgery for the primary tumour, and 14 (61%; 95% CI 39-80) had a pathological complete response. 38 (73%; 95% CI 59-84) of 52 patients had a complete response. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 20 (38%) of 53 patients; the most common were increased aminotransferase (six [11%]), bowel obstruction (four [8%]), and hypertension (four [8%]). Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in six (11%) of 53 patients. One patient died from treatment-related immune-related hepatitis. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib show promising antitumour activity in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer. Immune-related adverse events should be monitored with the utmost vigilance. Organ preservation seems promising not only in patients with rectal cancer, but also in those with colon cancer who have a clinical complete response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the oncological outcomes of the watch-and-wait approach. The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, and the Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

30P Immunological markers of pathological and clinical and outcomes in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancer (CRC)

30P Immunological markers of pathological and clinical and outcomes in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancer (CRC)

Neoadjuvant treatment of IBI310 (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) plus sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: Results from a randomized, open-labeled, phase Ib study.

3505 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been used in neoadjuvant setting and showed promising clinical benefits in various tumors. Herein, we evaluate IBI310 plus sintilimab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) in a randomized, open-labeled, phase Ib study. Methods: Previously untreated pts with locally advanced (stage IIB-III), resectable, MSI-H/dMMR CRC were enrolled and randomized to receive 1 cycle of IBI310 1mg/kg plus 2 cycles of sintilimab 200 mg Q3W (arm A) or 2 cycles of sintilimab 200 mg Q3W (arm B) as neoadjuvant treatment. The stratification factors were risk evaluation at baseline (high risk: stage T4 or N2 vs low risk: stage T1-3 and N1) and age ( &lt; 55 years vs ≥55 years). Curative resection was scheduled on day 36 to 56 after first dose of neoadjuvant treatment. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate and safety. Results: As of February 4, 2024, 101 pts were enrolled (males: 55.4%, median age: 56 years, ECOG PS 1: 54.5%, high risk: 76.2%) and randomized into arm A (n = 52) and arm B (n = 49). In arm A, 1 pt had early termination of treatment (withdrawal). In arm B, 4 pts had early termination of treatment (1 withdrawal, 1 died, 2 continued neoadjuvant sintilimab). Scheduled curative resection were performed in 51 (98.1%) pts in arm A and 45 (91.8%) pts in arm B. Postoperative evaluation revealed mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) in 1 pt each in arm A and arm B. The pCR rates were 80.0% (40/50, 95%CI: 66.3-90.0) in arm A vs 47.7% (21/44, 95%CI: 32.5-63.3) in arm B (p = 0.0007). All pts received surgery had R0 resection. Median time between first dose of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery was 47 days (range: 35-82). Surgery delay occurred in 3 pts including 2 pts in arm A due to grade 2 hypothyroidism (2 days delay) and grade 1 hyperthyroidism (13 days delay), and 1 pt in arm B for other reason (26 days delay). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 46 pts (88.5%, grade≥3 in 13 pts) in arm A and 39 pts (79.6%, grade≥3 in 9 pts) in arm B. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 22 pts (42.3%) in arm A and 18 pts (36.7%) in arm B. Grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 3 pts in arm A, including immune-mediated myocarditis, ileus and enteritis, and in 4 pts in arm B, including alanine aminotransferase increased, rash, hypothyroidism and myocarditis. Serious TRAEs occurred in 4 (7.7%) pts in arm A and 3 (6.1%) pts in arm B. TRAE leading to death occurred in 1 pt in arm B (myocarditis). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant IBI310 plus sintilimab significantly improved pCR rate than sintilimab alone in MSI-H/dMMR CRC. The safety profiles were comparable and manageable in both treatment arms. Clinical trial information: NCT05890742 .

Death receptors 4/5 mediate tumour sensitivity to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer.

Identifying the target of natural killer (NK) cells in colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for optimising the clinical use of NK cell-mediated immunotherapy. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is associated with high immune cell infiltration and MHC Class I defects. Whether dMMR CRC responses to NK cell therapy remains unclear. MLH1, DR4, and DR5 knockout cell lines were established using CRISPR-Cas9 system. NK92-MI or NK cell isolated from BABL/C mice were used as effector cells against tumour cells. Inflammatory cytokines secretion by CRC cells was assessed via cytokine analysis. NK-cell-deficient/proficient animal models were used to validate the NK cell sensitivity. We observed that dMMR CRC cells were more sensitive to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity than were mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) CRC cells. In dMMR CRC, Death receptor (DR)4/5 was upregulated and mediated sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. DR4/5-mediated secretion of interleukin -12 sustained NK cell viability in dMMR CRC. NK cell depletion induced dMMR CRC tumour growth, and NK cell transfer inhibited lung metastasis of dMMR CRC with DR4/5 expression in vivo. TP53 upregulated DR4/DR5 expression in dMMR CRC. dMMR associated with increased sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in CRC. DR4/DR5 sensitise dMMR CRC to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Abstract 578: Prediction of PD-1 treatment outcome in mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer using a multi-omic approach

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair (d-MMR) cancers, yet less than half of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receive clinical benefit. We analyzed heterogeneity within d-MMR tumors using a multi-omics approach inclusive of percent unstable microsatellite loci (MS). Methods: We studied consecutive patients with d-MMR mCRC with available primary tumors (N=32) that were treated with an anti-PD-1 antibody at Mayo Clinic (2015-2022). Tumors were profiled using a whole exome and transcriptome platform (ImmunoID NeXT®). MSIsensor was used to calculate percent unstable microsatellite loci from whole exome sequencing data. CIBERSORT and ssGSEA were used to analyze immune gene expression in relationship to percent unstable microsatellite loci. An immune checkpoint gene expression signature was calculated as the mean expression of CD274, CTLA-4, HAVCR2, LAG-3, PDCD1, PDCD1LG2, TIGIT. Aforementioned variables were analyzed in relationship to objective tumor response (RECIST version 1.1). A Cox proportional hazards model was fit to predict progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Among 32 patients with d-MMR mCRC treated with PD-1 blockade, 16 (50%) received first-line anti-PD-1 therapy; others had &amp;gt; 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Eighteen (56.3%) tumors harbored BRAFV600E, 4 (12.5%) had mutant KRAS, and median PFS was 24.6 months (95% CI: 8.4, NR) with 18 events. Neither tumor mutation burden (TMB) nor PD-L1 mRNA expression predicted PFS. Median percent unstable MS loci was 14.38 (IQR: 2.6-23.2). Patients whose tumors had higher percent unstable MS loci had significantly better PFS (Q2-4 vs Q1; HR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.06, 0.62; P=0.003), and were associated with increased objective response (P=0.049). Tumors with higher unstable loci also had higher neoantigen clonality (R= 0.64; P= 0.0003) and increased M0 (resting) macrophages (P=0.02). Nonresponders (vs responders) to PD-1 blockade had an increased immune checkpoint expression signature (P= 0.005). Conclusion: A higher percentage of unstable microsatellite loci, associated with higher neoantigen clonality and resting macrophages, was predictive of anti-PD-1 efficacy. Furthermore, an immune checkpoint gene expression signature was associated with objective response. Citation Format: Bahar Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Oluwadunni E. Emiloju, Rondell P. Graham, Jason T. Lewis, Charles W. Abbott, Sean M. Boyle, Frank A. Sinicrope. Prediction of PD-1 treatment outcome in mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer using a multi-omic approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 578.

An open-label clinical trial of RP2 and RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

TPS228 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, in combination with other modalities, has demonstrated significant benefit in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair–deficient CRC. However, these agents have limited, if any, clinical benefit in pts with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) CRC. RP2 is an enhanced potency oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 which expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule; RP3 additionally expresses 4-1BB and CD40 activating ligands but does not express GM-CSF. Both agents have demonstrated preliminary safety and antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and activity of RP2 and RP3 in combination with atezolizumab (Atezo) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in pts with advanced MSS/pMMR CRC (NCT05733611). Methods: Pts with a histologic diagnosis of unresectable and/or metastatic CRC, with documented MSS or pMMR status, and previously treated with up to 3 standard-of-care systemic regimens will be enrolled in the RP2 + Atezo + Bev or RP3 + Atezo + Bev treatment groups (30 pts per group). Further key inclusion criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 and adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. RP2/RP3 will be injected into tumors by direct or image-guided injection. Pts will receive 8 total doses of up to 10 mL of RP2 or RP3, with a first dose concentration of 1 × 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL, followed by 3 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 2 weeks, and then 4 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 3 weeks. Pts may receive a second course of up to 8 injections of RP2/RP3 if study criteria are met. Bev will be administered starting on week 1; Atezo will be administered starting week 7. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints are safety, overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and complete response rate. Antitumor activity will be evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as modified for this study. Safety will be assessed by physical examination, clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and monitoring for adverse events (AEs; including serious AEs). Clinical trial information: NCT05733611 .

Combining low-dose regorafenib with pembrolizumab for patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer: REGPEM-CRC-01.

TPS238 Background: Treatment for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancer (CRC) has rapidly evolved in the last decade. The KEYNOTE 177 trial recently established pembrolizumab as a frontline therapy for patients with MSI-H CRC. However, in this study, approximately 40% of patients were noted to have disease progression within 6 months of treatment. Furthermore, an additional 10% of patients experienced acquired resistance to therapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to improve outcomes for patients with MSI-H CRC. Preclinical studies have shown vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling to be overactive in MSI-H compared to MSS CRC (Hansen et al. Colorectal Dis. 2011). Moreover, exploratory analysis of CALBG-80405 and PARADIGM trials showed that patients with MSI-H CRC were more likely to benefit from anti-VEGF therapy than those with MSS disease. Regorafenib, an FDA-approved agent for patients with mCRC, is a potent VEGF inhibitor with immune modulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that adding low-dose regorafenib to pembrolizumab as frontline therapy may create synergistic activity in addition to the known clinical activity of each agent in MSI-H CRC. Methods: In the lead-in arm of this prospective study, 22 patients will be enrolled. Patients will receive regorafenib 60 mg daily on days 1–14 (2 weeks on) followed by 7 days off (1 week off) in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg in the cycle 1. In the following cycles, patients will receive regorafenib 90 mg daily for 2 weeks on 1 week off in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary outcome for the lead-in arm is overall response rate (ORR) within 12 months of treatment by RECIST 1.1. criteria. A formal one-sided hypothesis test will be conducted for futility, assuming that we will reject the null hypothesis of a target ORR only if we have strong evidence. In this study, we assume a null hypothesis that ORR is 0.60, which would reflect significant clinical improvement over the current standard of ORR = 0.43 from KEYNOTE 177. The alternative hypothesis is that ORR is less than 0.60. For the lead-in phase of the study, the emphasis is on controlling Type I error to be small, approximately 0.05. In the randomized phase of the study, patients will receive pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab in combination with regorafenib 90 mg. The sample size for the randomized phase of trial was determined based on an assumed median of PFS of 28 months with pembrolizumab and regorafenib combination (investigational arm). The standard of care pembrolizumab monotherapy results in a median PFS of 16 months when given as a first-line therapy. We hypothesize the proposed treatment will increase median PFS to 28 months from 16 months (N=132; H0: 16 months vs., H1: 28 months; Type I error: 0.05, power 80%). Clinical trial information: NCT06006923 .

Fruquintinib with PD-1 inhibitors versus fruquintinib monotherapy in late-line mCRC: A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.

139 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly effective in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the population of MSI-H/dMMR only accounts for 5% of mCRC. And most of the remaining microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) mCRC patients appeared not to benefit from mere immunotherapy. Fruquintinib, as the standard third-line regimen for mCRC, is an oral small-molecule anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Studies demonstrated that fruquintinib combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (FP) can reverse the immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy. However, due to the lack of the research comparing the efficacy between fruquintinib monotherapy (FM) and FP, it remains unclear if FP can bring extra benefit. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Patients (pts) with MSS/pMMR mCRC who had received at least the 2nd line treatment were eligible. Propensity score (PS) would be calculated to balance the baseline characteristics of two cohorts. Progression-Free survival (PFS) was set as the primary endpoint. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate PFS and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: From Apr 2020 to Jan 2023, 83 eligible pts in total were enrolled. According to the treatment received, 47 and 36 pts were respectively allocated into FP cohort and FM cohort. With a global median follow-up of 16.5 mo, the crude PFS was 6.8 (95% CI: 4.3-11.3) mo in FP cohort vs. 3.9 (3.1-4.7) mo in FM cohort. The HR of FP was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.98, FM as reference). Multivariate Cox regression showed that the adjusted HR was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.26-0.93), which was adjusted with sex, age greater than 65 yr, ECOG-PS, RAS mutation, BRAF mutation, location of lesion (left or right), surgery history, metastases (liver and lung), prior medication (bevacizumab and cetuximab), and current line (3 or later). With PS, we performed three statistical methods, namely inverse probability weighting, PS matching (the sample size was 37 vs. 29 after matching), and additional adjustment for propensity score with multivariate cox regression. The HR of FP were 0.49 (95% CI: 0.26-0.94), 0.40 (95% CI: 0.21-0.77), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.24-0.90), respectively. Conclusions: Pts in FP cohort showed a significantly greater PFS than those in FM cohort. And with further analysis, FP indicated robustly lower HRs than FM. Our study suggests FP could provide additional benefits to pts with MSS/pMMR mCRC, and warrants further investigations in a large cohort.

BRAF variants and oncogenic fusions to define sporadic MMR-deficient colorectal cancer subtypes.

211 Background: Mismatch-repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers (CRC) are rare tumors exquisitely sensitive to immunotherapy. The molecular events that initiate and sustain MMRd tumors remain controversial. The majority of sporadic MMRd CRCs exhibit BRAF-V600E variants with MLH1 hypermethylation, however BRAF-wild-type(wt) tumors exhibit high rates of rare gene fusions. Methods: We performed an integrated molecular and clinical analysis for 253 patients with MMRd sporadic CRC who received MSK-IMPACT genomic profiling at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Tumors were classified based on BRAF-V600E variants and gene fusion events. We evaluated the tumor burden of molecular alterations and disproportionate co-occurrence of specific driver variants of significance between each subtype. We used allele-specific FACETS analysis and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation assessments to infer the MMR-gene inactivation mechanism per tumor. We also examined differences in tumor phenotype and patient clinical outcomes. Patient progression-free-survival after treatment and overall survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: Patients exhibited BRAF-V600E-mutated (mut: n=178), BRAF-V600E-wt/gene-fusion positive (n=42), and BRAF-V600E-wt/fusion-negative (n=33) disease. Gene fusion events were mutually exclusive with BRAF-V600E variants and occurred in NTRK1 (n=13), NTRK3 (n=8; one with co-occurring NTRK1 fusion), RET (n=8), BRAF (n=8), ALK (n=5), and FGFR2 (n=1). BRAF-V600E-mut and fusion-positive tumors display similar predominant MLH1 silencing, WNT-signaling activators, and co-alterations. In contrast, BRAF-V600E-wt/fusion-negative tumors exhibit MLH1 inactivation associated with increased copy number alterations, and exhibit distinct co-occurring APC and TCFF7L2 variants. Both fusion-positive and BRAF-V600E-wt/fusion-negative tumors disproportionately arise in the transverse and left colon. In a multivariable analysis of 73 patients with stage IV MMRd CRC, fusion-positive status was an independently-significant, positive prognostic marker. For patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tumor regression rates were high in BRAF-V600E-mut (63%; n=22/35) and fusion-positive (62.5%, n=5/8) subtypes, with slightly poorer outcomes in BRAF-V600E-wt/fusion-negative (40%, n=2/5) tumors. Patients with fusion-positive tumors exhibited clinical benefit to NTRK inhibition. Conclusions: In sporadic MMRd CRC, gene fusion-positive tumors exhibit an improved prognosis with similar molecular and treatment outcomes to BRAF-V600E-mut tumors. BRAF-V600E-wt/fusion-negative tumors are a unique sporadic MMRd subtype driven by alternative WNT-activation and potentially lower immunotherapy responses in small numbers of patients.

Non-canonical antigens are the largest fraction of peptides presented by MHC class I in mismatch repair deficient murine colorectal cancer

BackgroundImmunotherapy based on checkpoint inhibitors is highly effective in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancer (CRC). These tumors carry a high number of mutations, which are predicted to translate into a wide array of neoepitopes; however, a systematic classification of the neoantigen repertoire in MMRd CRC is lacking. Mass spectrometry peptidomics has demonstrated the existence of MHC class I associated peptides (MAPs) originating from non-coding DNA regions. Based on these premises we investigated DNA genomic regions responsible for generating MMRd-induced peptides.MethodsWe exploited mouse CRC models in which the MMR gene Mlh1 was genetically inactivated. Isogenic cell lines CT26 Mlh1+/+ and Mlh1-/- were inoculated in immunocompromised and immunocompetent mice. Whole genome and RNA sequencing data were generated from samples obtained before and after injection in murine hosts. First, peptide databases were built from transcriptomes of isogenic cell lines. We then compiled a database of peptides lost after tumor cells injection in immunocompetent mice, likely due to immune editing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and matched next-generation sequencing databases were employed to identify the DNA regions from which the immune-targeted MAPs originated. Finally, we adopted in vitro T cell assays to verify whether MAP-specific T cells were part of the in vivo immune response against Mlh1-/- cells.ResultsWhole genome sequencing analyses revealed an unbalanced distribution of immune edited alterations across the genome in Mlh1-/- cells grown in immunocompetent mice. Specifically, untranslated (UTR) and coding regions exhibited the largest fraction of mutations leading to highly immunogenic peptides. Moreover, the integrated computational and LC-MS/MS analyses revealed that MAPs originate mainly from atypical translational events in both Mlh1+/+ and Mlh1-/- tumor cells. In addition, mutated MAPs—derived from UTRs and out-of-frame translation of coding regions—were highly enriched in Mlh1-/- cells. The MAPs trigger T-cell activation in mice primed with Mlh1-/- cells.ConclusionsOur results suggest that—in comparison to MMR proficient CRC—MMRd tumors generate a significantly higher number of non-canonical mutated peptides able to elicit T cell responses. These results reveal the importance of evaluating the diversity of neoepitope repertoire in MMRd tumors.

Stromal localization of inactive CD8+ T cells in metastatic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer.

The determinants of metastasis in mismatch repair deficiency with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer (CRC) are poorly understood. Here, we hypothesized that distinct immune and stromal microenvironments in primary tumors may discriminate between non-metastatic MSI-H CRC and metastatic MSI-H CRC. We profiled 46,727 single cells using high-plex imaging mass cytometry and analyzed both differential cell type abundance, and spatial distribution of fibroblasts and immune cells in primary CRC tumors with or without metastatic capacity. We validated our findings in a second independent cohort using immunohistochemistry. High-plex imaging mass cytometry and hierarchical clustering based on microenvironmental markers separated primary MSI-H CRC tumors with and without metastatic capacity. Primary tumors with metastatic capacity displayed a high stromal content and low influx of CD8+ T cells, which expressed significantly lower levels of markers reflecting proliferation (Ki67) and antigen-experience (CD45RO) compared to CD8+ T cells in non-metastatic tumors. CD8+ T cells showed intra-epithelial localization in non-metastatic tumors, but stromal localization in metastatic tumors, which was validated in a second cohort. We conclude that localization of phenotypically distinct CD8+ T cells within stroma may predict metastasis formation in MSI-H CRC.