Mismatch Repair Deficiency Research Articles

NFS-04. GENETIC COUNSELLING IN A MULTI-TUMOR PREDISPOSITION SYNDROME: A NOVEL FOUR-GENERATION TUNISIAN PEDIGREE

Abstract BACKGROUND Cancer predisposition syndromes associated with an increased risk of CNS tumors and colorectal polyposis are heterogeneous inherited disorders associated with multiples genes. The delineation of the inheritance pattern and the management of the genetic testing are recommended for optimal care of patients and their families. Our aim was to report a cancer predisposition brain tumor-polyposis syndrome in a four-generation Tunisian consanguineous pedigree characterized by uncommon tumors localizations. METHODS The index case was a 43-year-old infertile woman presented to our genetic counselling because of a suspected familial cancer predisposition syndrome. She consulted for digestive symptoms with epigastralgia. Six adenomatous polyposis of the colon were confirmed histologically. Her sister died of colon cancer at the age of 50. She developed a malignant mesenteric recurrence after surgical resection of a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma infiltrating the meso fat with lymph node metastases. Their three sisters and brother did not have any cancer. From the same third generation, only one cousin died of a brain cancer identified as a glioblastoma at the age of 43. Their maternal grandmother and her two brothers died of respectively breast, laryngeal and urothelial cancers. The second generation and fourth generation involved healthy members. RESULTS Analysis of the pedigree of this family indicated an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance of the brain tumor-polyposis syndrome. Clinically, there was uncommon association with breast, laryngeal and urothelial cancers in the first generation and brain/colon cancers in the third generation. CONCLUSIONS A recessive multi-tumor predisposition syndrome related to high microsatellite instability resulting in a mismatch repair deficiency seems to be the most reliable diagnosis in this family. Familial NTHL1 tumor and MUTYH associated polyposis syndromes were also suspected. NGS-based testing, from whole exome sequencing to multigene panel testing, is suggested as the most accurate genetic testing in such heterogeneous multi-tumor predisposition syndromes.

HGG-28. THE IMPACT OF CMMRD IN HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS, A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 7 YEARS IN LMIC; AN IRRDC STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Constitutional mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (CMMRD) is a genetic cancer predisposition syndrome presenting among children and young adults. This study is the first to evaluate CMMRD prevalence among high-grade glioma patients in Pakistan, a country with high consanguinity rates. METHODS We reviewed data of patients younger than 18 diagnosed with pediatric high-grade glioma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and diffuse midline glioma with CMMRD testing between 2016 and 2023. Tumor slides of all included cases were prepared and sent to Sick Kids Toronto to review the MMR protein stains via multi-gene panels. RESULTS Forty-five patients were identified (62.3% females); median age of 11. Headache (88.9%) was the most common symptom, followed by vomiting (60%) and seizures (37.8%); median duration of symptoms was two months. Histopathology revealed 73.3% pediatric high-grade glioma, 22.2% Anaplastic Astrocytoma, and 4.4% Diffuse Midline Glioma. Thirty-six patients (80%) had a cerebral tumor, 13.3%, and 6.7% had a posterior fossa and midline tumor, respectively. CMMRD was positive in 15 of 45 patients (33.3%). Eight patients (53.4%) had CMMRD with loss of PMS 2, two (13.3%) had loss of PMS 2 and MLH 1, two (13.3%) had loss of MSH 2, two (13.3%) had loss of MSH 6, and only one patient had loss of MSH 6 and MSH 2. Consanguinity correlated with CMMRD (P=0.045), but family history of malignancy was not significant (P=0.202). One-year overall survival of all patients, with a median follow-up of 4.8 months, was 44.4 %, whereas 1-year overall survival compared to CMMRD was 33.3%, with a median follow-up of 7.2 months (P=0.616) CONCLUSION We found high prevalence of CMMRD among pediatric high-grade glioma patients and patients with consanguinity. The findings of our study emphasize the importance of genetic testing and counseling. Timely accurate diagnosis is essential as decreased response to conventional treatment regimens may increase disease burden.

OTHR-30. THE CLINICAL AND BIOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE OF CNS CANCERS IN CONSTITUTIONAL MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY: AN IRRDC COHORT STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is an aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome. As a lack of data contributes to management challenges and inferior outcomes, especially in central nervous system (CNS) cancers, we aimed to determine the clinical spectrum, cancer biology, and impact of genetics on patient survival. METHODS To determine the cancer spectrum, biology, estimated incidence, and impact of genotype on cancer onset and survival, including following surveillance and immunotherapy, we collected cross-sectional, longitudinal, and genomic data on CMMRD patients and their cancers registered to an international consortium. RESULTS We report 201 patients enrolled between 2007-2022 (median follow-up: 7.2 years). Overall, 194 (97%) patients developed 339 cancers. Cumulative cancer and CNS tumor incidence were 93% and 82% by age 20, respectively. Median time between cancers was 2 years. Although neoplasms developed in 15 organs and included early-onset adult cancers, CNS tumors had the earliest median age of diagnosis (9.7 years), were the most common cancer type (51%), and the main cause of death (p<0.0001). All cancers exhibited high mutation and microsatellite burden, and pathognomonic mutational signatures. CNS cancers were enriched for mutations in POLE/POLD1, TP53, IDH1, and RAS/MAPK compared to hematopoietic and other cancers. These mutations determined response to therapy. Germline MLH1/MSH2 variants caused earlier cancer and CNS tumor onset than PMS2/MSH6, and inferior survival (survival at 15 years: PMS2: 63%, MSH6: 49%, MLH1: 19%, MSH2: 0%, p<0.0001). Strikingly, frameshift/truncating variants within the same gene caused earlier cancers and inferior outcomes (p<0.0001). The deleterious impact of MLH1/MSH2 persisted despite overall improvement in survival following surveillance and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION The extreme cancer burden and unique genomic landscape of CMMRD highlight the benefit of comprehensive assays in timely diagnosis focusing on specific genotypes to perform precision approaches toward surveillance and immunotherapy. These data will guide the management of children and emerging adult survivors of CMMRD.

HGG-01. DURABLE RESPONSE TO IMMUNOTHERAPY IN AN ADOLESCENT PATEINT WITH CONSTITUTIONAL MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY CMMRD AND SYNCHRONOUS THREE PRIMARY MALIGNANCIES

Abstract BACKGROUND Familial Cancer Syndrome FCS is of particular concern in Saudi Arabia due to the high rates of consanguinity. Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency Syndrome (CMMRD) is an autosomal recessive FCS with a wide spectrum of malignancies Caused by Biallelic germline mutations in one of 4 mismatch repair genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6). METHODS we report 13 yr. Saudi boy, previously healthy with multiple café-au-lait (CAL) macules, and Consanguineous parents with a positive family history of Malignancy. presented with progressive headache, vomiting, abdominal pain, weight loss, and microcytic anemia. MRI Brain showed a Large left hemispheric necrotic mass, MRI abdomen: Circumferential gastric body wall thickening Distal transverse colon intraluminal polypoid mass, and liver hypodense lesion. He had a Resection of the brain tumor and Upper GI endoscopy + colonoscopy with polypectomy: which showed an Ugly gastric ulcer, and multiple colonic polyps. RESULTS Brain tumor molecular pathology: Gliosarcoma WHO grade 4 with negative IHC expression in PMS2 protein, hypermutant tumor with somatic PMS2 ATRX, TP53, NFI, and PIK3R1 genes mutation. stomach biopsy confirmed invasive gastric adenocarcinoma and Colonic polyp biopsy: Tubulovillous adenoma. Genetic testing Detect pathogenic Biallelic germline PMS2 mutation. He received adjuvant focal Brain radiation therapy 59.4Gy/33 F concurrent with immunotherapy (PD-1) inhibitor Nivolumab. Follow-up Abdominal imaging showed excellent response to immunotherapy with no significant residual lesion. MRI of the brain showed surgical bed multi-cystic lesions with thick nodular enhancement suggestive either of radiation necrosis vs. progressions/pseudoprogression. repeated MRI confirmed further progression of the enhancing surgical cavity lesion which was unresectable. CTLA-4 Inhibitor ipilimumab was added to Nivolumab to optimize therapy. UpToDate our patient is clinically stable on Maintenance Nivolumab with no side effects. CONCLUSION Our case confirms immunotherapy’s efficacy for treating CMMRD-related cancers, which can improve survival while reducing toxicity from less effective conventional therapies.

HGG-26. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, AND PMS2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY REPRESENTS A HIGHLY SENSITIVE SCREENING METHOD FOR MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES IN PEDIATRIC HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors can occur as first manifestations of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) resulting from pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Early detection of MMR deficiencies (MMRD) may warrant the therapeutic use of checkpoint inhibitors and enable genetic consulting for the patient’s families. METHODS We prospectively screened 128 pediatric high-grade gliomas (pedHGG) for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as part of the HIT-HGG-2013 clinical trial. We compared IHC results to independently collected patient information on CPS including MMRD to test the method’s efficiency in screening for Lynch syndrome and Constitutional MMRD syndrome CMMRD. RESULTS From 128 successfully tested tumors, ten cases (10/128, 7.8%), showed loss of expression of at least one of the MMR proteins. In seven of the ten affected patients (7/128, 5.5%), genetic testing uncovered heterozygous (6/10) or homozygous (1/10) pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6) confirming the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome respectively CMMRD. In three cases (3/128 2.3%), MMR alterations were restricted to tumor tissue. The group of diffuse midline gliomas, H3 K27-altered, (67/128, 52.3%) did not show MMR alterations, while either somatic or germline MMR mutations were detected in two of eight patients with diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant. In 88 patients (88/128, 68.8%) either clinical or molecular-genetic information on CPS could be provided. All ten patients with signs of MMRD were successfully detected by IHC from tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS IHC for MMR proteins represents a highly sensitive screening method for MMRD in pedHGG. Considering the occurrence of at least 11.5% (7/61) of MMRD in pediatric patients with diffuse high-grade glioma excluding DMG, MMRD IHC should be part of routine diagnostics as cost-effective, broadly available and robust screening method.

Colombian consensus for the molecular diagnosis of endometrial cancer

Objective: The Cancer Genome Atlas research program (TCGA) developed the molecular classification for endometrial cancer with prognostic and therapeutic utility, which was replaced by the ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) classification by consensus and international guidelines due to its high cost. This article aims to present national recommendations from an expert consensus that allows unification and implementation of the molecular classification for women with endometrial cancer nationwide, with a rational use of resources and technology. Methods: Consensus of 36 experts in clinical oncology, oncological gynecology, pathology, and genetics, with clinical practice in the national territory. The leader group performed a literature review and structuring of questions rated 1 to 9 points. A modified nominal group technique was used. There was a face-to-face meeting with master presentations, deliberative dialogue, and Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) questionnaire voting with analysis and discussion of responses. The non-consensual responses led to a second round of voting. The final manuscript was finally prepared and revised. Results: Seven recommendations were formulated integrating the panelist responses based on evidence, but adjusted to the Colombian context and reality. Recommendation 1. The molecular classification is recommended in all the endometrial cancers using the immunohistochemistry markers as subrogated results from the molecular profile initially proposed in the TCGA classification. Recommendation 2. The sequential test strategy is recommended, starting with the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH 2, MSH6, PMS2) simultaneously in all the patients, defining to request POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon) (if available) according to the risk classification based on the surgical piece. Recommendation 3. It is recommended, that the gynecologist oncologist should be the one to request the POLE (if available) according to the final pathology report. This test must be requested for all endometrial cancers stage I-II, except in low risk (stage IA low grade endometrioid histology without linfovascular invasion normal p53) and, stages III-IV without residual disease, without affecting the request of subrogated immunohistochemistry molecular markers upon histology. The consensus proposes that the POLE is requested after the immunohistochemistry and according to the categories in the risk classification established by the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Recommendation 4. It is recommended to perform immunohistochemistry for hormonal receptors for all women with endometrial cancer and the HER2 in patients with p53abn, simultaneously with the others immunohistochemistry markers. Recommendation 5. It is recommended to perform the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 y PMS2) in an initial endometrial biopsy or curettage when the specimen is adequate and available. In case the initial immunohistochemistry is inconclusive, or there are histological discrepancies between the initial and definitive pathology, it is recommended to repeat the molecular profile in the surgical pathology. The immunohistochemistry markers must be reported in the pathology report according to the CAP (College of American Pathologists) recommendations, independently of the type of sample. Recommendation 6. It is recommended to perform MLH1 promoter methylation testing in patients who exhibit loss of expression of MLH1 in immunohistochemistry whether it is accompanied or not with loss of expression of PMS2. All the patients with deficient MMR (mismatch repair), should be sent for genetic counseling to rule out Lynch syndrome. Recommendation 7. It is recommended to consider the molecular classification in addition to the classical histopathological criteria when making adjuvant judgments, as incorporated by the classification of prognostic groups of the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Conclusions: It is necessary to implement the molecular classification of endometrial cancer in clinical practice in accordance to the Colombian context, due to its prognostic and probably predictive value. This will enable the characterization of the Colombian population in order to offer individualized guided treatments. This is an academic and nonregulatory document.

Comprehensive analysis of gene mutations and mismatch repair in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

RAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) are crucial biomarkers recommended by clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their characteristics and influencing factors in Chinese patients have not been thoroughly described. To analyze the clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations and the DNA MMR status in CRC. We enrolled 2271 Chinese CRC patients at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital. MMR proteins were tested using immunohistochemical analysis, and the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Microsatellite status was determined using an MSI detection kit. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software and logistic regression. The KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 44.6%, 3.4%, 3.7%, and 3.9% of CRC patients, respectively. KRAS mutations were more likely to occur in patients with moderate-to-high differentiation. BRAF mutations were more likely to occur in patients with right-sided CRC, poorly differentiated, or no perineural invasion. Deficient MMR (dMMR) was detected in 7.9% of all patients and 16.8% of those with mucinous adenocarcinomas. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 29.6%, 1.1%, 8.1%, and 22.3% of patients with dMMR, respectively. The dMMR was more likely to occur in patients with a family history of CRC, aged < 50 years, right-sided CRC, poorly differentiated histology, no perineural invasion, and with carcinoma in situ, stage I, or stage II tumors. This study analyzed the molecular profiles of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and MMR/MSI in CRC, identifying key influencing factors, with implications for clinical management of CRC.

Gastric SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT): a clinicopathological analysis of four rare cases

BackgroundSMARCA4, as one of the subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, drives SMARCA4-deficient tumors. Gastric SMARCA4-deficient tumors may include gastric SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma and gastric SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT). Gastric SMARCA4-UT is rare and challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. The present report aims to provide insight into the clinicopathological characteristics and genetic alterations of gastric SMARCA4-UTs.ResultsWe retrospectively reported four rare cases of gastric SMARCA4-UTs. All four cases were male, aged between 61 and 82 years. These tumors presented as ulcerated and transmural masses with infiltration, staged as TNM IV in cases 1, 2 and 4, and TNM IIIA in case 3. Pathologically, four cases presented solid architecture with undifferentiated morphology. Cases 2 and 3 showed focal necrosis and focal rhabdoid morphology. Immunohistochemical staining showed negative expression of epithelial markers and deficient expression of SMARCA4. Furthermore, positivity for Syn (cases 1, 2 and 3) and SALL4 (cases 1 and 2) were observed. Mutant p53 expression occurred in four cases, resulting in strong and diffuse staining of p53 expression in cases 1, 2 and 4, and complete loss in case 3. The Ki67 proliferative index exceeded 80%. 25% (1/4, case 4) of cases had mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Two available cases (cases 1 and 3) were detected with SMRACA4 gene alterations. The response to neoadjuvant therapy was ineffective in case 1.ConclusionsGastric SMARCA4-UT is a rare entity of gastric cancer with a poor prognosis, predominantly occurs in male patients. The tumors are typically diagnosed at advanced stages and shows a solid architecture with undifferentiated morphology. Negative expression of epithelial markers and complete loss of SMARCA4 immunoexpression are emerging as a useful diagnostic tool for rare gastric SMARCA4-UTs.

Comparison of PD-L1, VISTA, LAG-3, and GAL-3 Expressions and Their Relationships to Mismatch Repair Protein and p53 Expression in 529 Cases of Endometrial Carcinoma.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the expressions of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), and galectin-3 (GAL-3), in mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd)/MMR-proficient and abnormal p53 expressing endometrial carcinomas and their relationship with clinical-histopathological features. Patients who underwent surgery for endometrial carcinoma between January 2008 and December 2018 were included in the study. Immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, p53, PD-L1, VISTA, LAG-3, and GAL-3 was performed on the tissue samples of microarray. A total of 529 patients were included. MMRd and p53-mutant tumors accounted for 31.5% and 11.5% of cases, respectively. PD-L1 and LAG-3 expressions in the MMRd and p53-mutant groups were higher than in the MMR-proficient group (P < 0.001). GAL-3 expression in the MMR-proficient group was statistically higher than in the MMRd and p53-mutant groups (P < 0.001). Mean age, grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were significantly higher in the p53-mutant group (P < 0.001). In the group with PD-L1 expression, nonendometrioid histologic type, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly higher (P < 0.001). Tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and microcystic, elongated and fragmented pattern of invasion were significantly higher in the group with high VISTA expression (P < 0.05). Tumor grade was significantly higher in the group with LAG-3 expression (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemically determined subgroups and PD-L1, VISTA, LAG-3, and GAL-3 expression levels may be useful indicators of molecular features, and clinical outcomes also may have important implications for the development of targeted therapies in endometrial carcinoma.

A Subset of Microsatellite Unstable Cancer Genomes Prone to Short Insertions over Deletions Is Associated with Elevated Anticancer Immunity.

Deficiencies in DNA mismatch repair (MMRd) leave characteristic footprints of microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer genomes. We used data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium to conduct a comprehensive analysis of MSI-associated cancers, focusing on indel mutational signatures. We classified MSI-high genomes into two subtypes based on their indel profiles: deletion-dominant (MMRd-del) and insertion-dominant (MMRd-ins). Compared with MMRd-del genomes, MMRd-ins genomes exhibit distinct mutational and transcriptomic features, including a higher prevalence of T>C substitutions and related mutation signatures. Short insertions and deletions in MMRd-ins and MMRd-del genomes target different sets of genes, resulting in distinct indel profiles between the two subtypes. In addition, indels in the MMRd-ins genomes are enriched with subclonal alterations that provide clues about a distinct evolutionary relationship between the MMRd-ins and MMRd-del genomes. Notably, the transcriptome analysis indicated that MMRd-ins cancers upregulate immune-related genes, show a high level of immune cell infiltration, and display an elevated neoantigen burden. The genomic and transcriptomic distinctions between the two types of MMRd genomes highlight the heterogeneity of genetic mechanisms and resulting genomic footprints and transcriptomic changes in cancers, which has potential clinical implications.

Mismatch repair deficiency: how reliable is the two-antibody approach? A national real-life study.

Traditionally, mismatch repair (MMR) status is determined by a panel of four antibodies (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6). If all proteins are retained, cases are MMR proficient (pMMR), while loss of one or more proteins is indicative of MMR deficiency (dMMR). This approach has been challenged in favour of a two-antibody approach, using PMS2 and MSH6 as a first screening. Their retainment is deemed sufficient to declare cases pMMR. In this study we aim to verify the validity of the two-antibody approach. We performed a nationwide study in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosed between 2016 and 2023, including 47,657 patients to evaluate the two-antibody approach. In 0.17% and 0.4% of cases of CRC and EC, respectively, dMMR cases would be missed with the two-antibody approach. Subgroup analyses pointed towards slightly increased miss rates in younger patients (under the age of 50 years) in both groups and identified special subtypes (signet ring cell carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma in CRC and clear cell carcinoma in EC) with increased miss rates. For these specific subgroups, a low threshold should be used for further testing. In case of ambiguous or heterogeneous staining patterns, four antibodies should be used. In general, the application of a two-antibody MMR testing strategy does not lead to considerable failure of dMMR identification and saves costs.

Multiple primary tumors in children: a clinicopathological analysis of four cases

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features of children with metachronous or synchronous primary tumors and to identify related genetic tumor syndromes. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 4 children with multiple primary tumors diagnosed in the Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China from 2011 to 2023 were collected. The histological, immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics were examined using H&E staining, immunohistochemical staining, PCR, Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS). The patients were followed up. Results: Case 1 was an 8-year-old boy with the adrenal cortical carcinoma, and 5 years later a poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma was detected. Case 2 was a 2-year-old boy, presented with a left ventricular choroid plexus carcinoma, and a hepatoblastoma was detected 8 months later. Case 3 was a 9-month-old girl, diagnosed with renal rhabdoid tumor first and intracranial atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) 3 months later. Case 4 was a 7-year-old boy and had a sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma 3 years after the diagnosis of a glioblastoma. The morphology and immunohistochemical features of the metachronous or synchronous primary tumors in the 4 cases were similar to the corresponding symptom-presenting/first-diagnosed tumors. No characteristic germ line mutations were detected in cases 1 and 2 by relevant molecular detection, and the rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome was confirmed in case 3 using NGS. Case 4 was clearly related to constitutional mismatch repair deficiency as shown by the molecular testing and clinical features. Conclusions: Childhood multiple primary tumors are a rare disease with histological morphology and immunophenotype similar to the symptom-presenting tumors. They are either sporadic or associated with a genetic (tumor) syndrome. The development of both tumors can occur simultaneously (synchronously) or at different times (metachronously). Early identification of the children associated with genetic tumor syndromes can facilitate routine tumor screening and early treatment.

Correlation between immunohistochemical staining and clinicopathological findings in endometrial carcinoma.

To analyze the immunohistochemical staining pattern of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and p53 in endometrial carcinoma cases, including different subtypes and stages, to gain insights into their role in the pathogenesis and clinical behaviour of this malignancy. In this study, we investigate the association between MMR deficiency, p53 mutational status, and clinical outcomes in various subtypes of endometrial carcinoma. The immunohistochemical staining pattern of MMR proteins in 96 cases of endometrial carcinoma have been analyzed, including 72 endometrioid, 14 papillary serous, 5 clear cell, and 5 mixed Müllerian tumor. The results showed that 36 cases were MMR deficient, with the majority being of endometrioid subtype. The p53 immunostain showed a mutational pattern in a subset of cases, with a documented dismal prognosis. However, aforementioned stains failed to predict synchronous or metachronous cancers in 5 patients. These findings highlight the importance of MMR and p53 immunohistochemical staining in the classification, and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

Incidence and potential prognostic implications of fibroblast growth factor receptor gene alterations and coexisting mutations in colorectal cancer.

e15558 Background: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family comprises four tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFR1-4). FGFR1 amplification (6.3%) as well as overexpression of FGFR1 (10.1%), FGFR2 (5.5%) and FGFR3 (16.2%) have been demonstrated in primary colorectal cancer (CRC, incidence in brackets). The prognostic utility of testing FGFR alterations and association with response to FGFR-inhibitors are still emerging. Here, we report FGFR alteration data with clinicopathological correlations and survival outcomes from a Sydney based Local Health District in Australia. Methods: Clinicopathological data was analysed from 341 ethnically diverse patients with CRC treated at Southwestern Sydney Local Health District from 2014-2021. Next generation sequencing for point mutations, deletions, and amplifications was performed using the Qiagen 30-gene panel. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined using immunohistochemical staining. Demographic characteristics, histological features and survival outcomes were recorded from electronic medical records. Results: Of the 341 patients, 42 (12.3%) had FGFR alterations of which 52% were men and 48% women. 32 patients were Caucasian, 4 Middle Eastern, 5 Asian and 1 South American. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years. Of the 42 patients, FGFR1 mutations were present in 26.2%, FGFR1 amplifications in 4.7% and FGFR1 deletions in 4.7%. FGFR2 mutations were present in 16.7%, and 50% had FGFR3 mutations. One patient had concurrent FGFR1 and FGFR3 mutations. The vast majority were adenocarcinoma (81%), followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma (17%) and adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features (2%). 21.4% of patients with FGFR alterations had concurrent KRAS mutations, 28.6% had concurrent BRAF mutations (91.6% V600E) and MMR-deficiency was present in 19%. Median overall survival of patients with FGFR alterations was 44 months, for those who also had deficient MMR 48 months, concurrent BRAF V600E mutations 51 months and concurrent KRAS mutations 71 months. 43% (18 patients) were stage 4 at presentation. Of these 18 patients, 7 had FGFR1 mutations, 1 had a FGFR2 mutation and 10 had FGFR3 mutations. The median overall survival of patients with stage 4 disease was 11 months and those with concurrent BRAF V600E mutations 17 months. Two patients had concurrent KRAS mutations (both G12V), with median overall survival of 5.5 months and 1 patient had MMR deficiency, with an overall survival of 9 months. Conclusions: FGFR alterations were identified in 12.3% of patients with colorectal cancer in an ethnically diverse cohort in Australia. Concurrent KRAS and BRAF mutations appear to affect survival outcomes. Further multivariate analyses are underway.

Perioperative chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer with microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

4039 Background: Currently, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) remains controversial. It is still inconclusive whether chemotherapy can be spared for dMMR/MSI-H GC patients. Meanwhile, in the different therapeutic settings (e.g. neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or both), the efficacy of chemotherapy remains to be clarified. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis in this regard was conducted. Methods: Studies comparing perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GCs (up to December 1, 2023) were included. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of survival outcomes were extracted from the original research or recalculated using Kaplan-Meier curves if the number of patients at risk was provided. In the pooled analysis, a random-effects model was employed. Subgroup analyses (perioperative chemotherapy in stage II and stage III diseases) and sensitivity analysis including studies reporting the results from multivariable analyses were conducted. This study was previously registered on PROSPERO platform (CRD42023494276). Results: Nineteen studies, encompassing over 1500 dMMR/MSI-H GC patients, were included in this study. The results revealed that perioperative chemotherapy (including neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy) did not significantly improve the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.31) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46–1.05) in dMMR/MSI-H GCs. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy did not confer a significant survival advantage for dMMR/MSI-H GCs (OS, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.50–1.37) and (DFS, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.41–1.07). Similar results were observed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OS, HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55–2.15). In addition, stage stratification analysis demonstrated no significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II (OS, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.31–1.90) or stage III (OS, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36–1.46) dMMR/MSI-H GCs. In the sensitivity analysis, the results remained consistent. Conclusions: Perioperative (including adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant) chemotherapy does not significantly improve survival in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC patients. Immunotherapy may be better suitable for these patients in the future.

BRCA functional domains associated with PARP-inhibitors in patients with prostate cancer: The PROGRESS study.

10543 Background: Homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects are driver mutational imprints and actionable biomarkers in prostate cancer (PrC) patients. However, recent research provides evidence of PrC onset also in the context of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). In the current report, we investigated whether the position of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the functional domains (FDs) of HRR genes could be associated with reduced or increased sensitivity to PARP-inhibitors (PARPis). We also questioned whether the HRR FDs had a prognostic significance and affected the development of second primary tumor (SPT) in males with a genetic predisposition. Methods: This was a real-world, observational, study including PrC patients undergoing germline, somatic, and liquid biopsy testing between January 2020 and December 2023. Prognostic factors, SPT history, and PARPi benefit were evaluated according to mutated genes ( BRCA1, BRCA2,No- BRCAHRR), PV location within the FDs, and germline (g) or somatic (s) PV. The BRCA1FDs were RING, DNA-binding domain (DBD), BRCA1 C terminus (BRCT), or other location, and the BRCA2 FDs were RAD51-BD, DBD, or other location. Results: A total of 833 metastatic PrC patients, aging 40 to 91, were included in this study; 169 (20.3%) were carriers of germline (n.48, 5.8%) or somatic (n.121, 14.5%) PVs in HRR genes: 17 in BRCA1 (g BRCA1: n.4, 2.4%; s BRCA1: n.13, 7.7% ), 102 in BRCA2 (g BRCA2: n.33, 19.5%; s BRCA2: n.69, 40.8% ), and 53 in no- BRCA HRR genes (gHRR: n.11, 6.5%; sHRR: n.42, 24.8%). CHEK2was the HRR gene most frequently affected by germline PVs (27.3%), while the most frequent somatic PVs were in the ATM (40.5%). Liquid biopsy identified PVs in 33 patients out of 185 tested, including n.10 (5.4%) not detected through somatic and germline testing, considerably expanding the therapeutic window for the use of PARPi. Notably, differences in PFS rates at 48 months were observed when comparing sub-groups according to PV location in the FDs of BRCA2.Surprisingly, when we investigated the SPT in the cohorts of patients with and without germline PVs, the difference was not significant (14.5% vs 12.4%, respectively) and, in the subgroup without germline PVs, the sites of SPT were predominantly colorectal, gastric, bladder or other tumors classically dominated by MMRd and recognized as Lynch Syndrome-spectrum tumors. This observation may result in unexplored forms of hypermutable tumor phenotypes, potentially impacting cancer risk management and increasing therapeutic opportunities. Conclusions: Our results suggest preliminary evidence that not all BRCA2-mutated PrC are equally sensitive to PARPis, and the response could depend on the PV location within FDs. The study of SPT in patients with no-HRR-associated PrC highlights the need to expand the genes in multigene panel testing, including MMR along with HRR genes, to capture unrecognized constitutional predisposition.

A digital pathology AI model to predict immune-oncology biomarker status and pembrolizumab response in a real-world cohort of patients with colorectal and breast cancer.

e13617 Background: Deep learning (DL) algorithms have garnered significant attention for prediction of biomarker status in digitized tissue slides. Here, we trained and validated a digital pathology algorithm to predict microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and PD-L1 status in breast cancer (BC) using a large real-world patient cohort. Methods: H&amp;E and immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides of CRC and BC from Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) with known biomarker status were digitally scanned (CRC: N=27,494, 6.6% MSI-high by next-generation sequencing [NGS]; N=25,788, 6.4% MMRd by IHC; BC: N=16,069, 15.8% PD-L1+ by IHC). A transformer-based DL model (Wagner, Sophia J., et al., 2023) was trained to predict biomarker status, with 5-fold cross-validation. Accuracy, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), and other metrics were calculated comparing the model to NGS/IHC “truth”. Risk stratification was performed on holdout datasets of pembrolizumab-treated CRC (N=422-454) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; N=513) pts. Post-treatment overall survival (OS) was calculated from start of pembrolizumab to last contact, per insurance claims data. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by Cox-Proportional hazards and compared between model and “truth”. Results: When applied to holdout datasets for biomarker prediction, the validated model achieved AUC of 0.78-0.95. In CRC and BC, performance was better among primary specimens than metastatic. For MSI-H/MMRd risk stratification in pembrolizumab-treated CRC, HR for OS were comparable between model and “truth” for primary and metastatic cohorts. When applied to the TNBC holdout dataset, the model performed better than “truth” for PD-L1 risk stratification in pembrolizumab-treated pts. Conclusions: A digital pathology DL model predicts biomarker status with high accuracy and is non-inferior to NGS/IHC for risk stratification of pembrolizumab-treated CRC and TNBC pts. These results support further investigation of AI algorithms developed from large datasets as possible rapid screening tools for biomarker detection in molecular testing programs. [Table: see text]

517P Real-world efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in gastrointestinal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H)

517P Real-world efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in gastrointestinal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H)

511P Testing patterns for microsatellite instability & mismatch repair deficiency in gastrointestinal cancers: Real-world evidence from a tertiary care cancer center

511P Testing patterns for microsatellite instability & mismatch repair deficiency in gastrointestinal cancers: Real-world evidence from a tertiary care cancer center

30P Immunological markers of pathological and clinical and outcomes in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancer (CRC)

30P Immunological markers of pathological and clinical and outcomes in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancer (CRC)