MIS Group Research Articles

Comparison of third-generation minimally invasive surgery, split-drill osteotomy, and triplanar chevron osteotomy for treating mild to moderate hallux valgus with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women: An observational study.

This retrospective study compared the clinical efficacy of third-generation minimally invasive surgery (3rd-MIS) split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release to that of triplanar chevron osteotomy (TCO) for treating mild to moderate hallux valgus (HV) with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women. This study compared the efficacy of 3rd-MIS using split-drill osteotomy to that of TCO in treating mild to moderate HV with metatarsalgia in 52 middle-aged women from March 2022 to June 2023. Retrospectively analyzing a total of 52 patients (26 patients per group), we employed 2 distinct surgical methods across 2 groups in this study: the TCO group received a traditional TCO accompanied by soft tissue release, whereas the MIS group underwent a split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release. The study compared the operation time, onset of weight-bearing, osteotomy healing, blood loss, pre- and postsurgery X-ray measurements, metatarsalgia, and foot function scores. In the TCO group, complications included peri-incisional numbness, elevation of the first metatarsal head with metatarsalgia, and bone hyperplasia with stiffness at the MTPJ in one patient each. In the MIS group, bunions were successfully corrected without significant complications like bone nonunion or avascular necrosis of the metatarsal head, and the metatarsal length was preserved. Significant differences in operation time, weight-bearing onset, healing, and blood loss were detected between groups (P < .05). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in hallux valgus angle, 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, or distal metatarsal articular angle among the groups (P > .05). Nonetheless, notable postoperative differences were observed (P < .05). Foot function and pain scores, assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Visual Analogue Scale, showed significant improvements in both groups following surgery. Both surgical techniques effectively corrected the HV angle without significant changes in the first metatarsal length. The MIS group experienced significantly less pain on the second day postsurgery, as indicated by lower Visual Analogue Scale scores (P < .05). Both techniques were similarly effective in treating metatarsalgia. 3rd-MIS split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release offers several advantages over TCO techniques for treating mild to moderate HV with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women, such as reduced trauma, quicker healing, smaller scars, and less pain after surgery.

Can minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion achieve a better clinical and radiological outcome than traditional open technique in isthmic spondylolisthesis?

BackgroundSpondylolisthesis is a prevalent condition in the lumbar spine that can cause low back pain, leg pain, neurogenic claudication, and impact health-related quality of life in symptomatic individuals.Aimto assess the results of minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) versus open-TLIF and the impact of correcting spino-pelvic parameters on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of both methods in correcting spinopelvic parameters. The secondary objectives involved comparing clinical improvement, operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospital stays between the two procedures.Patients and methodsSeventy-two patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis were enrolled in this retrospective cohort-control study, with a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), while back and leg discomfort were rated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for each patient. The measurements comprised the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and Meyerding slip grades. We measured lumbar lordosis (LL), and segmental lordosis.ResultsThe seventy-two patients were 60 female and 12 males. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of operation between the two groups. In the MIS group, there was a notable reduction in blood loss, higher radiation exposure, and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001). The back VAS showed more favorable outcomes in the MIS-TLIF, while the leg VAS showed better results in the Open-TLIF in the early outcome. Both procedures significantly reduced leg and back pain VAS scores and ODI, with no notable difference between the two groups at the final follow-up. Post-surgery, the pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) matched properly in all patients, showing a rise in LL and sacral slope along with a decrease in pelvic tilt.ConclusionBoth open-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are effective methods for correcting spino-pelvic parameters and improving HRQoL in patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. The rapid improvement in back pain experienced by these patients favored the use of MIS-TLIF. However, the cost-effectiveness of this approach must be carefully evaluated.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in treatment of degenerative diseases of lumbosacral spine compared to modified open TLIF: a prospective randomised controlled study.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) compared to modified open TLIF via the Wiltse approach for treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbosacral region. The results were evaluated over a post-operative period of 48 months. Radiological data and medical records of patients who underwent MIS TLIF and modified open TLIF between May 2017 and May 2021 were reviewed. Parameters monitored to evaluate the surgical results were: clinical status, operation time, blood loss, radiation dose to patient, day of discharge, analgesic consumption, fusion, and complications rate. For functional assessment, the Visual Analogue Scale for back pain (VAS-BP), VAS for leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Satisfaction Rate (PSR), and the complication rate were used. This study included 57 patients randomly divided into two groups: 30 operated on using the MIS TLIF technique, and 27 operated on using the modified open TLIF technique via the Wiltse approach. 48-month follow-up rates were similar for the two cohorts. Patients did not differ significantly at baseline in terms of ODI, VAS-BP, or VAS-LP. Perioperatively, MIS TLIF was associated with significantly less blood loss (167.3 ± 80.0 vs. 297.9 ± 81.5 ml, p = 1.1E-05), slightly longer procedures (185.7 ± 45.2 vs. 183.1 ± 66.4 minutes, p = 0.76), a lower radiation dose (MIS 16.9 ± 7.1 vs. 22.0 ± 9.7 mGy OPEN p = 0.012), and shorter hospitalisations (MIS 5.9 ± 1.8 vs. 7.7 ± 1.6 days OPEN). The most common complication was radiculitis, which accounted for 33% and 37% in the MIS and the TLIF groups, respectively. The second most common complication was malposition of the fixation material, which accounted for 18.5% in the TLIF group and 20% in the MIS group. The level of fusion achieved was 92.6% in the MIS group versus 92.3% in the TLIF group. There was lower consumption of analgesics in MIS. Patient Satisfaction Rate (PSR) was 90%. Clinical and radiological outcomes after MIS TLIF in patients with degenerative disease of the lumbosacral region are generally favourable. MIS TLIF was associated with decreased blood loss perioperatively, a lower radiation dose and an earlier discharge, but there was no difference between MIS TLIF and modified open TLIF in 48-month outcomes in terms of disability, back pain, leg pain, quality of life, or patient satisfaction rate or complication rate. Although the differences taper off over time, MIS TLIF has undeniable advantages in the perioperative and early postoperative periods.

Effects of tendon elongation on plantar pressure and clinical outcomes: A comparative analysis between open repair and minimally invasive surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess whether variances in Achilles tendon elongation are linked to dissimilarities in the plantar pressure distribution following two different surgical approaches for an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR). All patients who were treated with open or minimally invasive surgical repair (MIS) and were over 2 years post their ATR were eligible for inclusion. A total of 65 patients with an average age of 43 ± 11 years were included in the study. Thirty-five patients were treated with open repair, and 30 patients were treated with MIS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and ATR Score (ATRS). Achilles tendon elongation was measured using axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Plantar pressure measurements for the forefoot, midfootand hindfoot during gait were divided into percentages based on total pressure, measured in g/cm2 for each area. The average AOFAS score was found 'excellent' (93 ± 2.8) in the MIS group, while it was found 'good' (87.4 ± 5.6) in the open repair group. In addition, the MIS group showed significantly superior ATRS scores (78.8 ± 7.4) compared to the open repair group (56.4 ± 15.4) (p < 0.001). The average tendon elongation in the MIS group was 11.3 ± 2 mm, while it was 17.3 ± 4.3 mm(p < 0.001) in the open repair group. While the open repair group showed significantly higher plantar pressure distribution in the initial contact and preswing phases compared to uninjured extremities, there was no significant difference between the uninjured extremities and the MIS group. In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery was associated with less tendon elongation, more proximity to the plantar pressure distributions of the uninjured extremity and superior clinical outcomes compared to open surgical repair. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery may be considered a more suitable option for acute Achilles tendon repair to achieve overall better outcomes. Level III.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin and Open Lapidus Surgery in Older Patients at a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up.

Hallux valgus deformity affects more than 35% of people aged ≥65 years. Surgical correction in this population can be more complicated because of poor bone quality, worse deformity, and postoperative recovery challenges. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent either open Lapidus or minimally invasive chevron Akin osteotomy for bunion correction. A retrospective review identified 62 patients aged ≥65 years who were treated surgically for hallux valgus with at least 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores (physical function and pain interference). Preoperative and at least 6-month postoperative radiographs were measured for the hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle. PROMIS scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1 and/or 2 years postoperatively. Differences in demographic, clinical, and radiographic outcomes were assessed using the Mann Whitney U test and P values were adjusted for a false discovery rate of 5%. There was no difference between the MIS and open cohorts in pre- or postoperative radiographic measurements or clinical outcomes at any time point. At 1 year postoperatively, both groups had statistically significant improvements in the PROMIS pain interference domain but only the MIS group had a statistically significant improvement in the PROMIS physical function domain. Clinical significance was equivocal. At 2 years postoperatively, there were clinically and statistically significant improvements in the PROMIS pain interference and physical function domains for the open and MIS groups. Patients in both surgical groups had improvement in radiographic measurements and 2-year PROMIS scores, although there was no clinical or statistical difference found between groups. MIS and open surgical techniques appear to be safe and effective in correcting hallux valgus in older patients; however, patients may need to be counseled that maximum improvement after surgery may take more than 1 year. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Minimally invasive surgery versus standard posterior approach in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2-year follow-up retrospective study.

This is a monocentric retrospective controlled study that compares the safety and efficacy of posterior minimally invasive surgery (MISS) to standard posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We retrospectively collected 111 patients with Lenke type 1-6 AIS who were treated with MIS (n = 47) or PSF (n = 64) between February 2019 and January 2021 with a 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up. MIS technique was applied via two midline noncontiguous skin incisions ranging from 3 to 7cm in length, so we obtained the arthrodesis only in the exposed tract, passing the rods below the fascia, avoiding the complete muscular sparing. Values of Cobb angles degrees were collected to study the correction rate of the structural major curve. Postoperative AP direct radiography and preoperative AP direct radiography were compared with the last follow-up examination. Operative time, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and second postoperative day Hb, full length of hospitalization, time to achieve verticalization and time to remove the drainage were recorded. NRS medium score was assessed immediately after surgery and during the whole postoperative rehabilitation treatment to estimate pain reduction. Complications were collected postoperatively and throughout the whole follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of radiographic and clinical features. The correction rates of the structural curve resulted to be not significantly different between MISS and PSF (64.6 ± 11.7 vs 60.9 ± 13.2, p = 0.1292) as well as for the correction rate of the secondary curve between the two compared techniques (59.1 ± 13.2 vs 59.2 ± 12.4, p = 0.9865). The two groups had comparable operative time (210min vs 215min). The MIS group had a significantly lower reduction of postoperative Hb in comparison with PSF group (2.8 ± 1.3mg/dl vs 4.3 ± 1.5mg/dl, p < 0.0001). The postoperative NRS score was lower in MIS group (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.3). PSF group was observed to have a significantly longer period of hospitalization than MIS (5.2 ± 1.4days vs 6.3 ± 2.9days, p = 0.206). Complications were more frequent in PSF group rather than in MFS group. MISS is a safe and capable alternative to PSF for AIS patients with curves < 70°, with analogue capacity of scoliosis correction and same operative time and with advantages in blood loss, length of stay and postoperative pain.

Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancer, is performed worldwide. However, limited information is available on the advantages of MIS over open surgery for multivisceral resection for cases clinically invading adjacent organs.Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective propensity score-matching study of consecutive clinical T4b rectal cancer patients who underwent curative intent surgery between 2006 and 2021 at the University of Tokyo Hospital.ResultsSixty-nine patients who underwent multivisceral resection were analyzed. Thirty-three patients underwent MIS (the MIS group), while 36 underwent open surgery (the open group). Twenty-three patients were matched to each group. Conversion was required in 2 patients who underwent MIS (8.7%). R0 resection was achieved in 87.0% and 91.3% of patients in the MIS and open groups, respectively. The MIS group had significantly less blood loss (170 vs. 1130 mL; p < 0.0001), fewer Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (30.4% vs. 65.2%; p = 0.0170), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (20 vs. 26 days; p = 0.0269) than the open group. The 3-year cancer-specific survival rate, relapse-free survival rate, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were 75.7, 35.9, and 13.9%, respectively, in the MIS group and 84.5, 45.4, and 27.1%, respectively, in the open group, which were not significantly different (p = 0.8462, 0.4344, and 0.2976, respectively).ConclusionMIS had several short-term advantages over open surgery, such as lower complication rates, faster recovery, and a shorter hospital stay, in rectal cancer patients who underwent multivisceral resection.Graphical abstract

Minimally invasive surgery is safe and effective for advanced HCC patients receiving perioperative adjuvant therapy: a real-world retrospective study

BackgroundCombining surgery and perioperative adjuvant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), anti-PD-1 antibody, and interventional therapy, can prolong the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Adverse reactions to adjuvant therapy, surgical trauma, and surgical complications are challenging for this combined treatment mode. This study aims to explore whether minimally invasive hepatectomy is safe or appropriate in patients with advanced HCC.MethodsThis retrospective study involved patients with advanced HCC who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS group, n = 31) or open surgery (OS group, n = 35) from August 2020 to April 2023 from four medical groups at two medical centers. Operation-related indicators, early postoperative complications, and postoperative drug tolerance were compared between the two groups.ResultsSixty-six patients were enrolled. Between the MIS group and the OS group, there were no significant differences in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) tumor staging (P = 0.44), surgical difficulty (P = 0.29), and R0 resection rate (P = 0.34). Compared with the OS group, the MIS group had less blood loss (101.9 mL vs. 209.0 mL, P = 0.003), shorter average operation time (165.7 min vs. 224.5 min, P = 0.000 4), shorter postoperative fasting time (1.5 d vs. 2.4 d, P = 0.002), shorter postoperative bed time (1.7 d vs. 3.0 d, P < 0.0001) and length of hospital stay (7.1 d vs. 9.4 d, P = 0.001), lower incidence of complication (Clavien-Dindo grade II–III, P = 0.03), better nutritional status, and earlier postoperative adjuvant treatment.ConclusionMinimally invasive hepatectomy is safe for patients with advanced HCC after conversion therapy and may improve tolerance to combination treatment relative to open surgery.Graphical

Outcomes of Dorsolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis Treated by MinimallyInvasive and Open Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study.

To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive and open techniques in the surgical management of dorsolumbar and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (STB). Skeletally mature patients with active STB involving thoracolumbar and lumbar region confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. Healed and mechanically stable STB, patients having severe hepatic and renal impairment, coexisting spinal conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and patients unwilling to participate were excluded from the study. The patients were divided in to two groups, group A consisted of patients treated by MIS techniques and group B consisted of patients treated by open techniques. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 24months. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. MIS techniques were used in 18 patients and open techniques were used in 24 patients. On comparison between the two groups, blood loss (234ml vs 742ml), and immediate post-operative VAS score (5.26 vs 7.08) were significantly better in group A, whereas kyphotic correction (16° vs 33.25°) was significantly better in group B. Rest of the parameters such as duration of surgery, VAS score, ODI score and number of instrumented levels did not show significant difference between the two groups. MIS stabilization when compared to open techniques is associated with significant improvement in immediate post-operative VAS scores. The MIS approaches at 2-year follow-up have functional results similar to open techniques. MIS is inferior to open techniques in kyphosis correction and may be associated with complications.

Incorporating microbial inoculants to reduce nitrogen loss during sludge composting by suppressing denitrification and promoting ammonia assimilation

To address the challenge of increasing nitrogen retention in compost, this study investigated the effects of microbial communities on denitrification and ammonia assimilation during sludge composting by inoculating microbial inoculants. The results showed that the retention rates of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and humic acid (HA) in MIs group (with microbial inoculants) were 4.94 % and 18.52 % higher than those in the control group (CK), respectively. Metagenomic analysis showed that Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were identified as main microorganisms contributing to denitrification and ammonia assimilation. The addition of microbial agents altered the structure of the microbial community, which in turn stimulated the expression of functional genes. During cooling period, the ammonia assimilation genes glnA, gltB and gltD in MIs were 15.98 %, 24.84 % and 32.88 % higher than those in CK, respectively. Canonical correspondence analysis revealed a positive correlation between the dominant bacterial genera from the cooling stage to the maturity stage and the levels of NO3−-N, NH4+-N, HA, and TKN contents. NH4+-N was positively correlated with HA, indicating NH4+-N might be incorporated into HA. Heat map and network analyses revealed NH4+-N as a key factor affecting functional genes of denitrification and ammonia assimilation, with Nitrospira identified as the core bacteria in the microbial network. Therefore, the addition of microbial agents could increase nitrogen retention and improve compost product quality.

Endoscopic versus minimally invasive surgical approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background/Aims Acute pancreatitis is a common condition of the digestive system, but sometimes it develops into severe cases. In about 10–20% of patients, necrosis of the pancreas or its periphery occurs. Although most have aseptic necrosis, 30% of cases will develop infectious necrotizing pancreatitis. Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) requires a critical treatment approach. Minimally invasive surgical approach (MIS) and endoscopy are the management methods. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of MIS and endoscopic treatments. Methods We searched a medical database until December 2022 to compare the results of endoscopic and MIS procedures for INP. We selected eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported treatment complications for the meta-analysis. Results Five RCTs comparing a total of 284 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among them, 139 patients underwent MIS, while 145 underwent endoscopic procedures. The results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the risk ratios (RRs) for major complications (RR: 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.97), new onset of organ failure (RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.82), surgical site infection (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07–0.92), fistula or perforation (RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12–0.64), and pancreatic fistula (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05–0.45). The hospital stay was significantly shorter for the endoscopic group compared to the MIS group, with a mean difference of 6.74 days (95% CI: −12.94 to −0.54). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the RR for death, bleeding, incisional hernia, percutaneous drainage, pancreatic endocrine deficiency, pancreatic exocrine deficiency, or the need for enzyme use. Conclusions Endoscopic management of INP performs better compared to surgical treatment due to its lower complication rate and higher patient life quality.

Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach

The adoption of laparoscopic surgery in the management of serosa-exposed colorectal cancer has raised concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether laparoscopic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence in patients undergoing resection for serosa-exposed colon cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 315 patients who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed T4a colon cancer without distant metastases at the Asan Medical Center between 2006 and 2015. Patients were categorized according to the surgical approach method: laparoscopic surgery (MIS group) versus open surgery (Open group). Multivariate analysis was employed to identify risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The MIS group included 148 patients and the Open group had 167 patients. Of the total cohort, 106 patients (33.7%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Rates, patterns, and time to recurrence were not different between groups. The MIS group (55.8%) showed more peritoneal metastasis compared to the Open group (44.4%) among recurrence sites, but it was not significant (p = 0.85). There was no significant difference in the five-year OS (73.5% vs. 78.4% p = 0.374) or DFS (62.0% vs. 64.6%; p = 0.61) between the Open and MIS groups. Age and the pathologic N stage were independently associated with OS, and the pathologic N stage was the only associated risk factor for DFS. The laparoscopic approach for serosa-exposed colon cancer did not compromise the DFS and OS. This study provides evidence that laparoscopic surgery does not compromise oncologic outcomes of patients with T4a colon cancer although peritoneal seeding is the most common type of disease failure of serosa-exposed colon cancer.

A meta-analysis of treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical trachelectomy

BackgroundIn previous systematic reviews, meta-analysis was lacking, resulting in the statistical difference between the data of different surgeries being impossible to judge. This meta-analysis aims to contrast the fertility results and cancer outcomes between open and minimally invasive surgery.MethodWe systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus to collect studies that included open and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.5.4.ResultEight studies (1369 patients) were incorporated into our study. For fertility results, the Open group excels MIS group in pregnancies-Third trimester delivery [OR = 2.68; 95% CI (1.29, 5.59); P = 0.008]. Nevertheless, there is no statistical difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and second-trimester rate. Concerning cancer outcomes, no difference was detected in the overall survival [OR = 1.56; 95% CI (0.70, 3.45); P = 0.27] and recurrence [OR = 0.63; 95% CI (0.35, 1.12); P = 0.12]. Concerning surgery-related outcomes, the comprehensive effects revealed that the estimated blood loss of the Open group was higher than that of the MIS group[MD = 139.40; 95% CI (79.05, 199.75); P < 0.0001]. However, there was no difference between the postoperative complication rate in the two groups [OR = 1.52; 95% CI (0.89, 2.60); P = 0.12].ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that the fertility result of the Open group may be better than the MIS group, while the MIS group has better surgery-related outcomes. Owing to the poor cases of our study, a more robust conclusion requires more relevant articles in the future.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022352999.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Hammertoe Correction: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Hammertoe deformity is a common forefoot pathology, characterized by a progressive deformity with dorsiflexion of the proximal phalanx on the metatarsal head at the metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTPJ) and plantarflexion of the intermediate phalanx on the proximal phalanx at the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). While there is literature available discussing open techniques for hammertoe correction, there is a lack of publications discussing minimally invasive techniques, therefore the objective of this retrospective comparative study is to evaluate minimally invasive versus open hammertoe surgery in terms of time to osseous union, complications, recurrence, and return to full activity. Sixty eight feet among 41 patients met the inclusion criteria and were surveyed. Among the 68 feet, 54 feet (124 toes) underwent minimally invasive hammertoe correction and 14 feet (22 toes) underwent open hammertoe correction. Time to osseous union (weeks) in the MIS group was 8.76 ± 2.31 weeks with similar outcomes to the open group with union at 8.42 ± 2.31 (p = .65). Return to activity (weeks) was 10.47 ± 3.45 in the MIS group and 9.92 ± 3.03 in the open group with no statistical significance (p = .62). There was 4 recurrent hammertoe deformities in the MIS group (3.23%) with no recurrent hammertoes in the open group (0%). In the MIS group 5 hammertoes had unplanned hardware removal (4.03%) compared to 0 in the open group. There was no statistical significance for both recurrence and unplanned hardware removal (p = 1). Overall, we concluded that both techniques are equivocal with no detectable statistical difference.

Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: Comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy

ObjectiveAim of our study was to evaluate whether the different laparotomic (ARH) or minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) approaches (MIS) in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer, present different patterns of recurrence of the disease. The secondary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the variables most involved with the risk of relapse and therefore lower DFS and OS. Material and methodsThe study enrolled patients with definitive histological diagnosis of squamous or adenocarcinoma stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive or abdominal radical hysterectomy from 2001 to 2018. ResultsThe study enrolled 360 patients and 59 patients (16.4 %) reported a disease relapse. The data showed that ARH group was not associated with different recurrence patterns than MIS group (p = 0.14). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference regarding DFS (p = 0.52) and OS (p = 0.29) between the ARH group and the MIS group. ConclusionsMIS, in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer, is not associated with different relapse patterns compared to ARH, nor with a higher risk of distance metastasis and finally, without significant difference in term of DFS and OS. More studies are needed to determine the factors that modify the site of relapse.

Mini-open Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy versus Standard Posterior Approach for Ankylosing Spondylitis-related Spinal Kyphosis: A Comparative Study.

Surgical strategy for spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been challenging. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) through a minimally invasive (MI) approach has been developed with promising clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PSO via an MI approach and a standard posterior approach (SPA) for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis. A total of 41 patients with AS-related spinal kyphosis who underwent PSO through an MI approach (MI surgery [MIS] group: n = 25) or SPA (SPA group: n = 16) between January 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively included. Spinopelvic parameters were evaluated before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up. Clinical data including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, level of fusion, incision length, bed rest period, length of hospitalization, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument-22 (SRS-22) was administered to assess patients' quality of life at the latest follow-up. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test. Characteristics and baseline kyphosis of the two groups were matched. At the 2-year follow-up, in the MIS group, the average correction values of the sagittal vertical axis and global kyphosis (GK) were 9.5 cm and 44.3°, respectively. Compared with the SPA group, the MIS group had similar correction values and correction losses after surgery. No obvious differences were observed in any radiographic parameters, except for GK, immediately after surgery and at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (p > 0.05). The MIS group had a significantly shorter operative time, lesser blood loss, lesser transfusion volume, shorter fusion level, and lesser time to mobilization than did the SPA group. Higher average functional activity scores of SRS-22 were obtained in the MIS group than in the SPA group. Mini-open PSO may be an effective alternative to the SPA for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis, with comparable correction effect, lesser surgical trauma and faster recovery. This comparative study may provide valuable guidance for surgical decision-making and patient counseling.

Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy of nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.

The aim was to compare short-term and long-term oncological outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS group) and laparotomy (lap group) in nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer (CRC). The study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 634 patients treated with radical operation from January 2015 to December 2021 for nonmetastatic pT4a CRC, with propensity score matching. The conversion rate from the MIS group to laparotomy is 3.5%. Intraoperative blood loss, time to first anal exhaust, defecation and drainage tube removal, and complication rate were significantly less in the MIS group. After 5 years, the outcomes of the MIS group were no inferior to laparotomy outcomes [overall survival (OS): 72.7 vs. 77.8%, P =0.285; disease-free survival (DFS): 72.2 vs. 75.0%, P =0.599]. And multivariate analysis showed that age greater than or equal to 60 years old, lymph node metastasis and the carcinoembryonic antigen levels were independent variables for OS, while lymph node metastasis and CA125 levels were independent variables for DFS. The results of the graph show the relationship between the sum of scores of sex, age, complications, BMI, carcinoembryonic antigen, age, CA125, tumor site, N stage and tumor length diameter and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality and DFS of patients. Among them, tumor length diameter and N stage are significantly correlated with long-term survival and disease-free of patients. MIS is safe and feasible for nonmetastatic pT4a CRC, with the added benefit of accelerated postoperative recovery. In oncology, MIS did not affect OS and DFS.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery. To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction. 1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score. At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 (P < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups. Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.

Effectiveness of Hallux Valgus Surgery on Post-Operative Outcomes in Skeletally Mature Patients

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of 1st MTP motion preserving hallux valgus surgery using Patient Reported Outcomes (PROMs) in the literature since 2001. This paper also tries to eliminate some of the heterogeneity in reporting by using the effect size of the treatment using Minimally Important Clinical Differences (MCIDs). Methods: For this systematic review, we searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles published in 2001 or later, using the electronic databases Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, PEDro, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and World Wide Science. There were a total of 5,544 articles published on bunions. We reviewed all the abstracts and 1,200 papers were selected for full text evaluation. Finally, we analyzed 310 of the articles for this review. In total, there were 21,109 patients in 401 cohorts that underwent surgery on a total of 24,231 feet. Results: Our primary endpoint was patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and was stratified based on location of the osteotomy on the metatarsal shaft as well as follow up time. AOFAS was the most common PROM used and was included in 83.5% of the articles. We found that double osteotomies had the greatest overall change score in PROMs with an overall mean improvement of 1.69 MCIDs (CI +/- 0.7), compared to 1.23 (CI +/-0.46) for distal osteotomies; shaft and proximal osteotomies were similar to the distal subgroup. Although it had the highest positive change, double osteotomies were associated with the highest complication rates of recurrence (11.2%), malunion (4.8%), and avascular necrosis (3.2%). Minimally invasive vs open techniques had similar changes in HVA, IMA, and PROMs. There was a slightly higher satisfaction rate in the Open group at 91.6% vs 89.6% in the MIS group. Conclusion: Bony correction of bunions demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in patient reported outcomes with an aggregate MCID between 1.26-1.69. They performed significantly better than soft tissue procedures +/- proximal phalanx osteotomy. Although double osteotomy did perform better than the other bony osteotomies it did have a higher complication rate and the group was a much smaller cohort which makes it more susceptible to bias. MIS vs Open bunion correction demonstrated similar correction and AOFAS scores, the satisfaction rate was about 2% higher in open which was statistically significant but may not have clinical significance