In November 1987, the Arena Stage in Washington hosted a symposium on non traditional casting in the theater. Even though Blacks and other racial minorities account for some 17 per cent of the population at large, minority actors have filled only 12 per cent of acting jobs in regional theaters and a mere six percent of casts in Broadway plays (Gelb, 1988). Accordingly, participants in the symposium were asked to identify the most appropriate remedies for enabling actors who belong to minorities to display their talents. Clearly, the exploration of these remedies raises questions about the social bases of the theatrical illusion. The co-chairman of the non traditional casting project, a non profit organization seeking to change the processes by which actors are traditionally selected points out that: "While a white actor is perceived as a human being, the third world actor is seen as a Hispanic, or an Afro-American human being. . . . Minority actors are limited to embodying the thoughts, feelings, and aspirations of their own races [we would add or their gender]." Since audiences are partly responsible for the contrasts between the universalism assigned to the former and the particularism assigned to the latter, "[they] should be taught to focus on the essence of what is presented rather than stumbling over the fact of an actor's size, weight, pigment, whatever" (as quoted by Gelb, 1988). Yet, as in any other form of communication, failures of the theatrical illusion may be attributed to conflicting forces (Jauss, 1982). To be sure, audiences may feel cosmopolitan enough to regard the ethnic or physical appearance of performers as irrelevant to their understanding of the dilemma which is at the root of the play, the scenario, or the argument. But even when they consider it to be essential to such an understanding, their responses may be mere a posteriori reactions to the performing skills of the interpreters. As the initial concern of the debate is focused on bread and butter issues, it highlights the universality of the miseries experienced by all occupational groups. As the debate evolves toward an assessment of the nature of the theatrical illusion, it also underscores dilemmas