Transient Ischemic Attack Research Articles

Defining short-term outcomes of minor ischemic stroke due to small artery occlusion in the era of dual antiplatelet treatment: A READAPT study sub-analysis

BackgroundThe outcomes of minor ischemic stroke resulting from small artery occlusion (SAO-MIS) have not yet been characterized after dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) has become the standard of care. We provided updated figures on the short-term prognosis of SAO-MIS treated with early short-term DAPT and compared the outcomes of SAO-MIS versus non-SAO-MIS patients. MethodsThis is a prespecified sub-analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT, NCT05476081) including patients with minor (NIHSS≤5) non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke treated with DAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of 90-day symptomatic ischemic stroke or major cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were the 90-day ordinal distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, 90-day excellent functional outcome (mRS of 0 to 1), and 24-h early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes were 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe and any bleedings. All outcomes were compared between SAO-MIS and non-SAO-MIS patients. ResultsWe included 678 MIS, of whom 253 (37.3 %) were SAO-related. At 90 days, 3 patients with SAO-MIS had primary outcome (1.2 % [95 % CI 0.2 %–3.5 %]), which were all SAO-related ischemic strokes. For the secondary outcomes, most SAO-MIS patients (n = 191, 75.5 %) had 90-day excellent functional outcome and 12 had 24-h END (4.7 % [95 % CI 2.5 %–8.3 %]). Referring to safety outcomes, 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage occurred only in one patient with SAO-MIS (0.4 % [95 % CI 0.0 %- 2.2 %]). Compared to non-SAO-MIS, the 90-day risk of recurrent vascular events was significantly lower among SAO-MIS (aHR 0.24 [95 % CI 0.08–0.68]; p = 0.007), while there were not significant differences in other secondary outcomes, nor in the risk of safety events. ConclusionsOur findings show overall favorable short-term prognosis after SAO-MIS treated with DAPT. Future studies should investigate factors associated with residual stroke risk and long-term outcomes of SAO-MIS.

Association of Perfusion Variables with Functional Outcome in Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke Patients or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Some patients with acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at risk for a poor prognosis. There are a limited number of studies that have investigated the functional prognosis of acute mild ischemic stroke or TIA based on imaging indicators. This study aims to explore the relationship between Perfusion Variables and poor prognosis in patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 344 patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA, who were admitted and treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2016 and March 2022. The criteria were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of ≤5. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≥2 points at 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors associated with clinical outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to explore the cutoff value of factors. Following a 3-month follow-up period, 49 (12.4%) out of the 344 patients with mild stroke or TIA demonstrated a poor prognosis. Multivariable regression analysis identified mismatch volume as independent predictors of a poor 90-day prognosis. The ROC curve analysis indicated that a mismatch volume exceeding 16.5 ml was associated with a higher risk of unfavorable functional outcomes. A mismatch volume of ≥16.5mL predicted poor functional outcome in mild stroke or TIA patients.

Glycated albumin levels are associated with adverse stroke outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in China.

Glycated albumin (GA) is a biomarker monitoring glycemia 2-4 weeks before stroke onset. This study was designed to explore the association between GA levels with poststroke outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Participants with ischemic stroke or TIA who had a baseline GA measurement were included in the Third China National Stroke Registry study. The effect of GA on stroke recurrence, poor functional outcomes, and combined vascular events was examined during the 1-year follow-up period. Multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the association. Discrimination tests were used to examine the incremental predictive value of GA when incorporating it into the conventional model. A total of 3861 participants were enrolled. At the 3-month follow-up, the elevated GA level was associated with an increased risk of poor functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.09). A similar increase was observed for stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.09-2.24), poor functional outcomes (adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.07-2.45), and combined vascular events (adjusted HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.09-2.20) at the 1-year follow-up. In nondiabetic patients, the association between GA and poor functional outcomes was more pronounced (adjusted OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.50). Adding GA into the conventional model resulted in slight improvements in predicting poor functional outcomes (net reclassification improvement [NRI]: 12.30% at 1 year). This study demonstrated that elevated GA levels in serum were associated with stroke adverse outcomes, including stroke recurrence, poor functional outcomes, and combined vascular events, in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA.

P114 SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING DRUGS ON CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLED-BLIND TRIALS

Background and Objective: There remains uncertainty about the short-term effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering drugs on cardiovascular events. This meta-analysis of double-blind, short-term randomised trials, evaluated the effect of BP-lowering drugs on cardiovascular events compared to placebo. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Epistemonikos. Trials satisfying the following criteria were included: (i) randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials of 2-26 weeks published in English language; (ii) adults (age ≥18 years) with hypertension (BP ≥140/90 mmHg) or taking BP-lowering drugs; (iii) intervention: oral fixed dose of BP-lowering drug(s) as either monotherapy or combination therapy from five major classes (angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin-II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, and diuretics); (iv) placebo comparator; (v) reported data on cardiovascular events; (vi). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina or coronary revascularisation. Results: 451 trials (93121 participants [mean age 54yrs, 56% males, mean follow-up 8 weeks] were included. There was no effect of the intervention compared to placebo on MACE (0.19% versus 0.43%; relative risk [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.14, p=0.35). There was a significant reduction in stroke (0.01% versus 0.05%; RR 0.37 [0.19-0.72]; p<0.001) and TIA (0.001% versus 0.01%; RR 0.26 [0.08-0.82]; p=0.02). Subgroup analysis suggested combination therapy provided the most benefit in stroke reduction (RR 0.21 [0.04-1.01], p=0.05), but benefits were observed across all anti-hypertensive groups for TIA outcomes. There were no between group differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, angina or coronary secularization. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of placebo-controlled RCTs demonstrated reduced stroke and TIA events with BP-lowering drugs even at short-term follow up. These findings suggest BP lowering treatment should be initiated as soon as possible in at risk individuals because even 8 weeks of treatment can significantly reduce the risk of stroke/TIA.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel resistance genotype testing after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and economic model.

Stroke or transient ischaemic attack patients are at increased risk of secondary vascular events. Antiplatelet medications, most commonly clopidogrel, are prescribed to reduce this risk. Factors including CYP2C19 genetic variants can hinder clopidogrel metabolism. Laboratory-based or point-of-care tests can detect these variants, enabling targeted treatment. To assess the effectiveness of genetic testing to identify clopidogrel resistance in people with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Specific objectives: Do people tested for clopidogrel resistance, and treated accordingly, have a reduced risk of secondary vascular events? Do people with loss-of-function alleles associated with clopidogrel resistance have a reduced risk of secondary vascular events if treated with alternative interventions compared to clopidogrel? Do people with loss-of-function alleles associated with clopidogrel resistance have an increased risk of secondary vascular events when treated with clopidogrel? What is the accuracy of point-of-care tests for detecting variants associated with clopidogrel resistance? What is the technical performance and cost of CYP2C19 genetic tests? Is genetic testing for clopidogrel resistance cost-effective compared with no testing? Systematic review and economic model. Objective 1: Two studies assessed secondary vascular events in patients tested for loss-of-function alleles and treated accordingly. They found a reduced risk, but confidence intervals were wide (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 2.74 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 1.18). Objective 2: Seven randomised controlled trials compared clopidogrel with alternative treatment in people with genetic variants. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of secondary vascular events than clopidogrel (summary hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.90; two studies). Objective 3: Twenty-five studies compared outcomes in people with and without genetic variants treated with clopidogrel. People with genetic variants were at an increased risk of secondary vascular events (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 2.08; 18 studies). There was no difference in bleeding risk (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40; five studies). Objective 4: Eleven studies evaluated Genomadix Cube accuracy; no studies evaluated Genedrive. Summary sensitivity and specificity against laboratory reference standards were both 100% (95% confidence interval 94% to 100% and 99% to 100%). Objective 5: Seventeen studies evaluated technical performance of point-of-care tests. Test failure rate ranged from 0.4% to 19% for Genomadix Cube. A survey of 8/10 genomic laboratory hubs revealed variation in preferred technologies for testing, and cost per test ranging from £15 to £250. Most laboratories expected test failure rate to be < 1%. Additional resources could enhance testing capacity and expedite turnaround times. Objective 6: Laboratory and point-of-care CYP2C19 testing strategies were cost-saving and increase quality-adjusted life-years compared with no testing. Both strategies gave similar costs, quality-adjusted life-years and expected net monetary benefit. Our results suggest that CYP2C19 testing followed by tailored treatment is likely to be effective and cost-effective in both populations. Accuracy and technical performance of Genedrive. Test failure rate of Genomadix Cube in a NationalHealthServicesetting. Value of testing additional loss-of-function alleles. Appropriateness of treatment dichotomy based on loss-of-function alleles. Lack of data on Genedrive. No randomised 'test-and-treat' studies of dipyramidole plus aspirin. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022357661. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135620) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 57. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

O68 ATRIAL SEPTAL ANEURYSM IN IDENTICALS TWINS

Introduction: Interatrial septal aneurysm (ISA) is a dilatation of saccular tissue, generally located in the foramen ovale area, which moves freely and protrudes into the right or left atrium, or even both. Today it is estimated that 85% of children born with congenital heart disease survive to adulthood, however, we have not found cases of ISA reported in identical twins in adulthood. Methods: Two 55-year-old female patients, identical twins EAM and RAM, body surface area 1,899 and 1,826 m2 respectively, consulted for elevated blood pressure (160/90 and 160/95 mmHg respectively). One of them reported headache accompanied by joint pain and mild dyspnea, the other patient reported palpitations and mild dizziness. His parents are hypertensive. They were hospitalized at 5 months of age due to viral meningitis, with no further consequences. Antihypertensive treatment, laboratory, stress test, and echocardiogram/Doppler were prescribed. Results: Laboratory tests were found to be normal. The stress test (protocol: Bruce) was reported to be negative for induced myocardial ischemia. Echocardiography revealed ISA in both patients. Conclusions: Twins, particularly monochorionic twins, are at increased risk of congenital anomalies compared with singleton pregnancies, and the risk of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with ISA is 6.7% in adult patients. ISA has been associated with acquired cardiac diseases, such as valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies, pulmonary and systemic hypertension, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, and thrombus formation. More recently, an association with embolic cerebrovascular pathology has been observed, both in TIA and CVD. For this reason, we consider that in adult patients who are identical twins when one of them is found with ISA, an evaluation should be carried out in their twin for its appropriate treatment and thus avoid future cardiovascular complications derived from this anomaly. According to our reviews, this is the first case of ISA in identical twins. New observations on ISA in twins are needed.

Time to treatment and disability attributed to index stroke in the POINT trial

BackgroundIn the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with reduced disability attributable to the index stroke compared to antiplatelet monotherapy. However, it is unknown whether earlier treatment with DAPT versus aspirin is associated with greater benefit. MethodsWe analyzed patients enrolled in POINT with minor ischemic stroke who had available data recording the treatment initiation time and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Patients were randomized to DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) vs. aspirin alone within 12 h of symptom onset. We estimated the effect of DAPT on disability (defined as mRS>1) ascribed to the index event and major hemorrhage at 90 days, stratified by tertiles of time from symptom onset-to-treatment-initiation. ResultsA total of 2559 patients were included; median onset-to-treatment-initiation time was 8.3 h (IQR:5.8-11.0). Comparing DAPT to aspirin, the rate of disability attributed to the index event at 90-day follow-up was 5.1 % vs. 8.6 % (OR 0.57; 95 % CI:0.33-0.99) in patients treated <6.7 h, 7.5 % vs. 9.9 % (OR 0.74; 95 % CI:0.45-1.19) in those treated 6.7-10.0 h, and 8.6 % vs. 10.6 % (OR 0.80; 95 % CI:0.50-1.26) in those treated >10.0 h after symptom onset (p for interaction=0.65). There was no difference in major hemorrhage across time strata. ConclusionsWhile not statistically significant, these results suggest the possibility of greater efficacy at reducing disability ascribed to minor stroke with earlier treatment with DAPT compared to aspirin. RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00991029.

Timing of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients after acute ischaemic stroke and outcome after 3 months: results of the multicentre Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry

BackgroundOral anticoagulation (OAC) is key in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but there is uncertainty regarding the optimal timing of OAC (re)initiation after stroke, as recent large...

Asundexian versus Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Stroke prevention with direct-acting oral anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation confers a risk of bleeding and limits their use. Asundexian, an activated factor XI (XIa) inhibitor, is an oral anticoagulant that may prevent strokes with less bleeding. In a phase 3, international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to receive asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily or standard-dose apixaban. The primary efficacy objective was to determine whether asundexian is at least noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety objective was to determine whether asundexian is superior to apixaban with respect to major bleeding events. A total of 14,810 randomly assigned patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 73.9±7.7 years, 35.2% were women, 18.6% had chronic kidney disease, 18.2% had a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, 16.8% had received oral anticoagulants for no more than 6 weeks, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) was 4.3±1.3. The trial was stopped prematurely at the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 98 patients (1.3%) assigned to receive asundexian and in 26 (0.4%) assigned to receive apixaban (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46 to 5.83). Major bleeding occurred in 17 patients (0.2%) who received asundexian and in 53 (0.7%) who received apixaban (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.55). The incidence of any adverse event appeared to be similar in the two groups. Among patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, treatment with asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily was associated with a higher incidence of stroke or systemic embolism than treatment with apixaban in the period before the trial was stopped prematurely. There were fewer major bleeding events with asundexian than with apixaban during this time. (Funded by Bayer; OCEANIC-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05643573; EudraCT number, 2022-000758-28.).

The European Society of Cardiology quality indicators in atrial fibrillation in centers of excellence in Spain: the SEC-EXCELENTE FA registry

Introduction and objectivesBy 2022, 9 centers had been accredited by the Spanish Society of Cardiology for the atrial fibrillation (AF) process. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of these centers based on the quality indicators (QIs) proposed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2020. MethodsAdults with AF who were attended in the cardiology departments of participating centers during the second week of May 2019 were included in a retrospective registry (n=797, age 72±11 years, 60% male). Key ESC QIs were assessed. ResultsCHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED scores, and serum creatinine levels were documented in 24.9%, 6.1%, and 96.2% of patients, respectively. Anticoagulation was appropriately prescribed in 90.6% of high-risk patients according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score, but was inappropriately prescribed in 57.8% of low-risk patients. Among all patients, 84.1% received high-quality anticoagulation. Inappropriate antiarrhythmic drugs were prescribed in 7.2% of patients with permanent AF, 2.9% of those with structural heart disease, and 0.0% of those with end-stage kidney disease. Catheter ablation was offered to 70% of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF after the failure or intolerance of 1 antiarrhythmic drug. All modifiable risk factors were documented in 59.3% of patients. Rates of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding were 8.1, 0.8, and 2.56 per 100 patients/y, respectively. QIs for anticoagulation and outcomes were similar between general cardiology and tertiary referral centers. ConclusionsAlthough accredited centers in Spain demonstrated good performance in many of the ESC QIs for AF, there remains room for improvement. These data could serve as a starting point for enhancing the quality of care in this population.

A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study to Identify High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack/Minor Stroke Patients Benefitting from Echocardiography

BackgroundWe aimed to derive a clinical decision rule to identify patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke most likely to benefit from echocardiography. MethodsThis multicentre prospective cohort study enrolled adults diagnosed with TIA/minor stroke in the emergency department who underwent echocardiograms within 90 days, from 13 Canadian academic emergency departments from October 2006 to May 2017. Our outcome was clinically significant echocardiogram findings. ResultsIn 7149 eligible patients, a clinically significant finding was found in 556 (7.8%). There were a further 2421 (33.9%) with potentially significant findings. History of heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.9) or coronary artery disease (OR, 2.7) were the factors most strongly associated with clinically significant echocardiogram findings, whereas young age, male sex, valvular heart disease, and infarct (any age) on neuroimaging were modestly associated (OR, 1.3-1.9). The model combining these predictors into a score (range: 0-15), had a C-statistic of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.70). A cut point of 6 points or more classified 6.6% of cases as high likelihood, defined as > 15% for clinically significant echocardiogram findings. ConclusionsEchocardiography is a very useful test in the investigations of patients with TIA/minor stroke. We identified high-risk clinical features—combined to create a clinical decision rule—to identify which patients with TIA/minor stroke are likely to have clinically significant echocardiogram findings requiring an immediate change in management. These patients should have echocardiography prioritized, whereas others may continue to have echocardiography conducted in a less urgent fashion.

Predictive Value of Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio for Stroke Risk in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack

Predictive Value of Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio for Stroke Risk in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack

Cerebrovascular Disease in Surgical Patients

It is well established that patients with a personal history of a cerebrovascular accident (stroke or transient ischemic attack) are at increased risk for perioperative cardiovascular complications, including recurrent stroke. Although the individual patient risk for perioperative stroke is typically low, the overall prevalence is significant, appears to be increasing, and has the potential for devastating complications including death. The perioperative provider must not only be knowledgeable of the elevated risk for patients with a history of stroke undergoing surgery, but also be familiar with perioperative risk reduction strategies. This article provides a general overview of cerebrovascular disease in surgical patients with much of the content being presented at the 2023 Perioperative Medicine Summit in Orlando, Florida.

Timing of Intervention in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is defined as an acute neurologic deficit (transient ischemic attack or stroke) occurring in the last six months that is ipsilateral to an extracranial carotid artery with at least 50% stenosis. Previous studies have identified the benefit of surgical intervention on symptomatic carotid stenosis, but the ideal timing is less clear. The timing of intervention must balance the risk of perioperative stroke and death (higher during the hyperacute period within 48 hours) and the risk of recurrent stroke while waiting to intervene, particularly if delayed beyond 14 days. Several factors such as acuity of neurological deficit, degree of stenosis or contralateral occlusion, and other comorbidities, may contribute to the risk of perioperative stroke or death when intervening within the acute period. The Society for Vascular Surgery recommends carotid endarterectomy as the intervention for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, but recent studies have shown that transcarotid revascularization may also have similar outcomes.

Pathological Review of Brain Damage After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) causes brain injury and systemic complications, including cardiopulmonary dysfunction, which mutually affect each other. Post-SAH brain injury includes early brain injury(EBI) and delayed cerebral ischemia(DCI). EBI is a non-iatrogenic pathology occurring within 72 h of clinical SAH, primarily induced by increased intracranial pressure, subsequent transient global cerebral ischemia, and extravasated blood components. DCI typically develops between days 4 and 14 after clinical SAH because of erythrolysis(free hemoglobin) and EBI-mediated reactions. EBI and DCI share many pathologies, including large-artery spasm, microvascular spasm, microthrombosis, blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, disturbance of venous outflow, and neuroelectric disturbances such as spreading depolarization and epileptic discharge. However, EBI and DCI differ not only in the timing of onset but also in their distribution, with EBI mainly occurring throughout the brain, while DCI occurs locally. Many substances, such as glutamic acid, cytokines, and matricellular proteins, mediate EBI and DCI pathologies. Further elucidation of EBI and DCI pathologies is essential for developing novel treatment strategies.

Impaired glucose metabolism and the risk of vascular events and mortality after ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM), prediabetes, and insulin resistance are highly prevalent in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). DM is associated with higher risk for poor outcomes after IS.ObjectiveInvestigate the risk of recurrent vascular events and mortality associated with impaired glucose metabolism compared to normoglycemia in patients with IS and transient ischemic attack (TIA).MethodsSystematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library on 21st March 2024 and via citation searching. Studies that comprised IS or TIA patients and exposures of impaired glucose metabolism were eligible. Study Quality Assessment Tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Covariate adjusted outcomes were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.Main outcomesRecurrent stroke, cardiac events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and composite of vascular outcomes.ResultsOf 10,974 identified studies 159 were eligible. 67% had low risk of bias. DM was associated with an increased risk for composite events (pooled HR (pHR) including 445,808 patients: 1.58, 95% CI 1.34–1.85, I2 = 88%), recurrent stroke (pHR including 1.161.527 patients: 1.42 (1.29–1.56, I2 = 92%), cardiac events (pHR including 443,863 patients: 1.55, 1.50–1.61, I2 = 0%), and all-cause mortality (pHR including 1.031.472 patients: 1.56, 1.34–1.82, I2 = 99%). Prediabetes was associated with an increased risk for composite events (pHR including 8,262 patients: 1.50, 1.15–1.96, I2 = 0%) and recurrent stroke (pHR including 10,429 patients: 1.50, 1.18–1.91, I2 = 0), however, not with mortality (pHR including 9,378 patients, 1.82, 0.73–4.57, I2 = 78%). Insulin resistance was associated with recurrent stroke (pHR including 21,363 patients: 1.56, 1.19–2.05, I2 = 55%), but not with mortality (pHR including 21,363 patients: 1.31, 0.66–2.59, I2 = 85%).DiscussionDM is associated with a 56% increased relative risk of death after IS and TIA. Risk estimates regarding recurrent events are similarly high between prediabetes and DM, indicating high cardiovascular risk burden already in precursor stages of DM. There was a high heterogeneity across most outcomes.

Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels with ischemic stroke in young patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionLipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis. However, its association with young-onset ischemic stroke is not well-established. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of elevated Lp(a) with young ischemic stroke. MethodsFour electronic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, profiling studies from inception till 6 Mar 2024. We included studies investigating the relationship between stratified Lp(a) levels and young ischemic stroke. We compared the odds of young stroke patients (age <65 years) having elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls without stroke or transient ischemic attack. ResultsFive case-control studies comprising a total of 1345 patients were included; 57.7 % (776/1345) were females, with a mean age of 41.5 years. Among them, 22.5 % (264/1171) were smokers. Additionally, 16.8 % (197/1171) had hypertension, 5.9 % (69/1171) had diabetes, and 29.2 % (284/971) had hyperlipidemia. Young stroke patients were more likely to have high Lp(a) level than age-matched controls (OR 1.61, 95 %CI 1.24–2.10). Four studies defined a high Lp(a) level as ≥30mg/dL, whilst one study used a Lp(a) level of >23.2mg/dL as the cut-off. A sensitivity analysis excluding this study showed that young stroke patients were still more likely to have Lp(a) ≥30mg/dL than controls (OR 1.43, 95 %CI 1.08–1.88). ConclusionYoung stroke patients are more likely to have elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls, suggesting an association between elevated Lp(a) and young stroke. Further research is warranted to evaluate the causal relationships between Lp(a) and young-onset ischemic stroke, as well as to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Lp(a) screening in young adults as part of a primary prevention strategy.

Neuraxial anesthesia for non-neurological emergency surgery in a patient with acute ischemic stroke: a case report

BackgroundThe recent guidelines recommend delaying elective non-neurological surgery after an index stroke, but there is a lack of consensus regarding emergency surgery in patients with a recent stroke. Impaired cerebral autoregulation and altered baroreceptor function elevate the risk of recurrent stroke in this group. Moreover, the impact of anesthesia type (general vs. regional) for non-cardiovascular, non-neurological surgery in patients with an index stroke remains inconclusive.Case presentationA 67-year-old male with an acute mild ischemic stroke underwent emergency surgery for an obstructed right-sided direct inguinal hernia under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Pre-operative assessment showed stable hemodynamics, and perioperative measures were taken to ensure stable blood pressure. Neuraxial anesthesia was employed successfully, and the patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the surgery and postoperative period. No neurological deficits were observed post-surgery, and follow-up up to 3 months revealed no cognitive impairment or neurological decline.ConclusionsNeuraxial anesthesia can be considered for patients with acute mild strokes requiring urgent non-neurological surgery, provided they are hemodynamically stable and without coagulopathy. However, the choice of anesthesia should be individualized based on factors such as neurological status, stroke severity, coagulation, and existing disabilities. This case highlights the importance of a personalized approach to anesthesia in emergency surgery for stroke patients.

Association between optic disc pallor and lacunar stroke

ObjectiveTo test for associations between optic disc pallor and two clinical variables: ischaemic stroke subtype (cortical and lacunar) and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) scores in a cohort of hospital...

Improving diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to identify post-stroke cognitive impairment

Given advantages in reperfusion therapy leading to mild stroke, less apparent cognitive deficits can be overseen in a routine neurological examination. Despite the widespread use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), age- and education-specific cutoffs for the detection of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) are not established, hampering its valid application in stroke. We aimed to establish age- and education-specific MoCA cutoffs to better discriminate patients with and without acute PSCI. Patients with acute ischemic stroke underwent the MoCA and a detailed neuropsychological assessment. PSCI was defined as a performance < − 1.5 SD in ≥ 2 cognitive domains. As secondary data analysis, the discriminant abilities of the MoCAraw-score (not adding + 1 as correction for ≤ 12 years of education, YoE) cutoffs were automatically derived based on Youden Index and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses across age- (< 55, 55–70, > 70 years old) and education-specific (≤ 12 and > 12 YoE) groups. 351 stroke patients (67.4 ± 14.1 years old; 13.1 ± 2.8 YoE) underwent the neuropsychological assessment 2.7 ± 2.0 days post-stroke. The original MoCA cutoff < 26 falsely classified 26.2% of examined patients, with poor sensitivity in younger adults (34.8% in patients < 55 years > 12 YoE) and poor specificity in older adults (55.0%, in > 70 years ≤ 12 YoE). By maximizing both sensitivity and specificity, the optimal MoCAraw cutoffs were: (i) < 28 in patients aged < 55 with > 12 YoE (sensitivity = 69.6%, specificity = 77.8%); (ii) < 22 and < 25 in patients > 70 years with ≤ 12 and > 12 YoE (sensitivity = 61.6%, specificity = 90.0%; sensitivity = 63.3%, specificity = 84.0%, respectively). In other groups the optimal MoCAraw cutoff was < 26. Age and education level should be considered when interpreting MoCA-scores. Though new age- and education-specific cutoffs demonstrated higher discriminant ability for PSCI, their performance in young stroke and adults with higher education level was low due to ceiling effects and MoCA subtests structure, and cautious interpretation in these patients is warranted.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05653141.