BackgroundMugwort, timothy, and birch are commonly spread pollen allergens across China. Although several studies have described the rates of sensitization to mugwort, timothy, and birch in China, most of them just on specific whole-allergen extracts but little was known about the co-sensitization characteristics of its allergen components. This study aimed to explore the patterns of sensitization to mugwort, timothy, birch, and their major allergen components. MethodSerum specific IgE (sIgE) levels of allergen components of mugwort, timothy, birch, and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) were detected in 160 patients whose serum showed positive results to at least one of mugwort, timothy, and birch allergens via EUROBlotMaster system. Skin prick testing was utilized to assess the allergic reaction of grass, weed, and tree allergens. Latent class analysis was used to identify underlying patterns of sensitization to a series of allergen components and their corresponding extracts. Results88.8% of patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma were positive for mugwort-sIgE, 30% for timothy-sIgE, and 32.5% for birch-sIgE. By using the LCA model, three sensitization patterns as “Mugwort, Art v 4, Bet v 2 and Phl p 12 co-sensitized”, “Timothy, mugwort, and CCD co-sensitized”, “Mugwort and Art v 1 co-sensitized” were revealed based on optimal statistical fit in this study. Compared with other clusters, participants in “Mugwort, Art v 4, Bet v 2 and Phl p 12 co-sensitized” pattern were associated with higher sensitization rates of common grass and tree pollens allergen. The spearman’s coefficient between CCD and timothy was larger than the corresponding values of CCD with mugwort or birch. ConclusionCCD and profilin, as minor allergens in pollens, were associated with other pollen sIgE false positives presumably due to cross-reactivity. Patients sensitized with profilin had a significantly higher risk of sensitization to other pollens.