ON February 18 Mr. J. G. Bennett, addressing the Fuel Luncheon Club in London on "The Future of Coal for Small-Scale Uses", compared raw coal, town's gas and electricity for household space heating. The comparison was based on heat costs incurred in production and distribution and the efficiency in use of gas and electricity when these are produced from coal. The results for all three, with appliances of current type, turned out to be identical—16 per cent of the heating value of the coal. Developments anticipated in appliances were estimated to increase these figures to 45 per cent for coal burnt in open fires, 24 per cent for gas and 33 per cent for electricity. Some may read into these figures the implication that no fuel-saving can be expected from the processing of coal before use. It should, however, be recalled that coal-less countries import large quantities of coal for carbonization to produce gas and coke. It is unlikely that they are unanimously thriftless. Attention should be paid to the difference in the method of calculation. In the case of coal and electric fires, the resulting heat is usually a product of the raw coal. Gas, however, is derived from the volatile matter only, which is not more than one third of the whole of the coal. Then nearly the whole of the heat cost of processing is charged against this gas, and the end efficiency figure is reduced to one sixth. Even then, the efficiency figure is not less than the figure given for coal and electricity. Unlike, but over and above these, there remains some halfton of coke available for domestic and industrial uses for which raw coal is unsuitable. At the moment, the Ministry of Fuel and Power is taking advantage of this reserve.
Read full abstract