This article critically analyzes the OECD DAC’s gender equality policy marker through the theoretical lens of sociological institutionalism, exploring its rationale, data production processes, and associated challenges. Drawing on empirical evidence from Finnish-funded development interventions in Afghanistan, it examines how qualitative gender-related objectives are translated into quantitative indicators at both national and organizational levels. The mixed-methods approach incorporates semi-structured and thematic interviews, quantitative data from the OECD DAC and Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, alongside relevant academic literature. Sociological institutionalism guides the analysis, uncovering the underlying reasons for the gender marker’s existence. For the OECD DAC, the marker enhances legitimacy and reinforces its authority by prompting comparability, transparency, and alignment amongst member states. For Finland, the marker initially served as a compliance tool for DAC reporting, but has since taken on additional roles, including steering development policy decisions, compiling aid statistics, and signaling the Ministry’s commitment to gender equality. These uses create a gap between rhetoric and practice, as the marker’s forward-looking design often fails to capture the realities of implemented interventions. The findings reveal that the gender marker falls short of its stated aim of measuring the development finances allocated by DAC members to support gender equality. This article provides insights into the creation and use of gender indicators, particularly in a global context where the women’s agenda has been increasingly overshadowed by geopolitics and securitization. This shift reflects the growing influence of the development-security nexus, which emerged in connection with the war-on-terror paradigm.
Read full abstract