Minipool Nucleic Acid Testing Research Articles

Parvovirus B19 DNA in Factor VIII concentrates: effects of manufacturing procedures and B19 screening by nucleic acid testing

Parvovirus B19 (B19) is a common contaminant, especially in coagulation factors. Because of B19 transmission by pooled plasma, solvent/detergent treated in 1999, some fractionators initiated minipool nucleic acid testing (NAT) to limit the B19 load in manufacturing pools. In this study, the extent of B19 DNA contamination in commercial Factor VIII concentrates, that is, antihemophilic factor (human) (AHF), manufactured before and after B19 NAT screening was implemented, was determined. A total of 284 lots representing six AHF products made during 1993 to 1998 and 2001 to 2004 were assayed for B19 DNA by an in-house NAT procedure. Anti-B19 immunoglobulin G (IgG) was also measured. Most lots made during 1993 to 1998 had detectable B19 DNA. The prevalence ranged from 56 to 100 percent and appeared to differ between manufacturers. The highest level of B19 DNA found was 10(6) genome equivalents (geq or international units [IU]) per mL. Forty percent of the lots tested contained 10(3) geq (IU) per mL. In comparison, both prevalence and levels in source plasma-derived AHF products made in 2001 to 2004 were lower. Both, however, remained unchanged in the recovered plasma-derived product because B19 NAT screening had not been implemented. Only an intermediate-purity AHF product was positive for the presence of anti-B19 IgG. The prevalence and levels of B19 DNA in AHF prepared from B19 NAT unscreened plasma were high but varied among products with different manufacturing procedures. B19 NAT screening of plasma effectively lowered the B19 DNA level in the final products and in the majority of cases rendered it undetectable and hence potentially reduced the risk of B19 transmission.

Residual risk of transfusion‐transmitted viral infections in Shenzhen, China, 2001 through 2004

There are no current estimates of the residual risks of transmission by blood of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in China. Such estimates are an essential prerequisite to monitoring and improving transfusion safety as well as supporting evidence based assessment of the value of implementing new screening interventions. Viral screening data for donors from Shenzhen, China, for the period 2001 to 2004, were retrospectively analyzed. The data were applied to a published model to estimate the residual risk of transmitting HIV, HBV, and HCV by blood transfusion in Shenzhen, as well as to assess the residual risk reduction value of various new tests. The point estimates for the combined 2003 and 2004 period calculate as 1 in 17,501 for HBV, 1 in 59,588 for HCV, and 1 in 903,498 for HIV. The predicted yield for improved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays, minipool (MP) nucleic acid testing (NAT), and individual-donation (ID) NAT was 6.9, 9.5, and 28.3 per million donations, respectively. The predicted yield for implementing a fourth-generation HCV (antigen-antibody) or MP NAT assay was 13.4 or 14.7 per million donations, respectively. For HIV, the predicted yield for implementing a fourth-generation HIV (antigen-antibody) or MP NAT assay was markedly smaller, 0.25 or 0.65 per million donations, respectively. Relative to that reported for Western blood systems, the prevalence and the residual risk of HBV and HCV are high, whereas HIV is comparable. Pending a formal cost-effectiveness study for NAT, implementing improved HBsAg and combination HCV antibody-antigen assays in Shenzhen would markedly reduce the residual risk.

Is an assay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibody a valuable alternative to nucleic acid testing?

A new enzyme immunoassay based on the simultaneous detection of nucleocapsid proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HCV (Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody Ultra, Bio-Rad) was evaluated as an alternative to nucleic acid testing (NAT) for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period in blood donations. The study included 107 sequential samples from 10 HCV seroconversion commercial panels; 81 samples were in the preseroconversion phase, and 26 were collected after seroconversion. All samples were tested with HCV antigen-antibody assay and the two minipool (MP) NAT procedures that are routinely used in France (transcription-mediated amplification in pools of 8 and COBAS AmpliScreen HCV test [Roche Diagnostic] in pools of 24 donations). From the 44 samples collected during window period that were MP-NAT-positive, 31 (70.5%) were also positive with the Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay. The mean delay in detecting HCV infection between these two methods was 5.1 days (range, 0-24 days). The Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay led to a reduction in the window period of 26.8 days (range, 0-72 days). All samples collected after seroconversion were detected with the HCV antigen-antibody assay. The specificity analyzed in 2503 consecutive blood donations was estimated at 99.88 percent. This new developed assay presents an improvement for the detection of HCV infection, especially in the early phase of infection when antibodies are undetectable. Although less sensitive than NAT, this assay could be a suitable solution for blood screening in developing countries where NAT (or HCV core antigen-specific assay) is not affordable or its implementation is not feasible.

Evaluation of COBAS AmpliPrep nucleic acid extraction in conjunction with COBAS AmpliScreen HBV DNA, HCV RNA and HIV‐1 RNA amplification and detection

This report describes the evaluation of the COBAS AmpliPrep instrument for fully automated generic nucleic acid extraction in conjunction with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 RNA COBAS AmpliScreen amplification and detection using serial dilutions of the WHO international standards (IS) and the PeliCheck reference panels. Serial diluted samples of the WHO IS and the PeliCheck reference panels were tested 24 times to determine the HBV DNA, HCV RNA and HIV-1 RNA detection limits by Probit analysis. The existence and extent of cross-contamination were assessed by testing alternating high titre HBV DNA-positive and -negative samples. The specificity of the AmpliPrep-AmpliScreen test for HBV was determined by testing 232 minipools consisting of six donations, all negative for HCV/HIV-1 nucleic acid testing (NAT) and HBsAg. In addition, a HBV genotypes A-G panel was tested. The respective 95% detection limits (and 95% CI) on the WHO IS and on the PeliCheck reference panels were 6.7 (4.3-13) IU/ml and 123 (68-301) gEq/ml for HBV DNA, 23 (11-106) IU/ml and 126 (84-233) gEq/ml for HCV RNA, and 187 (108-422) IU/ml and 183 (108-434) gEq/ml for HIV-1 RNA. Based on the WHO IS and the PeliCheck reference panels, no significant differences in sensitivity for HBV and HCV were found between AmpliPrep and the licensed MultiPrep extraction method. The sensitivity of AmpliPrep-AmpliScreen for HIV-1 was probably twofold lower as compared to the MultiPrep-AmpliScreen method. No cross contamination was observed. All 232 minipools were HBV NAT-negative. The AmpliPrep-AmpliScreen test for HBV detected HBV genotypes A-G with equal sensitivity. The AmpliPrep instrument combined with the AmpliScreen assays for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 is robust and suitable for NAT donor screening. The sensitivity criteria for HIV-1 and HCV as defined by the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Food and Drug Administration for minipool NAT screening are met by this system. SINGLE SENTENCE SUMMARY: Generic COBAS AmpliPrep nucleic acid extraction in conjunction with COBAS AmpliScreen detection for HBV, HCV and HIV-1.

Prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of human immunodeficiency virus among community and replacement first‐time blood donors in São Paulo, Brazil

Concerted efforts have been directed toward recruitment of community rather than replacement donors in Brazil. Time trends and demographic correlates of human immunodeficiency (HIV) prevalence and incidence among first-time (FT) donors in Brazil were examined by donation type. HIV residual risk from FT-donor transfusions, and projected yield of p24 antigen and nucleic acid test (NAT) screening were estimated. HIV prevalence data and seroreactive specimens were obtained at Fundação Pró-Sangue/Hemocentro-de-São Paulo from 1995 to 2001. To estimate incidence, confirmed-positive samples from July 1998 through December 2001 were tested with a less-sensitive (detuned) enzyme immunoassay to detect recent seroconversions. Incidence data were used to estimate residual risk and p24 and NAT yield based on published window periods (WPs). HIV prevalence was 22 percent higher among the FT community donors than replacement donors (19.6 vs. 16.1 per 10,000; p < 0.01) and 48 percent higher among men than women (19.1 vs. 12.9; p < 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression, both variables remained significant predictors of HIV prevalence. HIV prevalence decreased from 20.4 (1995) to 13.1 per 10,000 FT donations (2001). HIV incidence was 2.7 per 10,000 person-years. The estimated rate of infected antibody-negative donations was 14.9 per 1,000,000 units (95% confidence interval, 9.8-20.0). It was estimated that addition of p24 antigen, minipool NAT, and individual-donation NAT assays would detect 3.9 (2.0-5.8), 8.3 (5.3-11.3), and 10.8 (7.1-14.5) WP units per 1,000,000 FT donations, respectively. HIV incidence and residual transfusion risk estimates are approximately 10 times higher in Brazil FT donors compared to US and European FT donors. Community FT donors had higher HIV prevalence than replacement FT donors. The yield of p24 antigen or RNA screening will be low in Brazilian donors, but substantially higher than in US donors.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA screening of blood donations in minipools with the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion (estimated at 1 in 63,000-1 in 205,000 units in the United States) exceeds that of hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Reduction of window-period HBV transmissions through detection of HBV DNA-positive units by minipool nucleic acid testing (MP NAT) would be expected to decrease this risk. A large multicenter study of the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test (Roche Molecular Systems) was conducted on minipools of 24 blood donation specimens. The yield of HBV DNA-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative window-period donations was determined relative to current and newly licensed HBsAg assays. Donors with selected HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) results were further evaluated. The detection rate of window-period units was 1 in 352,451 (95% confidence interval, 1 in 2,941,176-1 in 97,561). Assay specificity was high (99.9964%). HBV DNA was detected in 84 percent of HBsAg-positive, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 94 percent when individual-donation (ID) NAT was added. HBV DNA was detected in 0.03 percent of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 0.41 percent when ID NAT was added. Implementation of HBV MP NAT will provide an increment in safety relative to HBV serologic screening, similar to that for HCV and in excess of that for HIV. Our data indicate that the implementation of HBV MP NAT would likely interdict 39 HBV window-period units and prevent 56 cases of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection annually. The current data indicate that HBV MP NAT should not lead to discontinuation of anti-HBc testing but that discontinuation of HBsAg testing with retention of anti-HBc testing may be possible.

A new strategy for estimating risks of transfusion‐transmitted viral infections based on rates of detection of recently infected donors

Estimates for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transfusion-transmitted risks have relied on incidence derived from repeat donor histories and imprecise estimates for infectious, preseroconversion window periods (WPs). By use of novel approaches, WPs were estimated by back-extrapolation of acute viral replication dynamics. Incidence was derived from the yield of viremic, antibody-negative donations detected by routine minipool nucleic acid testing (MP-NAT) of 37 million US donations (1999-2002) or from sensitive/less-sensitive HIV-1 enzyme immunoassay (S/LS-EIA) results for seropositive samples from 6.5 million donations (1999). Incidences and WPs were combined to calculate risks and project yield of individual donation (ID)-NAT. The HIV-1 WP from presumed infectivity (1 copy/20 mL) to ID-NAT detection was estimated at 5.6 days, and the periods from ID to MP-NAT detection and from MP-NAT to p24 detection at 3.4 and 6.0 days, respectively; corresponding estimates for HCV were 4.9, 2.5, and 50.9 days (the latter represents period from MP-NAT to HCV antibody detection). The HIV-1 incidence projected from MP-NAT yield or from S/LS-EIA data was 1.8 per 100,000 person-years, resulting in a corresponding HIV-1 transfusion-transmitted risk of 1 in 2.3 million. The HCV incidence from MP-NAT yield was 2.70 per 100,000 person-years with a corresponding risk of 1 in 1.8 million donations. Conversion from MP-NAT to ID-NAT was projected to detect two to three additional HIV-1 and HCV infectious units annually. MP-NAT yield and S/LS-EIA rates can accurately project transfusion risks. HCV and HIV-1 risks, currently estimated at 1 per 2 million units, could be reduced to 1 in 3 to 4 million units by ID-NAT screening.

West Nile virus blood transfusion‐related infection despite nucleic acid testing

A case of West Nile virus (WNV) encephalitis associated with transfusion of blood that did not react when tested for WNV by minipool (MP) nucleic acid testing (NAT) is described. A Nebraska man developed clinical encephalitis 13 days after surgery and transfusion of 26 blood components. Antibody testing confirmed WNV infection. An investigation was initiated to determine the source of this infection. The patient's family members were interviewed to identify risk factors for WNV infection. Residual samples were retested for WNV RNA using transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay and two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Blood donors' follow-up serum samples were collected. All samples were tested for WNV-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies. The patient's family denied recent mosquito exposure. The 20 blood components collected after July 2003 did not react when tested for WNV in a six-member MP-NAT at the time of donation. Retrospective individual testing identified one sample as WNV-reactive by the TMA assay and one of the PCR assays. Seroconversion was demonstrated in the donor associated with this sample. WNV RNA detection by individual donation NAT demonstrates viremic blood escaping MP-NAT and supports transfusion-related WNV transmission. MP-NAT may not detect all WNV-infected blood donors, allowing WNV transmission to continue at low levels. WNV NAT assays might vary in sensitivity and pooling donations could further impact test performance. Understanding MP NAT limitations can improve strategies to maintain safety of the blood supply in the United States.

Triggers for switching from minipool testing by nucleic acid technology to individual‐donation nucleic acid testing for West Nile virus: Analysis of 2003 data to inform 2004 decision making

Concern about West Nile virus (WNV) transfusion-transmitted infections missed by minipool (MP) nucleic acid testing (NAT) has prompted consideration of the use of individual-donation (ID) NAT. Strategies were investigated for the application of limited ID-NAT capacity in 2004. Patterns of WNV MP-NAT-reactive donations tested by the Blood Systems Laboratory each week for 79 blood centers from June 29 to November 23, 2003 (196 MP-NAT repeat-reactive [RR] donations among 801,697 units), were analyzed. ID-NAT initiation strategies were developed consisting of counts of RR donations and/or weekly RR rates, together with three ID-NAT discontinuation strategies, and ID testing burden was assessed based on these combined start and stop strategies. The effectiveness, reported as the percentage of MP-RR donations that would trigger ID-NAT based on each initiation strategy, ranged from 57 to 100 percent. The addition of a 1- or 2-week no-yield requirement for ID discontinuation substantially increased testing burden. Combined strategies resulted in projected ID-NAT of between 10 and 50 percent of donations for a 10- to 20-week period. For this organization, the most feasible ID-NAT initiation strategy was 2 MP-reactive donations and a weekly rate of 1 in 1000, which had an effectiveness of 81 percent and led to peak weekly ID-NAT of 20 to 25 percent of donations depending on the discontinuation rule. This new approach of targeted ID-NAT based on ongoing monitoring of MP-NAT yield may prove to be a rational policy for agents like WNV that cause seasonal and regional epidemics.

Cost‐effectiveness of nucleic acid test screening of volunteer blood donations for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus in the United States

The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of adding nucleic acid testing (NAT) to serological (antibody and antigen) screening protocols for donated blood in the United States (US) with the purpose of reducing the risks of transfusion-transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The costs, health consequences and cost-effectiveness of adding either minipool or individual-donor NAT to serological screening (SS) testing were estimated using a decision-analysis model. With the given modelling assumptions, adding minipool NAT would avoid an estimated 37, 128 and eight cases of HBV, HCV and HIV, respectively, and save approximately 53 additional years of life and 102 additional quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with SS, at a net cost of $154 million. SS + minipool NAT - p24 compared with SS alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.5 million per QALY gained (range in sensitivity analysis $1.0-2.1 million per QALY gained) in this US analysis. The cost effectiveness of adding NAT screening is outside the typical range for most healthcare interventions, but not for established blood safety measures.

Application de la biologie moléculaire à la sécurité virale transfusionnelle : le dépistage génomique viral

Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for HIV-1 and HCV has been introduced in France and became mandatory for all homologous blood donations since July 1st 2001 in addition to serology screening. Previously, a feasibility study led to the selection of 2 technologies : a TMA based assay (Chiron) uses the Procleix HIV-/HCV assay on pools of 8 samples and a PCR based assay from BioMérieux-Roche which is a combination of an RNA extraction system (NucliSens, BioMérieux) with a fully automated system for nucleic acid amplification and detection (Cobas Amplicor, Roche). This system uses the Cobas Ampliscreen HCV test v.2.0 and the The Cobas Ampliscreen HIV test v1.5, on 24 sample pools. Pooling was required because single-donation testing is not yet feasible, as a result of the limitations in automation available for all current NAT technologies. The two technologies were easily implemented and showed nearly the same detection limit for HCV RNA and HIV-1 RNA. During a one-year period, from July 1st 2001 to June 30, 2002, out of the 2.5 million donations tested, the NAT yield resulted in one HIV-1 RNA positive-antibody negative donation and one HCV RNA positive-antibody negative donation. Two HIV NAT positive-antibody negative donations were missed by minipool NAT because a very low viral load. Moreover, the NAT implementation did not impact on blood component availability, including platelet concentrates.