Minimum Two-year Follow-up Research Articles

Primary Repair versus Reconstruction in Patients with Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: What Do Patients Prefer?

Purpose The purpose is to evaluate knee preference and functional outcomes of patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair in one knee and ACL reconstruction in the contralateral side. Methods All patients who underwent both procedures were retrospectively reviewed at minimum two-year follow-up. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their operated knees' preferences during rehabilitation, daily activities, sports activities, and overall function. Furthermore, the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Forgotten Joint Score-12, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury were completed. Results Twenty-one patients were included. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction first, which was displayed at younger age at surgery (24 vs. 33 years, p = 0.010) and longer follow-up (10.2 vs. 2.3 years, p < 0.001), respectively. Thirty-three percent preferred the repaired knee, 11% the reconstructed knee, and 56% had no preference; however, 78% indicated that their repaired knee was less painful during rehabilitation and 83% reported earlier range of motion (ROM) return following repair, which was similar for both knees in 17%. Eighty-three percent of patients indicated better function and progression during rehabilitation with their repaired knee and 11% with their reconstructed knees. No statistical differences were found in patient-reported outcomes between both procedures (all p > 0.4). Objective laxity assessment showed mean side-to-side difference of 0.6 mm between both sides in favor of the reconstructed knee. Conclusion This study showed that ACL repair and ACL reconstruction lead to similar functional outcomes. However, patients undergoing both procedures may have less pain, earlier ROM return, and faster rehabilitation progression following primary repair.

Treatment of Morton's neuroma with minimally invasive distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) and percutaneous release of the deep transverse metatarsal ligament (DTML): a case series with minimum two-year follow-up.

The optimal treatment of symptomatic Morton's neuroma remains unclear; conservative methods are sometimes ineffective and neurectomy has significant rates of patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) and percutaneous release of the deep transverse metatarsal ligament (DTML) in patients with Morton's neuroma. Between January 2018 and November 2019, 27 patients (29 feet) diagnosed with Morton's neuroma after clinical and radiological evaluation underwent DMMO and percutaneous DTML release. The primary clinical outcomes were pain (VAS) and function (AOFAS score). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, complications, and radiographic outcomes. Patients were followed up for a minimum of twoyears. The median age of the participants was 66years (range 48-79) and the follow-up time was 28months (24-47). There was a decrease of 5.7 points in the VAS for pain (p < .001) and an increase of 19.9 in AOFAS (p < .001) after the surgical procedure. There was one case of superficial infection and one patient required resection of the neuroma (neurectomy). The majority of patients (89.7%) were satisfied and considered the procedure outcome as excellent or good. Treatment of Morton's neuroma with minimally invasive distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy and percutaneous release of the deep transverse metatarsal ligament showed significant improvement in pain and function with a low incidence of complications and a high rate of personal satisfaction.

P76. Return to activity after thoracic anterior lumbar posterior tethering versus posterior spinal fusion

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Fusionless surgery for the treatment of skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis has the theoretical benefit of preserved motion. Thoracic anterior lumbar posterior tethering (TALPT) is one option for fusionless surgery. However, little is known about how TALPT compares to PSF with respect to return to activity and sport. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported physical activity between TALPT and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with minimum two-year followup. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective cohort study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Consecutive skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis and a thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude 40 degrees who underwent either TALPT or PSF were included. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> The primary outcome was rate of returning to sport. Secondary outcomes included ability to bend and satisfaction with sport performance as well as weeks until return to sport, school, physical education (PE) classes and running. <h3>METHODS</h3> In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis and a thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude of 40 degrees who underwent either TALPT or PSF were included. The primary outcome was rate of returning to sport. Secondary outcomes included ability to bend and satisfaction with sport performance as well as weeks until return to sport, school, physical education (PE) classes and running. <h3>RESULTS</h3> Of 41 patients with at least two-year follow-up, 6 underwent TALPT. TALPT patients reported significantly higher rate of return to sport (100% vs. 65.7%, p=0.01) and faster return to sport (18.9 weeks vs. 35.1 weeks, p < 0.01) compared to PSF patients. TALPT patients also reported improved ability to bend ("Minimal" or "No Change" 100% vs 60%, p < 0.01) as well as faster return to PE (15.2 weeks vs. 34.2 weeks, p < 0.01), and running (20.0 weeks vs. 41.6 weeks, p < 0.01) compared to PSF patients. However, TALPT patients were less satisfied with the cosmetic effect of their surgery ("Satisfied with cosmetic effect) 16.7% vs. 88.6%, p < 0.01) compared to PSF patients. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> While TALPT patients were less satisfied than their PSF counterparts with respect to cosmesis, they also reported both significantly higher rates of returning to sport, improved ability to bend as well as faster return time to sport, PE and running. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> Thoracic anterior and lumbar posterior tether (Investigational/Not Approved).

Repeat revision TKR for failed management of peri-prosthetic infection has long-term success but often require multiple operations: a case control study.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with poor outcomes and catastrophic complications. The aim of this study was to present the outcomes of re-revision surgery for PJI of the knee following previous failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty. A retrospective analysis was performed of 32 patients who underwent re-revision knee arthroplasty, having already undergone at least one previous two-stage exchange for PJI with a minimum follow-up of two-years for alive patients. Outcomes were compared to a matched control of two-stage revisions for PJI of a primary knee replacement also containing 32 patients. Outcomes investigated were eradication of infection, re-operation, mortality and limb-salvage rate. Successful eradication of infection was achieved in 50% of patients following re-revision surgery, compared with 91% following two-stage exchange of primary knee replacement for PJI (p < 0.001). Fourteen (44%) patients required further re-operation compared with three (9%) patients in the primary group (p = 0.006). Amputation was performed in one case (3%) with thirteen patients (92%) who had infection controlled by debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), further revision surgery or arthrodesis. Two patients died with infection (6%) and the long-term rate for infection control was 91%. The mean number of procedures following surgery for the re-revision group was 2.8 (0-9) compared with 0.13 (0-1) for the primary two-stage group (p < 0.001). Five-year patient survival was 90.6% (95% CI 77.1-100). The limb-salvage rate for the re-revision cohort was 97%. Outcomes for re-revision knee arthroplasty for PJI have higher re-operation and failure rates, but no worse mortality than in revisions of primary knee replacements. Failures can successfully be managed by further operation.

The "kickstand rod" technique for correction of coronal malalignment: two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Restoring coronal alignment in spine deformity patients has been shown to play an important role in improving patient reported outcomes (PRO). Recently, the "kickstand rod" (KSR) technique was developed as a novel coronal correction method in complex spine deformity cases. The goal of the present study was to assess outcomes of this technique at two years of follow-up. Consecutive, unique adult patients who underwent KSR constructs for coronal spinal malalignment between 2015 and 2019 with a minimum 2year clinical and radiographic follow-up were identified. A KSR construct includes a more laterally placed iliac screw and additional rod that effectively depresses the ipsilateral ilium/pelvis for coronal correction, while serving as a buttress to prevent future loss of correction. Outcomes included revision for instrumentation-related complications, radiographic alignment, and PROs. Twenty patients were included with a mean age of 54years [range: 20-73years]. Mean follow-up time was 2.5years [range: 2.0-5.0]. Mean number of levels fused was 17.3 [range: 10-24]. There were significant improvements in coronal alignment (CVA: 5.8cm ± 2.6cm vs. 1.7cm ± 1.5cm), sagittal alignment (SVA: 5.6cm ± 5.9cm vs. 1.6cm ± 2.5cm) and major Cobb angle (55º ± 32 vs. 26º ± 21) maintained at 2 years (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an asymptomatic fracture at the shank of the KSR iliac screw. There were significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index and SRS-22 domains (p < 0.05). The KSR technique is a safe and effective method for correcting coronal malalignment in complex spinal deformity patients with no revisions specific for the KSR or iliac screw and significantly improved PROs at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Rehabilitation and functional outcomes in internally braced and standard ACL reconstructions

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, with and without internal bracing, at 1–3, 4–7, and 8–12 months of postoperative physical therapy. Previous studies show that ACL reconstruction with internal bracing allows earlier and more aggressive rehabilitation. Therefore, it was hypothesized that patients with internal bracing would display superior surgical recovery compared to ACL reconstruction alone after adjusting for length of physical therapy.1–3 MethodsPatients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Demographics including age, gender, use of internal bracing, and pre-operative level of activity were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using KOOS scores. Results46 patients underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2013 and December 2015. The mean age was 31.53 ± 8.37 years. Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported similar improvement in KOOS scores (mean = 42.82 ± 15.44; median = 46.39 [34.52–51.80]) compared to ACL reconstruction alone (mean = 38.18 ± 19.91; median = 40.17 [29.49–53.90]) (p = 0.475). Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported comparable improvement to ACL reconstruction alone at 0–3 months (Internal bracing: mean = 35.39 ± 15.26, median = 40.45 [26.49–47.73]; No internal bracing: mean = 42.51 ± 12.33, median = 39.32 [35.69–52.94], p = 0.4113), 4–7 months (Internal bracing: 41.96 ± 14.49, 45.55 [33.94–52.68]; No internal bracing: 30.64 ± 32.29, 41.65 [26.17–46.12], p = 0.7491) and 8+ months groups (Internal bracing: 63.36 ± 13.06, 63.36 [58.74–67.98]; No internal bracing: 47.05 ± 10.14, 47.05 [43.46–50.63]) (p = 0.6985). ConclusionThis study demonstrates no statistical difference in functional outcome scores when comparing patients with internally braced ACL reconstruction compared to standard reconstruction. Therefore, the increased structural support provided by use of internal bracing in ACL reconstruction does not afford to quicker improvement in patient-reported recovery.

Standalone cage versus anchored cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

The use of standalone cages (SAC) and anchored cages (AC) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery (ACDF) has shown advantage of reduced operative time and lower incidence of dysphagia. However, there is limited literature available comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of SAC and AC. We conducted a prospective study for patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Patient were classified based on the cage used into SAC group and the AC group. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) for myelopathy and Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for radiculopathy. Dysphagia was graded as per Bazaz score. Radiologically, global cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis, cage subsidence, and migration were assessed. We analyzed 31 patients in each group with a minimum twoyear follow-up. The mean VAS improved from 7.9 to 4.56, mean NDI score improved from 27.6 to 19.8, and mean mJOA improved from 10.8 to 11.7 which were statistically significant (p < 0.05); however, no significant difference was noted between the SAC and AC groups. Mean global lordosis improved from 14.4 to 20.3° and mean segmental lordosis improved from 6 to 10.1° at sixmonths and plateaued to 6.9° at final follow up without any significant difference between the groups. The subsidence was statistically more in 12.9% (4/31) in SAC than 6.4% (2/31) in AC. AC showed of lower rates of subsidence while both SAC and AC had comparable clinical outcomes and radiological alignment outcomes.

Paper 57: Labral Tear Management in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Study Comparing Labral Reconstruction to Labral Repair with Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up. *ACCEPTED TO AJSM*

Objectives:To report minimum two-year patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, survivorship, and secondary surgeries, in patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction compared to a propensity-matched primary labral repair group.Methods:Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent a primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome from January 2014 to June 2018. Patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent a labral reconstruction or a labral repair and had preoperative and minimum two-year PROs for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were included. Patients with prior ipsilateral hip conditions and surgery, Tonnis grade > 1, hip dysplasia, or worker’s compensation status were excluded. Patients in the reconstruction group were propensity-matched 1:2 to patients in the repair group based on age, sex, and body mass index. Secondary surgeries and the achievement of the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and maximum outcome improvement (MOI) were recorded.Results:Fifty-three and 106 hips were included in the labral reconstruction and repair groups, respectively. The average follow-up time was 37.6 months. The average age for the reconstruction and repair groups were 48.01 ± 5.4 years and 48.61 ± 6.0 years, respectively. Both groups achieved significant improvements in all PROs at minimum two-years with similar achievements of MCID, PASS, and MOI. Both groups showed comparable secondary surgeries rates.Conclusions:Patients aged 40 years and older who received primary labral repair and primary labral reconstruction, achieved similar significant improvements in all PROs, VAS pain, and patient satisfaction at minimum two-year follow-up, with comparable rates of secondary surgeries and achieving MCID, PASS, and MOI. Based on these findings, labral repair remains the gold standard treatment for viable labrum in this population group, while reconstruction is a useful alternative for irreparable labrum.

Poster 230: A Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in High-Risk Adolescents Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes

Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with a modified Lemaire technique (MLT) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children and adolescents at increased risk for failed ACLR.Methods:A consecutive series of patients ≤19 years who underwent simultaneous ACLR and LET with minimum two-year follow-up data were reviewed. Patients were indicated for LET when one or more of the following risk factors were present: participant in high-risk competitive sport such as football, lacrosse, soccer or basketball, grade 3 pivot shift, hyperlaxity (Beighton score > 6), recurvatum, revision ACLR, contralateral ACLR, or chronic ACL insufficiency. ACLR was performed using either full-thickness quadriceps tendon (QUAD) for skeletally immature patients or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft for skeletally mature patients. All-epiphyseal (AE) or complete transphyseal (CT) techniques were used depending on patients’ skeletal maturity. At a minimum two-year follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC), and the HSS Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) scores. Return-to-sport (RTS) data and second surgeries were also obtained.Results:Sixty-one consecutive patients (mean age 15.17 ±1.73 years, range 11-19 years, 62% female) were analyzed (Table 1). 59 patients (97%) participated in organized sports including soccer, basketball, football and lacrosse, with soccer being the most popular one. The average grade at the time of surgery was 9th grade. Ten patients (16%) were revision ACLR procedures. Seven (11%) patients underwent AE and 54 (89%) underwent CT ACLR. Forty-two (69%) cases employed a QUAD autograft, while 19 (31%) utilized a BTB autograft. All patients underwent a LET with a MLT and 2 patients underwent simultaneous implant mediated guided growth with a plate for structural genu valgum. At two-year follow-up, mean SANE score was 95, median Pedi-IKDC score was 91, and median HSS-Pedi Fabs score was 27. RTS rate was 91.8%. Ten patients had subsequent surgical procedures, including two hardware removal procedures for hemiepiphysiodesis, three contralateral ACLR, three meniscus surgeries, one lysis of adhesions, and one revision ACLR for BTB graft re-rupture. Two patients were lost to follow-up and excluded from the study.Conclusions:The findings suggest that concomitant LET and ACLR in adolescent patients with risk factors for failed ACLR is associated with favorable patient-reported outcomes, high return to sports participation, and low ACL re-rupture rate at two years follow-up.Table 1.Patient Demographics and Surgical Characteristics.

Guided growth versus varus osteotomy for type II avascular necrosis following surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of guided growth and varus osteotomy in treating Kalamchi type II avascular necrosis (AVN) after open reduction and Pemberton acetabuloplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This retrospective study reviewed patients undergoing guided growth or varus osteotomy for Kalamchi type II AVN between September 2009 and January 2019. All children who had undergone open reduction and Pemberton acetabuloplasty for DDH with a minimum two-year follow-up were enrolled in the study. Demographic and radiological data, which included the head-shaft angle (HSA), neck-shaft angle (NSA), articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), Sharp angle (SA), and lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) at baseline, two years, and at the extended follow-up, were compared. Revision rates were evaluated. Clinical outcomes using the Harris Hip Score were assessed two years postoperatively. A total of 24 patients underwent guided growth and 19 underwent varus osteotomy, over a mean period of 3.3 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8 to 3.8) and 5.2 years (95% CI 4.5 to 6.0), respectively. There were no differences in demographic and preoperative radiological data, except for a younger age at time of acetabuloplasty and larger ATD for the osteotomy group. The HSA did not differ at two years and the extended follow-up because of postoperative rebound in the osteotomy group. The NSA of the osteotomy group remained smaller postoperatively. There were no significant differences in the follow-up ATD, SA, and LCEA, except for a smaller two-year ATD of the osteotomy group. Seven patients (29.2%) in the guided growth group underwent revision surgery and none in the osteotomy group. The Harris Hip Score was similar between groups. Guided growth and varus osteotomy had comparable results in improving caput valgum deformity, given the rebound of lateral tilting of the physis after osteotomy correction. There were no differences in clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(7):902-908.

Paper 47: Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Femoral Acetabular Impingement Syndrome and Acetabular Retroversion: A 3D Analysis

Objectives:To use computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) bone models to (1) quantify acetabular version in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) explore the relationship between the magnitude of acetabular version and clinical outcomes following hip arthroscopy.Methods:Preoperative CT scans were acquired in 105 consecutive patients prior to hip arthroscopy for FAIS, of which 84 (80.0%) completed minimum two-year patient reported outcomes. 3D models of the pelvis and femur were generated by semi-automated segmentation, and aligned to a standard coordinate system. Acetabular version was quantified at the 12, 2, and 3 o’clock position. (Figure I) Acetabular version classifications were based on the version at the 3 o’clock position, and were defined as follows: acetabular retroversion (AR [<15°]), normal acetabular version (NV [15°-25°]), and acetabular anteversion (AA [>25°]). Patient demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes including the Hip Outcome Score – Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score – Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction were analyzed.Results:Mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients was 33.9±12.6 years and 26.0±5.4 kg/m2, respectively, while 70.2% were female. The average acetabular version at 12, 2, and 3 o’clock for the study cohort was 9.3° ± 9.3°, 12.3° ± 7.4°, and 20.9° ± 5.7°, respectively (Figure II). After stratification based on the magnitude of acetabular anteversion at the 3 o’clock position, the number of patients and the average torsion within each group were as follows: AR (n=12; 11.3°±2.7°), NT (n=56; 20.7°±2.9°), AA (n=16; 28.5°±2.7°) (Figure III). At minimum two-year follow-up, significant between group differences in mHHS, iHOT-12, VAS for pain and satisfaction (P < 0.05) were appreciated (Table I). Post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.0167) found lower scores on mHHS, iHOT-12, VAS for pain and satisfaction in patients with AR compared to NV (Table I). Lower VAS for satisfaction scores were reported in patients with AR when compared to AA (P = 0.006), but not mHHS (0.023), iHOT-12 (0.032), or VAS for pain (0.072) (Table I).Conclusions:Patients with AR reported inferior outcomes when compared to patients with NV and AA following hip arthroscopy for FAIS.

Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty : a multicentre study.

AimsThe aim of this study was to report patient and clinical outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) at multiple institutions with a minimum two-year follow-up.MethodsThis was a multicentre registry study from October 2016 to June 2021 that included 861 primary RA-TKA patients who completed at least one pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire, including Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and pain out of 100 points. The mean age was 67 years (35 to 86), 452 were male (53%), mean BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (19 to 58), and 553 (64%) cemented and 308 (36%) cementless implants.ResultsThere were significant improvements in PROMs over time between preoperative, one- to two-year, and > two-year follow-up, with a mean FJS of 17.5 (SD 18.2), 70.2 (SD 27.8), and 76.7 (SD 25.8; p < 0.001); mean KOOS JR of 51.6 (SD 11.5), 85.1 (SD 13.8), and 87.9 (SD 13.0; p < 0.001); and mean pain scores of 65.7 (SD 20.4), 13.0 (SD 19.1), and 11.3 (SD 19.9; p < 0.001), respectively. There were eight superficial infections (0.9%) and four revisions (0.5%).ConclusionRA-TKA demonstrated consistent clinical results across multiple institutions with excellent PROMs that continued to improve over time. With the ability to achieve target alignment in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and provide intraoperative real-time data to obtain balanced gaps, RA-TKA demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and PROMs in this patient population.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):589–595.

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in patients with cerebral palsy after hip surgery-incidence and impact on quality of life.

This study investigated the incidence of AVN in patients with cerebral palsy who underwent a hip reconstruction surgery (soft tissue release, femur and pelvic osteotomies) and its impact on quality of life. Retrospective study, with clinical and radiographic analysis of 104 patients (128 hips) GMFCS IV and V with a minimum twoyear follow-up. Reimers migration percentage, the amount of abduction, acetabular index, and the neck-shaft angle were collected before and after surgery. Modified Tönnis classification was used to analyze the hips before surgery, and the Bucholz and Ogden classification was used to identify hips with AVN. Function and quality of life were investigated with the CPCHILD questionnaire after surgery. The mean age of participants at surgery was 120.1months (72-184), and it was not related with AVN (p = 0.946). AVN signs were observed in 62 hips (48.5%). The mean pre-op Reimers value was 68.7% (16-100) in normal hips and 83.1% (0-100) in hips with AVN (p = 0.003). All hips considered as Tönnis IV before surgery developed AVN (p = 0.006). The amount of abduction did not differ between hips that developed AVN and those that did not (p = 0.313). Patients who developed AVN had lower scores of quality of life (p = 0.023) and comfort (p = 0.025) according to the CPCHILD questionnaire. We observed a relationship between the greater pre-operative severity according to the Reimers index and the modified Tonnis classification and the development of AVN.

Postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with large thoracic curve (Cobb angle ≥ 70 degrees): a radiographic study

BackgroundLarge amounts of thoracic curve correction had been considered as a risk factor for postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aims to evaluate postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke type 1 AIS patients with large thoracic curve (Cobb angle ≥ 70 degrees) and compared it with those with moderate thoracic curve (Cobb angle < 70 degrees).MethodsA total of 47 Lenke type 1 AIS patients underwent posterior correction surgery between Sept. 2016 to Nov. 2018 in our institution were included. All these patient were divided into 2 groups based on the severity of main thoracic (MT) curve. Group A consisted of 25 cases with MT curve equal to or more than 70 degree while Group B consisted of 22 cases with MT curve less than 70 degree. Proximal thoracic (PT) Cobb angle, MT Cobb angle, MT apical vertebral translation (AVT), T2-T5 kyphosis, T5-T12 kyphosis, and radiographic shoulder height (RSH) were compared between these 2 groups preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at a minimum of two-year follow-up.ResultsAlthough all the correction of PT Cobb angle (15.8° ± 6.0° vs 12.5° ± 3.6°, P = 0.028), that of MT Cobb angle 47.3° ± 9.1° vs 30.9° ± 6.7°, P < 0.001) and that of MT AVT (35.1 mm ± 16.0 mm vs 24.1 mm ± 8.9 mm, P = 0.007) were significantly larger in Group A when compared with Group B, RSH was comparable between these 2 groups at last follow up (7.5 mm ± 7.4 mm vs 9.2 mm ± 4.2 mm P = 0.363). Most of the patients gained satisfactory shoulder balance with only 7 cases with minimal PSI in group A (28%) and only 6 cases with minimal PSI in group B (27.3%) at last follow-up (P > 0.05).ConclusionsAlthough Lenke type 1 AIS patients with large thoracic curve had more amounts of MT curve correction when compared with those with moderate thoracic curve, it did not lead to higher incidence of PSI if the correction rate is proper.

Clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasties: a systematic review

BackgroundOver the last decade, cementless total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated improved outcomes and survivorship due to advances in technologies of implant design, manufacturing capabilities, and biomaterials. Due to increasing interest in cementless implant design for TKA, our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes and revision rates of the Triathlon Total Knee system over the past decade.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with cementless Triathalon Total Knee System implants. Patients had a minimum of two-year follow-up and data included clinical outcome scores and survivorship data.ResultsTwenty studies were included in the final analysis. The survivability of the Stryker Triathlon TKA due to all causes was 98.7%, with an aseptic survivability of 99.2%. The overall revision incidence per 1,000 person-years was 3.4. Re-revision incidence per 1,000 person-years was 2.2 for infection, and 1.3 for aseptic loosening. The average KSS for pain was 92.2 and the average KSS for function was 82.7.ConclusionsThis systematic review demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship at a mean time of 3.8 years. Additional research is necessary to examine the long-term success of the Stryker Triathlon TKA and the use of cementless TKAs in obese and younger populations.Level of evidenceIII.

Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Component in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: AClinical, Radiological, and Biomechanical Study.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a procedure with low morbidity and fast recovery. Anatomic implants or robotic-assisted UKA has been proposed to improve outcomes with precise positioning. Femoral component position (FCP) relative to the tibial insert could be a factor influencing the contact stresses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FCP relative to the tibial insert on clinical outcomes and stress distribution after medial UKA. Sixty-two medial fixed-bearing UKAs were evaluated at a minimum two-year follow-up using the Knee Society Score. Postoperative radiological evaluation performed on frontal X-rays classified the FCP relative to the tibial insert into the following: group M (medial), group C (central), and group L (lateral). A finite element model was developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the FCP relative to the tibial component. The postoperative radiological evaluation showed 9 cases in group M, 46 cases in group C, and 7 cases in group L. The maximum knee flexion angle and the 2-year postoperative "symptom" and "patient satisfaction" scores of the Knee Society Score were significantly higher in group C. Compared with central positioning, a shift along the mediolateral axis leads to a displacement of the contact pressure center. The FCP relative to the tibial insert may increase patient outcomes at a minimum follow-up of two years after fixed-bearing medial UKA. Accordance between FCP and contact stresses on the polyethylene insert could be a contributing factor of long-term survival of UKA.

Quadriceps tendon vs hamstring autograft in primary ACL reconstruction - a comparative study with minimum two-year follow-up.

Recently there has been growing interest in the quadriceps tendon (QUAD) as a valid option for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR). The aims of the study is to compare the outcomes achieved in anatomic ACLR involving QUAD vs. Hamstring (HT) autografts. A total of 52 consecutive patients underwent an ACLR, 25 patients with QUAD graft and 27 with HT graft. The same surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. The following parameters were evaluated: functional status (Lysholm, Tegner, subjective IKDC scores), joint stability (Lachman and pivot shift tests), surgical reoperation rate, complications, degree of satisfaction and return to previous level of activity. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the Student's t-test. Forty four patients were evaluated (20 QUAD, 24 HT), with a mean follow-up of 27.4 months. Two patients were re-operated in the QUAD group (including one ACL revision), and one patient in the HT group required an ACL revision. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative scores: Lysholm (96.05 vs. 96.05), IKDC (86.2 vs. 91.2) and Tegner (6 vs. 5) scales. The percentage of negative Lachman and pivot shift tests was similar in the two groups (45% vs. 50% and 40% vs. 45.8%, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups in the degree of satisfaction (95.8% vs. 80%, p = .16) or in the percentage who returned to their previous level of activity (62.5% vs. 45%, p = .17). The use of a QUAD graft in ACL reconstruction leads to similar clinical and functional outcomes to those obtained with HT.

Mid-term outcomes of the Wagner Cone Prosthesis™ stem for developmental dysplasia of the hip: minimum twoyear follow-up.

Treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requires a technically demanding total hip arthroplasty (THA) reconstruction. In patients with DDH, prostheses can be difficult to implant and often face the risk of fracture, mismatch, and loosening. The Wagner Cone Prosthesis™ is a tapered, conical stem which can improve treatment success in this population. We look at midterm survivorship and outcomes of THA for DDH using the Wagner Cone Prosthesis™. We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients (33 hips) with DDH undergoing THA using the Wagner Cone Prosthesis™ between January 2008 and January 2020. Ten, nine, and fourteen included patients were classified as Hartofilakidis A, B, and C, respectively. Survivorship according to Kaplan-Meier analysis was the primary outcome, with re-operation and revision as endpoints. The Oxford hip score (OHS) was used to assess clinical outcome. We used multivariate analysis to determine predictors of poor outcomes. The average follow-up was 4.6years, with a minimum of twoyears. Kaplan-Meier survivorship over the 13-year study period was 93.9 ± 4.2% for all-cause revision as an endpoint and 96.9 ± 3.1% for stem revisions only. The overall reoperation rate was 6.1%, with periprosthetic fracture and dislocation being reasons for re-operation. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening, and no patients were revised for subsidence. OHS improved from 19.3 ± 9.6 (4-39) pre-operatively to 37.6 ± 8.4 (19-48) at latest follow-up (p < 0.05). In patients with DDH, THA with the Wagner Cone Prosthesis™ demonstrates excellent clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported functional outcomes at midterm follow-up.

Paper 13: None: Clinical Outcomes of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Non-Throwing Athletes

Objectives:Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery continues to improve since its inception by Dr. Frank Jobe in 1974. There is now ample data on the outcomes of surgery for throwing athletes, such as baseball players, who undergo either UCL reconstruction or UCL repair. In comparison, there is very little available data regarding outcomes of UCL surgery for non-throwing athletes who are seeking similar benefit from the procedure. The primary objective of this study is to provide clinical outcomes of UCL surgery performed in non-throwing athletes at a single institution with a minimum two-year follow-up.Methods:Forty non-throwing athletes who underwent UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction) between 2011 and 2019 were identified. All surgeries were performed by one of three fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons at our institution utilizing a uniform technique for repair or reconstruction. Demographics were recorded including age, sex, laterality, arm dominance, sport, level of competition, and type of surgery (UCL repair or reconstruction). Outcomes included return to play (rate and average time), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications.Results:Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) were available for evaluation with a minimum two-year follow-up consisting of 16 males (43%) and 21 females (57%). Mean age at the time of surgery was 18±3.7 years.28 UCL repairs (76%) and 9 UCL reconstructions (24%) were performed.Sports included football (n=11), gymnastics (11), cheerleading (7), wrestling (4), volleyball (2), basketball (1), and acrobatics (1). Quarterbacks were excluded from the football patients as quarterbacks are throwing athletes. Level of competition included youth (1), high school (26), college (8), and professional (2).Return to play rate was 93% (26 of 28) at a mean of 7.4 months for UCL repair, and 100% (9 of 9) at a mean of 10 months for UCL reconstruction.Mean ASES scores were 94.4 and 98.7 for UCL repair and reconstruction, respectively.Two Patients in the UCL repair group required ulnar neurolysis and revision ulnar nerve transposition.Conclusions:Both UCL reconstruction and UCL repair show favorable outcomes at minimum two-year follow-up in non-throwing athletes.93% or greater returned to play with good functional outcomes and minimal complications.Table 1.Patient CharacteristicsTable 2.Outcomes Comparison

Paper 02: A Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in High Risk Adolescents Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes

Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with a modified Lemaire technique (MLT) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children and adolescents at increased risk for failed ACLR.Methods:A consecutive series of patients ≤19 years who underwent simultaneous ACLR and LET with minimum two-year follow-up data were reviewed. Patients were indicated for LET when one or more of the following risk factors were present: participant in high-risk competitive sport such as football, lacrosse, soccer or basketball, grade 3 pivot shift, hyperlaxity (Beighton score > 6), recurvatum, revision ACLR, contralateral ACLR, or chronic ACL insufficiency. ACLR was performed using either full-thickness quadriceps tendon (QUAD) for skeletally immature patients or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft for skeletally mature patients. All-epiphyseal (AE) or complete transphyseal (CT)techniques were used depending on patients’ skeletal maturity. At a minimum two-year follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC), and the HSS Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) scores. Return-to-sport (RTS)data and second surgeries were also obtained.Results:Sixty-one consecutive patients (mean age 15.17 ±1.73 years, range 11-19 years, 62% female) were analyzed (Table 1). 59 patients (97%) participated in organized sports including soccer, basketball, football and lacrosse, with soccer being the most popular one. The average grade at the time of surgery was 9th grade. Ten patients (16%) were revision ACLR procedures. Seven (11%) patients underwent AE and 54 (89%) underwent CT ACLR. Forty-two (69%) cases employed a QUAD autograft, while 19 (31%) utilized a BTB autograft. All patients underwent a LET with a MLT and 2 patients underwent simultaneous implant mediated guided growth with a plate for structural genu valgum. At two-year follow-up, mean SANE score was 95, median Pedi-IKDC score was 91, and median HSS-Pedi Fabs score was 27. RTS rate was 91.8%. Ten patients had subsequent surgical procedures, including two hardware removal procedures for hemiepiphysiodesis, three contralateral ACLR, three meniscus surgeries, one lysis of adhesions, and one revision ACLR for BTB graft re-rupture. Two patients were lost to follow-up and excluded from the study.Conclusions:The findings suggest that concomitant LET and ACLR in adolescent patients with risk factors for failed ACLR is associated with favorable patient-reported outcomes, high return to sports participation, and low ACL re-rupture rate at two years follow-up.