Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Research Articles

Depressed patients with greater symptom duration before MIS-TLIF do not report inferior outcomes.

Patients with preoperative depressive symptoms may demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The effect of preoperative symptom duration (SD) on PROs in this population has not been well-studied. We aim to assess the influence of preoperative SD on PROs in patients with low mental health scores prior to minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Patients who had undergone elective, primary MIS-TLIF with preoperative SF-12 MCS score below 45.6, a previously established threshold for depression, were selected. Patients were divided into matched lesser duration (LD; SD<365 days) and greater duration (GD; SD≥365 days) cohorts. PROs were collected preoperatively and at 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year postoperative periods. PROs included PROMIS-PF/ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS. PROs were compared within and between groups. Rates of achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were compared between groups. One hundred twenty-two patients were included after matching cohorts. Patients in the LD cohort demonstrated improvement in PROMIS-PF at 12-weeks/6-month/1-year, and ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS at all postoperative periods (p≤0.024, all). Patients in the GD cohort demonstrated improvement in PROMIS-PF at 12-weeks/6-month/1-year, and ODI/VAS back/VAS leg/SF-12 MCS at all postoperative periods (p≤0.013, all). There were no differences in PROs or MCID achievement between cohorts at any period. Patients with preoperative depressive symptoms undergoing MIS-TLIF, regardless of duration of preoperative symptoms, demonstrated improvements in physical function, disability, pain, and mental health domains. Patients with greater duration of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior outcomes at any period. Rates of clinically important improvements in all domains were favorable and similar between cohorts.

Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders.

Since 2015, we have performed minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 for various lumbosacral spine disorders using percutaneous pedicle screws. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF at L5/S1 and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single to multilevel degenerative lumbosacral disorders. A total of 124 patients underwent either OLIF (62 cases) or MIS-TLIF (62 cases). The applied disorders were L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration, a combination of L4/5 and L5/S1 pathology, and others. We performed OLIF with posterior percutaneous fixation in the same lateral position. MIS-TLIF was performed with modified cortical bone trajectory screws. The operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (%),Visual Analog Scale (VAS), fusion rate, radiologic segmental alignment, and complications were evaluated. The average follow-up periods were 51 and 69 months (24-95) in the OLIF and MIS-TLIF groups, respectively. Furthermore, the average fused segments were 1.6 and 1.5 in each group, respectively. The OT and EBL per segment were 130 min and 56 mL and 100 min and 64 mL, respectively. The JOABPEQ effectiveness rate in the OLIF group demonstrated a statistically higher value in the domains of pain, low-back function, and gait than the MIS-TLIF group (P<0.01). The follow-up VAS of low-back pain (LBP) and lower extremity numbness had lower values in the OLIF group (P<0.05). The fusion rates were 98% and 90%, respectively. Segmental lordosis at L5/S1 was significantly larger in the OLIF group (15° vs. 11°, P<0.01). The OLIF group demonstrated less pain as well as better low-back and gait functions at follow-up. The minimally invasive anterolateral fusion employing OLIF at L5/S1 using percutaneous screws serves as a viable and effective procedure with less residual LBP and high fusion rate.

Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis.

The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model. In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis.

Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Surgical Microscope vs Surgical Loupes: A Comparative Study.

Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is an effective procedure for lumbar spine diseases. The procedure can be done using a surgical microscope (SM) or surgical loupes (SL) magnification. However, there are no studies that compared outcomes between using these 2 magnifying devices in the MIS-TLIF procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and radiographic parameters of MIS-TLIF using SM compared with SL magnification. We included all patients undergoing 1-level MIS-TLIF between January 2017 and December 2019. Type of magnification (SM vs SL), operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, and fusion rates were analyzed. Clinical outcomes measurement using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared between groups. A total of 100 patients had underwent MIS-TLIF (SM group: 62; SL group: 38). Operative time (SM: 182.7 ± 41.5 vs SL: 165.6 ± 32.6 minutes, P = 0.043) was significantly shorter in the SL group, with a mean difference of 17.2 minutes and a 10.4% increase in operative time between SL and SM. Blood loss (SM: 187.4 ± 176.4 vs SL: 215.6 ± 99.4 mL, P = 0.36) was not different between groups, with a mean difference of 28.2 mL. Both the SM group and SL group demonstrated no significant differences in improvement from baseline in VAS back, VAS legs, ODI score, and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal. There was also no significant difference in complication rates and fusion rates between groups. Our study found no difference between intraoperative use of SL compared with SM in clinical outcomes through the 12-month follow-up timepoint. However, the use of SM resulted in an increased average operative time of 17 minutes compared with the SL group. Intraoperative use of SM and SL magnification in MIS-TLIF provides similar outcomes except prolonged operative time in the SM group.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at Lumbosacral Spine.

Background Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) has been considered as a serious complication from changes in the biological stress pattern after spinal fusion. The sagittal balance significantly associated with lumbar loading is largely dependent on L5-S1 segment. However, the evidence indicating risk factors for radiological and symptomatic ASD after minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) remains insufficient. Methods This single-central retrospective study recruited patients with lumbosacral degeneration receiving MIS-TLIF at the L5-S1 level from January 2015 to December 2018. The targeted variables included demographic information, radiological indicators, surgery-related parameters, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) extracted from the electronic medical system by natural language processing. In these patients, a minimum of 3-year follow-up was done. After reviewing the preoperative and postoperative follow-up digital radiographs, patients were assigned to radiological ASD group (disc height narrowing ≥3 mm, progressive slipping ≥3 mm, angular motion >10°, and osteophyte formation >3 mm), symptomatic ASD group, and control group. We identified potential predictors for radiological and symptomatic ASD with the service of stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results Among the 157 consecutive patients treated with MIS-TLIF in our department, 16 cases (10.2%) were diagnosed with radiological ASD at 3-year follow-up. The clinical evaluation did not reveal suspicious risk factors, but several significant differences were confirmed in radiological indicators. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed postoperative PI, postoperative DA, and ∆PI-LL in radiological ASD group were significantly different from those in control group. Nevertheless, for patients diagnosed with simultaneously radiological and symptomatic ASD, postoperative DA and postoperative PT as risk factors significantly affected the clinical outcome following MIS-TLIF. Conclusion In this study, while approximately 10% of lumbosacral degenerations develop radiographic ASD, prognosis-related symptomatic ASD was shown not to be a frequent postoperative complication. Postoperative PI, postoperative DA, and mismatched PI-LL are risk factors for radiological ASD, and postoperative DA and postoperative PT are responsible for the occurrence of symptomatic ASD following MIS-TLIF. These radiological risk factors demonstrate that restoration of normal sagittal balance is an effective measure to optimize treatment strategies for secondary ASD prevention.

Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Analysis of magnetic resonance image (MRI) quality after open (Op)-transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF with the implantation of structurally different systems has not previously been performed. The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the postoperative MRI following MI and Op one-segment TLIF. Material and Methods: The nonrandomized retrospective single-center study included 80 patients (46 men and 24 women) aged 48 + 14.2 years. In group I (n = 20) Op-TLIF with open transpedicular screw fixation (TSF) was performed, in II group (n = 60), the MI-TLIF technique was used: IIa (n = 20)—rigid interspinous stabilizer; IIb (n = 20)—unilateral TSF and contralateral facet fixation; IIc (n = 20)—bilateral TSF. Results: Comparison of the quality of postoperative imaging in IIa and IIb subgroups showed fewer MRI artifacts and a significantly greater MR deterioration after Op and MI TSF. Comparison of the multifidus muscle area showed less atrophy after MI-TLIF and significantly greater atrophy after Op-TLIF. Conclusion: MI-TLIF and Op-TLIF with TSF have comparable postoperative MR artifacts at the operative level, with a greater degree of muscle atrophy using the Op-TLIF. Rigid interspinous implant and unilateral TSF with contralateral facet fixation have less artifacts and changes in the multifidus muscle area.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Technical tips, learning curve, short-term clinical outcome, and brief review.

Background:Current trends in spine surgeries have shifted to minimally invasive procedures. Minimally invasive approaches are getting more popular for lumbar interbody fusion procedures.Objectives:The objective of the study was to report technical modifications, learning curve, and short-term clinical results in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MITLIF).Materials and Methods:All MITLIF cases performed from 2018 July to March 2020 were included. First three authors were operating surgeons. Visual analog scores (VAS) scoring for pain, Macnab criteria, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used for outcome assessment. Operating time, radiation exposure, and complications were assessed separately in a group of 20 as per time sequence in series to assess the learning curve.Results:A total of 61 patients were included. Various indications included spondylolisthesis, failed back surgery, calcified lumbar disc, and spondylodiscitis. Mean age was 47.08 ± 12.06. Intraoperative blood loss was 97.04 ± 25.58. Mean operating time and number of C-arm shots were 190.75 ± 37.11 and 159.3 ± 74.54, respectively, in initial 20 cases which however reduced in later operated cases. Significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores was observed at follow-up of 6.34 ± 4.67 months. Three cases needed surgical revision in the initial 20 cases, and there were no revision surgeries in later operated cases.Conclusion:MITLIF could be done in failed back surgery cases, spondylodiscitis, and deformity corrections in addition to spondylolisthesis. It has advantages of less injury to soft tissues, maintaining the posterior tension band, decrease in blood loss and hospital stays, and early mobilization. However, it has longer learning curve and takes minimum 20 cases for the surgeon to acquire reasonable experience and confidence.

Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

BackgroundThe lateral interbody fusion (LIF) has gained popularity for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), however, LIF often requires the position change for posterior screwing. We have performed the single-position lateral surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior screwing (OLIF-LPF). The present study compared the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF-LPF and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). MethodsA total of 142 patients underwent either OLIF-LPF (92 cases) or MIS-TLIF (50 cases) for L3 or L4 DS. The average age was 72 and 70 years old, respectively. The OLIF-LPF was performed in right decubitus position with allograft and percutaneous modified cortical bone trajectory screws (mCBT). The MIS-TLIF utilized a single 4 cm midline incision, allograft, boomerang cage and mCBTs. The operation time, estimated blood loss, and serum CRP levels were recorded. JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (%), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), fusion rate, segmental radiologic alignment, and complications were also evaluated. ResultsAverage follow-up period was 31 and 57 months in OLIF-LPF and MIS-TLIF, respectively. The average operation time and estimated blood loss were 108min, 51 ml and 104 min and 69 ml, respectively. OLIF-LPF demonstrated significantly higher values of mental health domain of JOABPEQ effectiveness rate and VAS improvement of leg pain than those in MIS-TLIF. The less correction loss of posterior disc height was demonstrated in OLIF-LPF. The fusion rate and symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) were statistically equivalent between two groups. ConclusionsThe single-position surgery of OLIF combined with posterior screwing serves as a safe, minimally invasive and effective surgical modality without the need of position change. It provides comparable fusion rate, segmental radiologic alignment, and symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration to MIS-TLIF surgery.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion.

Study Design:Narrative review.Objectives:In this review, we address the question of whether the literature supports the notion that minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) improves outcome as compared with open TLIF (open-TLIF). Short and long-term outcomes, fusion rate, and cost-effectiveness were reviewed.Methods:This is a narrative review using various databases. Open-TLIF and MIS-TLIF studies were included and posterior lumbar interbody fusion studies were excluded. A description of paramedian incision in surgical technique was essential to the definition of MIS-TLIF. The present review included 14 prospective observational studies and 6 randomized controlled trials.Results:With short-term outcomes, some studies indicate a better outcome with MIS-TLIF regarding intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, time to ambulation, postoperative narcotic use, and time to resume work. Both MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF surgeries improved Oswestry Disability Index, back pain, and leg pain. Some studies show that MIS-TLIF resulted in lower back pain than open-TLIF. Radiation exposure was higher with MIS-TLIF. In the longer term, clinical outcomes were improved in both MIS and open TLIF groups. Fusion rates were more than 90% in both MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF. Cost-effectiveness and length of surgery had mixed results.Conclusions:The potential benefits of MIS-TLIF might be present in the early recovery period after surgery. Long-term outcomes were similar with both MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion using 3-Dimensional Total Navigation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

This video demonstrates the workflow of a minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) using a portable intraoperative CT (iCT) scanner, (Airo®, Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany), combined with state-of-the-art total 3D computer navigation. The navigation is used not only for instrumentation but also for intraoperative planning throughout the procedure, inserting the cage, therefore, completely eliminating the need for fluoroscopy. In this video, we present a case of a 72-yr-old female patient with a history of lower back pain, right lower extremity radicular pain and weakness for 2 yr due to L4-L5 spondylolisthesis with instability and severe lumbar spinal stenosis. The patient is treated by a L4-L5 unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) and MIS-TLIF. MIS-TLIF using total 3D navigation significantly improves the workflow of the conventional TLIF procedure. The tailored access to the spine is translated into smaller but more efficient surgical corridors. This modification in a "total navigation" modality minimizes the staff radiation exposure to 0 by navigating in real time over iCT obtained images that can be acquired while the surgical staff is protected or outside the OR. Furthermore, this technique makes real-time and virtual intraoperative imaging of screws and their planned trajectory feasible. 3D Navigation eliminates the need for K-Wires, thus decreasing the risk of vascular penetration injury due to K-Wire malpositioning. 3D navigation can also predict the positioning of the interbody cage, thereby, decreasing the risk of malpositioning or subsidence. Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure.

Reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis with a long tab percutaneous pedicle screw system: "swing" technique.

OBJECTIVEWith the development of minimally invasive procedures, percutaneous pedicle screw systems have been used to attempt to correct spondylolisthesis. No previous studies have reported on reduction measures using long tab percutaneous pedicle screws for spondylolisthesis. Additional intraoperative correction has been proposed with the "swing" technique. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of standard minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with the efficacy of MIS-TLIF with the "swing" technique (MIS-TLIF and swing) in lumbar spondylolisthesis.METHODSThis was a matched-control study and included 30 consecutive patients who were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Of those patients, 15 were treated with operative reduction via MIS-TLIF with the "swing" technique, whereas the other 15 were treated with the standard MIS-TLIF procedure. The swing technique is a new reduction procedure for use with long tab percutaneous screws. In the swing technique, the entire system is swung back and forth several times after all constructs are placed. Only patients with Meyerding grade I or II lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in the study (18 with grade I and 12 with grade II). Perioperative and clinical outcomes, radiological parameters (Meyerding grade, percentage of slip, slip correction rate, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis) were compared between groups at 6 months after surgery.RESULTSDemographic data did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Postoperative clinical outcomes showed significant improvement in both groups. Postoperative radiological parameters showed that the degree of spondylolisthesis (swing: 4.7% vs standard: 8.9%) and reduction rate (swing: 77.3% vs standard: 57.1%) favored the swing group. The swing technique effectively decreased the degree of spondylolisthesis (swing: 24.1% to 4.7% vs standard: 21.8% to 8.9%). No complications related to the procedure were reported.CONCLUSIONSMIS-TLIF with the "swing" technique with long tab percutaneous pedicle screws is a safe and effective reduction method for monosegmental spondylolisthesis. This technique cannot only alleviate symptoms but also achieve nearly completely reduction of slippage.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has been increasingly advocated during the last decade with new studies being reported every year. Minimally invasive spine procedures, such as minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF), have been introduced to reduce approach-related muscle trauma, to minimise blood loss, and to achieve faster wound healing, quicker ambulation and earlier patient discharge. The aim of this article was to give a comprehensive review of the available English literature comparing open TLIF with MI-TLIF techniques published or available online between 1990 and 2014 as identified by an electronic database search on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed . Fourteen relevant studies comparing MI-TLIF and open TLIF cohorts could be identified. MI-TLIF seems to be a valid alternative to open TLIF. Both methods yield good clinical results with similar improvements of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) on follow-up. There seems to be no significant differences in clinical outcome and fusion rates on comparison. These results are consistent throughout all reported studies in this review. The most pronounced benefits of MI-TLIF are a significant reduction of blood loss, shorter lengths of hospital stay (LOHS) and lower surgical site infection rates. On the downside, MI-TLIF seems to be associated with significantly higher intraoperative radiation doses, a shallow learning curve, at least in the beginning, longer operating times and potentially more frequent implant failures/cage displacements and revision surgeries.

Microsurgical treatment by MIS-TLIF through bilateral Wiltse approach for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis: report of 13 cases

Objective To analyze microsurgical treatment of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) through bilateral Wiltse approach for spondylolisthesis.Methods Between May 2012 and November 2013,13 patients diagnosed lumbar spondylolisthesis (Myerding Grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ) were included.With the assistant of neurophysiological monitoring and microscope,all patients were treated by MIS-TLIF through bilateral Wiltse approach (gap between the multifidus and the longissimus).Operation time,blood loss,postoperative wound pain duration and Lumbocrural pain relief time were analyzed.Creatine phosphokinase (CPK-MM) level was recorded preoperatively,1 day,3 days and 7 days postoperatively.Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were analyzed preoperatively,1 week,3 months and 6 months postoperatively.X-ray examination and MR imaging of lumbar spine were achieved preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively to assess slippage reset and nerve decompression.Lumbar CT three-dimensional reconstruction was used to confirm pedicle placement and spinal stability.Results All patients accepted successful operation without nerve injury.The blood loss was (185.3 ±26.3) ml,and operating time was (186.0 ±23.0) min.Postoperative lumbar X-ray examination and MRI scan demonstrated good slippage reset and complete nerve decompression.Postoperative lumbar CT three dimensional reconstruction showed accurate pedicle placement and good spinal stability.VAS,JOA score obviously improved in postoperative 1 week,3 months and 6 months compared with that before operation(P ＜0.05).CPK-MM level peaked at postoperative 1 day,then gradually reduced,and almost descended to preoperative level at postoperative 7 day.Conclusions MIS-TLIF technique has obvious advantages over operating time,blood loss,paraspinal muscle protection and improvement of clinical symptoms.It is feasible and clinically effective of MIS-TLIF through bilateral Wiltse approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis with the assistance of microscope and neurophysiological monitoring. Key words: Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Muscle splitting approach; Minimally invasive spinal surgery ; Surgical option ; Efficacy analysis

Finite element analysis of minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

The purpose of our study is to develop and validate three-dimensional finite element models of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and explore the most appropriate method of fixation and fusion by comparing biomechanical characteristics of different fixation method. We developed four fusion models: bilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (A), bilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (B), unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage insertion model (C), and unilateral pedicle screws fixation with two cages insertion model (D); the models were subjected to different forces including anterior bending, posterior extension, left bending, right bending, rotation, and axial compressive. The von Mises stress of the fusion segments on the pedicle screw and cages was recorded. Angular variation and stress of pedicle screw and cage were compared. There were differences of Von Mises peak stress among four models, but were within the range of maximum force. The angular variation in A, B, C, and D decreased significantly compared with normal. There was no significant difference of angular variation between A and B, and C and D. Bilateral pedicle screws fixation had more superior biomechanics than unilateral pedicle screws fixation. In conclusion, the lumbar interbody fusion models were established using varying fixation methods, and the results verified that unilateral pedicle screws fixation with a single cage could meet the stability demand in minimal invasive transforaminal interbody fusion.

Preliminary Results of Minimally Invasive Decompression, TLIF and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion in Stenotic Spondylolisthesis with Severe Facet Joint Osteoarthritis

Object: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) procedures are increasingly being recognized as equivalent to open procedures with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes. These techniques are also believed to result in less pain and disability in the immediate postoperative period. There are, however, little data to assess whether these procedures in combination with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw insertion are effective in complex cases of stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis with severe facet joint osteoarthritis (FJO). Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation, fusion and decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis with severe stenosis and facet joint osteoarthritis (FJO) between June 2010 and June 2011. Blood loss, operative time and intraoperative complications were assessed in all surgically treated patients who were treated with MIS decompression, MI-TLIF and percutaneous transpedicular instrumentation. Clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain, leg pain, and activity level. Satisfaction was assessed with VAS for satisfaction. Radiological follow-up includes x-ray films, computed tomography and in some cases magnetic tomography scan. Results: Twenty four cases with severe stenotic changes accompanied by severe FJO were treated with minimally invasive procedure. The minimum follow-up was 6 months with a mean of 8 months. The mean preoperative ODI score was 46.8, decreasing to a mean of 23 postoperatively. The mean VAS leg and back pain scores were 67.5 improving to means of 25.8. Twenty one out of 24 cases experienced a clinical benefit according to VAS for satisfaction and ODI. Complications included wound healing disturbance (4%), CSF fistula (4%) and contralateral radiculopathy due to articular bone spurs (8%). The accuracy of pedicle screws was high and only one revision surgery was performed. Conclusion: MIS for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis leads to adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis and results in a highly significant reduction of symptoms and disability. MIS-TLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw insertion constitute a promising treatment alternative for patients with severe stenosis and facet joint osteoarthritis.

Hypertension intracrânienne idiopathique révélant une malformation d’Arnold-Chiari

Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been shown to have excellent outcomes for surgical management of degenerative disc disease. However, the challenge is in addressing coronal imbalance and restoring lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment. Use of expandable cages in MIS-TLIF has been hypothesized to circumvent this disadvantage. An indirect meta-analysis of the evidence is presented comparing outcomes from expandable cages with those from nonexpandable cages, in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF.PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable cages and nonexpandable cages in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF.Twelve studies (706 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The mean increase in disc height was found to be significantly greater for the nonexpandable cages group than for the expandable cages group (1.33 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28–1.38 vs. 1.14 mm,; 95% CI, 1.06–1.23; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding change in lumbar lordosis at last follow-up between the 2 groups (P = 0.34). The mean change in segmental lordosis was found to be significantly higher for the expandable cage group (5.04°, 95% CI, 3.89–6.20 vs. 2.08°, 95% CI, 1.93–2.22; P < 0.001). We did not detect any significant difference in fusion rate (P = 0.33), subsidence rate (P = 0.41) or in reoperations (P = 0.56) at last follow-up between the 2 groups.Our results indicate that there may not be a significant difference in clinical and radiologic parameters between expandable cages and nonexpandable cages among patients undergoing MIS-TLIF, and it is unclear if the higher cost of the expandable cages is justified.

Health Care Seeking Among Urban Minority Adolescent Girls: The Crisis at Sexual Debut

We wanted to explore the context of help seeking for reproductive and nonreproductive health concerns by urban adolescent girls. We undertook a qualitative study using in-depth interviews of African American and Latina girls (n = 22) aged 13 to 19 years attending public high schools in the Bronx, NY. Before the onset of sexual activity, most girls meet health needs within the context of the family, relying heavily on mothers for health care and advice. Many new needs and concerns emerge at sexual debut. Key factors modulating girls' ability to address their health needs and concerns include (1) the strategy of selective disclosure of information perceived to be harmful to close family relationships or threaten privacy; (2) the desire for personalized care, modeled on the emotional and physical care received from mother; and (3) relationships with physicians that vary in quality, ranging from distant relationships focused on providing information to close continuity relationships. Core values shaping these processes include privacy, a close relationship with the mother, and a perception of sexual activity as dangerous. No girl was able to meet her specific reproductive health needs within the mother-daughter relationship. Some find nonmaternal sources of personalized health care and advice for reproductive health needs, but many do not. Adolescent girls attempt to meet reproductive health needs within a context shaped by values of privacy and close mother-daughter relationships. Difficulty balancing these values often results in inadequate support and care.