Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test Research Articles

The effectiveness of peroneal nerve functional electrical simulation for the reduction of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A feasibility study for a randomised control trial

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of a multi-site randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of functional electrical stimulation on bradykinesia in people with Parkinson’s disease. Design: A two-arm assessor blinded randomised controlled trial with an 18 weeks intervention period and 4 weeks post-intervention follow-up. Setting: Two UK hospitals; a therapy outpatient department in a district general hospital and a specialist neuroscience centre. Participants: A total of 64 participants with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and slow gait <1.25 ms−1. Interventions: Functional electrical stimulation delivered to the common peroneal nerve while walking in addition to standard care compared with standard care alone. Main measures: Feasibility aims included the determination of sample size, recruitment and retention rates, acceptability of the protocol and confirmation of the primary outcome measure. The outcome measures were 10 m walking speed, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level, New Freezing of Gait questionnaire, Falls Efficacy Score International and falls diary. Participants opinion on the study design and relevance of outcome measures were evaluated using an embedded qualitative study. Results: There was a mean difference between groups of 0.14 ms−1 (CI 0.03, 0.26) at week 18 in favour of the treatment group, which was maintained at week 22, 0.10 ms−1 (CI –0.05, 0.25). There was a mean difference in UPDRS motor examination score of –3.65 (CI –4.35, 0.54) at week 18 which was lost at week 22 –0.91 (CI –2.19, 2.26). Conclusion: The study design and intervention were feasible and supportive for a definitive trial. While both the study protocol and intervention were acceptable, recommendations for modifications are made.

The McNemar Change Index worked better than the Minimal Detectable Change in demonstrating the change at a single subject level

Background and ObjectiveTo assess the agreement between the Rasch Change Index (RCI), minimal detectable change (MDC), and McNemar Change Index (McCI), three statistics for demonstrating the patient's improvement/deterioration. MethodsThe Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest (MB)) (a balance scale developed with the Rasch analysis) was administered before and after rehabilitation to 315 neurological patients. The MB RCI was chosen as the criterion standard for detecting the patient's improvement. Positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios (PLRs and NLRs, respectively) were used to evaluate the MDC and McCI accuracy in identifying the patient's improvement. Three different MB MDCs were assessed. ResultsOne-hundred patients improved their MB in accordance with the RCI. All three MDCs and the McCI were solid in ruling out the patient's improvement (NLR <0.2). The McCI and the largest MDC were also good in detecting the patient's improvement (PLR>5), whereas the smaller MDCs were not. Of the four indices, McCI was the most robust in case of missing items. ConclusionA patient stable in accordance with the MDCs or McCI is actually stable as per the criterion standard. To be reasonably sure that the patient is actually improved, larger MDC values or the McCI should be preferred, and the McCI is preferable if there are missing items.

A Human Interactive Hybrid FES-Robotic System Applicable to Improvement of Foot Drop after Stroke: Case Report of a Patient with Chronic Stroke.

The purpose of this case report is to present and to assess a new exercise therapy using an intelligent robotic system endowed by the functional electrical stimulation (FES) for gait improvement in a person with foot drop due to stroke. The subject was a 30-year-old man who had suffered a hemorrhagic stroke patient 8 years ago. He had gotten all proper conventional physical therapies, yet suffered from right foot drop which affected significantly on the gait quality. The patient wore the FES-robotic system on his impaired ankle and walked about 50 strides in each therapy session. During each gait cycle, the subject voluntarily determined the starting times of the dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of the affected ankle through toughing a sensor. Three clinical tests including Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Mini Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest) were conducted. All related quantitative indexes increased after four-month exercise therapy. It proves the improvement of the gait quality in the patient after getting the proposed exercise therapy using the implemented FES-robotic system.

Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Mini-BESTest in individuals after stroke: an observational study

BackgroundPostural control is a very important function in everyday life. However, assessing postural control with commonly used measurement instruments (MIs) is limited due to deficits in their psychometric properties. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a comprehensive and multidimensional MI for assessing postural control in persons with limited balance function, such as individuals after stroke. Despite the increasing use of the Mini-BESTest worldwide, no German version is available.Research questionIs the German version of the Mini-BESTest (GVMBT) comprehensible and valid for measuring postural control in individuals after stroke?MethodsThe Mini-BESTest was translated and cross-culturally adapted, following established guidelines. It was pilot-tested with ten participants. This observational measurement and validation study was conducted at one point and included 50 participants with subacute and chronic stroke (mean age: 64.58 ± 13.34 years/ 34 men/ 16 women). Convergent validity was investigated using 1) the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and 2) the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG). The MIs were evaluated for normal distribution with the calculation of skewness, kurtosis and Q-Q-Plots. Spearman correlation coefficients and Bland Altman analysis were used to examine the relationship between the MIs. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.ResultsComprehension of the GVMBT was confirmed. The GVMBT correlated significantly with the BBS (rs = 0.93) and the TUG (rs = − 0.85). Bland Altman analysis revealed low absolute differences. The GVMBT demonstrated no significant floor or ceiling effects and showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90).SignificanceThe GVMBT has excellent validity and internal consistency. Due to this and its specific subcategories, the GVMBT is recommended for the use in research and clinical practice. Further psychometric properties should be evaluated.

Responsiveness of Objective vs. Clinical Balance Domain Outcomes for Exercise Intervention in Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Balance deficits in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are often not helped by pharmacological or surgical treatment. Although balance exercise intervention has been shown to improve clinical measures of balance, the efficacy of exercise on different, objective balance domains is still unknown.Objective: To compare the sensitivity to change in objective and clinical measures of several different domains of balance and gait following an Agility Boot Camp with Cognitive Challenges (ABC-C) intervention.Methods: In this cross-over, randomized design, 86 individuals with PD participated in 6-week (3×/week) ABC-C exercise classes and 6-week education classes, consisting of 3–6 individuals. Blinded examiners tested people in their practical off state. Objective outcome measures from wearable sensors quantified four domains of balance: sway in standing balance, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) during step initiation, postural responses to the push-and-release test, and a 2-min natural speed walk with and without a cognitive task. Clinical outcome measures included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), the Activities of Balance Confidence (ABC), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). The standardized response means (SRM) of the differences between before and after each intervention compared responsiveness of outcomes to intervention. A linear mixed model compared effects of exercise with the active control—education intervention.Results: The most responsive outcome measures to exercise intervention with an SRM > 0.5 were objective measures of gait and APAs, specifically arm range of motion, gait speed during a dual-task walk, trunk coronal range of motion, foot strike angle, and first-step length at step initiation. The most responsive clinical outcome measure was the patient-reported PDQ-39 activities daily living subscore, but all clinical measures had SRMs <0.5.Conclusions: The objective measures were more sensitive to change after exercise intervention compared to the clinical measures. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait, including gait speed with a dual task, and APAs were the most sensitive objective measures, and perceived functional independence was the most sensitive clinical measure to change after the ABC-C exercise intervention. Future exercise intervention to improve gait and balance in PD should include objective outcome measures.

Impacts of Motion-Based Technology on Balance, Movement Confidence, and Cognitive Function Among People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Pre- and Posttest Study.

BackgroundWhile exercise can benefit the health and well-being of people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, many exercise programs offered to this population are passive, unengaging, and inaccessible, resulting in poor adherence. Motion-based technologies are increasingly being explored to encourage exercise participation among people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. However, the impacts of using motion-based technologies with people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment on variables including balance, movement confidence, and cognitive function have yet to be determined.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of a group motion-based technology intervention on balance, movement confidence, and cognitive function among people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.MethodsIn this quasi-experimental pre- and posttest design, we will recruit 24 people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment from 4 adult day programs and invite them to play Xbox Kinect bowling in a group setting, twice weekly for 10 weeks. We will require participants to speak and understand English, be without visual impairment, and be able to stand and walk. At pretest, participants will complete the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We will video record participants during weeks 1, 5, and 10 of the intervention to capture behavioral indicators of movement confidence (eg, fluency of motion) through coding. At posttest, the Mini-BESTest and MoCA will be repeated. We will analyze quantitative data collected through the Mini-BESTest and the MoCA using an intent-to-treat analysis, with study site and number of intervention sessions attended as covariates. To analyze the videos, we will extract count and percentage data from the coded recordings.ResultsThis study will address the question of whether a group motion-based technology intervention, delivered in an adult day program context, has the potential to impact balance, movement confidence, and cognitive function among people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. The project was funded in 2019 and enrollment was completed on February 28, 2020. Data analysis is underway and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021.ConclusionsThis study will assess the feasibility and potential benefits of using motion-based technology to deliver exercise interventions to people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. This work can also be used as the basis for developing specific software and future exercise programs using motion-based technology for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, as well as understanding some of the conditions in which these programs can be delivered.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/18209

Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Patients with Stroke.

BackgroundStroke can cause balance disorders, which often lead to falls and fall-related injuries. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a balance test that has been recently translated into Persian. The reliability and validity of the Persian version of Mini-BESTest have not been assessed in patients with stroke.ObjectivesTo assess the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Mini-BESTest in patients with stroke.MethodsA cross-sectional study was designed. Thirty patients with stroke participated in this study. Patients were tested using the Mini-BESTest according to the Persian instructions, and two raters independently rated each patient’s performance. Each patient was matched with a healthy adult in the terms of age and gender. Healthy subjects were also tested for discriminative validity.ResultsThere was excellent correlation between two raters on the Persian version of the Mini-BESTest total scores (rPearson = 0.98, P < 0.001) and its sections (rPearson > 0.9). There was a significant difference between stroke patients and healthy subjects confirming the discriminative validity of the Persian version of the Mini-BESTest (19.4 ± 5.4 vs. 24.8 ± 2.3, P < 0.001).LimitationsWe only assessed stroke patients, and the results may not be generalized to other patients with balance deficits.ConclusionsThe Persian version of the Mini-BESTest is a reliable and valid tool for balance evaluation of stroke patients.

Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus Visual Feedback Balance Training for Standing Balance Performance Among Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Individuals with an incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are highly susceptible to falls during walking or standing. Our objective was to evaluate a therapeutic tool for standing balance that combined functional electrical stimulation, applied bilaterally to the plantarflexors and dorsiflexors, with visual feedback balance training (FES+VFBT). Five adults with iSCI completed 12 FES+VFBT sessions over 4 weeks. During the training sessions, participants completed each of the four balance exercises twice. Visual feedback of the center-of-pressure (COP) location was provided as participants completed the balance exercises and received FES to assist with performance of the exercises. A closed-loop FES system was used in which the COP was continually monitored and the level of electrical current administered was automatically adjusted. Balance abilities were assessed pre- and post- training using clinical balance scales (i.e., Berg Balance Scale, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale) and biomechanical assessments (i.e., postural sway measures and limits of stability test during standing). User acceptability was explored through semi-structured interviews. Improvements were seen for four of the five participants on at least one of the clinical scales following completion of the training intervention. All participants showed greater maximal COP excursion area during the limits of stability test after the training intervention, whereas only one participant demonstrated a reduction in postural sway. Specific components of FES+VFBT, including the ability to safely practice challenging balance exercises, were deemed important by the participants. These results suggest that FES+VFBT has potential as an intervention for standing balance after iSCI.

What are the relationships between trunk control, balance and walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis with minor to moderate disability?

Purpose This study aimed to identify relationships between trunk control, balance and walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) with minor to moderate disability to guide the content of interventions to optimise balance and walking. Methods and materials Correlation analysis of baseline data from a prospective randomised controlled study comprising 79 individuals with MS was conducted using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 1.0–6.5 (mean 2.36), Trunk Impairment Scale-Norwegian Version (TIS-modNV), Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), 2-min walk test (2MWT), 10-m walk test (10MWT), MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment (RVGA) and number of steps using ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT. Log-transformations of skewed variables were conducted and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. Results Strong correlations (r = 0.70–0.90) between the 2MWT and 10MWT, the 10MWT preferred speed and number of steps, and the Mini-BESTest and 2MWT and 10MWT were identified. Moderate relationships (r = 0.50–0.70) were detected between the TIS-modNV and Mini-BESTest, as well as the 2MWT, 10MWT and RVGA. Conclusions The strong relationships support the need to address several aspects of balance to improve walking, while the moderate associations suggest that dynamic trunk control should be considered addressed in interventions for individuals with minor to moderate disability to optimise balance and walking.

A Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Effects of Table Tennis Training in Parkinson Disease

ObjectiveTo investigate feasibility and effects of table tennis training on balance control and physical function in individuals with Parkinson disease. DesignSingle group, observational, before-after trial. SettingTable tennis training in a gymnasium. ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling individuals with Parkinson disease (N=9; 5 men, 4 women) with an average age of 66.9 years, average time since diagnosis of 8.6 years, and a modified Hoehn and Yahr score between 2 and 2.5 participated in this study. Participants were recruited via newspaper advertisement, at the patient organization, and at the university hospital outpatient clinic. Eight participants completed the study. One participant withdrew for logistical reasons. InterventionsGroup training program consisting of 2 table tennis training sessions per week (120min each) for 10 weeks. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was feasibility, including attendance rate, drop-out rate, a final questionnaire assessing the participants’ experience during the intervention, and any adverse events. The primary effect outcome was the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). Secondary effect outcomes were Parkinson's disease questionnaire-8, European quality of life questionnaire, Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, 10-meter walk test, generic walking scale, activities-specific balance confidence scale, and physical activity measured with an accelerometer and the Frändin-Grimby scale. ResultsThe average attendance rate was 84%. There were no adverse events reported. The participants reported that the training improved well-being. The mean total score on the Mini-BESTest before and after intervention was 21.2 versus 23.3 (P=.093). Statistically significant positive effects without adjustment for multiple comparisons were found for MADRS and the Frändin-Grimby scale. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that table tennis training is safe and feasible, and may have the potential to improve balance control, mental well-being, and self-reported physical activity level. Further studies are required before table tennis can be considered an evidence-based recommendation for individuals with Parkinson disease.

Predictors of improved balance performance in persons with Parkinson’s disease following a training intervention: analysis of data from an effectiveness-implementation trial

Objective: (1) To determine associated factors of improved balance performance after a 10-week HiBalance intervention period, and (2) to determine effects of the programme on modifiable factors found above, considering both groups. Design: Pre-posttest substudy founded on the outcomes evaluation of an effectiveness-implementation trial. Participants: Sixty-one participants were allocated the HiBalance training, while 56 were controls. Intervention: Participants received a 10-week, two times weekly, progressive balance training, that is, HiBalance intervention, led by physical therapists. The intervention was group based and gradually incorporated dual-tasking over the training period. Participants also performed, unsupervised, a 1×/week home exercise programme. Main outcome: The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) assessed balance performance, and those having improved by ⩾2 points were classified as positive responders. Balance confidence was the secondary outcome. Results: Fifty-three (87%) participants completed the intervention and 32 (60%) improved their balance scores by ⩾2 points in the intervention group, with 11 (24%) in the control group. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed two independently associated factors of improved balance, which included balance confidence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.90–0.99) and attendance of ⩾80% of training sessions (OR = 10.10; 95% CI = 1.71–59.60). The final model demonstrated good fit and acceptable discrimination (area under the curve = 0.84). Secondary analysis revealed a fair relationship (Rho = 0.30; P = 0.044) between improvements in balance confidence and balance performance in the intervention but not control group. Conclusion: Two personal factors were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of improvement in clinically measured balance performance. The HiBalance intervention appears to benefit those with lower balance confidence.

Effects of a core stabilization training program on balance ability in persons with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: To explore the effects of an eight-week core stability program on balance ability in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: A local Parkinson’s association. Subjects: A total of 44 participants with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 22) or control group (n = 22). Intervention: The experimental group received 24 sessions of core training, while the control group received an intervention including active joint mobilization, muscle stretching, and motor coordination exercises. Main measures: The primary outcome measure was dynamic balance evaluated using the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test. Secondary outcomes included the balance confidence assessed with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and standing balance assessed by the maximal excursion of center of pressure during the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance and the Limits of Stability test. Results: After treatment, a significant between-group improvement in dynamic balance was observed in the experimental group compared to the control group (change, 2.75 ± 1.80 vs 0.38 ± 2.15, P = 0.002). The experimental group also showed a significant improvement in confidence (change, 16.48 ± 16.21 vs 3.05 ± 13.53, P = 0.047) and maximal excursion of center of pressure in forward (change, 0.86 ± 1.89 cm vs 0.17 ± 0.26 cm, P = 0.048), left (change, 0.88 ± 2.63 cm vs 0.07 ± 0.48 cm, P = 0.010), and right (change, 1.63 ± 2.82 cm vs 0.05 ± 0.17 cm, P = 0.046) directions of limits of stability compared to the control group. Conclusion: A program based on core stability in comparison with non-specific exercise benefits dynamic balance and confidence and increases center of mass excursion in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

What is the best clinical assessment tool for identification of adults aged ≥80 years at high risk of falls?

ObjectivesTo assess the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and gait speed to determine which is the most appropriate test for identification of adults aged ≥80 years at higher risk of falls, and to investigate the clinical usefulness of the combination of such tests by cumulative post-test probability (PoTP) for predicting the risk of falls. DesignLongitudinal prospective study. ParticipantsNinety-eight older adults (aged 80–102 years). InterventionsOlder adults were submitted to the clinical tests and followed-up in order to record the occurrence of falls. The capacity of the clinical tests to detect which older adults are at higher risk of falls was measured using the receiver operating characteristic curve, followed by calculation of PoTP for predicting the risk of falls. ResultsThe BESTest and the Mini-BESTest demonstrated the best PoTP for predicting the risk of falls for a positive test (70%), followed by the TUG test (66%) and gait speed (63%). When performed in combination, a positive result on the TUG test, gait speed and Mini-BESTest increased the probability of older adults falling within the next 6months from 50% to 89%; a negative result on these three tests decreased the probability of older adults falling within the next 6months from 50% to 3%. ConclusionThe combination of TUG test, gait speed and Mini-BESTest provided the best approach. If all three tests are positive, there is an 89% chance of identifying an older person at risk of falling. If all three tests are negative, there would only be a 3% chance of obtaining a false-negative result.

Standardized regression-based clinical change score cutoffs for normal pressure hydrocephalus

BackgroundPresently, for patients presenting with suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) who undergo temporary drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) there is no defined model to differentiate chance improvement form clinical significance change at the individual patient level. To address this lack of information we computed standard regression based clinical change models for the 10 Meter Walk Test, Timed Up & Go, Dual Timed Up & Go, 6-Minute Walk Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Symbol Digit Modalities using data from patients with suspected NPH that underwent temporary drainage of CSF. These clinically significant change modes can classify clinically significant improvement following temporary drainage of CSF at the individual patient level. This allows for physicians to differentiate a clinically significant improvement in symptoms from chance improvement.MethodsData was collected from 323 patients, over the age of 60, with suspected NPH that underwent temporary drainage of CSF with corresponding gait and cognitive testing. McSweeney Standardized Regression Based Clinical Change Models were computed for standard gait and cognitive measures: Timed Up & Go, Dual Timed Up & Go, 10 Meter Walk Test, MiniBESTest, 6-Minute Walk Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. To assess the discriminate validity of the measures we used correlations, Chi2, and regression analyses.ResultsThe clinical change models explained 69–91.8% of the variability in post-drain performance (p < 0.001). As patient scores became more impaired, the percent change required for improvement to be clinically significant increased for all measures. We found that the measures were not discriminate, the Timed Up & Go was highly related to the 10 Meter Walk Test (r = 0.85, R2 = 0.769–0.738, p < 0.001), MiniBESTest (r = − 0.67, R2 = 0.589–0.734, p < 0.001), and 6 Minute Walk Test (r = − 0.77, R2 = 0.71–0.734, p < 0.001).ConclusionStandardized Regression Based Clinically Significant Change Models allow for physicians to use an evidence-based approach to differentiate clinically significant change from chance improvement at the individual patient level. The Timed Up & Go was shown to be predictive of detailed measures of gait velocity, balance, and endurance.

Comparing the measurement properties and relationship to gait speed recovery of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test and the Berg Balance Scale in ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke.

Although the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is known to be a reliable and valid measure of balance in individuals with stroke, the utility of this tool in relation to subacute stroke walking speed and the recovery of gait ability has not been explored. Here, we compared the measurement properties and their relationship to gait speed on the Mini-BESTest and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke, and we investigated which balance assessment tool is more likely to capture the status of the recovery of gait speed. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 88 individuals 50 years or older with stroke who had been evaluated using the Mini-BESTest by using the BBS and by assessing their comfortable walking speed (CWS). The proportion of subjects who showed improvement was calculated for 34 stroke survivors from data obtained at admission to and discharge from the hospital. Compared with the BBS, the Mini-BESTest showed a better distribution of total scores without a ceiling effect. The two scales showed correlations with gait speed (Mini-BESTest: r=0.702; BBS: r=0.592) and discrimination between fast and slow walkers. The responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest was excellent, with an area under the curve of 0.894, thus discriminating between gait speed improvement versus non-improvement. These results indicate that the Mini-BESTest is more useful than the BBS in terms of its measurement properties and ability to measure gait recovery in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke.

Do Patients With Parkinson’s Disease With Freezing of Gait Respond Differently Than Those Without to Treadmill Training Augmented by Virtual Reality?

Background. People with Parkinson’s disease and freezing of gait (FOG+) have more falls, postural instability and cognitive impairment compared with FOG−. Objective. To conduct a secondary analysis of the V-TIME study, a randomized, controlled investigation showing a greater reduction of falls after virtual reality treadmill training (TT + VR) compared with usual treadmill walking (TT) in a mixed population of fallers. We addressed whether these treadmill interventions led to similar gains in FOG+ as in FOG−. Methods. A total of 77 FOG+ and 44 FOG− were assigned randomly to TT + VR or TT. Participants were assessed pre- and posttraining and at 6 months’ follow-up. Main outcome was postural stability assessed by the Mini Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BEST) test. Falls were documented using diaries. Other outcomes included the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) and the Trail Making Test (TMT-B). Results. Mini-BEST scores and the TMT-B improved in both groups after training (P = .001), irrespective of study arm and FOG subgroup. However, gains were not retained at 6 months. Both FOG+ and FOG− had a greater reduction of falls after TT + VR compared with TT (P = .008). NFOG-Q scores did not change after both training modes in the FOG+ group. Conclusions. Treadmill walking (with or without VR) improved postural instability in both FOG+ and FOG−, while controlling for disease severity differences. As found previously, TT + VR reduced falls more than TT alone, even among those with FOG. Interestingly, FOG itself was not helped by training, suggesting that although postural instability, falls and FOG are related, they may be controlled by different mechanisms.

Relationship between Dynamic Trunk Balance and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Elderly Women

Objectives: Among elderly individuals, falls are major contributors to becoming bedridden, and evaluating and preventing the risk of falls is thus important in the elderly. Trunk balance stability is important to prevent falling. To safely measure trunk balance function, we have developed a dynamic balance-measurement device that is used with the subject in a sitting position. This Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a simple balance evaluation test that appears useful for detecting problems with balance function. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between dynamic trunk balance and findings on the Mini-BESTest in elderly women. Methods: Participants comprised 31 healthy women >60 years old. Evaluation items were the Mini-BESTest total score; dynamic sitting balance, static postural balance, and muscle strength (back muscle, iliopsoas muscle, and quadriceps). Results: Mean total Mini-BESTest score was 21.1. Mean dynamic sitting balance measured as total center of gravity (COG) trajectory length was 1447.5 mm. A negative correlation (r=-0.382, p=0.034) was observed between total COG trajectory length and BESTest score. No correlations were evident between total COG trajectory length, stationary standing COG, and muscle strength. Conclusion: In elderly women, trunk balance in dynamic sitting correlated negatively with total Mini-BESTest score.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and multicomponent training on functional capacity in older adults: protocol for a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial

IntroductionWhen physical activity contains training of at least three components such as balance, coordination and strength, among others, it is called multicomponent training. This type of training is recommended for improving the functional capacity in elderly individuals but has no lasting effects. The association of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with other types of therapy has been shown to facilitate the enhancement and prolongation of therapy outcomes.AimThe objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of multicomponent training associated with active or sham tDCS on the performance of functional capacity in the elderly before treatment, after treatment and 30 days after the end of treatment. The secondary objective will be to correlate the performance of the primary outcome (functional capacity assessed by the Glittre Daily Life Activity Test) with walking capacity (by 6-min walk test), balance (with the mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test), functional independence (by the Functional Independence Measure) and quality of life (with the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument).MethodsTwenty-eight elderly people from the community will participate in the study, and will be randomized into two groups: 1) multicomponent training associated with active tDCS; and 2) multicomponent training associated with sham tDCS. The multicomponent training sessions will be held twice a week for 12 weeks, totaling 24 sessions. The tDCS will be administered over the dominant dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at the same time as multicomponent training, with an intensity of 2 mA, for 20 min. The evaluations will be made pretraining, after 24 training sessions and 30 days after the end of the training.DiscussionWe hypothesize that tDCS, when associated with multicomponent training, can potentiate and prolong the effects of this training on the functional capacity of the elderly. If this hypothesis is confirmed, this protocol may contribute to a longer-lasting physical rehabilitation of the elderly, encouraging them to maintain their independent daily activities for longer.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trial Registry (RBR-2crd42) and received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of University Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil (process number 3.077.953).

The short term-effects of both feet plantar vibration in post stroke patients balance

Background and Aim: Balance disorder is a common problem in post stroke patients. Vibration therapy is one of the interventions that is used to treat this impairment in physiotherapy. There are several studies on the effects of more affected foot plantar vibration on balance, however according to the researchers this cerebral lesion causes bilateral side effects in the body. So the aim of this study was to investigate the shortterm effects of both feet plantar vibration on the balance of post stroke patients. Methods: This pretest-posttest clinical study included 12 post stroke patients (8 male and 4 female, mean age 52.41 ± 9.03 years). The participants received one session of 5-min vibration stimuli (frequency, 100 Hz) to the plantar region on both feet. Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) score and plantar cutaneous sensation by Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination (SWME) were assessed before and immediately after the intervention. Results: Mini-BESTest mean total score improved significantly (p ≤ 0.001) after both feet vibration and these results were supported by a large effect size (Cohen d = 2.83). Mean number of detected points by SWME decreased after vibration therapy (p = 0.06) but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The findings suggest that local vibration applied directly to the plantar region of both feet in post-stroke patients could be an appropriate physiotherapy intervention to improve their balance. Keywords: Vibration; balance; stroke

Comparison of balance changes after inspiratory muscle or Otago exercise training.

The inspiratory muscles contribute to balance via diaphragmatic contraction and by increasing intra-abdominal pressure. We have shown inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improves dynamic balance significantly with healthy community-dwellers. However, it is not known how the magnitude of balance improvements following IMT compares to that of an established balance program. This study compared the effects of 8-week of IMT for community-dwellers, to 8-week of the Otago exercise program (OEP) for care-residents, on balance and physical performance outcomes. Nineteen healthy community-dwellers (74 ± 4 years) were assigned to self-administered IMT. Eighteen, healthy care-residents (82 ± 4 years) were assigned to instructor-led OEP. The IMT involved 30 breaths twice-daily at ~50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The OEP group undertook resistance and mobility exercises for ~60 minutes, twice-weekly. Balance and physical performance were assessed using the mini Balance Evaluation System Test (mini-BEST) and time up and go (TUG). After 8-week, both groups improved balance ability significantly (mini-BEST: IMT by 24 ± 34%; OEP by 34 ± 28%), with no between-group difference. Dynamic balance sub-tasks improved significantly more for the IMT group (P < 0.01), than the OEP group and vice versa for static balance sub-tasks (P = 0.01). The IMT group also improved MIP (by 66 ± 97%), peak inspiratory power (by 31 ± 12%) and TUG (by -11 ± 27%); whereas the OEP did not. IMT and OEP improved balance ability similarly, with IMT eliciting greater improvement in dynamic balance, whilst OEP improved static balance more than IMT. Unlike IMT, the OEP did not provide additional benefits in inspiratory muscle function and TUG performance. Our findings suggest that IMT offers a novel method of improving dynamic balance in older adults, which may be more relevant to function than static balance and potentially a useful adjunct to the OEP in frailty prevention.