Use Of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Research Articles

Factors influencing inappropriate device therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a predictive analysis

Abstract Background Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation and subsequent ICD therapy have shown to be efficacious in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, patients with an ICD are at risk of inappropriate device therapy (IDT), which is associated with worse outcomes, reduced quality of life (QoL), and may influence psychosocial and mental wellbeing. Purpose This study aimed to predict which patients are at risk of IDT by investigating the influence of pre-implant clinical parameters on occurrence of IDT. Methods From January 2010 to December 2019, patients who received an ICD in our medical center, were included in a prospective registry. Only patients with ICD (including ICDs used for cardiac resynchronization therapy, i.e. CRT-D) with an atrial lead were included in the current analysis, to better distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate device therapy. After implant, the device was interrogated at least every 6 months and clinical symptoms related to the device, recorded events, and relevant technical setting changes were recorded. IDT was defined as antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock delivered for any reason other than ventricular arrhythmia. Follow-up ended after IDT, death, or loss-to-follow-up. Results 428 patients underwent an implantation of a dual chamber ICD or CRT-D of various manufacturers. 14 patients were lost to follow-up within the first year and one patient was excluded because of a dislocated atrial lead, leaving 413 patients (76% male, mean age 67±9.7 years, 39% CRT-D) with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. During a mean of 5.3 (±3.0) years, 136 (32.9%) patients received appropriate therapy and 36 (8.7%) patients received IDT. Of those 36 patients, 18 patients received only ATP, 12 received ATP followed by a shock, and 6 patients received a shock without prior ATP. The median time from implantation to IDT was 2.8 [0.3-5.8] years. Univariate logistic regression on 40 clinical parameters followed by a forward multivariate logistic regression was performed. The area under the ROC curve of the resulting multivariate model was 0.724 (95%CI 0.622-0.826). Cox regression analysis resulted in device type (CRT-D) (HR=0.533, 95%CI 0.234-1.211, p=0.133), use of mineralocorticoid receptor-antagonists (MRA) (HR=0.280, 95%CI 0.104-0.754, p=0.012), use of diuretics (HR=3.378, 95%CI 1.479-7.714, p=0.004), and eGFR (HR=1.217, 95%CI 0.972-1.523, p=0.087) as predictors of IDT. A history of atrial fibrillation was not a significant predictor of IDT. Conclusion This study identified CRT-D and use of MRAs to be protective against IDT, and use of diuretics and lower eGFR as risk factors of IDT. To inform patients optimally, pre-implant assessment of those factors could help identify patients at higher risk of IDT. Furthermore, it could dictate more cautious device programming and consequently reduce rates of IDT, reducing the negative influence of IDT on QoL and wellbeing in the ICD population.

#694 Effects of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on kidney of cirrhotic rats

Abstract Background and Aims Aldosterone binds to renal mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) to regulate fluid and electrolytes homeostasis. In addition, aldosterone can be deleterious as a driver of inflammation and tissue fibrosis in several organs. Thus, blockade of aldosterone represents an important option to mitigate the target-organ damage. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been widely used as diuretic drugs for the management of hypertension, cirrhosis, and heart failure. However, the use of MRAs is limited by adverse events such as hyperkalemia. More recently, novel nonsteroidal selective MRAs with improved safety profiles have been developed. This nonsteroidal MRA (finerenone) has higher selectivity and stronger affinity for the MR, leading to lower risk of hyperkalemia. Recent evidences showed that finerenone reduces albuminuria, risk of CKD progression, and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes with a low incidence of hyperkalemia related treatment discontinuation. The pathophysiology of cirrhosis is very similar to that of cardiac failure. Decompensated cirrhosis is frequently treated with the MRAs. In addition to fluid management, MRAs showed hepatoprotective actions via reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in CCl4-induced and common bile duct ligation (CBDL)-induced liver injury models. The potential beneficial effects of nonsteroidal MRA on cirrhosis had never been studied. This study aims to explore the renal protective role of nonsteroidal selective MRA and associated mechanisms in common bile duct ligation-related liver injury in rat model. Method CBDL was used to create liver injury in the Male Sprague-Dawley Drats. Finerenone (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was administered since the 1st day after CBDL. The effects of nonsteroidal selective MRA on kidneys were surveyed in two paralleled series on the 7th day (inflammation) and the 28th day (cirrhosis), respectively. The following parameters were evaluated: (a) hemodynamic parameters; (b) serum potassium, liver and renal function; (c) in-situ kidney perfusion; (d) western analyses of renal cortex and medulla. Results Compared with the vehicle-treated group, there was significantly lower renal vascular responsiveness to ET-1 in CBDL rats receiving 28 days of MRA (p<0.05) (Fig. 1B), but not in those receiving 7 days of MRA (Fig. 1A). MRA treatment led to no significant change in mean arterial pressure, portal pressure, serum potassium, liver, and renal function in CBDL rats (Table 1). The expressions of vasoactive mediators, such as iNOS, eNOS, ETA, and ETB in both renal cortex and medulla showed no significant change in CBDL rats following 28 days of MRA treatment (Fig. 2). Conclusion MRA treatment led to no significant effects on hemodynamics, liver, and renal function, but lower renal vascular responsiveness to ET-1 in CBDL rats receiving 28 days of MRA. The exact mechanisms remained to be further studied.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for patients with mild or moderate chronic kidney disease and heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction

BackgroundRenin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure (HF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and mild or moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, RASI administration rate and its association with long-term outcomes in patients with CKD complicated by HF with LVEF >40% remain unclear. MethodsWe analyzed 1923 consecutive patients with LVEF >40% registered within the multicenter database for hospitalized HF. We assessed RASI administration rate and its association with all-cause mortality among patients with mild or moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Exploratory subgroups included patients grouped by age (<80, ≥80 years), sex, previous HF hospitalization, B-type natriuretic peptide (higher, lower than median), eGFR (30–44, 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2), systolic blood pressure (<120, ≥120 mmHg), LVEF (41–49, ≥50%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) use. ResultsAmong patients with LVEF >40%, 980 (51.0%) had mild or moderate CKD (age: 81 [74–86] years; male, 52.6%; hypertension, 69.7%; diabetes, 25.9%), and 370 (37.8%) did not receive RASI. RASI use was associated with hypertension, absence of atrial fibrillation, and MRA use. After multivariable adjustments, RASI use was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality over a 2-year median follow-up (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.43–0.79, P = 0.001), and the mortality rate difference was predominantly due to cardiac death, consistent in all subgroups. ConclusionsApproximately one-third of HF patients with mild or moderate CKD and LVEF >40% were discharged without RASI administration and demonstrated relatively guarded outcomes.

Finerenone in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the FINEARTS-HF trial.

Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), spironolactone and eplerenone, are strongly recommended in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but the balance of efficacy and safety in those with higher LVEF has not been well established. Broad use of steroidal MRAs has further been limited in part due to safety concerns around risks of hyperkalaemia, gynecomastia, and kidney dysfunction. These risks may be mitigated by the unique pharmacological properties of the non-steroidal MRA finerenone. The FINEARTS-HF trial is designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the selective non-steroidal MRA finerenone among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. FINEARTS-HF is a global, multicentre, event-driven randomized trial evaluating oral finerenone versus matching placebo in symptomatic patients with HF with LVEF ≥40%. Adults (≥40 years) with HF with New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, LVEF ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and diuretic use for at least the previous 30 days were eligible. All patients required elevated natriuretic peptide levels: for patients in sinus rhythm, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥300 pg/ml (or B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] ≥100 pg/ml) were required, measured within 30 days (in those without a recent worsening HF event) or within 90 days (in those with a recent worsening HF event). Qualifying levels of NT-proBNP or BNP were tripled if a patient was in atrial fibrillation at screening. Estimated glomerular filtration rate <25 ml/min/1.73 m2 or serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L were key exclusion criteria. Patients were enrolled irrespective of clinical care setting (whether hospitalized, recently hospitalized, or ambulatory). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death and total (first and recurrent) HF events. The trial started on 14 September 2020 and has validly randomized 6001 participants across 37 countries. Approximately 2375 total primary composite events are targeted. The FINEARTS-HF trial will determine the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal MRA finerenone in a broad population of hospitalized and ambulatory patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04435626 and EudraCT 2020-000306-29.

Screening and management of hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease referred to Hypertension Excellence Centres among 27 countries. A pilot survey based on questionnaire.

Real-life management of hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. A survey was conducted in 2023 by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) to assess management of CKD patients referred to ESH-Hypertension Excellence Centres (ESH-ECs) at first referral visit. The questionnaire contained 64 questions with which ESH-ECs representatives were asked to estimate preexisting CKD management quality. Overall, 88 ESH-ECs from 27 countries participated (fully completed surveys: 66/88 [75.0%]). ESH-ECs reported that 28% (median, interquartile range: 15-50%) had preexisting CKD, with 10% of them (5-30%) previously referred to a nephrologist, while 30% (15-40%) had resistant hypertension. The reported rate of previous recent (<6 months) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing were 80% (50-95%) and 30% (15-50%), respectively. The reported use of renin-angiotensin system blockers was 80% (70-90%). When a nephrologist was part of the ESH-EC teams the reported rates SGLT2 inhibitors (27.5% [20-40%] vs. 15% [10-25], P = 0.003), GLP1-RA (10% [10-20%] vs. 5% [5-10%], P = 0.003) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (20% [10-30%] vs. 15% [10-20%], P = 0.05) use were greater as compared to ESH-ECs without nephrologist participation. The rate of reported resistant hypertension, recent eGFR and UACR results and management of CKD patients prior to referral varied widely across countries. Our estimation indicates deficits regarding CKD screening, use of nephroprotective drugs and referral to nephrologists before referral to ESH-ECs but results varied widely across countries. This information can be used to build specific programs to improve care in hypertensives with CKD.

Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Therapy for HeartFailure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Three medications are now guideline-recommended treatments for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), however, the cost-effectiveness of these agents in combination has yet to be established. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in individuals with HFmrEF/HFpEF. Using a 3-state Markov model, we performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated cohorts of 1,000 patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Treatment with 1-, 2-, and 3-drug combinations was modeled. Based on a United States health care sector perspective, outcome data was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 United States dollars based on a 30-year time horizon. Treatment with MRA, MRA+SGLT2i, and MRA+SGLT2i+ARNI therapy resulted in an increase in life years of 1.04, 1.58, and 1.80 in the HFmrEF subgroup, respectively, and 0.99, 1.54, and 1.77 in the HFpEF subgroup, respectively, compared with placebo. At a yearly cost of $18, MRA therapy resulted in ICERs of $10,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in both subgroups. The ICER for the addition of SGLT2i therapy ($4,962 per year) was $113,000 per QALY in the HFmrEF subgroup and $141,000 in the HFpEF subgroup. The addition of ARNI therapy ($5,504 per year) resulted in ICERs >$250,000 per QALY in both subgroups. If SGLT2i and ARNI were available at generic pricing the ICERs become <$10,000 per QALY in both EF subgroups. Outcomes were highly sensitive to assumed benefit in cardiovascular death. For patients with heart failure, MRA was of high value, SGLT2i was of intermediate value, and ARNI was of low value in both HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups. For patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF increased use of MRA and SGLT2i therapies should be encouraged and be accompanied with efforts to lower the cost of SGLT2i and ARNI therapies.

Effect of Empagliflozin on Heart Failure Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the EMPACT-MI Trial.

Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, chronic kidney disease, or prevalent HF irrespective of ejection fraction. Whereas the EMPACT-MI trial (Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) showed that empagliflozin does not reduce the risk of the composite of hospitalization for HF and all-cause death, the effect of empagliflozin on first and recurrent HF events after myocardial infarction is unknown. EMPACT-MI was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial that randomized 6522 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction at risk for HF on the basis of newly developed left ventricular ejection fraction of <45% or signs or symptoms of congestion to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo within 14 days of admission. In prespecified secondary analyses, treatment groups were analyzed for HF outcomes. Over a median follow-up of 17.9 months, the risk for first HF hospitalization and total HF hospitalizations was significantly lower in the empagliflozin compared with the placebo group (118 [3.6%] versus 153 [4.7%] patients with events; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60, 0.98]; P=0.031, for first HF hospitalization; 148 versus 207 events; rate ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51, 0.89]; P=0.006, for total HF hospitalizations). Subgroup analysis showed consistency of empagliflozin benefit across clinically relevant patient subgroups for first and total HF hospitalizations. The need for new use of diuretics, renin-angiotensin modulators, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists after discharge was less in patients randomized to empagliflozin versus placebo (all P<0.05). Empagliflozin reduced the risk of HF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or congestion after acute myocardial infarction. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04509674.

Larger Degree of Renal Function Decline in Chronic Kidney Disease Is a Favorable Factor for the Attenuation of eGFR Slope Worsening by SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) have beneficial effects on the renal function of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, although the types of patients suitable for this treatment remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on CKD patients who were treated with SGLT2I in our department from 2020 to 2023. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) just before treatment was defined as the baseline and the difference between pre-and post-treatment eGFR slopes were used to compare the improvement of renal function. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent factors for its improvement. Results: A total of 128 patients were analyzed (mean age: 67.2 years; number of women: 28 [22%]). The mean eGFR was 42.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, and urine protein was 0.66 g/gCr. The eGFR slopes of patients with an eGFR 2 were improved significantly after treatment (−0.28 to −0.14 mL/min/1.73 m2/month, p 2. Logistic analysis for the improvement in eGFR slopes showed that women (odds ratio [OR], 5.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–27.3; p = 0.03), use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (OR, 11.79; 95% CI, 1.05–132.67; p = 0.012) and rapid decline of eGFR before treatment (OR, 12.8 per mL/min/1.73 m2/month decrease in eGFR; 95% CI, 3.32–49.40; p Conclusion: SGLT2Is may have beneficial effects, especially for rapid decliners of eGFR, including advanced CKD.

Electrocardiographic predictors of response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BackgroundSacubitril/valsartan (SV) is currently recommended as a first-line therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to its significant clinical and prognostic benefit; however, not all patients respond to therapy and predictors of clinical response to SV remain under-studied. AimsTo identify electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of response to SV therapy in HFrEF patients. MethodsA retrospective analysis of a hospital heart failure registry was undertaken. Consecutive HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association class II–III) on maximal-dose SV were studied. Response to SV was defined as ≥10% relative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 3-months post-maximal-dose therapy. Pre-therapy ECGs were retrospectively analyzed for axes and standard wave and interval durations. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between predictors and therapeutic response. Backward stepwise regression was employed to develop a parsimonious model. ResultsP-wave duration (PWD) 100–120 ms, PWD >120 ms, and QTc >460 ms were associated with response to SV on univariate analysis: OR 18.00 (4.45–122.90), 5.00 (1.47–20.42), and 3.10 (1.18–9.22), respectively. The preferred model that included the former two predictors in combination with pre-therapy creatinine, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use, and LVEF was highly selective (area under the ROC curve = 0.868). ConclusionsProlongation of both PWD and QTc interval on baseline ECG in HFrEF patients is predictive of therapeutic response to maximal-dose SV therapy and may indicate early cardiac remodeling that is highly amenable to reversal.

Prognostic impact of polypharmacy and discharge medications in octogenarians and nonagenarian patients with acute heart failure.

With the increasing frequency of heart failure (HF) in elderly patients, polypharmacy has become a major concern owing to its adverse outcomes. However, reports on the clinical impact of polypharmacy and discharge medications in hospitalized super-aged patients with acute HF are rare. Data from 682 patients aged 80years or older, hospitalized for treating acute HF, were analyzed. We recorded the number of medications at discharge and classified them into three groups: HF, non-HF cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular medications. We investigated the correlation of polypharmacy, defined as daily administration of 10 or more medications at discharge, and the use of discharge medications with post-discharge prognosis. Polypharmacy was recorded in 24.3% of enrolled patients. Polypharmacy was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, the incidence of cardiac-related death, or HF-associated rehospitalization; however, the number of non-cardiovascular medications, multiple usage of potentially inappropriate medications, use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and doses of loop diuretics were associated with poor prognosis. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with higher mortality in patients with Barthel index ≥ 60 at discharge; hence, physical function at discharge was useful for the stratification of prognostic impacts of polypharmacy. The current study demonstrated that polypharmacy was not essentially associated with poor prognosis in super-aged patients with acute HF. Appropriate medications that consider the patient's physical function, rather than polypharmacy itself, are important for the management of HF.

The changing landscape of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists – finerenone in cardiovascular and renal health

Finerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) with high selectivity and affinity to mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Steroidal MRAs, like spironolactone and eplerenone, have been in use for decades. They have an established position in the management of hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There are studies showing that MR antagonism has anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects resulting in cardiovascular and renal protection. However, broader use of steroidal MRAs is seriously limited by antiandrogenic side effects and the risk of hyperkalemia. The differences in structure as well as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties between steroidal and non-steroidal MRAs result in reduced risk of side effects while offering the benefit of cardiorenal protection. Finerenone is currently the only non-steroidal MRA approved by European Medicines Agency (EMA). It is indicated for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with albuminuria and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Several studies showed a reduction of the risk of cardiovascular and renal events in this group of patients compared to placebo. The risk of hyperkalemia was increased resulting in discontinuation of treatment in more patients than placebo, but the risk of serious adverse events did not differ significantly. The other indications for finerenone, including heart failure (HF) management, are currently being researched.

Additive renal protective effects between arctigenin and puerarin in diabetic kidney disease

Recent studies have shown that the combined use of renin angiotensin system inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitors and/or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist provides additional renal protection for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Similarly, in traditional Chinese medicine, the synergistic application of multiple herbs often brings more significant therapeutic effects. However, the synergistic or additive mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine in combination therapy are not fully understood. In our previous studies, we show that arctigenin (ATG), a major component of Fructus Arctii, attenuates proteinuria and renal injury in diabetic mice by activating PP2A, and puerarin (a class of known isoflavones) can also reduce proteinuria and renal injury in diabetic mice via activation of Sirt1. Here, we further explored the potential additive renal protection of these two compounds in diabetic mice. Research has found that ATG and puerarin have a synergistic effect in reducing albuminuria in db/db mice. Mechanistically, we found that ATG reduced NF-κB p65 phosphorylation likely through activation of PP2A while puerarin reduced p65 acetylation via Sirt1 activation. Therefore, ATG and puerarin have additive inhibitory effects on the NF-κB activation, which is a key inflammatory pathway in DKD. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed distinct pathways activated by ATG and puerarin in the diabetic kidney, which may provide an additional mechanism for their additive effects in DKD. Our study suggests that ATG and puerarin could be a new combination therapy for DKD and reveals its underlined mechanisms.

Incidence and progression of atrial fibrillation in patients with and without heart failure using mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: a meta-analysis.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have emerged as potential therapy to target the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate in atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, there have been inconsistent results on the impact of MRAs on AF. We sought to evaluate the effect of MRAs on AF incidence and progression in patients with and without heart failure. Electronic databases were searched up to September, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated MRA use and reported AF outcomes. Primary outcome was a composite of new-onset or recurrent AF. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia and gynecomastia risks. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). 12 RCTs, comprising 11,419 patients treated with various MRAs were included [5960 (52%) on MRA]. On follow-up (6-39months), 714 (5.5%) patients developed AF. MRA therapy was associated with a 32% reduction in the risk of new-onset or recurrent AF [OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.92), I2 = 40%]. On subgroup analysis, the greatest benefit magnitude was demonstrated in reducing AF recurrence [OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83)] and among patients with left ventricular dysfunction [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.40-0.85)]. Gynecomastia, but not hyperkalemia, was associated with MRA use. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that therapy duration was a significant interaction factor driving the effect size (Pinteraction = 0.013). MRA use is associated with a reduction in AF risk, especially AF progression. A prominent effect is seen in patients with heart failure, further augmented by therapy duration. Prospective trials are warranted to evaluate MRA use as upstream therapy for preventing this common arrhythmia.

Echocardiographic predictors of positive left ventricular remodeling in patients with a history of active myocarditis.

Myocarditis may be difficult to diagnose because of the variety of its clinical manifestations, and the clinical course of the disease can be unpredictable. Nevertheless, some patients may exhibit partial or full contractile recovery following myocarditis. Standard and speckle-tracking echocardiography may serve as tools to follow this recovery. We aimed to evaluate predictors of positive left ventricular (LV) remodeling after active myocarditis (AM). A database of a high‑volume, tertiary cardiology center was searched for patients with AM hospitalized between 2016 and 2019. They were included in the analysis based on clinical manifestations and presence of at least 1 of the following diagnostic criteria: positive findings on electrocardiography / Holter monitoring, echocardiography, elevated troponin T/I levels, functional or structural abnormalities on cardiac imaging, or tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance. LV global longitudinal strain and mechanical dispersion (MD; defined as SD of the time to peak longitudinal strain derived from all LV segments in 3 apical views) were determined. Echocardiographic response (positive LV remodeling measured by transthoracic echocardiography) was defined as end‑systolic volume (ESV) reduction by 15% or greater or end-diastolic volume (EDV) reduction by 15% or greater from the baseline values. A total of 61 consecutive patients were recruited. The median follow‑up was 1.4 years (range, 0.3-4). The mortality rate was 1.6%. Echocardiographic response was noted in 24 patients (39.4%). A multivariable Cox regression model including significant baseline differences as covariates showed that QRS duration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.57; P = 0.049), MD (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.04), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA] use (HR, 8.60; 95% CI, 1.50-46.49; P = 0.01) were independently associated with positive LV remodeling with ESV reduction. MD (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P = 0.04) was also independently associated with positive LV remodeling with EDV reduction. Mechanical dispersion, QRS duration, and MRA use are independent predictors of positive LV remodeling in individuals with a history of AM.

Independent Link Between Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Muscle Wasting in Heart Failure Patients Not Receiving Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation is a proposed mechanism of muscle wasting (MW i.e., reduction in muscle mass). Although we reported that RAS inhibitors (RASIs) were associated with lower prevalence of MW in heart failure (HF) patients, the relationship between mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling and MW has not been analyzed.Methods and Results: We analyzed data from 320 consecutive Japanese HF patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning for assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI). In multiple linear regression analyses, plasma renin activity (PRA) was negatively correlated with ASMI in patients not receiving RASIs, indicating an untoward role of the RAS in MW. Results of analysis of covariance in which risk factors of MW served as covariates showed that use of MR antagonists (MRAs) was associated with lower ASMI and higher PRA in the non-RASIs group. The close relationship between use of MRAs and lower ASMI or higher PRA in the non-RASIs group was confirmed in analyses in which the differences in baseline characteristics between users and non-users of MRAs were minimized by using an inverse probability of treatment weighting. Increased PRA by MR inhibition without concurrent RAS inhibition, possibly contributing to upregulation of angiotensin II signaling, may be associated with reduction in muscle mass.

Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Insight from the PARADISE MI trial.

It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion. Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR]MRA 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.19 and HRMRA- 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction). Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion.

Hyperaldosteronism Screening and Findings From a Large Diverse Population With Resistant Hypertension Within an Integrated Health System.

Hyperaldosteronism (HA) is a common cause of secondary hypertension and may contribute to resistant hypertension (RH). The authors sought to determine and characterize HA screening, positivity rates, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use among patients with RH. A cross-sectional study was performed within Kaiser Permanente Southern California (7/1/2012-6/30/2017). Using contemporary criteria, RH was defined as blood pressure uncontrolled (≥ 130/80) on ≥ 3 medications or requiring ≥ 4 antihypertensive medications. The primary outcome was screening rate for HA defined as any aldosterone and plasma renin activity measurement. Secondary outcomes were HA screen positive rates and MRA use among all patients with RH. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratio (with 95% confidence intervals) for factors associated with HA screening and for patients that screened positive. Among 102,480 patients identified as RH, 1977 (1.9%) were screened for HA and 727 (36.8%) screened positive for HA. MRA use was 6.5% among all patients with RH (22.5% among screened, 31.2% among screened positive). Black race, potassium < 4, bicarbonate > 29, chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and systolic blood pressure were associated with HA screening, but only Black race (1.55 [1.20-2.01]), potassium (1.82 [1.48-2.24]), bicarbonate levels (1.39 [1.10-1.75]), and diastolic blood pressure (1.15 [1.03-1.29]) were associated with positive screenings. The authors' findings demonstrate low screening rates for HA among patients with difficult-to-control hypertension yet a high positivity rate among those screened. Factors associated with screening did not always correlate with screening positive. Screening and targeted use of MRA may lead to improved blood pressure control and outcomes among patients with RH.

Has the use of concomitant cardiac medications improved over time in primary prevention ICD patients? Insights from the APPRAISE ATP study

Abstract Introduction Patients (pts) implanted with an ICD for a primary prevention (PP) typically receive concomitant medications (meds) to treat LV dysfunction. However, It is not well established whether compliance with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has improved over time in this population. Methods Data were drawn from the MADIT-RIT (2009-2012) and APPRAISE ATP (2016-present) studies. Both studies were global in scope and enrolled pts who were implanted with an ICD for PP indications. Meds prescribed at baseline were compared between the two studies. Meds of interest included: evidence-based beta blockers [(BB-EV) defined as carvedilol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol], ACE inhibitors, ARBs, ARNIs, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). SGLT2i were introduced into GDMT after the study APPRAISE ATP started and were not included. Meds were analyzed both individually and in combination as GDMT, defined as joint use of BB-EV, ACE/ARB/ARNI, and MRA. Differences were compared with a t-test for continuous variables, a Chi-square test for categorical data and a Cochran-Armitage trend test for ordinal categorical data. Results Demographics for the two studies were compared for pts who received ICDs in MADIT-RIT (n=742) and APPRAISE ATP (n=2627 enrolled with n=2596 randomized) and are shown in the table below. When compared to MADIT-RIT, APPRAISE ATP pts were significantly older with a greater prevalence of diabetes. Comparison of baseline meds are shown in both the table and in the figure. Although BB-EV and ACE/ARB use was slightly but significantly lower in APPRAISE ATP, these declines were offset by a significant increase in MRA use in APPRAISE ATP. A marked shift was seen over time with significant decline in use of ACE-I that was matched by a significant increase in use of ARBs, either alone or in combination with ARNIs. When considering meds used in combination for GDMT, pts in APPRAISE ATP were significantly more likely to meet GDMT recommendations than pts who were enrolled in MADIT-RIT (36.7% vs 27.2%, respectively, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions In the APPRAISE ATP study, compliance with GDMT in PP ICD pts has significantly improved when compared to the MADIT-RIT study conducted 10 years previously. These changes have been characterized by greater use of MRAs as well as a shift away from ACE inhibitors towards use of ARBs and ARNIs. Although there was considerably greater compliance with GDMT, with approximately one third of pts fulfilling GMDT, opportunities still remain for improvement. Further investigation is needed to determine what influence greater compliance with GDMT may have on improved clinical outcomes such as reductions in VT/VF event rates and all-cause mortality.

Dietary sodium intake and outcomes: a secondary analysis from SODIUM - HF

Abstract Background Sodium restriction is common advice provided to patients with heart failure, however, evidence from the SODIUM-HF trial and a subsequent meta-analysis failed to show a beneficial effect of dietary sodium restriction on outcomes. Purpose This secondary analysis of SODIUM HF is aimed to assess association between baseline dietary sodium intake, the change in dietary sodium at 6 months and a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization, emergency department visit, and all-cause death at 12 and 24 months. Methods Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess association of dietary sodium level measured at randomization with primary and secondary endpoints. Adjusted Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were presented. A responder analysis also explored the achieved dietary sodium at 6 months with subsequent risk for clinical outcomes. Results 792 participants were included. At baseline, sodium intake was ≤ 1500 mg/day in 19.9% (n = 158), &amp;gt;1500-3000 mg/day in 56.5% (n = 448) and &amp;gt;3000 mg/day in 23.4% (n= 186) of the participants. Women, older patients, and those with lower glomerular filtration rate and higher ejection fraction were more often represented in the group with sodium intake ≤1500 mg/day; conversely, diabetes, prior smoking, use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and ICD were observed in the groups of higher sodium intake levels (&amp;gt;3000 mg/day)(Table 1). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed no association between sodium level (per doubling) at baseline with clinical outcomes (all associations p=ns), however, adjusted models exhibited a trend towards a decreased risk of CV hospitalizations at 2 years. In the responder analysis, a trend towards a decreased adjusted risk for composite outcome and CV hospitalizations at 1 year in those achieving a sodium level &amp;lt;1500 mg at 6 months was observed (Table 2). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed no association for 1- and 2-year outcomes per 500 mg increase in absolute difference in sodium level between baseline and 6 months. Conclusion In SODIUM HF, there was no association between sodium level at baseline with clinical outcomes at any time point but there is a trend towards a decreased risk of CV hospitalizations at 2 years and in patients achieving &amp;lt;1500 mg / day by 6 months, a trend towards fewer subsequent clinical events was present. This finding should be explored via a prospective clinical trial.Baseline characteristics of populationOutcomes

Timing of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor initiation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: data from the Swedish heart failure registry

Abstract Background International guidelines recommend early and fast optimization of the treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Angiotensin receptor-neprilyisin inhibitor (ARNI) reduced mortality/morbidity in HFrEF. However, despite early initiation of ARNI appeared safe and of potential benefit in randomized clinical trials, their early implementation is underutilized in real world. Purpose To explore the timing, modalities and predictors of ARNI initiation in a large, nationwide cohort of patients with HFrEF. Methods ARNI-naïve patients with HFrEF (EF&amp;lt;40%) registered in the SwedeHF Registry from January 2017 to December-2021 were included. Separate analyses were performed to investigate ARNI initiation in terms of 1) course of the disease (duration of HF &amp;lt;6 vs ≥6 months), 2) location (in hospital vs out-patient), 3) time from a previous HF hospitalization (in-hospital or ≤14 days from discharge vs 15-90 days vs &amp;gt;90 days or no initiation). Results Analysis 1) Among 16,086 HFrEF patients registered in SwedeHF during the study period, 63% had an HF duration &amp;lt;6 months. 5% vs. 9% of patients with HF duration &amp;lt;6 vs. ≥6 initiated ARNI, respectively. Younger age and referral to specialty care were more strongly associated with ARNI initiation whether HF duration was ≥6 or &amp;lt;6 months. In-patient status, lower EF, and hypertension were independently associated with initiation only if HF duration was &amp;lt;6 months, and HF nurse-led clinic and higher income only if HF duration was ≥6 months. Previous ACEi/ARB use was associated with more likely ARNI initiation in HF duration ≥6 months and less likely initiation in HF duration &amp;lt;6 months (Figure). Analysis 2) Of 1,065 HFrEF patients who initiated ARNI, 30% started as in-patients. Analysis 3) Among 3,892 patients registered as in-patients in SwedeHF, 8% initiated ARNI ≤14 days from the hospital discharge, 4% between 15-90 days, and 88% &amp;gt;90 days or did not initiate. Important independent predictors of earlier initiation (≤14 days) were a more recent registration in SwedeHF, follow-up in specialty care and HF nurse-led clinic, lower EF, worse New York Heart Association class, previous use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB), use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, ICD/CRT, and higher income, whereas older age, higher mean arterial pressure, atrial fibrillation (AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and living alone where associated with lower likelihood. Conclusions In this nationwide HFrEF cohort ARNI were rarely initiated early at/after an HF hospitalization discharge, initiation was more likely in the out-patient setting and in the later course of the HF disease. Key patient characteristics associated with early initiation were linked with more severe HF and follow-up in dedicated HF care. Overall our data highlight a delayed initiation of ARNI therapy and claim for better implementation in the early stage of HF.Predictors of ARNI initiation