The rapid development of resistance to insecticides in house flies (Musca domestica L.) indicates a growing need for other approaches toward their suppression. Food-handling establishments and military installations could well benefit from a repellent. A residual treatment to the approaches to buildings, as well as to areas where refuse is kept would prevent flies from congregating in these locations, and thereby reduce the sources from which they normally migrate into the buildings. Areas around poultry houses and dairy barns could also be sprayed with a repellent until proper disposal of breeding materials could be arranged. In these circumstances a good repellent would not obviate the need for insecticides, but would reduce the frequency of applications and thus retard the development of resistance. At Orlando, Fla., 65 chemicals were tested in the laboratory as vapor or contact repellents against house flies. Some of the compounds were received from commercial laboratories where they had been developed specifically as fly repellents, and others were selected because of their repellency to other species. A semicircle of heavy white cardboard 31/4 inches in radius was sprayed with a 2 percent solution of the repellent in acetone to give a deposit of 200 milligrams per square foot. Twenty-four hours later the card was rolled into the shape of a funnel, stapled, and placed in the top of a standard drinking glass to form an inverted cone trap. The treated side of the card formed the interior of the funnel. Prior to its insertion 10 grams of Edamin (a casein hydrolysate) moistened with 10 milliliters of water was placed in the bottom of the trap as an attractant, and a screen barrier was placed above the solution to prevent contact of flies with the attractant. A duplicate trap containing an untreated funnel was utilized as the standard. The traps were exposed for 30 minutes at opposite ends of a cage, 7 x 10 x 10 inches, containing 100 flies of mixed sexes. The number of females in the untreated trap divided by the number in the repellent trap gave the repellency ratio. Only female flies were counted, as Edamin is much more attractive to females than males. If less than five were captured in the untreated trap, the test was discarded. Duplicate tests were run with each repellent, with 2 sets of funnels and 2 cages of flies. The treated funnels were then stored for aging. Tests were run at 1 and 2 days of aging, after which, if the ratio of repellency remained greater than 2.0, they were tested after 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days, until the ratio dropped below 2.0. The results with 28 compounds that were effective for 2 or more days are given in Table 1. The most promising compounds were di-n-octylamine, n-propyl n-octyl sulfoxide, and 3-chloropropyl n-octyl sulfoxide, which were effective more than 90 days. Allyl n-octyl sulfoxide and N-amyl-2,3-norcamphanedicarboximide were effective for 30 days and N(n-pentyl) succinamide, N-n-heptylphthalimide, and N-sec-pentylphthalimide for 14 days.
Read full abstract