Miller Children Research Articles

COMPAISON BETWEEN INVASIVE AND NONINVASIVI CARDIAC OUTPUT DETERMINATION IN CRITICALLY ILL CHILDREN

Pediatric Care Unit, Miller Children's Hospital of Long Beach, Dept. of Pediatrics, Univ. ot Calif., Irvine, CA., 2801 Atlantic, Long Beach CA 90801–1428

Massive pulmonary infarction in sickle cell anemia

1From The Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Miller Children's Hospital Medical Center University of California, Irvine 2From the Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine

Teaching tools made by peers: a novel approach to medical preparation.

Materials created by patients who have undergone medical procedures and surgery are being used by the health team at Miller Children's Hospital to help prepare other children for their hospital experiences. The materials include booklets written by children about their tests and surgeries, drawings illustrating their hospital experiences, and photographs of treatment rooms and equipment. These booklets are compiled, along with supplies associated with the tests and surgeries, into attractively decorated boxes. Case studies have shown that the input from peers who have created the preparation materials is well received by patients and has added credibility to the teaching sessions. The creators of the preparation boxes have also benefitted by helping other children and by putting their own hospital experiences into perspective.

Intact Survival Rates in Nearly Drowned, Comatose Children-Reply

<i>In Reply</i>.—The letter by McComb addresses the controversial issue of brain resuscitation. The lack of prospective, well-controlled studies on nearly drowned victims is probably the source of confusion in designing therapeutic modalities for posthypoxic, severely brain-injured children. The difficulties in evaluating previous studies were compounded by the fact that instead of analyzing one variable between two well-matched groups, multiple factors were rather introduced. Unless the two groups of patients from Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach, Calif,¹and Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles²were well matched in terms of baseline evaluation and therapeutic approach, one should be cautious in comparing the results. In addition, some investigators believe that hypothermia^3,4may play a major role in "resuscitating" those neurons that were severely insulted by hypoxic event but that are capable of recovery. On the other hand, our experience with children who had either severe brain damage or full

Responses to Language: Judgments of Grammaticalness

Previous articleNext article No AccessResponses to Language: Judgments of GrammaticalnessHoward Maclay, and Mary D. SleatorHoward Maclay Search for more articles by this author , and Mary D. Sleator Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by International Journal of American Linguistics Volume 26, Number 4Oct., 1960 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/464587 Views: 8Total views on this site Citations: 29Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Inbal Arnon, Ivan A. Sag, Neal Snider The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments, Language and Cognitive Processes 28, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2013): 48–87.https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.572401Shobhana L. Chelliah, Willem J. de Reuse Grammar Gathering Techniques, (Aug 2010): 357–412.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9026-3_12Hiroshi Nagata Judgments of Grammaticality as Related to Judgments of Meaningfulness and Ordinariness, Perceptual and Motor Skills 84, no.22 (Dec 2016): 600–602.https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.600Hiroshi Nagata Repetition Effect in Judgments of Grammaticality of Sentences: Examination with Ungrammatical Sentences, Perceptual and Motor Skills 68, no.11 (Aug 2016): 275–282.https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.68.1.275Craig Chraudron RESEARCH ON METALINGUISTIC JUDGMENTS: A REVIEW OF THEORY, METHODS, AND RESULTS, Language Learning 33, no.33 (Oct 2006): 343–377.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00546.xHarold J. Vetter, Jerry Volovecky, Richard W. Howell Judgments of grammaticalness: A partial replication and extension, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8, no.66 (Nov 1979): 567–583.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071184JOHN B. CARROLL Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Language Abilities, (Jan 1979): 13–31.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50008-1Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Lila R. Gleitman, Henry Gleitman What Did the Brain Say to the Mind? A Study of the Detection and Report of Ambiguity by Young Children, (Jan 1978): 97–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67155-5_7Lila R. Gleitman, Henry Gleitman, Elizabeth F. Shipley The Emergence of the Child as Grammarian, (Jan 1977): 91–117.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4175-8_8Deana Finkler Role of Stimulus Modality in Rating Ordinary and Derived Word Strings, Perceptual and Motor Skills 40, no.22 (Oct 2016): 495–501.https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1975.40.2.495John T. Tokar, Anthony J. Brunse, Pietro Castelnuovo-Tedesco, Volney J. Stefflre An Objective Method of Dream Analysis, The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 42, no.44 (Nov 2017): 563–578.https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1973.11926649Sharon L. James, Jon F. Miller Children's Awareness of Semantic Constraints in Sentences, Child Development 44, no.11 (Mar 1973): 69.https://doi.org/10.2307/1127681Peter A. de Villiers, Jill G. de Villiers Early judgments of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1, no.44 (Dec 1972): 299–310.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067785Lila R. Gleitman, Henry Gleitman, Elizabeth F. Shipley The emergence of the child as grammarian, Cognition 1, no.2-32-3 (Jan 1972): 137–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90016-9John B. Carroll LEARNING FROM VERBAL DISCOURSE IN EDUCATIONAL MEDIA: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1971, no.22 (Aug 2014): i–288.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1971.tb00814.xAlice F. Healy, George A. Miller The relative contribution of nouns and verbs to sentence acceptability and comprehensibility, Psychonomic Science 24, no.22 (Nov 2013): 94–96.https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337909Ronald S. Tikofsky, Donald G. Reiff Structural Apperception in the Absence of Syntactic Constraints, Language and Speech 13, no.44 (Aug 2016): 240–253.https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097001300403Joseph H. Danks, Charles Lewis PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF RATINGS OF SOME DEVIANT ENGLISH SENTENCES, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1970, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–85.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1970.tb00408.xJoseph H. Danks, Sam Glucksberg Psychological Scaling of Linguistic Properties, Language and Speech 13, no.22 (Aug 2016): 118–138.https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097001300204Joseph H. Danks Grammaticalness and meaningfulness in the comprehension of sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, no.66 (Dec 1969): 687–696.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80031-9Walter S. Stolz Some Experiments with Queer Sentences, Language and Speech 12, no.44 (Aug 2016): 203–219.https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096901200401Kiat-Boey Lim PROMPTING VS. CONFIRMATION, PICTURES VS. TRANSLATIONS, AND OTHER VARIABLES IN CHILDREN'S LEARNING OF GRAMMAR IN A SECOND LANGUAGE, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1968, no.22 (Aug 2014): i–183.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00999.xLawrence E. Marks Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7, no.55 (Oct 1968): 965–967.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80106-9John B. Carroll DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE LANGUAGE SKILLS BEYOND THE EARLY YEARS, ETS Research Bulletin Series 1968, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–98.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00388.xRonald G. Downey, David T. Hakes Some psychological effects of violating linguistic rules, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7, no.11 (Feb 1968): 158–161.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80182-3 References, (Jan 1967): 352–366.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395568-5.50021-1 References, (Jan 1967): 463–495.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3264-5.50034-0E.B. Coleman Responses to a scale of grammaticalness, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4, no.66 (Dec 1965): 521–527.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80052-4DELL HYMES Directions in (Ethno-) Linguistic Theory1, American Anthropologist 66, no.33 (Oct 2009): 6–56.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00820