Author’s e-mail: David.Donoghue@dfa.ie Irish Studies in International Affairs, Vol. 29 (2018), 13–16 doi: https://doi.org/10.3318/ISIA.2018.29.21 Multilateralism and Interdependence David Donoghue Former Irish Permanent Representative to the United Nations The fortunes of multilateral diplomacy as a means of addressing pressing global challenges have tended to ebb and flow over the years. The period from the early 1990s onwards marked a high point with the ending of the Cold War, which had polarised the world for decades and thwarted most efforts at international consensus-building. In the post-Soviet order, there were new opportunities to explore the scope for global solutions to increasingly global challenges. Changing power dynamics were at work as new regional players emerged to challenge the traditional hegemony of two super powers. The Beijing Platform of Action on gender equality and women’s empowerment (1995) was an early illustration of what multilateral diplomacy could achieve. The Millennium Summit a few years later unveiled new global goals for human development and poverty reduction. However, for a number of reasons the dividend expected from the new multilateralism was never fully realised. Considerable instability had accompanied the break-up of the Soviet Union. There was significant competition from, and among, the emerging regional powers. Violent extremism, religious fundamentalism and terrorism characterised the new century, with non-state actors playing a steadily greater role. Health epidemics, natural disasters and economic shocks also had destabilising effects from the late 1990s onwards. There was a proliferation of regional conflicts and humanitarian crises, along with mass displacement of people linked to these. Climate change and environmental degradation were aggravating factors. Even as some improvement was achieved in terms of overall poverty levels, inequalities within states deepened, adding to existing social and ethnic tensions. Disquiet about the impact of globalisation on employment also began to spread. A turning point came, however, with the ‘Rio plus 20’ conference which was held in Rio de Janeiro in 2012. Marking the twentieth anniversary of the first ‘Earth Summit’ which had taken place in the Brazilian city in 1992, this event gave renewed impetus to the concept of ‘sustainable development’ spanning three dimensions—the economic, social and environmental—and requiring a holistic approach to all three. From this point on there was much greater recognition of the interconnections between peace, human rights and sustainable 14 Irish Studies in International Affairs development—and of the capacity of the UN system and of multilateral diplomacy to deliver global agreements based on these interconnections. There was also clearer acceptance that we were long past the point where nation states, however powerful, could solve on their own challenges which were increasingly global in nature. Further insights followed. It was agreed that, when the period set for achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) expired in 2015, there wouldhavetobeanewsetof goalscoveringtheperiodfrom2015to2030.However, these could not be confined to the relatively narrow set of policy concerns addressed by the MDGs (poverty reduction in the traditional sense); instead, they would have to range much more widely so as to do justice to all three dimensions of sustainable development. Second, in contrast to the MDGs which had been drafted by a handful of UN officials and simply promulgated, the new set of goals would have to be ‘owned’ by all 193 member States; they would be subject to detailed negotiation and agreement, with each member State having a veto over each word. Third, the new development agenda which emerged would apply to all States, not just developing states (as had been the case with the MDGs). This would be a truly universal agenda; all 193 member States would undertake to implement the same set of commitments over the period from 2015 to 2030. Building on work done by a smaller group of states during 2014, the ambassadors of Ireland and Kenya were asked to lead the formal intergovernmental negotiations which would agree this new agenda in time for a special summit to launch it in September 2015. I set to work with my Kenyan counterpart, Macharia Kamau, and on 2 August of that year, some six weeks ahead of schedule ,wedeliveredagreementonanew2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopment.It contained seventeen Sustainable Development Goals...
Read full abstract