United States military personnel are required to meet a standard weight or body fat percentage, and military personnel are subject to circumference measurements when their maximal allowable weight is exceeded. Each military branch has an independently derived circumference-based equation (C) to predict body fat percentage, with the Navy and Air Force being equivalent. If a service member fails to comply with body fat standards, disciplinary action may be taken. In this validation study, we examined the performance of Army and Navy/Air Force C's in 1,191 civil service employees (firefighters), and compared them with percent body fat estimated by skinfold measurement (S). PURPOSE To determine the correlation between military C and S to predict body fat percentage. We also compared the Army and Navy/Air Force C's in order to evaluate the efficacy of C to determine body fat. Lastly, we evaluated the variation between C and S to identify non-compliant personnel. METHODS Girth measurements (neck, abdomen, and hips) were taken on 1,191 male firefighters using a spring-loaded tape measure. S were taken in circuit on the same 1,191 men using Lange calipers at the chest, abdomen, and thigh. RESULTS Mean age of the subjects was 37.9 ± 7.9 years. The percent body fat was estimated lowest for S (18.4 ± 6.1) followed by Navy/Air Force C (20.4 ± 5.8) and Army C (20.6 ± 5.2). There was a strong correlation coefficient between S vs. Army C (r = 0.79) and S vs. Navy/Air Force C (r = 0.79). Non-compliants were estimated higher by Army C than S (231 vs. 153) and by Navy/Air Force C than S (336 vs. 213). CONCLUSIONS The Navy/Air Force C and Army C yielded similar results in predicting body fat percentage and the data shows a strong correlation between S and C. However, when compared with S, C predicts a higher percentage of body fat. Therefore, when employing C standards a greater number of subjects were classified as non-compliant according to military body composition standards.