Military Acute Concussion Evaluation Research Articles

Utility of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening in Military Medicine: A Systematic Review.

The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) was created as a brief clinical screening tool for identifying vestibular and ocular motor symptoms and impairments post-concussion. It was found to have predictive validity in correctly identifying concussed athletes from healthy controls. In 2018, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE2) replaced the original Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE); the most prominent change between the MACE and MACE2 was the addition of the VOMS. Despite its adoption into military medicine, it is not known if the addition of the VOMS to the MACE2 is acutely helpful, and if it provides additional information for diagnosis, prognosis, and/or management. The purposes of this systematic review were: (1) to determine the utility of the VOMS in correctly identifying concussed individuals, particularly as it pertains to military medicine; (2) to explore the extent to which the VOMS can inform concussion prognosis; and (3) to establish the value of the VOMS as a measure for monitoring the evolution of symptoms throughout a service member's course of care. A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed from January 1, 2014 through August 16, 2023. Articles were included if they researched concussion or a related health condition or healthy controls and administered the VOMS. Articles were excluded if they discussed health conditions other than concussion; did not administer the VOMS; or were written in languages other than English. The tools used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias varied according to study design. Articles were classified into three primary domains: diagnosis, prognosis, and/or rehabilitation/recovery over time. A total of 231 articles were retrieved and 3 were duplicates, leaving 228 articles for review. Of the 228 articles screened, 100 relevant full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Fifty-nine articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria while the other 41 articles were rejected. Thirty-two articles helped to inform diagnosis, 15 prognosis, and 16 rehabilitation/recovery over time. The VOMS had excellent internal consistency and moderate to good test-retest reliability; however, a false-positive rate of 21.9% was found. Most studies indicated that a positive VOMS was associated with a delayed recovery. Several studies indicated that VOMS scores improved with targeted, active interventions and/or a symptom-guided progressive return to activity. The greatest limitation was the paucity of published evidence in the military population. More research is needed on the use of the VOMS in service members.

Comparative Performance of Three Eye-Tracking Devices in Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Acute Versus Chronic Subject Populations.

Presently, traumatic brain injury (TBI) triage in field settings relies on symptom-based screening tools such as the updated Military Acute Concussion Evaluation. Objective eye-tracking may provide an alternative means of neurotrauma screening due to sensitivity to neurotrauma brain-health changes. Previously, the US Army Medical Research and Development Command Non-Invasive NeuroAssessment Devices (NINAD) Integrated Product Team identified 3 commercially available eye-tracking devices (SyncThink EYE-SYNC, Oculogica EyeBOX, NeuroKinetics IPAS) as meeting criteria toward being operationally effective in the detection of TBI in service members. We compared these devices to assess their relative performance in the classification of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) subjects versus normal healthy controls. Participants 18 to 45 years of age were assigned to Acute mTBI, Chronic mTBI, or Control group per study criteria. Each completed a TBI assessment protocol with all 3 devices counterbalanced across participants. Acute mTBI participants were tested within 72 hours following injury whereas time since last injury for the Chronic mTBI group ranged from months to years. Discriminant analysis was undertaken to determine device classification performance in separating TBI subjects from controls. Area Under the Curves (AUCs) were calculated and used to compare the accuracy of device performance. Device-related factors including data quality, the need to repeat tests, and technical issues experienced were aggregated for reporting. A total of 63 participants were recruited as Acute mTBI subjects, 34 as Chronic mTBI subjects, and 119 participants without history of TBI as controls. To maximize outcomes, poorer quality data were excluded from analysis using specific criteria where possible. Final analysis utilized 49 (43 male/6 female, mean [x̅] age = 24.3 years, SD [s] = 5.1) Acute mTBI subjects, and 34 (33 male/1 female, x̅ age = 38.8 years, s = 3.9) Chronic mTBI subjects were age- and gender-matched as closely as possible with Control subjects. AUCs obtained with 80% of total dataset ranged from 0.690 to 0.950 for the Acute Group and from 0.753 to 0.811 for the Chronic mTBI group. Validation with the remaining 20% of dataset produced AUCs ranging from 0.600 to 0.750 for Acute mTBI group and 0.490 to 0.571 for the Chronic mTBI group. Potential eye-tracking detection of mTBI, per training model outcomes, ranged from acceptable to excellent for the Acute mTBI group; however, it was less consistent for the Chronic mTBI group. The self-imposed targeted performance (AUC of 0.850) appears achievable, but further device improvements and research are necessary. Discriminant analysis models differed for the Acute versus Chronic mTBI groups, suggesting performance differences in eye-tracking. Although eye-tracking demonstrated sensitivity in the Chronic group, a more rigorous and/or longitudinal study design is required to evaluate this observation. mTBI injuries were not controlled for this study, potentially reducing eye-tracking assessment sensitivity. Overall, these findings indicate that while eye-tracking remains a viable means of mTBI screening, device-specific variability in data quality, length of testing, and ease of use must be addressed to achieve NINAD objectives and DoD implementation.

Comparison of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and Computerized Eye-tracking to Identify Exposure to Repetitive Head Impacts.

Military service members (SMs) are exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in combat and training that are purported to adversely affect brain health, including cognition, behavior, and function. Researchers have reported that RHI from blast-related exposure may affect both vestibular and ocular function, which in turn may be related to symptomology. As such, an examination of the effects of RHI on exposed military SMs should incorporate these domains. To date, researchers have not compared groups of exposed special operations forces (SOF) operators on combined clinical vestibular/ocular and eye-tracker-based outcomes. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare participant-reported symptoms and performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with performance on the computerized RightEye tracking system between SOF operators exposed to blast-related RHI and healthy controls without blast-related exposure. In addition, the study aimed to compare subgroups of snipers and breachers exposed to RHI to controls on the preceding metrics, as well as identify a subset of individual (demographic) factors, participant-reported symptoms, and performance metrics on VOMS and RightEye that best identify SOF operators exposed to RHI from unexposed controls. The study involved a cross-sectional design including 25 Canadian SOF SMs comprised of breachers (n = 9), snipers (n = 9), and healthy, unexposed controls (n = 7). The former 2 groups were combined into an RHI group (n = 18) and compared to controls (n = 7). Participants provided demographics and completed a self-reported concussion-related symptom report via the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2, the VOMS, and RightEye computerized eye-tracking assessments. Independent samples t-tests and ANOVAs were used to compare the groups on the outcomes, with receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to identify predictors of blast exposure. This study was approved by the Defence Research Development Canada Human Research Ethics Committee and the Canadian Forces Surgeon General/Special Forces Command. The results from t-tests supported group differences for age (P = .012), participant-reported symptoms (P = .006), and all VOMS items (P range = <.001-.02), with the RHI group being higher than healthy controls on all variables. ANOVA results supported group differences among snipers, breachers, and controls for age (P = .01), RightEye saccades (P = .04), participant-reported total symptom severity (P = .03), and VOMS total scores (P = .003). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses supported age (AUC = 0.81), Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 participant-reported total symptom severity (AUC = 0.87), and VOMS total scores (AUC = 0.92) as significant predictors of prior blast exposure. Participant-reported concussion symptoms, VOMS scores, and age were useful in identifying SOF operators exposed to RHI from controls. RightEye metrics were not useful in differentiating RHI groups from controls. Differences between snipers and breachers warrant further research. Overall, the findings suggest that VOMS may be a useful tool for screening for the effects of exposure to RHI in SOF operators. Future investigations should be conducted on a larger sample of military SMs, consider additional factors (e.g., RHI exposure levels, medical history, and sex), and include additional assessment domains (e.g., balance, cognitive, and psychological).

Reconsidering Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Cutoff Scores forConcussion.

Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is often part of a comprehensive evaluation to identify acute mild traumatic brain injury. Most of the reports describe the use of the VOMS in adolescents/young adults and not in older adults or military service members. The purpose of this study was to describe VOMS findings in healthy civilians and active duty military service members up to the age of 50 years. Seventy-seven healthy civilians between 18 and 50 years of age (22 males, age 31.8 [9.0] years) participated across three sites in addition to 40 healthy active duty service members (25 males, age 27.5 [4.9] years) from one site. Demographics, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scores, mean near point convergence (NPC) distance, and Total Symptom Change (TSS) scores from the VOMS were evaluated. For civilians, the group mean NPC distance was 4.98 (3.8) cm. For military service members, the group mean NPC distance was 6.17 (4.57) cm. For civilians, the mean TSS was 1.2 (2.3) with 53.2% reporting 0 TSS, 27.3% reporting one TSS, and 19.5% reporting two or more TSS. For military service members, the mean TSS was 0.20 (0.72) with 92.5% reporting 0 TSS, 0% reporting one TSS, and 7.5% reporting two or more TSS. Age did not correlate with the mean NPC distance and TSS in healthy civilians and active duty military service members. Reconsideration of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, Version 2 cutoff value for abnormal mean NPC distance may be warranted to improve diagnostic accuracy in both civilian and military adult populations. Similarly, re-evaluating criteria for interpreting the TSS results of the VOMS, specifically in civilians, may be warranted.

187 Use of Quantitative Pupillometry in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to Diagnose and Predict Symptom Severity

INTRODUCTION: Concussion screening using the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE 2) and imaging modalities can be subjective, time intensive, and monopolize scarce resources in a forward deployed environment. The Pupillary light reflex (PLR) has shown recent promise in identifying mild traumatic brain injuries. METHODS: Freshman entering a military service academy had baseline PLR measurements (starting pupillary diameter, ending pupillary diameter, average constriction velocity, average dilation velocity, constriction latency, constriction percentage, T75 and pupillary wave form) completed using a Neuroptic PLR-3000. If a subject experienced a concussion they returned for PLR measurements and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) scores within 48 hours of injury. RESULTS: Five hundred and fourteen cadets (383 males and 131 females) completed baseline PLR measurements. Sixteen cadets subsequently sustained an mTBI and performed full post-injury assessments. The one-way MANCOVA performed on PLR metrics controlling for symptom severity revealed a marginally significant difference in combined PLR metrics between baseline and post-injury time points [Wilks’ λ = .578, F(8,22) = 2.01, p = .094, partial η = .422]. A significant difference in outcomes between baseline and post-injury were observed for starting pupillary diameter [F(1,29) = 3.10, p = .089, partial η2 = .097], average constriction velocity [F(1,29) = 5.79, p = .023, partial η2 = .167], and maximum constriction velocity [F(1,29) = 4.54, p =.042, partial η2 = .135]. Correlation coefficients demonstrated that post-injury changes in pupillary metrics were strongly associated with post-injury changes in symptom severity, particularly for starting pupillary diameter, constriction percentage, average constriction velocity, maximum constriction velocity, and T75. CONCLUSIONS: In this evaluation of service academy cadets there are measurable differences in pupillary dynamics after sustaining an mTBI which correlates with symptom severity.

Patterns of acute stress disorder in a sample of blast-injured military service members: A latent profile analysis.

The primary aims of this study were to identify latent profiles of acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms and to evaluate postconcussive symptom differences across the identified profiles as measured by the Acute Stress Disorder Scale and the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, respectively. Participants (N = 315) in the current study were predominantly active-duty (75.0%), enlisted (97.8%) males (97.4%) serving in the U.S. Army (87.8%). Approximately, half of the sample reported being married or engaged (51.1%) and was on average 25.94 (SD = 6.31) years old. Participants were referred to the Air Force Theater Hospital, 332nd Air Expeditionary Wing, Joint Base Balad, Iraq, to be evaluated as part of routine clinical assessment for neurocognitive and psychological symptoms following exposure to a blast. A 3-profile solution was identified as the most parsimonious and best-fitting model based on statistical model fit indices. Blast injured service members in Profile 3 had greater ASD total and subscale severity compared to the other 2 subgroups, with effect size estimates largely differing by hyperarousal and reexperiencing symptoms. Furthermore, Profiles 2 and 3 were more likely to demonstrate postconcussive symptoms compared to Profile 1. Findings provide novel information on heterogenous ASD symptom profiles during the acute phase following a blast injury and highlight the relationship between psychological and physical symptoms. Classification of blast-injured service members may help identify at-risk individuals who would benefit from further clinical care and mitigate long-term psychological and neurocognitive issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Optimizing VOMS for identifying acute concussion in collegiate athletes: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE consortium

The Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening (VOMS), an important component in acute (<72 h) sport-related concussion (SRC) assessment, is increasingly used alongside the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) and as part of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE2). VOMS demonstrates clinically useful diagnostic accuracy for acute SRC and improves the overall utility when added to the SCAT3. However, potential overlap among VOMS’s vestibular and oculomotor items suggests the possibility of a more efficient version. VOMS and SCAT3 scores were analyzed for 3,958 preseason (47.8% female) and 496 acute-SRC (37.5% female) NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) consortium collegiate athlete evaluations. Analyses revealed very large effect sizes (d = 2.39–2.45) and high correlations (rho = 0.95–0.99) among all VOMS items except near point of convergence distance (d = 0.79, rho ≤ 0.341). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed clinically useful discriminative utility for VOMS Total (AUC = 0.85) and the VOMS Total change score, where pretest symptoms were incorporated (AUC = 0.81). A modified VOMS (mVOMS) consisting of four items (smooth pursuits, horizontal saccades, horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) yielded identical AUCs to VOMS Total. Integer cutoff analyses suggest a score of ≥4 for VOMS Total and ≥4 for mVOMS Total optimizes concussion identification. Incorporating VOMS or mVOMS into SCAT3 (AUC = 0.79) significantly improved the combined tool’s acute utility for acute concussion identification by a maximum of 4% (SCAT3+VOMS AUC = 0.84, SCAT3+mVOMS AUC = 0.83). Future versions of SCAT or MACE may want to consider incorporating a more parsimonious VOMS for the purpose of identifying acute concussion.

Military Acute Concussion Evaluation: A Report on Clinical Usability, Utility, and User's Perceived Confidence.

The signs and symptoms of concussion may not always be clear. Therefore, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) tool was created to help deployed medics and corpsmen identify concussions, particularly in deployed settings. Since 2008, the MACE has been updated multiple times, but each new version of the tool is more complex and takes longer to complete. The objective of this study was to assess the usability, utility, and perceived confidence among military healthcare providers for the latest version, MACE 2. Therefore, a semi-structured interview, including Likert-scale and open-ended questions, was conducted among military healthcare providers at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in order to assess the usability, utility and perceived confidence of the MACE 2. All of the providers had completed a training course on the MACE 2 and had used it for at least 3 months in their clinics. A total of 28 participants were recruited, including 22 medics, two physicians, three nurses, and one physician assistant. Average scores of usability, utility, and confidence were 5.7, 6.6, and 6.3, respectively, with 7.0 being the most positive score, and thus indicating positive assessments in all categories. The open-ended questions revealed high usability and confidence and the desire for additional training on the tool. In conclusion, despite the increased complexity and duration of the MACE 2 compared with the previous version of this tool, military providers and army medics found the new MACE 2 very useable and had a high degree of confidence in its performance.

Test–retest reliability of the Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) in US military personnel

The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE 2), which includes the Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool and the single-leg stance component of the modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), was introduced in 2018 as an assessment of acute mTBI in US military personnel. However, the reliability of the VOMS and mBESS in this population has not been established. ObjectivesThe primary purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of the VOMS across a 6-month period in healthy, uninjured US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel. DesignActive duty/heathy military personnel (n=108) completed the VOMS and mBESS at baseline and follow-up 6 months later (±1 month). MethodCronbach's alpha was used to examine the internal consistency of the VOMS and mBESS at both time points. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with consistency agreement were used to evaluate test–retest reliability. ResultsVOMS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=0.99), whereas, the mBESS demonstrated poor internal consistency (α=0.29). Test–retest reliability of VOMS items was moderate-to-good with ICCs ranging from 0.60 to 0.81. Test–retest reliability was moderate for mBESS total score (ICC=0.59) and double-leg stance (ICC=0.73), while single-leg (ICC=0.49) and tandem (ICC=0.02) stances were poor. ConclusionsThe findings suggest that VOMS has high internal consistency and moderate-to-good test–retest reliability. mBESS has poor internal consistency and poor-to-moderate test–retest reliability. The results suggest that VOMS is a reliable addition to the MACE-2, whereas, mBESS single-leg stance is less reliable. As such, mBESS double-leg stance may be a more reliable measure of balance in this population.

Performance on the DANA Brief Cognitive Test Correlates With MACE Cognitive Score and May Be a New Tool to Diagnose Concussion.

Nearly 380,000 U.S. service members between 2000 and 2017 were, and at least 300,000 athletes annually are, diagnosed with concussion. It is imperative to establish a gold-standard diagnostic test to quickly and accurately diagnose concussion. In this non-randomized, prospective study, we examined the reliability and validity of a novel neurocognitive assessment tool, the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA), designed to be a more sensitive, yet efficient, measure of concussion symptomatology. In this study, the DANA Brief version was compared to an established measure of concussion screening, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE), in a group of non-concussed service members. DANA Brief subtests demonstrated low to moderate reliability, as measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; values range: 0.28–0.58), which is comparable to other computerized neurocognitive tests that are widely-implemented to diagnose concussion. Statistically significant associations were found between learning and memory components of the DANA Brief and the diagnostic MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: CDD: R2 = 0.05, p = 0.023; CDS: R2 = 0.10, p = 0.010). However, a more robust relationship was found between DANA Brief components involving attention and working memory, including immediate memory, and the MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: GNG: R2 = 0.08, p = 0.003; PRO: R2 = 0.08, p = 0.002). These results provide evidence that the DANA Rapid version, a 5-min assessment self-administered on a hand-held portable device, based on the DANA Brief version, may serve as a clinically useful and improved neurocognitive concussion screen to minimize the time between injury and diagnosis in settings where professional medical evaluation may be unavailable or delayed. The DANA's portability, durability, shorter test time and lack of need for a medical professional to diagnose concussion overcome these critical limitations of the MACE.

Acute Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-Traumatic Stress After Exposure to a Deployment-Related Explosive Blast.

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are two of the signature injuries in military service members who have been exposed to explosive blasts during deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. Acute stress disorder (ASD), which occurs within 2–30 d after trauma exposure, is a more immediate psychological reaction predictive of the later development of PTSD. Most previous studies have evaluated service members after their return from deployment, which is often months or years after the initial blast exposure. The current study is the first large study to collect psychological and neuropsychological data from active duty service members within a few days after blast exposure.Materials and MethodsRecruitment for blast-injured TBI patients occurred at the Air Force Theater Hospital, 332nd Air Expeditionary Wing, Joint Base Balad, Iraq. Patients were referred from across the combat theater and evaluated as part of routine clinical assessment of psychiatric and neuropsychological symptoms after exposure to an explosive blast. Four measures of neuropsychological functioning were used: the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE); the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS); the Headminder Cognitive Stability Index (CSI); and the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, Version 4.0 (ANAM4). Three measures of combat exposure and psychological functioning were used: the Combat Experiences Scale (CES); the PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M); and the Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS). Assessments were completed by a deployed clinical psychologist, clinical social worker, or mental health technician.ResultsA total of 894 patients were evaluated. Data from 93 patients were removed from the data set for analysis because they experienced a head injury due to an event that was not an explosive blast (n = 84) or they were only assessed for psychiatric symptoms (n = 9). This resulted in a total of 801 blast-exposed patients for data analysis. Because data were collected in-theater for the initial purpose of clinical evaluation, sample size varied widely between measures, from 565 patients who completed the MACE to 154 who completed the CES. Bivariate correlations revealed that the majority of psychological measures were significantly correlated with each other (ps ≤ 0.01), neuropsychological measures were correlated with each other (ps ≤ 0.05), and psychological and neuropsychological measures were also correlated with each other (ps ≤ 0.05).ConclusionsThis paper provides one of the first descriptions of psychological and neuropsychological functioning (and their inter-correlation) within days after blast exposure in a large sample of military personnel. Furthermore, this report describes the methodology used to gather data for the acute assessment of TBI, PTSD, and ASD after exposure to an explosive blast in the combat theater. Future analyses will examine the common and unique symptoms of TBI and PTSD, which will be instrumental in developing new assessment approaches and intervention strategies.

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center: The First 25 Years

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center: The First 25 Years

Incidence of Concussion in Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures.

This study examines the association between isolated mandible fractures and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). To determine the rates of mTBI in patients who have sustained isolated mandible fractures. A prospective study was conducted among patients who sustained isolated mandible fractures within 24 hours of presentation. Patients were administered the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE). Recorded data included demographics, time since injury, use of alcohol or illicit drugs, nonfacial pain, and mechanism of injury. All patients were evaluated in the emergency department of a level I trauma center between June 20, 2013, and June 20, 2014. In addition, discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was analyzed to identify current rates of patients with a diagnosis of both mandible fractures and concussions. Rates of concussion. Patients with a MACE score of less than 25 were considered to have mTBI. Sixteen patients met the study criteria over a 1-year period. Fourteen patients (88%) were male, and mean age was 27.5 years. The mean time since injury was 11.25 hours (range, 3-21 hours). The mechanism of injury was assault in 12 patients (75%), sports in 2 patients (13%), all-terrain vehicle crash in 1 patient (6%), and biking in 1 patient (6%). Eight patients (50%) admitted to the use of alcohol, and none reported the use of illicit drugs. Eleven patients (69%) reported loss of consciousness. Twelve patients (75%) met criteria for concussion according to the MACE. Among these 12 patients, 7 (58%) admitted to the use of alcohol at the time of injury. There was no relationship between the rates of concussion and the use of alcohol. Mandible fractures are often sustained after high-force impacts during altercations between men. In our study, a 75% (12 of 16) rate of concussions associated with isolated mandible fractures was identified. Patients with isolated mandible fractures may benefit from being screened for concussion and referred to a concussion clinic. 4.

Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. Diagnostic study, level II.

Day of injury cognitive performance on the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) by U.S. military service members in OEF/OIF.

The study investigated the clinical validity of the cognitive screening component of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) for the evaluation of acute mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a military operational setting. This was a retrospective data study involving analysis of MACE data on Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom deployed service members with mTBI. In total, 179 cases were included in analyses based on ICD-9 diagnostic codes and characteristics of mTBI, and availability of MACE data on day of injury. MACE data from the mTBI group was compared to a military sample without mTBI administered the MACE as part of a normative data project. On day of injury, the mTBI group performed worse than controls on the MACE cognitive test (d = 0.90), with significant impairments in all cognitive domains assessed. MACE cognitive score was strongly associated with established indicators of acute injury severity. Lower MACE cognitive performance on day of injury was predictive of lengthier postinjury recovery time and time until return to duty after mTBI. Findings from the current study support the use of the MACE as a valid screening tool to assess for cognitive dysfunction in military service members during the acute phase after mTBI.

Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 in a Civilian Trauma Sample with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-Second Edition (SCAT2) in patients with acute mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) in a civilian trauma setting. In addition, the SCAT2 was compared to the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE). All the participants of the study were prospectively recruited from the emergency department of Tampere University Hospital (Tampere, Finland). Patients (n=49) between the ages of 18 and 60 years, with no premorbid medical or psychiatric conditions, who met the World Health Organization criteria for mTBI, were enrolled. Trauma controls (n=33) were recruited using similar study criteria. The main measures of the study consisted of SCAT2, MACE, and mTBI severity markers, including neuroimaging (computed tomography and conventional magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and 1-month clinical outcomes (postconcussion syndrome diagnosis and return to work status). The scoreable components of the SCAT2 performed variably across five dimensions of validity (diagnostic, criterion, divergent, predictive, and responsiveness). The Standardized Assessment of Concussion component reasonably discriminated mTBI patients from controls, was associated with MRI lesions, improved over time, and predicted return to work. Symptom scores differentiated patients with mTBIs from controls, and elevated initial symptom scores in patients with mTBI were associated with a greater risk of persistent postconcussion symptoms. The SCAT2 was superior to the MACE. The SCAT2 appears useful for detecting acute mTBI-related symptoms and cognitive impairment, refining prognosis, and monitoring recovery.

War-Zone Stresses Extend Far Beyond Direct Combat

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessWar-Zone Stresses Extend Far Beyond Direct CombatAaron LevinAaron LevinSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:21 Dec 2012https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2012.12b14AbstractA National Guard psychiatrist in Iraq faces the same incoming fire and the same stresses as the troops he cares for.Col. Philip Dingmann, M.D., a 24-year veteran of the Massachusetts Army National Guard experienced U.S. military operations in Iraq just as many of his patients did, he said at the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law’s annual meeting in Montreal in October.“There are a ton of people who are injured psychologically and physically who are never evaluated and never will be,” says Col. Philip Dingmann, M.D., of the Massachusetts Army National Guard.homeros/ShutterstockThe Cape Cod psychiatrist went to Iraq in 2004, 2007, and 2011. Dingmann and the troops he served were often subjected to enemy fire. Rockets or mortars usually came in from 8 p.m. to midnight or from 2 to 4 in the morning. Sleep was often interrupted by warning alerts, and soldiers dashed to concrete shelters for protection until the attack passed. Soldiers—including the division psychiatrist—ended up with chronic insomnia and fatigue on top of all the other stressors they faced.And those stressors weren’t confined to direct combat. Troops faced infectious diseases and other nonbattle injuries. Many didn’t sleep in the same place each night, depending on their duties. Most also had survived or witnessed roadside bomb blasts.“Even without direct exposure to a blast, people can be shocked,” said Dingmann. “Surprise and a lack of control of the situation take their psychological toll, too.”TBI Not on Radar a Few Years AgoDuring his 2004 and 2007 deployments, there was little discussion of traumatic brain injury (TBI), he recalled. “But in 2011, TBI was everything.”In that most recent deployment, Dingmann was responsible for 19 bases and 9,000 soldiers, scattered from Baghdad to Kuwait. Among his responsibilities was overseeing reports on TBIs, which was no simple process.Medics and corpsman in the American forces use the MACE—the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation—to screen all soldiers exposed to a blast. Anyone who screens positive in the field must return to base for a follow-up examination, escorted by other members of his squad. The commander decides if he can spare the individual and still carry out the unit’s mission, he explained. “So the affected soldier doesn’t want to be screened,” except in the worst cases.Given the additive effects of concussive blasts, the lack of screening provides no record of exposure that might guide future treatment or requests for disability.Mixed Messages SentAttitudes toward mental health care have evolved since 2004, though stigma remains said Dingmann.Many of his psychiatric “evaluations” came outside the clinic. Soldiers talked informally in the gym, at church, or elsewhere, but there was a clear ambivalence about contacts with the unit psychiatrist.“I’d sit down in the dining hall and talk with people,” he said. “But when they found out I was a psychiatrist, I could sit there the next day and clear the table.”The chain of command understands the need for mental health services as part of the military mission, but ordinary soldiers are slow to accept the open discussion of emotions, he said. For them, anyone even seen talking to a psychiatrist is perceived as weak.“They’ll decide there’s something wrong with that soldier and will lose trust in him,” he said. “There are a ton of people who are injured psychologically and physically who are never evaluated and never will be.”The Army trains soldiers to be each other’s confidant, and urges that serious cases be escorted to the chain of command for formal assessment.Even after troops return home, soldiers resist talking about their psychological concerns.“Troops repeatedly deployed over the years have an increasingly difficult time reintegrating into civilian life,” he said. “They struggle with hypervigilance and anger while facing the indifference of civilians and a lack of military discipline and structure.”Even Dingmann wasn’t immune from the feelings that keep his fellow soldiers from seeking care.“It’s hard for someone in our field to sit on the other side of the desk,” he said.Back home in Massachusetts, he decided he needed help for himself. He drove to the VA Boston Healthcare System’s Brockton facility but sat in the parking lot long past his appointment time. Eventually, the therapist with whom he had the appointment called him on his cell phone, came outside, and walked him into the building. ■ ISSUES NewArchived

Military medical revolution

Abstract : The battlefield has seen tremendous revolutions in military medical affairs (RMMAs) as a result of the last decade of continuous combat operations. The advances in deployed and en route combat casualty care are categorized as individual RMMAs shown in Table 1. As with prehospital advances, the basis for many of the RMMAs in the deployed hospital care environment as well as en route care was translated from civilian trauma practice but is realistic and relevant to the battlefield context. As the conflict evolved, the substantive data from the battlefield led to many new paradigms of treatment and evacuation. The successful implementation of many of these battlefield practices was then effectively translated back into the civilian injury care environment as has been typical of medical advances developed subsequent to previous conflicts of antiquity. The RMMAs that occurred during the last 10 years of combat casualty care are in the realm of deployed hospital care and en route care and are discussed in detail in this article.

Return to Combat Duty after Concussive Blast Injury

Little data exist regarding the acute assessment of blast concussion and the course of recovery in the combat zone, as most research has examined service members long after they have returned home. This manuscript examined a case series of 377 service members seen for acute concussion evaluation following medical evacuation from the battlefield in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. Of these, 111 were assessed for concussion prior to their return to the continental USA for other severe physical injuries. Of the remainder, and when comparing those who returned to duty (RTD)/recovered from concussion in the combat zone and those who did not, data indicate that those who did not RTD were older and were more likely to endorse symptoms of combat stress. Quicker recovery times were associated with less severe headaches and fewer acute symptoms at the time of injury as well as the absence of combat stress reaction. Variables that were not associated with RTD and/or recovery were Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) cognitive scores and whether or not individuals suffered loss of consciousness. While MACE scores were not associated with recovery, they were deemed clinically useful as a part of a serial concussion evaluation if the initial MACE was given within 6 h of the blast. Implications for battlefield concussion assessment and management as well as future research directions are discussed.

Treating the Signature Injury

Treating the Signature Injury