Abstract
Nearly 380,000 U.S. service members between 2000 and 2017 were, and at least 300,000 athletes annually are, diagnosed with concussion. It is imperative to establish a gold-standard diagnostic test to quickly and accurately diagnose concussion. In this non-randomized, prospective study, we examined the reliability and validity of a novel neurocognitive assessment tool, the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA), designed to be a more sensitive, yet efficient, measure of concussion symptomatology. In this study, the DANA Brief version was compared to an established measure of concussion screening, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE), in a group of non-concussed service members. DANA Brief subtests demonstrated low to moderate reliability, as measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; values range: 0.28–0.58), which is comparable to other computerized neurocognitive tests that are widely-implemented to diagnose concussion. Statistically significant associations were found between learning and memory components of the DANA Brief and the diagnostic MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: CDD: R2 = 0.05, p = 0.023; CDS: R2 = 0.10, p = 0.010). However, a more robust relationship was found between DANA Brief components involving attention and working memory, including immediate memory, and the MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: GNG: R2 = 0.08, p = 0.003; PRO: R2 = 0.08, p = 0.002). These results provide evidence that the DANA Rapid version, a 5-min assessment self-administered on a hand-held portable device, based on the DANA Brief version, may serve as a clinically useful and improved neurocognitive concussion screen to minimize the time between injury and diagnosis in settings where professional medical evaluation may be unavailable or delayed. The DANA's portability, durability, shorter test time and lack of need for a medical professional to diagnose concussion overcome these critical limitations of the MACE.
Highlights
According to the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, US service members sustained nearly 380,000 cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) between 2000 and 2017
This study examined the reliability and validity of a novel measure, designed to be a more sensitive, yet efficient, measure of cognitive performance following a concussion
In this non-randomized, prospective study, the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) Brief was compared to an established measure of concussion screening
Summary
According to the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, US service members (a person serving in the armed forces) sustained nearly 380,000 cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) between 2000 and 2017. Sport-related concussions are defined as a mTBI induced by biomechanical forces and, because of their potential to have rapidly changing and sometimes unpredictable clinical symptoms, are often difficult to diagnose [4, 5]. Exposure to these biomechanical forces triggers a complex neurometabolic cascade, described by Giza and Hovda as a series of microcellular events, including ionic shifts, abnormal energy metabolism, diminished cerebral blood flow, and impaired neurotransmission [6]. McCrea et al reported on confidential surveys of 1,500 high school football players, 40% of which acknowledged the presence of concussive symptoms but deliberately failed to disclose the information out of fear of being removed from play [8]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call