period examined. 19 patients had an aggressive resection while 29 patients had a conservative resection. There were no differences in gender between the “aggressive” and “conservative” groups with a preponderance of females (58% vs 76%, p = 0.22). The mean age was lower in the “aggressive” group (16.46 years vs 29.12 years, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in indications for sympathectomy between the groups which included Long QT syndrome (subtypes 1 to 3), CPVT and other. Procedural times were longer in the aggressive group as the mean operating time was longer using the 3-port technique in comparison to the single-port technique (43.95 mins vs 20.38 mins, p <0.0001). Only 1 patient required insertion of chest drain post-operatively for a pneumothorax and there was no difference in hospital stay (1.32 days vs 1.36 days, p = 0.81). There was no significant difference in the shortening of the QT interval between the 2 groups (66.7% vs 56%, p = 0.55). There were no differences between the 2 groups for later requirement for implantable defibrillators, further arrhythmias or death (31.25% vs 26.92%, p = 1.0). Compensatory hyperhidrosis was not significantly different between the groups (6.25% vs 15.38%, p = 0.63). Partial Horner’s syndrome occurred only in the “aggressive” group in 5 patients (31.25% vs 0%, p = 0.005); in only 2 patients did a mild left ptosis persist for longer than 6 months. Discussion: Aggressive approaches that sacrifice the lower third to half of the stellate ganglion run the risk of resulting in a partialHorner’s syndrome,without conferring additional electrocardiographic or clinical benefit. The majority of the stellate ganglion therefore should be spared, and only the very bottom of it should be sacrificed. A single port access technique is an efficient access method for such procedures.