Abstract Background Identifying IBD and evaluating disease activity depend critically on endoscopy. But it is expensive and intrusive, which emphasizes the need for more easily available and non-invasive biomarkers to help in IBD diagnosis and assessment. This work seeks to investigate their correlation with endoscopic activity and assess the diagnostic relevance in IBD. Methods Between January 2022 and September 2024, we registered 365 UC patients, 319 CD patients and 100 control patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The subsequent biomarkers were examined:WBC, Hb, PLT, N, L, HCT, EOS, ALB, GLB, CRP, ESR, ALB/GLB (AGR), CRP/ALB (CAR), CRP/L (CLR), PLT/ALB (PAR), PLT/L(PLR), N/L (NLR). MES, SES-CD were respectively utilized to evaluate endoscopic activity in UC and CD. Mild endoscopic activity was characterized by MES=1 or SES-CD=3-6, moderate activity by MES=2 or SES-CD=7-15, and severe activity by MES=3 or SES-CD≥16. Biomarker comparions were conducted among UC, CD, and control groups, and between biomarkers and endoscopic activity were examined. Results 1. While Hb, HCT, L, ALB, and AGR were significantly lower (P<0.05) in both UC and CD groups compared with controls, N, PLT, GLB, CRP, ESR, CAR, CLR, PLR, PAR, and NLR were significantly raised (P<0.001). EOS levels in UC group averaged 0.19×109/L while in CD group they averaged 0.14×109/L, with this difference reaching statistical significance (P<0.01). 2. Whereas WBC, PLT, N, CRP, ESR, GLB, CAR, CLR, PLR, PAR, and NLR were significantly increased (P<0.01), Hb, HCT, ALB, and AGR were significantly lowered in those with moderate to severe disease compared to mild group. Significant variations in N, CRP, ESR, ALR, GLB, AGR, CAR, CLR, and PAR were noted among mild, moderate, and severe disease categories for CD patients (P<0.05). 3. ESR (OR=1.09, P=0.0015), CAR (OR=381.71, P=0.0018) and PAR (OR=1.27, P=0.0072) were independent risk factors for UC endoscopic activity. The AUC of their combination (0.87; 95%CI 0.82-0.92) surpassed the individual values of ESR(0.81; 95%CI 0.75-0.87), CAR(0.84; 95%CI 0.79-0.89), and PAR(0.81; 95%CI 0.76-0.87). AGR (OR=0.05, P<0.001) and CAR (OR=1.72, P=0.0117) were independent risk factors for endoscopic activity in CD. The AUC for the combination (0.81; 95%CI 0.75-0.86) was also higher than only AGR (0.80; 95%CI 0.74-0.85) or CAR (0.74; 95%CI 0.68-0.80). Conclusion IBD endoscopic activity was substantially correlated with biomarkers WBC, Hb, HCT, PLT, N, CRP, ESR, ALB, GLB, AGR, CAR, CLR, PLR, PAR, and NLR. While a lower AGR and a higher CAR may indicate more severe endoscopic activity in CD patients, elevated ESR, CAR, and PAR may point to more severe endoscopic activity in UC patients. Their amalgamation can enhance diagnostic efficacy.
Read full abstract