AbstractCover imageThe cover image depicts immunofluorescence histology of OT‐II cells within the popliteal draining lymph nodes. The image was taken from the article by Serre et al. (pp.1573–1586), in which the authors assess the complexity of Th2 responses in vivo. The authors show that early central‐memory‐like cells induced by immunization re‐enter the cell cycle and migrate to B‐cell follicles, where the induction and survival of memory cells are independent of the starting frequency of antigen‐specific CD4+ T cells. magnified imageMicro‐RNA and the control of human natural Treg functionpp. 1608–1619A micro‐RNA signature for human Treg had not been described before. In this issue, Rouas et al. show, using T cells purified from unifected cord blood mononuclear cells, a novel signature for the CD4+CD25+ population. This is composed of five micro‐RNA (miR‐21, miR‐31, miR‐21, miR‐125a, miR‐181c and miR‐374). Among those, the authors show that miR‐21 and miR‐31 play a role in the control of FOXP3 expression. While the three other micro‐RNA did not influence FOXP3 expression, it remains to be determined if they are involved in regulating other genes critical for Treg function. A comprehensive understanding of the control of natural Treg function, as well as of induced Treg, could potentially lead to clinical interventions for various immune‐related diseases. magnified imageHow CD11c+CD8+ Treg go about suppressing CD4+ T cellspp. 1552–1563CD11c expression on CD8+ T cells defines a novel subset of Treg. These CD11c+ CD8+ T cells have been shown to possess therapeutic activitiy in arthritis; what is less known, is how these cells go about their business of suppression. In this issue Vinay et al. demonstrate that in vivo anti‐4‐1BB mAb expand a novel immunoregulatory CD11c+CD8+ T‐cell subset from CD11c−CD8+ T‐cell precursors in an Ag‐specific manner. Increased IFN‐γ as a result of anti‐4‐1BB treatment, upregulates IDO in DC, which in turn suppresses CD4+ T cells. Further supporting this regulatory loop is the observation that mice deficient in GCN2, a transcription factor downstream of IDO, do not exhibit inhibited CD4+ T cell response when treated with anti‐4‐1BB. Thus, we now have a better understanding of how CD11c+CD8+ Treg work. magnified imageThe when and where of CTLA‐4 function on Tregpp. 1544–1551Despite constitutive expression of CTLA‐4 by Treg, its role in Treg suppression remains elusive. CTLA‐4‐deficient Treg do retain regulatory function in a number of settings suggesting that either CTLA‐4 is not essential or that such Treg develop compensatory suppressive mechanisms. In vivo measures of Treg activity often rely on the transfer of non‐regulatory CD4+CD25− T cells with or without CD4+CD25+ Treg to lymphopenic hosts. In these systems, Treg can modulate T‐cell activity during homeostatic expansion as well as regulate T‐cell effector function and likely control these two stages using distinct mechanisms. In this issue, Sojka et al. identify a non‐redundant role for CTLA‐4 in Treg suppression of lymphopenia‐induced homeostatic expansion. In the absence of CTLA‐4, Treg were unable to limit early CD4+ T‐cell expansion and unchecked colitis ensued. Understanding when and where Treg use specific immunosuppressive tools is key to our ability to manipulate their activity. magnified imageγδ T cells set the stage for autoimmune demyelinationpp. 1516–1526EAE is a T‐cell‐mediated autoimmune disease that shares many features of the human disease multiple sclerosis. γδ T cells contribute to the pathogenesis of EAE; however the mechanisms behind this contribution are still unclear. In this issue, Wohler et al. track bioluminescent γδ T cells during EAE development and show these cells initially localize at the sites of immunization. γδ T cells then rapidly infiltrate the CNS prior to clinical disease onset, peaking in number during acute disease and then rapidly recede at the peak phase of disease. γδ T cells appear to be activated at the site of antigen exposure and then prime the CNS for disease development, in part, through the production of IFN‐γ and TNF‐α. The authors show γδ T cells to be critical in setting the stage for the development of EAE and thus suggesting a potential therapeutic target in demyelinating disease. magnified imageCCR6 in EAE: Help or hindrance?pp. 1671–1681Continuing along the EAE theme, chemokines are also critically important for disease development. The CCR6 chemokine receptor is expressed by certain tissue‐homing Treg and Th17 cells, which show functional dichotomy in inflammatory processes. By mediating Th17 cell migration to target tissues, CCR6 drives CNS inflammation. In this issue, Villares et al. demonstrate that CCR6 are necessary for CD4+ Treg to downregulate the inflammatory process in the CNS and reduce EAE‐associated neurological symptoms. While CCR6 deficiency leads to delayed onset of clinical symptoms, it is nevertheless accompanied by more persistent neurological damage. This dichotomy in CCR6 function strongly suggests that more needs to be done before considering CCR6 as a therapeutic target in human CNS disease. magnified image