Migraine Days Research Articles

Natural history of non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease in Austria.

Non-polyglutamine CACNA1A variants underlie an extremely variable phenotypic spectrum encompassing developmental delay, hemiplegic migraine, epilepsy, psychiatric symptoms, episodic and chronic cerebellar signs. We provide our experience with the long-term follow-up of CACNA1A patients and their response to interval therapy. Patients with genetically confirmed non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease were prospectively followed at the Center for Rare Movement Disorders of the Medical University of Innsbruck from 2004 to 2024. We recruited 41 subjects with non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease, of which 38 (93%) familial cases. The mean age at the first examination was 35 ± 22years. Disease onset was in the childhood/adolescence in 31/41 patients (76%). Developmental delay and episodic symptoms were the first disease manifestation in 9/41 (22%) and 32/41 (78%) patients respectively. Chronic neurological signs encompassed a cerebellar syndrome in 35/41 (85%), which showed almost no progression during the observation period, as well as cognitive deficits in 9/20 (45%, MOCA test score < 26), psychiatric and behavioral symptoms in 11/41(27%). Seizures occurred in two patients concomitant to severe hemiplegic migraine. At the last visit, 27/41 patients (66%) required an interval prophylaxis (including acetazolamide, flunarizine, 4-aminopyridine, topiramate), which was efficacious in reducing the frequency and severity of episodic symptoms in all cases. In one patient in his 70ies with progressively therapy resistant hemiplegic migraine, treatment with the anti-CGRP antibody galcanezumab successfully reduced the frequency of migraine days from 4 to 1/month. Non-polyglutamine CACNA1A disease show an evolving age-dependent presentation. Interval prophylaxis is effective in reducing the burden of episodic symptoms.

Average steps per day as marker of treatment response with anti-CGRP mAbs in adults with chronic migraine: a pilot study

Physical activity can worsen migraine, leading to reduced activity levels in adults with chronic migraine. This study investigated the change in average steps per day, as a surrogate marker of physical activity, in adults with chronic migraine successfully treated with monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. Data were obtained from adults with chronic migraine, who were classified as responders to preventive treatment with monoclonal antibodies. The primary endpoint was the difference in a mean number of steps per day between the 3 months prior to treatment initiation and the first 3 months after treatment initiation. The secondary endpoint was the correlation between the change in steps per day and the change in monthly migraine days. Twenty-two (20 females) participants with a median age of 48.5 years were enrolled. The median number of steps per day increased from 4421 at baseline to 5241 after treatment (P = 0.039). We found a positive correlation between the increase in steps per day and the treatment response (P = 0.013). In conclusion, an increase in physical activity, based on steps per day, positively correlated with treatment response to monoclonal antibodies. Automatically registered daily step count data might be used to monitor physical activity as a response to preventive treatment in adults with chronic migraine.

Exploring Erenumab's Efficacy and Safety for Migraine Prevention in Real-World Settings: A Systematic Review.

Migraine causes debilitating headaches and significantly impacts quality of life. Effective migraine-specific treatments have been lacking until the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors, which have expanded therapy options for migraine treatment. This study explores the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 criteria guided this systematic review. Five databases - PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Sage Journal - were searched for published, freely accessible, full-text articles in English from the past five years. Eligible patients included those with episodic or chronic migraines who received erenumab intervention. From an initial search yielding 680 relevant studies, 12 prospective observational cohort studies were selected after assessing the risk of bias through the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. All included studies demonstrated a significant reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) by the end of the treatment period, with mild adverse effects observed. No significant short-term or long-term safety concerns were identified.

European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 4: propranolol

ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to critically re-appraise the published trials assessing propranolol for migraine prophylaxis.MethodsWe report methods and results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized trials of pharmacologic treatments for migraine prophylaxis. We included randomized trials that compared propranolol with placebo for migraine prophylaxis in adults. The outcomes of interest were informed by the Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) and include the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the reduction of monthly migraine days, and the number of adverse events leading to discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias by using a modified Cochrane RoB (risk of bias) 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence by using the GRADE approach.ResultsOur search yielded twenty trials (n = 1291 patients) eligible for data synthesis and analysis. The analysis revealed a moderate certainty evidence that propranolol leads to a reduction in monthly migraine days versus placebo (-1.27; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.3). We found moderate certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo with a relative risk of 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.93); absolute risk difference: 179 more per 1,000 (95% CI 113 to 256). We found high certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo with a risk difference of 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03); absolute risk difference: 20 more per 1,000 (95% CI 0 to 30).ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis shows that propranolol has a prophylactic role in migraine, with an overall acceptable tolerability profile. Combining these results with its long-standing use and its global availability at a low cost confirms its role as a first line agent in the prophylaxis of migraine.

Efficacy of Atogepant in Chronic Migraine With and Without Acute Medication Overuse in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 PROGRESS Trial.

Atogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in participants with and without acute medication overuse. This subgroup analysis of the phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROGRESS trial evaluated adults with a ≥1-year history of CM, ≥15 monthly headache days (MHDs), and ≥8 monthly migraine days (MMDs) during the 4-week baseline period. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and were analyzed by acute medication overuse status (triptans/ergots for ≥10 days per month, simple analgesics for ≥15 days per month, or combinations of triptans/ergots/simple analgesics for ≥10 days per month). Outcomes included change from baseline in mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days; ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across 12 weeks; and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Of 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) met baseline acute medication overuse criteria (placebo, n = 169 [68.7%]; atogepant 30 mg BID, n = 161 [63.6%]; atogepant 60 mg QD, n = 170 [66.4%]). The least squares mean difference (LSMD) (95% CI) from placebo in MMDs was -2.7 (-4.0 to -1.4) with atogepant 30 mg BID and -1.9 (-3.2 to -0.6) with atogepant 60 mg QD. Mean MHDs (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.0 to -1.5] and -2.1 [-3.3 to -0.8]) and mean acute medication use days (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.1 to -1.6] and -2.6 [-3.9 to -1.3]) were reduced and a higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.5 [1.5-4.0] and 2.3 [1.4-3.7]) with atogepant 30 mg BID and atogepant 60 mg QD. There was a 52.1%-61.9% reduction in the proportion of atogepant-treated participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria over 12 weeks. Atogepant improved PRO measures. Similar results were observed in the subgroup without acute medication overuse. Atogepant was effective in participants with CM, with and without acute medication overuse, as evidenced by reductions in mean MMDs, MHDs, and acute medication use days; reductions in the proportion of participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria; and improvements in PROs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03855137. Submitted: February 25, 2019; first patient enrolled: March 11, 2019. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03855137. This study provides Class II evidence that atogepant reduces mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days in adult patients with or without medication overuse.

Switching of monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in migraine. Results from a Spanish Cohort

BackgroundSwitching between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be a beneficial strategy after discontinuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate switching outcomes of effectiveness/tolerability. MethodsRetrospective multicentric study of migraine patients who switched to another CGRP–mAb due to lack of tolerability or effectiveness (defined as <30% reduction of monthly headache days [MHD]). Assessment was performed before and 3 months after switch. The main outcome was the response rate of MHD. Secondary outcomes included other effectiveness/tolerability measures. Results90patients were included: 75(83.3%) women, 72(80%) chronic, and 18(20%) episodic migraine. Mean age was 45.9±11 years and mean duration of migraine was 29.2±12.4 years. Mean time under first mAb prior to switch was 10.4±4.9 months. Most frequent switches were erenumab-galcanezumab 38 (42.2%) and erenumab–fremanezumab 21 (23.3%). Lack of effectiveness (50/90, 55.6%) or tolerability (40/90, 44.4%) provoked switching. Most common adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were constipation and flu-like syndrome in 16 (40%) patients each. Response rate (RR) of MHD 30%–50% occurred in 10 patients (11.1%), ≥50% in 32 (35.6%) and <30% in 48 (53.3%) patients. Significant reduction was proved after switch in MHD (20 [IQR:15–29] vs 13 [IQR:7–23]; p<.001) and monthly migraine days (15 [IQR:12–20] vs 10 [IQR:7–16]; p<.001). After switching, 38 (42.2%) experienced AEs, but tolerability improved in 50% of patients who discontinued due to lack of tolerability. RR compared between switches to different CGRP-mAb classes showed no differences. ConclusionSwitching may become an individualized strategy in migraine refractory patients who discontinue CGRP–mAbs due to lack of effectiveness/tolerability. In this study, supportive data are provided to the growing evidence of switch and future needs are highlighted.

Efficacy and safety of atogepant, a small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, for the preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMigraine is one of the most common diseases worldwide while current treatment options are not ideal. New therapeutic classes of migraine, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, have been developed and shown considerable effectiveness and safety. The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of atogepant, a CGRP antagonist, for migraine prophylaxis from the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsThe Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ were searched for RCTs that compared atogepant with placebo for migraine prophylaxis from inception of the databases to Feb 1, 2024. Outcome data involving efficacy and safety were combined and analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). For each outcome, risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated.Results4 RCTs with a total of 2813 subjects met our inclusion criteria. The overall effect estimate showed that atogepant was significantly superior to placebo in terms of the reduction of monthly migraine (SMD − 0.40, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.34) or headache (SMD − 0.39, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.33) days, the reduction of acute medication use days (SMD − 0.45, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.39) and 50% responder rate (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.89), while no dose-related improvements were found between different dosage groups. For the safety, significant number of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with atogepant than with placebo (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.21) while there was no obvious difference between the five dosage groups. Most TEAEs involved constipation (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.91–3.41), nausea (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.67–2.87) and urinary tract infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05–2.11). In addition, a high dosage of atogepant may also increase the risk of treatment-related TEAEs (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.02–2.63) and fatigue (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.13–8.35).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that atogepant is effective and tolerable for migraine prophylaxis including episodic or chronic migraine compared with placebo. It is critical to weigh the benefits of different doses against the risk of adverse events in clinical application of atogepant. Longer and multi-dose trials with larger sample sizes are required to verify the current findings.

Impact of duration of chronic migraine on long-term effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway-A real-world study.

We assessed whether the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway changes according to the duration of chronic migraine (CM) over 12 months. In most patients, CM is a progressive disease starting with episodic migraine. Longer CM duration might be associated with more difficult treatment, probably because the mechanisms underlying chronicization are strengthened. Therefore, early treatment of CM could lead to better outcomes compared with later treatment. This cohort study included individuals with CM treated with anti-CGRP mAbs in two tertiary headache centers from April 2019 to May 2023. The primary outcome included a change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline to the third trimester of treatment, 10-12 months. Secondary outcomes established whether response to anti-CGRP mAbs has a more rapid onset in individuals with shorter CM duration compared with longer duration; they included change in MMDs, monthly headache days (MHDs), and days and number of intakes of acute medication during each trimester compared to baseline. Additional outcomes included persisting MMDs, MHDs, and days and number of intakes of acute medication during each trimester of treatment. Patients were compared across tertiles of the overall CM duration. The study included 335 individuals with CM, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 48 (39-57) years; 270 (80.6%) were women. Patients in the highest tertile of CM duration (aged 18-60 years) were older than patients in the lower duration tertiles (0-7 years and 8-18 years, respectively), with a median (IQR) age of 56 (48-64) years compared with 42 (31-50) years, and 48 (39-56)years, respectively (p = 0.025); however, this difference was likely due to a correlation between age and disease duration. The change in MMDs from baseline to the last trimester of treatment (10-12 months) was comparable across tertiles of CM duration (median [IQR] -12 [-18 to -5] days, -12 [-17 to -6] days, and -12 [-18 to -4] days; p = 0.946). No difference emerged in secondary outcomes, suggesting a similar time to onset of anti-CGRP mAbs effect across all tertiles of CM duration. Our data showed that anti-CGRP mAbs are effective and have a rapid onset of action in CM regardless of disease duration.

Anti‑CGRP monoclonal antibodies in resistant migraine: preliminary real-world effectiveness and clinical predictors of response at twoyears.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown clinical effectiveness and safety in randomized clinical studies. However, long-term studies in clinical practice remain limited. To assess the long-term effectiveness, clinical predictors and safety of three anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) in resistant migraine patients. A single-center retrospective study was conducted from December 2019 to June 2023 involving 120 resistant migraine patients who received at least a month of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Patients completed a headache diary that included monthly acute medication intake (MAM), monthly migraine days (MMD), adverse events as well as completed Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires (MIDAS [Migraine Disability Assessment] and Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6]). The number of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days was determined and classified as ≥ 50% responders, and baseline parameters and logistic regression between responders and non-responders were analyzed to identify potential predictors of response. Adverse events were registered in every follow-up. Treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs led to reductions in MIDAS, HIT-6, MMD and MAM from baseline to 6-24months. At 6-12months, responders (61% and 57%, respectively) exhibited lower baseline MMD and MAM. Medication overuse was associated with non-responders from 6 to 24months and it was identified as a negative predictor of treatment effectiveness (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.74; p = 0.014). Anti-CGRP mAbs prove effectiveness and safety over a 24-month period in a RM population. Patients with no medication overuse and lower basal MMDs and MAM may respond better to anti-CGRP mAbs.

The Modern Clinician as an "Argonaut" Guiding Through the "Symplegades" of Evidence for PFO Closure in Patients With Migraine.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with migraine, especially migraine with aura, and 30-50% of individuals with migraine with aura have a PFO, suggesting it could be more than just an "innocent bystander''. Observational data showed a reduction of the frequency and severity of migraine attacks, particularly those with aura, following transcatheter PFO closure for established indications. Three small randomized controlled trials have demonstrated significant benefits of PFO closure in most of their secondary endpoints, such as reductions in the mean number of monthly migraine attacks and migraine days. Since a significant proportion of patients experience important side effects from traditional migraine medications and newer highly effective migraine prevention strategies may need to be instituted. PFO closure could in this regard to be a valuable add-on in the armamentarium of migraine treatment, improving the quality of life by alleviating the need for medications. The effect of percutaneous PFO closure on migraine treatment is needed to be clarified. As the underlying pathophysiology remains poorly understood and largely hypothetical, future investigations, focusing on the causal relationship between PFO and migraine, will help to define the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from PFO closure. More accurate patient recruitment may lead to greater postprocedural benefits and more significant symptom improvement. Additionally, randomized controlled trials need to be reported adequately with more realistic endpoints, sufficient duration of follow-up, and statistical power to detect differences between closure and placebo groups to ensure precise and reliable findings.

Biofeedback therapy using Cerebri for the prevention of migraine attacks in adults with episodic migraine (BioCer): a randomized, wait-list controlled trial – the study protocol

Introduction Biofeedback is a non-pharmacological treatment option valued for its minimal risk of adverse events and offers a safe alternative for individuals seeking preventive care for migraine. Despite level A evidence for migraine prevention, biofeedback treatment is still unavailable to most patients. We developed a novel medical device (Cerebri) for multimodal biofeedback treatment that omits the need for healthcare personnel involvement. Cerebri consists of a smartphone application (app) and two wireless sensors. Unique in its approach, the Cerebri app seamlessly integrates three biofeedback modalities – heart rate variability, temperature, and electromyography – making it a comprehensive, therapist-independent solution for non-pharmacological migraine management. Methods Biofeedback therapy using Cerebri for the prevention of migraine attacks in adults with episodic migraine (The BioCer study) was an open-label, randomized, waitlist-controlled, multicenter trial. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of daily home-based biofeedback sessions using the Cerebri device. A total of 286 participants will be randomized to either a 12-week intervention arm or waitlist control arm. The primary outcome was the change in the mean number of migraine days from baseline to the last 28-day period during the treatment phase in the treatment group compared with the control group. The primary outcome variable was prospectively collected through daily eDiary entries. Ethics and Dissemination Approval from the ethics committee and competent authorities was obtained prior to study initiation. Participation was voluntary and informed and written consent was obtained prior to inclusion. The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed international medical journals and communicated to patients and healthcare personnel through the relevant channels. Trial registration numbers EUDAMED: CIV-NO-22-08-040446 REK (Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics): 502734 Date of approval 2022-10-14 Trial registration: NCT05616741, 2022-11-15, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05616741

Persistent effectiveness of CGRP antibody therapy in migraine and comorbid medication overuse or medication overuse headache - a retrospective real-world analysis

BackgroundManagement of patients with migraine who have concomitant medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) is a major problem in clinical practice. Detoxification of acute analgesics before or during initiation of prophylactic therapy has long been recommended although this concept has recently been questioned. Additionally, relapse after detoxification is a common problem. This real-world study analyses the initial and sustained effectiveness of prophylactic migraine therapy with CGRP (receptor) antibodies without prior detoxification in patients with comorbid MO or MOH for up to one year.MethodsA retrospective real-world analysis was performed on 291 patients (episodic migraine (EM) with MO (EM-MO; n = 35), EM without MO (EM-noMO; n = 77), chronic migraine (CM) with MOH (CM-MOH; n = 109), CM without MOH (CM-noMOH; n = 70). All patients began treatment with either erenumab (n = 173), fremanezumab (n = 70) or galcanezumab (n = 48) without prior detoxification. Data were available for up to 12 months of treatment. Responder rates for monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute medication intake (AMD) were analysed.ResultsAll groups showed a significant reduction in MHD, MMD and AMD at the last observed time point compared to baseline. In patients with CM and MOH, 60.6% (66/109) no longer fulfilled the definition of MO or MOH and a further 13.8% (15/109) had only EM-MO. In the EM cohort, 89% (31/35) of MO patients lost their MO during therapy. MHD and AMD 30% responder rates were comparable for CM-MOH and CM-noMOH (MHD: CM-MOH: 56.0% vs. CM-noMOH: 41.4%, p = 0.058, AMD: CM-MOH: 66.1% vs. CM-noMOH: 52.9%, p = 0.077). MMD responder rate did not differ significantly (after Bonferroni adjustment) (CM-MOH: 62.4% vs. CM-noMOH: 47.1%, p = 0.045, α = 0.017). After successful initiation of therapy, 15.4% of the initial CM-MOH patients relapsed and met the criterion for CM-MOH at the end of follow-up. There were no antibody specific differences in response to therapy.ConclusionsOur data confirms the effectiveness of CGRP antibody treatment in migraine patients with additional MOH or MO in a real-world setting. Low relapse rates after initial successful therapy support an early start of CGRP antibody treatment in patients with MOH or MO.Trial registrationNo registration, retrospective analysis.Graphical

Evaluating the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Eptinezumab in High-Frequency and Chronic Migraine in Real World: EMBRACE-The First Italian Multicenter, Prospective, Real-Life Study.

We conducted a multicenter, prospective study (EMBRACE) evaluating the real-life effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of eptinezumab (100 mg/300 mg)-a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAb)-in high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM). The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD) for CM at weeks 9-12 compared to baseline. The secondary endpoints included changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), and responder rates. The safety analysis involved 44 subjects; the effectiveness analysis included 26 individuals. Eptinezumab was well-tolerated. In CM patients, eptinezumab significantly reduced MHD (-16.1 ± 9.9, p < 0.001), MAI, NRS, HIT-6, MIDAS, and MIBS-4. In HFEM patients, it significantly reduced NRS, HIT-6, MIDAS, and MIBS-4, though reductions in MMD (-3.3 ± 4.5) and MAI were not statistically significant. Overall, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 61.5% and 30.8%, respectively (60% and 30% in non-responders to subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs). The clinical change was rated as much or very much improved by 61.0% of the patients. Eptinezumab demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in real-life among hard-to-treat migraine patients with multiple treatment failures, including anti-CGRP mAbs.

Onabotulinumtoxina in the Prevention of Migraine in Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet it remains underrecognized and undertreated, especially in the pediatric and adolescent population. Chronic migraine occurs approximately in 1% of children and adolescents requiring preventive treatment. Topiramate is the only FDA-approved preventative treatment for children older than 12 years of age, but there is conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy. OnabotulinumtoxinA is a known and approved treatment for the management of chronic migraine in people older than 18 years. Several studies examine its role in the pediatric population with positive results; however, the clear-cut benefit is still unclear. OnabotulinumtoxinA seems not only to improve disability scores (PedMIDAS) but also to improve the quality, characteristics, and frequency of migraines in the said population. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on the efficacy, dosing, administration, long-term outcomes, and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in pediatric and adolescent migraine. Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), decreased from of 21.2 days per month to 10.7 after treatment. The reported treatment-related adverse effects were mild and primarily injection site related and ranged from 0% to 47.0%. Thus, this review provides compelling evidence suggesting that OnabotulinumtoxinA may represent a safe and effective preventive treatment option for pediatric migraine.

Real-world experiences of migraine patients on Erenumab: a Kuwait single center cohort

ABSTRACT Background Migraine is a prevalent headache disorder with a significant impact on the quality of life. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of erenumab, mAb targeting the CGRP receptor, in treating chronic (CM) and episodic (EM) migraine in clinical practice Kuwait, providing region-specific insights to treatment options. Method This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with EM or CM treated with erenumab. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly mean migraine days, and several changes including the mean number of monthly migraine days, the frequency of analgesic use, attack severity, AEs, and QoL. Results The study included 151 patients with a mean age of 44.0±11.4 years, and 81.9% female. The primary outcome was achieved in 74.2% of patients, with a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in headache frequency, pain severity, analgesic use, and improvement in QoL. Age and duration of migraine were significant predictors of achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency after therapy (OR = 0.955; p = 0.009) and (OR = 0.965; p = 0.025), respectively. Treatment compliance was observed in 76.2% of patients, and 24.5% discontinued treatment. Constipation was the most commonly reported AEs (6.0%), and conservative management was the most common approach to managing AEs. Conclusion Erenumab was effective in reducing the frequency and severity of migraine attacks and improving QoL, and safe with manageable AEs in a real-world setting in Kuwait. Further research is needed to better understand erenumab’s effectiveness and safety in different populations and settings, as well as to compare it with other migraine prophylactic treatments.

The effectiveness and predictors influencing the outcome of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: understanding from diverse patient profiles in a single session.

This real-world study aimed to investigate how onabotulinumtoxinA affects the outcome of migraine, along with accompanying anxiety, depression, and bruxism among a group of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and define predictors of good response. Patients diagnosed with CM who received onabotulinumtoxinA were included in this single-center, real-world retrospective cohort study. Monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly migraine days (MMDs), headache intensity (numeric rating scale-NRS) and headache characteristics were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, 12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Response to onabotulinumtoxinA (% reduction in MHDs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated. OnabotulinumA was applied to the masseter muscles in patients complaining of bruxism. A total of 72 patients (mean ± SD age: 36.3 ± 8.5 years; 91.7% were female) diagnosed with CM were included. OnabotulinumtoxinA revealed significant decrease in median (IQR) MHDs [from 20(15-25) at baseline to 6(4-10), p < 0.001], MMDs [from 9(6-12) to 3(1-6), p < 0.001] and NRS [from 9(8-10) to 7(6-8), p < 0.001], and the MIDAS [from 54(30-81) to 16(7-24), p < 0.001], HIT-6 [from 67(65-69) to 58(54-64), p < 0.001], ASC-12 [from 6(1.5-9) to 2(0-9), p = 0.002], BAI [from 12(6.5-19) to 9(3-17), p < 0.001] and BDI [from 11(6.5-17) to 3(2-7) p < 0.001] scores at 12 weeks post-treatment. Patients complaining of bruxism received onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the first n = 27 (37.5%) and 12. week post-treatment n = 19 (70.4%) periods. Overall, 70.8% of patients responded (≥50% reduction in MHDs), while 29.2% did not (<50% reduction). Both groups showed similar characteristics in demographics, migraine history, baseline PROMs scores, comorbidities, and prior treatments. OnabotulinumtoxinA is an effective treatment option that rapidly improves migraine outcomes, disability, and impact while also alleviating comorbid depression and/or anxiety. This study's noteworthy finding is that onabotulinumtoxinA is effective in a majority of CM patients, irrespective of their prior treatment history, migraine characteristics, or concurrent comorbidities. Furthermore, we identified no specific predictors for a favorable response to onabotulinumtoxinA. Applying onabotulinumtoxinA to the masseter muscles can relieve discomfort associated with concurrent bruxism; however, it does not impact migraine outcomes.

A Risk-Difference Meta-Analysis for the Prophylactic Treatments of Chronic Migraine.

Chronic migraine (CM) imposes significant personal, societal, and financial burdens, historically lacking specific prophylactic treatments. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) represent a novel, mechanism-based, and migraine-specific prophylactic approach. Four mAbs, namely, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, have been marketed, although head-to-head trials with standard anti-migraine treatments are absent. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs with standard anti-migraine treatments using a cross-trial indirect model of the absolute risk difference (ARD) of a 50% responder rate, in order to express the final results in terms of the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). Phase 3 and 2b randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for CM prophylaxis were searched in the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The ARD between groups for the percentage of trial participants who reported a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days and the differences in the number of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and participants who withdrew from each RCT were calculated, and subsequently, the NNT and NNH were calculated for each one of the outcome measures. In total, eight RCTs were considered eligible. A similar efficacy and safety have been demonstrated among CGRP mAbs and all standard CM treatments. The results of the ARD for the total number of studies concerning efficacy, total adverse events, serious adverse events, and dropout from the RCTs ranged from -0.688 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.821-(-0.513)) to -0.018 (95% CI: -0.044-(0.007)), from 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104) to -0.380 (95% CI: -0.589, -0.126), from -0.025 (95% CI: -0.046, -0.006) to 0.014 (95% CI: -0.015, 0.42), from 0.048 (95% CI: -0.112, 0.014) to 0.232 (95% CI: -0.016, 0.458) correspondingly. All anti-CGRP mAbs showed a roughly equal statistically significant ARD and similar NNTs, ranging from 5 to 8, while the ARD of onbotulinum toxin A (oBTA) was not significant with an NNT 56. The two studies of topiramate showed contradictory results, the one significant while the other not, with NNTs 2 and 22, respectively. All four anti-CGRP mAbs showed an invariably high efficacy among their studies, in terms of the ARD and its derivative measure of NNT, in contrast to oBTA, while in topiramate, the results are contradictory between the two studies.

Implications of therapy interruption on monthly migraine days and modified migraine disability assessment in patients treated with erenumab for chronic and episodic migraine: SQUARE study interim results

BackgroundThere are limited real-world data in Switzerland examining the impact of erenumab, a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, on migraine-related quality of life.ObjectiveThis 18-month interim analysis of 172 patients with episodic or chronic migraine from the SQUARE study provides first prospective insights on the impact of mandatory erenumab treatment interruption, following Swiss-reimbursement requirements, in a real-world clinical setting in Switzerland.FindingsRecruited patients receiving 70 or 140 mg erenumab underwent treatment interruption on average 11.2 months after therapy onset with a mean duration of 4 months. There were sustained improvements in mean monthly migraine days (MMD) and migraine disability (mMIDAS) during initial treatment with erenumab. Treatment interruption was associated with a temporary worsening of condition. Symptoms ameliorated upon therapy reuptake reaching improvements similar to pre-break within 3 months.ConclusionsTreatment interruption was associated with a temporary worsening of condition, which improved again after therapy restart.

Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: A multicenter, real-world study in Taiwan.

To compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine (CM) patients. This multicenter study involved retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA, including difficult-to-treat (DTT) patients (i.e., ≥3 preventive failures). Treatment outcomes were determined at 6 months based on prospective headache diaries and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). The study included 316 (55 M/261F, mean age 44.4 ± 13.5 years) and 333 (61 M/272F, mean age 47.9 ± 13.4 years) CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinbumtoxinA, respectively. At 6 months, CGRP mAb treatment was associated with a greater decrease in monthly migraine days (MMDs) (-13.0 vs. -8.7 days/month, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% responder rate (RR) (74.7% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The findings were consistent in DTT patients (-13.0 vs. -9.1 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 73.9% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001) or those with medication-overuse headache (MOH) (-13.3 vs. -9.0 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 79.0% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001). Besides, patients receiving CGRP mAbs had greater improvement (-42.2 vs. -11.8, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% RR (62.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.001) in MIDAS scores and a lower rate of adverse events (AEs) (6.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). However, none of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. In this multicenter, real-world study, CGRP mAbs were more effective than onabotulinumtoxinA in CM patients, even in DTT or MOH patients. All of these injectables were well tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.

Therapeutic patterns and migraine disease burden in switchers of CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies – insights from the German NeuroTransData registry

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.MethodsThis study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.ResultsOf the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.ConclusionPatients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.