Migraine Attacks Research Articles

TRIPTANS: HOPE FOR THE BEST, PREPARE FOR THE WORST

Abstract The estimated prevalence of headaches in the population is 66%. According to recent guidelines, basic analgesics, nonsteroidal anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or acetaminophen are frequently used as first–line treatment for mild migraine attacks. A triptan is added when analgesic–resistant attacks occur. So these drugs are used as a second–line medication for mild migraines and a first–line medication for moderate to severe headaches. A correlation between spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and triptans has already been reported in the literature. If myocardial infarction is more common in patients with cardiovascular risk factors, SCAD seems more frequent in young and smoker females. What is interesting is the speculation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of SCAD after triptans use. A possible option may consist in the fact that the dissection of the anterior descending artery is due to circumferential shear stress caused by these drugs, combined with smoking habits and estrogen deprivation. These latters influence the immune system and the circulating progenitor cells, which are reduced and less active to replace senescent endothelial cells. That is why an intimal flap is formed so that the blood would enter the media and the dissection would be perpetuated. The suspension of the drug is necessary to prevent the vasoconstriction of the vessel from exacerbating the wall stress caused by smoke and sexual hormones deficiency.

Development and Evaluation of Chemometric Models for the Estimation of Sumatriptan in the Presence of Naproxen and a Degradation Product Using UV Spectrophotometry.

Chemometrics is a discipline that allows the spectral resolution of drugs in a pharmaceutical formulation along with degradation product and it is an alternative to chromatographic methods. Sumatriptan (SUM) is co-formulated with naproxen (NAP) and used in acute migraine attacks. SUM, which has physiological importance, has not been subjected to any stability-indicating chemometric approaches yet, so there is a need for an accurate and safe method for the assay of the cited drug in its preparations. The greenness and blueness assessment was applied using different ecological metrics, including the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Greenness Metric (AGREE), Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) and new "blueness" evaluation using the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) tool. SUM was determined in pharmaceutical formulation along with NAP and in presence of alkali-induced degradation product with simple and cost-effective multivariate approaches using spectrophotometric data. Three chemometric approaches were applied for the stability-indicating determination of SUM in the presence of NAP. Classical least-squares (CLS), partial least-squaresregression (PLS), and principal components regression (PCR)-three multivariate calibration numerical models that were applied to the UV spectra of the mixtures-were used to achieve the best resolution. Sumatriptan was analyzed with mean accuracies for PLS (100.29% ± 1.318) and for PCR (100.60% ± 1.564). The presented methods were compared and validated for their quantitative analyses. Moreover, statistical comparison between the results obtained by the proposed models and the official methods showed no significant differences. The proposed multivariate calibrations were accurate and specific for quantitative analysis of the studied component. PLS is the best method that has the capacity for qualitative analysis of SUM and it is suitable for routine analysis and stability studies of SUM in QC laboratories. Various ecological assessment metrics confirmed the long-standing eco-friendliness of the suggested models. Severally overlapped mixtures of SUM along with co-formulated drug NAP and an alkali-induced degradation product were analyzed by three chemometric approaches. The analytical performance of PLS and PCR was compared and validated in terms of root-mean-square error of calibration (RMSEC), SE of prediction, and recoveries. PLS gave the highest predicted concentrations with the lowest RMSEC and root-mean-square error of prediction. The standard addition was applied for accuracy assessment and the results were compared to those of official methods. Proposed models determined SUM in synthetic mixtures and pharmaceutical formulation in QC laboratories and stability studies. Ecological evaluation tools for measuring the environmental friendliness of chemicals were utilized for the first time in the analysis of SUM.

Prospective evaluation of aura during anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody therapy after 52 weeks of treatment

Background: Clinical studies have shown the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti- CGRP) in migraine patients with and without aura. Early evidence from post hoc and small subgroup analyses suggests that anti-CGRP mAbs reduce the frequency and intensity of aura. Herein, we prospectively assessed the changes in aura after 12 months of anti-CGRP mAb treatment and performed a literature review.Methods: All outpatients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for one year in two tertiary Headache Centers and who experienced ≥1 episode of aura/month were enrolled. The study reports data from one month before (baseline) and the last three months (months 10, 11, 12) of treatment.Results: Data from 13 patients with a diagnosis of migraine with and without aura were collected. The mean duration from aura onset was 17.8±7.9 years. At baseline nine patients (69.2%) reported visual aura, and four (30.8%) visual and sensory aura. Mean duration of aura episodes was of 34.2±15.7 minutes. At baseline, the mean number of monthly migraine days (MMDs) was 22.3±7.5, and the mean number of MMDs preceded by aura was 9.15±9.0. At month 12 of treatment, there was a significant reduction of MMDs (6.2±9.0, p=0.002) and MMDs with aura (2.6±2.7, p=0.015). Three patients reported episodes of aura without subsequent headache, a phenomenon that was absent prior to treatment. We identified 14 studies that reported changes in aura during anti-CGRP mAbs treatment.Conclusions: This prospective study shows that anti-CGRP mAbs reduce the number of migraine attacks with aura consistently with the reduction of MMDs. Randomized studies with anti-CGRP mAbs specifically assessing migraine aura are required.

Facile and green chemistry-compatible fluorescence spectroscopic applications of acid red 87 used to evaluate eletriptan, antimigraine, in its pharmaceutical and biological samples

Eletriptan (ETR), a selective pharmaceutical agent agonist of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1 receptor subtype, are primarily used to treat acute migraine attacks. ETR is a triptan-class medication that works by narrowing cerebral blood vessels and reducing chemicals that produce headache pain, light and sound sensitivity, and nausea. Due to its effectiveness in reducing migraine symptoms, it is a worthwhile choice for those looking for quick and efficient treatment. A green, raid, one-pot and straightforward fluorescence spectrometric method was employed to evaluate ETR in tablets and biological samples. By introducing the ETR drug and the fluorescent ligand, Acid red 87, in an acidic buffer, a quenching of the ligand native fluorescent was promptly produced. The quenching action was simply attributed to the selective ion-pair complex generation between the cationic target and the selected ligand. An increase in ETR concentration was linearly proportional to the quenching response in the 50.0 – 500.0 ng/mL range. The optimal configurations for adjusting the system's variable parameters were determined by examining the ETR–Acid red 87 system's response. Additionally, the sensor that was developed met the standards set by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. The sensitivity thresholds of the approach were 13.8 and 42.0 ng/mL for the detection and quantification parameters, respectively, LOD and LOQ. This approach proficiently evaluated the pharmaceutical and biological samples of ETR. Finally, the proposed approach not only simplifies the analysis process but also limits the badimpact on the environment, making it a promising technique for analytical applications.

Sequential administration of peripheral nerve blocks andonabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine andother headache disorders-A retrospective tolerability and safety study.

To determine the tolerability and safety of concurrent peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. Procedural interventions are available for the treatment of headache disorders. OnabotulinumtoxinA and peripheral nerve blocks are used as alternatives or in addition to oral therapies to reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks. There is currently a lack of safety data focusing on the sequential administration of local anesthetic via peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA during a single clinical encounter for the treatment of headache. The primary aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of concurrent peripheral nerve blockade and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. We hypothesized that the dual intervention would be safe and well tolerated by patients with chronic migraine and other headache disorders. A retrospective chart review was performed using clinical data from patients seen by multiple providers over a 16-month timeframe at one outpatient headache clinic. Patients were identified by procedure codes and those receiving peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single encounter within the study period were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 18 years and older who were (2) receiving both peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of chronic migraine. Patients were excluded if they were under age 18, received their procedure outside of the clinic (emergency room, inpatient ward), or were receiving sphenopalatine ganglion blocks. Age- and sex-matched patients who received one procedure, either peripheral nerve blocks or onabotulinumtoxinA, were used for control. The primary outcome of this safety study was the number of adverse events that occurred in the dual intervention group compared to the single intervention control arms. Information regarding adverse events was gathered via retrospective chart review. If an adverse event was recorded, it was then graded by the reviewer utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ranging from Grade 1 Mild Event to Grade 5 Death. Additionally, it was noted whether the adverse event led to treatment discontinuation. In total, 375 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. After age and sex matching of controls, 131 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 131 patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone and 104 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 104 patients receiving peripheral nerve block(s) alone. The primary endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in total adverse events between dual intervention compared to nerve blocks alone or onabotulinumtoxinA alone. The number of adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation approached but did not reach statistical significance for those receiving dual intervention versus onabotulinumtoxinA alone in the number of adverse events that led to treatment termination (4.6%, 6/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131, p = 0.065); however, the number of patients who discontinued therapy was not significantly different between those groups (2.3%, 3/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131; p = 0.314; odds ratio 0.3 [0-3.2]; p = 0.338). In this retrospective chart review, there was no significant difference in adverse events or therapy discontinuation between patients receiving sequential peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus those receiving either peripheral nerve block(s) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections alone. As a result, we concluded that the combination procedure is likely safe and well tolerated in routine clinical practice.

Auricular Therapy for Migraine.

Migraine brings hours or even days of disability, affecting 15% of the US population and one billion people worldwide. Migraine treatments have improved over the years and there is now a range of non-pharmacologic therapies that can be administered as monotherapy, combined with pharmacologic therapy or combined with other non-pharmacologic therapies to give greater options for those who do not tolerate, do not respond to, or who wish to reduce or avoid pharmacologic treatments. We conducted a review of the literature on auricular therapy as acute or preventive treatment for migraine, searching the databases of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2013 to 2023. A total of 43 articles contained at least one search term, with three studies specific to acute or prevention of migraine (one for acute only, one for prevention only and one for both acute and prevention). The population was limited to, adults with migraine ages 18 or older, with the administration of auricular therapy as the intervention. While there have been studies on the use of auricular therapy for pain on two specific standardized auricular therapies, Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) and National Acupuncture Detoxification Association (NADA), neither of these protocols were utilized in any of the studies specific to migraine management. Each of the three studies used different techniques, with one using acupuncture needles and five specific points and two using semi-permanent needles (remained in for a few days) that were placed in areas that showed high activity. Each of these studies showed auricular therapy to have benefit for the management of migraine. However, the authors of each of the studies recommended further studies. Auricular therapy may be a helpful adjunctive treatment to abort a current migraine attack or aid in reducing the frequency or severity of migraine attacks.

Non-vascular ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation does not trigger migraine attacks: A randomized clinical trial.

To investigate the role of NN414, a selective KATP channel opener for the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype found in neurons and β-pancreatic cells, in inducing migraine attacks in individuals with migraine without aura. Thirteen participants were randomly allocated to receive NN414 and placebo on two days separated by at least one week. The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of migraine attacks after NN414 compared with placebo. The secondary endpoints were the difference in the area under the curve for headache intensity scores, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (VMCA), superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Twelve participants completed the study, with two (16.6%) reporting migraine attacks after NN414 compared to one (8.3%) after placebo (p = 0.53). The area under the curve for headache intensity, VMCA, superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not differ between NN414 and placebo (p > 0.05, all comparisons). The lack of migraine induction upon activation of the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype suggests it may not contribute to migraine pathogenesis. Our findings point to KATP channel blockers that target the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype, found in cerebral vasculature, as potential candidates for innovative antimigraine treatments.Registration number: NCT04744129.

Unlocking the potential of luteolin: A natural migraine management approach through network pharmacology

BackgroundLuteolin, a natural flavonoid, exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and has been investigated for potential health benefits. Its focus on migraine management arises from its ability to mitigate neuroinflammation, a key factor in migraine attacks. MethodspkCSM and Swiss ADME were employed to assess luteolin's pharmacokinetic properties, revealing challenges such as low water solubility and limited skin permeability. OSIRIS Property Explorer is used to check the toxicity. Ligand binding simulations indicated luteolin's potential to interact with calcitonin gene related peptide proteins, crucial in migraine pathophysiology. DisGeNet identified common targets related to migraine, with subsequent network analysis emphasizing promising targets. Results and DiscussionLuteolin demonstrated good intestinal absorption but faced BBB limitations, suggesting a potential for oral administration but questioning direct brain impact. Nanoformulation was proposed to address solubility challenges, emphasizing the need for in vivo validation. The highest binding affinity with CGRP proteins PDBID: 6PFO (−7.63 kcal/mol) suggested a potential for migraine treatment, requiring empirical confirmation. Enrichment network analysis illustrated luteolin's potential in migraine treatment, emphasizing key targets such as PTGS2, AKT1, ESR1, MMP2, and MMP9. Luteolin shows promise for migraine management, evident in its pharmacokinetic, toxicological profiles, and interactions with CGRP proteins. Challenges like low solubility suggest the need for nanoformulations and empirical validation. Target identification and network analysis offer insights, highlighting potential therapeutic avenues in migraine treatment. ConclusionLuteolin holds promise in migraine management, necessitating further research for translation into effective interventions, considering its neuroprotective potential in broader neurological conditions.

Zavegepant for Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of zavegepant (BHV-3500), a recently approved nasal spray containing a third-generation calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for treating acute migraine attacks. A comprehensive search was conducted across various databases up to 06/26/2023 to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on zavegepant's efficacy and safety in treatment of acute migraine attacks. Primary outcome: freedom from pain at 2 hours postdose. Safety outcomes were evaluated based on adverse events (AEs), with zavegepant 10 mg and placebo groups compared for incidence of AEs. Two RCTs, involving 2061 participants (1014 receiving zavegepant and 1047 receiving placebo), were quantitatively analyzed. An additional trial was included for qualitative synthesis. Zavegepant 10 mg exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of achieving freedom from pain at 2 hours postdose compared with the placebo group (risk ratio [RR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28 to 1.84). It also showed superior relief from the most bothersome symptoms at 2 hours postdose compared with placebo (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.42). However, the zavegepant 10 mg group experienced a higher incidence of AEs compared with placebo (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.12), with dysgeusia being the most reported AE (RR 4.18, 95% CI 3.05 to 5.72). Zavegepant 10 mg is more effective than placebo in treating acute migraine attacks, providing compelling evidence of its efficacy in relieving migraine pain and most bothersome associated symptoms. Further trials are necessary to confirm its efficacy, tolerability, and safety in diverse clinic-based settings with varied patient populations.

Use of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Migraines in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.

Migraines are a common comorbidity and source of disability in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS). Recently, therapeutic agents for episodic and chronic migraine known as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors have shown to effectively control migraine attacks and improve quality of life in the general population. This study explored the use of these novel agents in individuals with comorbid MS. This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study at the University of South Florida's neurology clinic; it evaluated individuals with both MS and migraine. A total of 27 individuals with MS and chronic or episodic migraine who received treatment with a CGRP monoclonal antibody were identified. Of these, 63% reported a reduction in their migraine frequency of greater than 75%. Concurrent use of a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for MS occurred in 82% of patients, and in 37% of these, the DMT used was also a monoclonal antibody. Adverse effects from CGRP monoclonal antibodies were mild and occurred in only 11% of patients, and no patient experienced worsening of their MS symptoms during cotreatment over the duration of the study. Our study showed a significant reduction in migraine frequency and a favorable adverse event profile for individuals with comorbid MS who took CGRP monoclonal antibodies and experienced no worsening of MS symptoms. In individuals with MS, CGRP monoclonal antibodies seem to be a safe and effective therapy for episodic or chronic migraine.

Transcranial direct current stimulation for migrane

Migraine is one of the most common primary headache disorders. Nowadays, there is an increase in the prevalence of migraine. It causes a significant reduction in the Quality of Life of those affected. There are two major approaches to treating migraines: attack management and prevention. The concept of primary prophylactic therapy of migraine has developed rapidly. In addition to standard medication, there are increasing data indicating the usefulness and feasibility of non-drug treatments, such as TES (transcranial electrical stimulation). Both cathodal and anodal stimulation have been shown to be effective in migraine treatment: after a course of TES, the number of days per month with headache decreased, the duration and intensity of migraine attacks decreased, and some studies reported a reduction in the number of medications used. O1/O2 (1–2 mA) for cathodal stimulation and F3/F4 (1–2 mA) for anodal stimulation were the most frequently stimulated cortical areas. The average duration of each session was 20 minutes. The length of TES sessions varied from study to study. TES has shown efficacy and safety in treating various forms of migraine. Using this non-invasive method to prevent attacks may be one of the directions for personalizing migraine treatment.

The Effect of Melatonin on Reducing the Frequency and Severity of Migraine Attacks: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

There is no definite recommendation for melatonin supplementation in episodic migraine. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of melatonin on reducing the frequency and severity of migraine attacks. This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at Golestan Hospital of Ahvaz, Iran, in 2021. A total of 60 patients with episodic migraine were randomly assigned into 2 groups of receiving 3 mg melatonin (intervention group; n=30) or the same dose of placebo (control group; n=30) along with baseline therapy (propranolol 20 mg, BID) for two months. The attack frequency, attack duration, attack severity (based on VAS), the number of analgesic intakes, drug complications, Migraine Disability Assessment score (MIDAS), and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) were evaluated at baseline and in the first, second, third, and fourth months of follow-up. The independent t test, chi-square, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures were used to compare variables between the two groups. In both groups, the frequency, duration, and severity of attacks, taking analgesics, MIDAS, and PSQI scores during follow-up decreased significantly (P<0.001). After treatment, the mean frequency (P=0.032) and duration of attacks (P=0.001), taking analgesic (P<0.001), and MIDAS (P<0.001) and PSQI scores (P<0.001) in the melatonin group were lower than placebo. Only the attack severity was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.126). Side effects were observed in two patients (6.7%) in the melatonin group and one patient (3.3%) in the placebo group (P>0.999). Our study shows that melatonin was more efficacious than the placebo in the reduction of frequency and duration of migraine attacks. It was equally safe as the placebo and might be effective in the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults.Trial Registration Number: IRCT20190107042264N5.

Aberrant concordance among dynamics of spontaneous brain activity in patients with migraine without aura: A multivariate pattern analysis study

BackgroundAlterations in the static and dynamic characteristics of spontaneous brain activity have been extensively studied to investigate functional brain changes in migraine without aura (MwoA). However, alterations in concordance among the dynamics of spontaneous brain activity in MwoA remain largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the possibilities of diagnosis based on the concordance indices. MethodsResting-state functional MRI scans were performed on 32 patients with MwoA and 33 matched healthy controls (HCs) in the first cohort, as well as 36 patients with MwoA and 32 HCs in the validation cohort. The dynamic indices including fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation, regional homogeneity, voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity, degree centrality and global signal connectivity were analyzed. We calculated the concordance of grey matter volume-wise (across voxels) and voxel-wise (across time windows) to quantify the degree of integration among different functional levels represented by these dynamic indices. Subsequently, the voxel-wise concordance alterations were analyzed as features for multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) utilizing the support vector machine. ResultsCompared with that of HCs, patients with MwoA had lower whole-grey matter volume-wise concordance, and the mean value of volume-wise concordance was negatively correlated with the frequency of migraine attacks. The MVPA results revealed that the most discriminative brain regions were the right thalamus, right cerebellar Crus II, left insula, left precentral gyrus, right cuneus, and left inferior occipital gyrus. ConclusionsConcordance alterations in the dynamics of spontaneous brain activity in brain regions could be an important feature in the identification of patients with MwoA.

Is functional MRI meaningful in migraine?

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an imaging method that enables us to understand brain anatomy, mapping and its function. While fMRI was previously used in experimental studies, it has now been used in clinical studies. Imaging in fMRI is based on measuring the increase in regional blood flow caused by cortical activation. fMRI indirectly demonstrates neural activation by detecting increases in oxygenation. fMRI relies on the sensitivity of magnetic resonance signals to changes in deoxyhemoglobin levels or perfusion, reflecting the metabolic and hemodynamic responses associated with neural activation. Imaging is arranged in the clinic for primary headaches if needed for a differential diagnosis. However, imaging studies are utilized in scientific research to elucidate the pathophysiology. Migraine is a common episodic disorder characterized by recurring attacks. Investigating the functional structure of the brain during both attack and interictal periods is crucial in understanding migraine pathology. However, capturing patients' migraine attacks for monitoring purposes without treatment is considered unethical in many countries. Moreover, conducting such studies is hindered by the requirement for prolonged hospital stays and extended imaging times, which significantly increase costs. Despite the challenges of conducting research in migraine patients, fMRI stands out as an excellent imaging method for investigating the functional brain structures involved in this episodic disorder. Several fMRI studies have yielded valuable insights into the pathophysiology of migraine. fMRI is believed to offer valuable guidance in refining our understanding of migraine-specific mechanisms, facilitating biomarker studies for migraine activity, and elucidating abnormal functions in regions affected by migraine. Monitoring treatment response using biomarkers is anticipated to be an effective tool for identifying targets for migraine treatment, including assessing treatment efficacy in the development of new migraine-specific therapies.

New treatment for migraines: Use of monoclonal antibodies – Review

Migraine is one of the most prevalent diseases in the population and is also one of the main disabling diseases, having a negative impact on the sufferer's quality of life. Migraine mainly affects people of working age, reducing productivity and impacting the entire labor market. The field of migraine therapies includes monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP), which has a strong correlation with the pathophysiology of migraine attacks. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the literature to review the treatment of migraines with the use of monoclonal antibodies, analyzing the prognosis and improvement of patients who have undergone treatment. A systematic review of the literature was carried out between September 2021 and April 2022 by two independent researchers. A total of 1,105 articles were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria and were then analyzed. The use of the monoclonal antibodies Erenumab, Eptinezumab, Fremanezumab and Galcanezumab showed better results in all the parameters analyzed when compared to the placebo groups. They showed a reduction in the average number of migraine days per month, a reduction in the number of days with crises, a reduction in the use of acute medication and an improvement in quality of life assessment scores. In conclusion, monoclonal antibodies are an innovative therapy for migraine and are emerging as preventive options with good tolerability in terms of adverse effects and efficacy. Further research should be carried out with a view to evaluating efficacy and long-term safety, given the recent introduction of this therapy.

Cortical Hyperperfusion on MRI Arterial Spin-Labeling during the Interictal Period of Patients with Migraine Headache.

Concentrations of calcitonin gene-related peptide, a neuropeptide and potent endogenous vasodilator, are reportedly higher in patients with migraine than in healthy subjects, both during and between migraine attacks, reflecting ongoing activation of the trigeminal nervous system. In this prospective study, we measured CBF during the interictal period of patients with migraine after considering insomnia and depression and examined the effects of ongoing activation of the trigeminal nervous system, including during the interictal period, on CBF. In a total of 242 patient with migraine (age range, 18-75 years), CBF was measured by MR imaging arterial spin-labeling during the interictal period and was compared with results from 26 healthy volunteers younger than 45 years of age as control subjects (age range, 22-45 years). Cortical hyperperfusion was defined as identification of ≥2 cerebral cortical regions with regional CBF values at least 2 SDs above the mean regional CBF in control subjects. The overall frequency of cortical hyperperfusion was significantly higher in patients with migraine (115 of 242, 48%) than in control subjects (1 of 26, 4%). Multivariable analysis revealed the 18- to 40-year age group and patients with migraine without insomnia as significant positive clinical factors associated with cortical hyperperfusion. Among patients with migraine without insomnia, the frequency of cortical hyperperfusion was >92% (89 of 97). One-way ANOVA showed that in all ROIs of the cortex, regional CBF was significantly higher in patients with migraine without insomnia than in patients with migraine with insomnia or control subjects. In patients with migraine without insomnia, cortical hyperperfusion findings showed a sensitivity of 0.918 and a specificity of 0.962 for migraine in the interictal period, representing excellent accuracy. In contrast, among patients with migraine with insomnia, sensitivity was only 0.179 but specificity was 0.962. Patients with migraine without insomnia may have cortical hyperperfusion during the interictal period; however, the findings of the present study need to be prospectively validated on a larger scale before clinical applicability can be considered.

An update on migraine: Current and new treatment options.

Migraine headache is a common and potentially debilitating disorder often treated by physician associates/assistants (PAs) and other providers. With the recent advances in new drugs and device technology for the treatment of migraine, the American Headache Society has released a consensus statement on both preventive and acute strategies for clinical practice. The US FDA has recently approved various types of medications and devices for the treatment and prevention of migraine attacks including several calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor inhibitors, a selective serotonin receptor agonist (SSRA), noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), external trigeminal nerve stimulation (e-TNS), and external concurrent occipital and trigeminal neurostimulation (eCOT-NS), among other pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options. This article provides a review of migraine prevention and acute treatment protocol, highlighting new approaches to both.

Real-world effectiveness and satisfaction with intravenous eptinezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine: REVIEW, an observational, multi-site, US-based study

BackgroundDespite recent advancements in migraine treatment, some patients continue to endure significant disease burden. Due to the controlled nature of randomized trials in migraine prevention, many real-world patients with comorbidities or prior exposure to certain therapies are excluded. Capturing evidence of the effectiveness of treatment in real-world clinical settings can further shape treatment paradigms. The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive understanding of both patients’ and physicians’ real-world experiences with eptinezumab for chronic migraine (CM).MethodsREVIEW (Real-world EVidence and Insights into Experiences With eptinezumab) is an observational, multi-site (n = 4), US-based study designed to evaluate real-world experiences of patients treated with eptinezumab and their treating physicians. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of CM, who had completed ≥ 2 consecutive eptinezumab infusion cycles (≥ 6 months of exposure). The study included a retrospective chart review, a patient survey, and a semi-structured physician interview that assessed patient and/or physician satisfaction with elements of daily living / well-being, migraine symptomology, and perspectives of the eptinezumab infusion experience.ResultsOf the 94 patients enrolled, 83% (78/94) were female, the mean age was 49.2 years, and the mean time since migraine diagnosis was 15.4 years. Before eptinezumab treatment, patients experienced a mean of 8 self-reported “good” days/month, which increased to 18 after treatment. Most patients took, on average, ≥ 10 days/month of prescription and/or over-the-counter medication (81% [75/93] and 66% [61/93], respectively) to treat migraine attacks before eptinezumab treatment, which dropped to 26% (24/93) and 23% (21/93) following eptinezumab treatment. Prior to receiving eptinezumab, 62% (58/93) of patients indicated being at least slightly concerned about infusions; after eptinezumab infusion, this dropped to 14% (13/93). These patient survey findings were consistent with physician responses.ConclusionThis real-world evidence study demonstrated high overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of eptinezumab treatment for CM among most patients and their physicians.

Blood serum levels of PACAP and migraine onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the relationship between blood pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) levels and migraine. PACAP is involved in the onset of migraine, but the results from clinical studies on PACAP level variations across different periods of migraine are conflicting. We systematically searched for observational studies that reported PACAP levels in people with migraine and non-migraine controls published in English from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid electronic databases, or in Chinese from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and the WanFang Med database. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Of the 514 identified studies, 8 were eligible for inclusion. There was a "very low" level of evidence suggesting that the PACAP level is negatively correlated with migraine disease duration in adults with migraine (summary = -0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.49 to -0.22) and that the PACAP is higher in people with migraine during the ictal period than in the interictal period (standardized mean difference = 0.41, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.66) for both adults and children with migraine. Adult patients with episodic migraine (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -9.58 pg/mL, 95% CI -13.41 to -5.75 pg/mL) or chronic migraine (WMD = -10.93 pg/mL, 95% CI -15.57 to -6.29 pg/mL) had lower blood PACAP levels than non-migraine controls during the interictal period, supported by a "low" or "very low" quality of evidence, respectively, according to the GRADE rules. There is a very low certainty of evidence suggesting that the PACAP level is negatively correlated with migraine disease duration of adults with migraine and it varies greatly among different periods of migraine of both adults and children with migraine.

Unsatisfactory response to acute medications does not affect the medication overuse headache development in pediatric chronic migraine

BackgroundChronic migraine (CM) negatively impacts the quality of life of 2 to 4% of pediatric patients. In adults, CM is frequently linked to medication overuse headache (MOH), but there is a much lower prevalence of MOH in children. A suboptimal response to acute therapies may lead to their reduced use, thus preventing MOH development in children and adolescents. The frequency of patients with CM who do not respond to acute therapies was examined in the present study. We investigated whether the prevalence of MOH was different between responders and non-responders. We also examined whether patients receiving prophylactic therapy had an improved response to acute therapy. Finally, we investigated if there was a difference in the frequency of psychiatric comorbidities between responders and non-responders.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed clinical data of all chronic pediatric migraineurs under the age of 18 referred to the Headache Centre at Bambino Gesù Children Hospital in June 2021 and February 2023. ICHD3 criteria were used to diagnose CM and MOH. We collected demographic data, including the age at onset of migraine and the age of the CM course. At baseline and after 3 months of preventive treatment, we evaluated the response to acute medications. Neuropsychiatric comorbidities were referred by the children’s parents during the first attendance evaluation.ResultsSeventy patients with CM were assessed during the chosen period. Paracetamol was tried by 41 patients (58.5%), NSAIDs by 56 patients (80.0%), and triptans by 1 patient (1.4%). Fifty-one participants (73%) were non-responder to the abortive treatment. The presence of MOH was detected in 27.1% of the whole populations. Regarding our primary aim, MOH was diagnosed in 29% of non-responder patients and 22% of responders (p > 0.05). All patients received preventative treatment. After 3 months of preventive pharmacological therapy, 65.4% of patients who did not respond to acute medications achieved a response, while 34.6% of patients who were non-responder remain non-responder (p < 0.05). Prophylactic therapy was also effective in 69% of patients who responded to acute medication (p < 0.05). Psychiatric comorbidities were detected in 68.6% of patients, with no difference between responders and non-responders (72.2% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.05).ConclusionsDespite the high prevalence of unresponsiveness to acute therapies in pediatric CM, it does not act as a protective factor for MOH. Moreover, responsiveness to acute drugs is improved by pharmacological preventive treatment and it is not affected by concomitant psychiatric comorbidities.