HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular ImagingVol. 6, No. 6Letter by Taylor et al Regarding Article, “Myocardial Fibrosis as a Key Determinant of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Study” Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBLetter by Taylor et al Regarding Article, “Myocardial Fibrosis as a Key Determinant of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Study” Robin J. Taylor, Fraz Umar and Francisco Leyva Robin J. TaylorRobin J. Taylor Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom Search for more papers by this author , Fraz UmarFraz Umar Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom Search for more papers by this author and Francisco LeyvaFrancisco Leyva Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom Search for more papers by this author Originally published1 Nov 2013https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001230Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2013;6:e78To the Editor:Masci et al1 should be commended for providing new evidence with respect to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular MRI in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). After categorizing patients by LGE status, they demonstrated that every patient remained in the same cohort during the 2 years of follow-up, a novel finding strongly suggestive of 2 distinct phenotypes. The observed progression in myocardial fibrosis, in association with a reduction in left ventricular systolic function, adds to the growing evidence of the malignant natural history of IDCM with fibrosis.Although we concur with the authors’ view that LGE-cardiovascular MRI is key to the assessment of patients with suspected IDCM, this study did not include patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Therefore, we do not agree with the authors’ view that patients with fibrosis should be selected for CRT at an earlier point. The experience in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy is that scar burden relates to a poor outcome after CRT.2,3 Moreover, we have recently shown that in patients with IDCM managed with CRT, the presence of midwall fibrosis is associated with unsuccessful reverse remodeling and a dramatically higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 18.6).4 This relationship was mediated through both sudden cardiac death and pump failure.The authors also argue that the positive response of patients without LGE to optimal medical therapy should influence the clinician to delay CRT. Clearly, this group of patients has a particularly favorable outcome.4,5 Nevertheless, the authors have not provided information on the outcome in patients who would be appropriate for CRT. It is reported that 59% of patients without LGE underwent reverse left ventricular remodeling, but it would be useful to know the further specific influence of QRS duration on this. Importantly, 14% of the study population were excluded from follow-up analyses because they received device therapy. Arguably, CRT may be paramount to left ventricular reverse remodeling in this subgroup.In essence, Masci et al1 have shown that patients with IDCM and myocardial fibrosis have a worse outcome than patients without fibrosis after medical therapy. However, because the study cohort did not include patients undergoing CRT, no conclusions can be drawn as to the eligibility or timing of CRT.Robin J. Taylor, MBChB, MRCPFraz Umar, MRCPFrancisco Leyva, MBChB, MDCentre for Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, Birmingham, United KingdomDisclosuresNone.