Middle-preserving Pancreatectomy Research Articles

One-stage middle-preserving pancreatectomy: indications and results

One-stage middle-preserving pancreatectomy: indications and results

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas: experience of surgical treatment

To evaluate the outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the pancreas. A retrospective analysis included 54 patients with pancreatic metastases (PM) of RCC who underwent surgical treatment at the Blokhin National Cancer Medical Research Center and Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery in 1995-2018. PM were synchronous in 6 (11%) patients and metachronous in 48 (89%) patients. Solitary metastases were identified in 35 (65%), single metastases - in 14 (26%), multiple metastases - in 5 (9%) patients. Thirty (56%) patients had isolated PM, 24 (44%) patients - PM associated with another metastatic site. The following surgical procedures were performed: distal pancreatectomy (n=30, 55%), pancreatoduodenectomy (n=12, 21%), total pancreatectomy (n=6, 12%), pancreatic head resection (n=3, 6%), middle-preserving pancreatectomy (n=1, 2%), middle pancreatectomy (n=1, 2%), cryosurgical destruction of tumor (n=1, 2%). Median blood loss was 950 ml (interquartile range 400-1800 ml). Postoperative complications occurred in 52% patients. The 90-day mortality rate was 6%, overall 5-year survival 74±7%, median - 84 months. Surgery is associated with an acceptable perioperative complications and long-term survival in patients with synchronous and metachronous, solitary and multiple PM of RCC, including cases of extrapancreatic disease. This approach may be considered as a management option in these patients.

Middle-preserving pancreatectomy with reversed pancreaticogastrostomy: report of a case

Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic resections have been reported increasingly in recent years; however, for multifocal diseases involving the head and the tail of the pancreas, total pancreatectomy is still the preferred procedure. The possible consequence of this procedure is loss of normal pancreatic parenchyma, resulting in insufficiency of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine functions. Various types of limited resection have been introduced for isolated or multiple pancreatic lesions, depending on the location of the tumor. Even for multifocal diseases, if the pancreatic body is spared, a middle-preserving pancreatectomy (MPP) can be performed to assure maximal pancreatic function and uncompromised quality of life. Yet, few papers have introduced the feasibility of MPP for a better outcome. This report describes a new surgical technique for MPP using an alternative approach for the remnant pancreas anastomosis. We used this technique successfully to remove a bifocal neoplasm: adenocarcinoma of the distal bile duct and mucinous cyst adenoma in the tail of the pancreas.

Middle-preserving pancreatectomy: report of two cases and review of the literature

BackgroundMiddle-preserving pancreatectomy (MPP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure which has recently been sporadically reported for the treatment of multicentric periampullary-pancreatic lesions. However, a comprehensive recognition of this procedure has not been clearly elucidated.Case presentationWe herein report two patients undergoing MPP due to synchronous multicentric pancreatic neoplasm. Patient one was a 24-year-old woman with a multicentric solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and patient two was a 36-year-old woman with a multicentric serous cystic neoplasm (SCN). Simultaneous atypical pancreaticoduodenectomy and atypical left pancreatectomy were performed in patient one; simultaneous standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and atypical left pancreatectomy with spleen preservation were performed in patient two. Approximately 6 cm and 5 cm segments of the middle portion of the pancreas were preserved, respectively. At follow-up at 36 months and 6 months respectively, patient one had developed diabetes and malabsorption requiring dietary control, exercise and pancreatic enzyme supplement whereas patient two showed normal fasting blood glucose without diarrhea. Both patients were disease-free and in good nutritional condition. We reviewed twenty cases of MPP that were previously reported in the literature. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.ConclusionMPP is mainly beneficial for multicentric noninvasive periampullary-pancreatic lesions. However, for multicentric periampullary-pancreatic lesions involving even primary invasive cancers, as long as the invasive cancers affect only one side of the pancreas (proximal or distal), MPP could serve as a rational choice in well-selected patients.

Middle-preserving pancreatectomy for synchronous ampullary carcinoma and solid-pseudopapillary tumor of distal pancreas

IntroductionTotal pancreatectomy is the treatment of choice for multicentric diseases involving the pancreas. Middle-preserving pancreatectomy is a recently reported alternative procedure when the pancreatic body is spared from disease. Presentation of caseWe report a 63-year old lady who underwent a combined Whipple's operation and distal splenopancreatectomy for her synchronous ampullary carcinoma and solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the distal pancreas. DiscussionFor multiple tumors of the pancreas, the choice of surgery should be based on the nature of pathology and follow the principle of oncological resection. ConclusionMiddle-preserving pancreatectomy is a safe and feasible option for patient with multicentric or synchronous pancreatic pathologies.

Middle-preserving pancreatectomy for advanced transverse colon cancer invading the duodenun and non-functioning endocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail.

A 73-year-old female was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of advanced transverse colon cancer with severe anemia and body weight loss. Preoperative evaluations, including colonoscopy, gastroduodenoscopy, and computed tomography, revealed not only a transverse colon cancer massively invading the duodenum, but also a non-functioning endocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail. We performed middle-preserving pancreatectomy (MPP) with right hemicolectomy for these tumors with a curative intent. After the resection, about 6cm of the body of the pancreas was preserved, and signs of diabetes mellitus have not appeared. The postoperative course was complicated by a grade B pancreatic fistula, but this was successfully treated with conservative management. After a 33-day hospital stay, the patient returned to daily life without signs of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Although the long-term follow-up of the patient is indispensable, in this case, MPP might be able to lead to the curative resection of transverse colon cancer massively invading the duodenum and non-functioning endocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail with preservation of pancreatic function.

Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies for benign or border-line tumors of the pancreas.

Standard pancreatic resections, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, or total pancreatectomy, result in an important loss of normal pancreatic parenchyma and may cause impairment of exocrine and endocrine function. Whilst these procedures are mandatory for malignant tumors, they seem to be too extensive for benign or border-line tumors, especially in patients with a long life expectancy. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery with the aim of achieving better functional results without compromising oncological radicality in patients with benign, border-line or low-grade malignant tumors. Several limited resections have been introduced for isolated or multiple pancreatic lesions, depending on the location of the tumor: central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with or without segmental duodenectomy, inferior head resection, dorsal pancreatectomy, excavation of the pancreatic head, middle-preserving pancreatectomy, and other multiple segmental resections. All these procedures are technically feasible in experienced hands, with very low mortality, although with high morbidity rate when compared to standard procedures. Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function is better preserved with good quality of life in most of the patients, and tumor recurrence is uncommon. Careful patient selection and expertise in pancreatic surgery are crucial to achieve the best results.

Parenchyma‐sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms

In recent years there has been an increase in the indications for pancreatic resection of benign or low-grade malignant lesions, especially in young patients with long life expectancy. In this setting, patients may benefit from parenchyma-sparing resections in order to decrease the risk of development of exocrine/endocrine insufficiency. A review of the literature and authors experience was undertaken. Parenchyma-sparing resections of the pancreas including enucleation, middle pancreatectomy (MP) and middle-preserving pancreatectomy are described. Short and long-term outcomes after surgery are analyzed with special regard to postoperative morbidity/mortality, and oncological and functional long-term results. Parenchyma-sparing resections are safe and effective procedures for treatment of benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms. Despite a significant postoperative morbidity they are associated with good long-term functional and oncological results. Enucleation should preferentially be performed laparoscopically whenever possible.

Middle-preserving pancreatectomy for multicentric body-sparing lesions of the pancreas

Background The appropriate surgical approach of a pancreatic multifocal disease that skips the body of the gland remains unknown. We sought t o analyze a parenchyma-sparing surgical technique consisting of a middle-preserving pancreatectomy (MPP) evaluating feasibility, safety, and oncological and functional outcomes. Patients and methods Between 1999 and 2007, 5 patients affected by pancreatic benign or slow malignant multicentric body-sparing disease underwent MPP. Results There were 3 men and 2 women with a median age of 35 years (range 28–70 years). The median operative time was 365 minutes (range 330–440 minutes). Postoperative mortality was nil and postoperative morbidity was 1 (20%). At a median follow-up of 20 months (range 14–118 months) all of the patients are alive and disease-free. Overall, 2 patients developed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, as well as exocrine insufficiency. One patient developed only exocrine insufficiency. Conclusions MPP is a feasible procedure and might reduce the risk of both endocrine and exocrine insufficiency.