Reviews 824 movement offree thinking. Itistheir intellectual independence from the prejudices oftheChristian religion that allows them toseedeath as a logical endtothelifecycle that canbe faced inthesamewayas theother events inlife, free from the solemnsuperstitions withwhichreligion surrounds it. This was, of course, inflammatory stuff atthetime ofitspublication, andFranck Salaun's introduction dealswell with theimportance ofthis aspect both for thecontent ofthetext andits success. Deslandes's initial inspiration, ashetells ushimself, camefrom Montaigne, butheisnottheonly influence, andanother strength oftheedition isthedetailed treatment given tosources inthefootnotes. The editor's study ofcontemporary responses tothework is supported byan appendix containing reviews from the jrournal deWrevoux andthe jroarnal litteraire, andthearticle onDeslandes inSabatier deCastres's LesErois Siecles denotre litte'rature. Thewitty writing andclarity ofstyle andexpression maketheReJifexions a joy to read;theselected poemsthatwere appended toitinlater editions aremore pedestrian, although many ofthem have interesting links with theprose work, particularly poignantly inthelast, inwhich thepoetaspires to makethesamegooddeathas hisheroes.One oddity of presentation, which aXects verse quotations intheReflexions as wellas thetoe'sies diverses, isthehabit inpoems with varying line-lengths ofaligning alllinestothe sameleft margin, rather thanfollowing thenormal practice ofindenting shorter lines, a characteristic that makes appreciation ofthe rhythmic subtleties ofthe verse difficult. Thatapart, though, this is a welcome edition ofa text which, with its controversial content, isaninteresting social document, butalsomakes pleasurable . . . . reac mglnlts ownrlg zt. UNIVERSITY OFWALES, SWANSEA DEREK F.CONNON 'DesBeaute's plushardies...': le theatre allemand dansla France de l'Ancien Re'gime (I750-I789). BYFRANSOIS GENTON. (Seriedetudes germaniques, 4) SaintDenis :EditionsSuger. I999. 3s8pp. gsF. The importance oftheinfluence of Diderot's dramatic theories on Lessing's Hamburgische Dramaturgie isreadily acknowledged, as areother eighteenth-century French cultural exports totheGerman-speaking countries. FranSois Genton's study gives a timely reminder that this wasnot, however, quite theone-way traffic that it isoften assumed tobe,andthat MmedeStael's Del'Allemagne, important asitmay havebeen,didnot,infact, bring toan endan erainwhich France wastotally ignorant ofthetheatre ofitsneighbour. Of course, there wereanti-German prejudices, prejudices shared bymany Germans themselves, which Genton sets out atlength atthe beginning ofthis study: itwastoocoldinthe north toproduce great art; the political divisions oftheGerman peoples meant that there wasnocentre to encourage artistic production inthewaythatParisdidfortheFrench, and,of course, thelanguage wasbarbaric. The subsequent chapters showthegrowing interest ofthe French for German theatre, even ifthe French influence inGermany remained strong enough for French adaptations ofGerman works tofind their way backtotheir native land.Inmuch the same way aswith English theatre inFrance at this period, faithful translations ofplays areconfined topublished editions, while it isGallicized adaptations, inwhich theoriginal isoften barely recognizable, that find their wayontothepublicstage, although Lessing's Mtif SaraSampson was performed privately. The sheerscaleofactivity revealed bythisstudy is most impressive: theanthologies ofGerman theatre that appeared during the period are examined indetail, as arejournals that discuss German artandculture. Genton provides a chapter ontranslation andanother onchildren's literature andthe drame, MLR,96.3,200I 825 butthebulkofthestudy dealswiththeperiodin fourchronological blocks (beginning notin I750, butin I738). Although thishelpsto givea senseof development, italsomakes for a narrative which toooften reads like a catalogue of titles, plot-summaries andcontemporary critical responses, with thesamenames and playsoften recurring. Thereis also an occasionaltendency to become sidetracked bytangential issues. Perhaps this aspect ofthestudy couldhavebeen dealt with more concisely, leaving spacefor a more analytical, in-depth account of thedeveloping approaches to someofthemorepopular and significant works, which might havehelped flesh outtherather baldly factual approach. Thereis, though, a lotofinformation here, andthedetailed bibliography oftranslations and adaptations reveals a vast array ofmaterial that will behelpful tofuture researchers . . lnt]1S area. UNIVERSITY OFWALES, SWANSEA DEREK F.CONNON Jeanne Marae LePrince deBeaumont: Contes etautres ecrits. Ed. byBARBARA KALTZ. Oxford: TheVoltaire Foundation. 2000.xxiii + I92PP. £I4.90;I49F. From a modest Rouennais background, theremarkable Mmede Beaumont shed twohusbands and madeherownwayas a respectable governess and a very successful author. Today sheisknown mainly for her version of'La Belleetlabete', butherhistorical significance liesinhermajorcontribution tofemale education. Following Fenelon andinfluenced bySarahFielding, butgoing farbeyond both, shesetoutina series ofbooksconcrete teaching programmes centred ongroup discussion and (initially at least)Enlightenment ambitions. The conjunction of French andEnglish seems indeed tobethe key toher. Shecombines anincreasingly devout Catholicism, anaristocratic biasandEurope's dominant language with the energetic middle-class ways that shefound inLondon. Herfirst publication (from NancyandtheLuneville court) wasa playful proclamation ofthesuperiority of women. TheEnglish model (shewasinLondon from December I748until I763) underlies hersubstantial periodical andpedagogical output. Botharereflected in herinvariable insistence thatshewishes to form 'le cceurautant que l'esprit'. Education iscentrally moral and...
Read full abstract