REVIEWS 295 connection between past and present. “Given the intrinsic nature of jihad to Islam it will never disappear, yet crusading has ended … for centuries we have actually seen just shadows of the crusades, not true shapes” (350–351). Whatever the contemporary intellectual and political interests may be, the continuity of crusading is principally emotional rather than chronological (310). Other scholars have been making this point for many years now, especially since September 11th , but their voices are often drowned out. Hopefully Holy Warriors , with its many strengths, will succeed in educating a wide audience. SAM ZENO CONEDERA, S.J. Simon Phillips, The Prior of the Knights Hospitaller in Late Medieval England (Woodbridge: Boydell Press 2009) 224 pp. According to Simon Phillips, the Prior of the English Hospitallers in the Late Middle Ages ought to be viewed “as an Englishman first … with his first loyalty to the crown, and a Hospitaller second” (18). This is the fundamental argument of The Prior of the Knights Hospitaller in Late Medieval England, which seeks to overcome the excessive reliance of previous historians upon Maltese sources. Making extensive use of English materials, including crown archives, privy seal and council records, and treaty rolls, Phillips offers a revised understanding of the office of Prior during the Late Middle Ages, arguing that “the Prior was never as independent or active a crusader as is normally supposed, but neither did his office quite become a royal sinecure” (2). Prior of the Knights gives an account that is multi-faceted, synthetic, and supported by copious references; there remain, however, a few unanswered questions about the Prior’s role as a national statesman. The book also raises issues for further research, such as the role of “national” interests in the life of an international military order, and the need to reassess the English Hospitallers in light of local sources. Prior of the Knights Hospitaller is divided into five main chapters, each addressing a different aspect of the Prior’s activities: financier and treasurer, defender of the realm, international ambassador, national statesman, and role in the secularization of the order. The Prior had two major financial roles in England : as a provider and collector of funds, and, in three cases, as royal treasurer (25). Like the Templars before them, the Hospitallers had the responsibility of collecting and storing tax revenues, and their headquarters of Clerckenwell served as “a convenient local storage center for the crown to dip into” (31). The Priors’ effectiveness as providers and collectors of funds, as well as their personal honesty, probably contributed to the appointment of three of them as treasurers. Phillips speculates that Priors did not serve in this capacity more frequently because of their regular travels outside the country, and because the job entailed various hazards; Prior Hales was murdered while in office (43). Although the Hospitallers were theoretically exempt from military service to lay rulers, in practice things sometimes worked out otherwise: “[t]he Prior was expected to take up arms against other Christians for his king, but only on the grounds of the defense of the realm” (46). Phillips sees a trajectory in the Prior’s military role over the course of the Late Middle Ages: from traditional feudal service, to appointment to defensive military positions, to active participation in offensive campaigns (47). This change was tied to a broader shift in REVIEWS 296 military service towards a contractual model. From the mid-fourteenth century, the Prior was appointed to offices, such as admiral, normally reserved for the high nobility. This military service, says Phillips, seems to have led to the Prior’s political role at home and abroad (58). The Prior’s activities as international ambassador and national statesman are crucial for supporting the book’s claim that the Hospitallers “may have considered that their loyalty was due to their king first and their Order second” (91). The Prior exercised a diplomatic role for the crown from the late fourteenth century, but around the middle of the fifteenth it intensified, such that Phillips is inclined to place Prior Botyll (1440–1468) among the king’s core of diplomats (74). The timing of this change was crucial, for the increase of diplomatic...
Read full abstract