Microtubule Release Research Articles

Contribution of plus and minus end pathways to microtubule turnover.

Turnover is important for the maintenance and remodeling of the cytoskeleton during the processes of cell morphogenesis, mitosis and motility. Microtubule (MT) turnover is thought to occur by dynamic instability, growth and shortening at distal (plus) ends. Recent observation of MT release from the centrosome and depolymerization from proximal (minus) ends indicates the existence of a minus end pathway. To evaluate the relative contributions of plus and minus end pathways to turnover, we analyzed MT dynamics in a model system, the fish melanophore, a large non-motile cell with a regular radial array of long MTs. MT ends were tracked in digital fluorescence time-lapse sequences and life histories of individual MTs were analyzed using random walk theory generalized to the case of diffusion with drift. Analysis of plus end dynamics gave an apparent diffusion coefficient of D=7.5 microm2/minute. The random walk model predicts that the half-time for turnover driven solely by plus end dynamics will depend strongly on position in the cell. Based on the experimentally determined value of D, turnover of MTs near the center of a typical melanophore of radius 70 microm was calculated to require over 5 hours, a paradoxically long time. To examine MT behavior deep in the cytoplasm, we developed a novel, sequential subtraction mode of image analysis. This analysis revealed a subpopulation of MTs which shortened from their minus ends, presumably after constitutive release from the centrosome. Given the relative slowness of plus end dynamics to turn over the root of a long MT, the turnover of MTs near the cell center is determined primarily by the minus-end pathway. MTs released from the centrosome become replaced by newly nucleated ones. The relative contributions of plus and minus end pathways was estimated from the diffusion coefficient, D, for the plus end, the length distribution of MTs, t he frequency of free minus ends, and the rate of minus-end shortening. We conclude that, in large animal cells with a centrosomally focussed array of MTs, turnover occurs by a combination of plus and minus end pathways, the plus end dominating at the cell periphery and the minus end dominating near the cell center.

Microtubule release and capture in epithelial cells

Many differentiated cells including polarised epithelial cells display a non-radial, apico-basal microtubule array. In some cells the centrosome disassembles and new nucleating sites are created at more appropriate locations. In others the centrosome remains, but relatively few microtubules radiate from it's immediate environs. Instead, the majority of the microtubule minus-ends are associated with apical cell surface sites. Centrosomal microtubule release and capture is evidently a mechanism exploited by some polarised epithelial cells as a means of producing non-centrosomal, apico-basal microtubule arrays. This involves microtubule nucleation at the centrosome, release and subsequent translocation and capture at the apical sites. Two functionally distinct centrosomal complexes dedicated to the control of microtubule nucleation and anchorage have been suggested to be essential and universal features of all centrosomes. The centrosomal proteins ninein and R2 are potential microtubule anchoring proteins and their discovery has exciting implications for centrosomal organisation and microtubule positioning in cells.

An Essential Role for Katanin in Severing Microtubules in the Neuron

Several lines of evidence suggest that microtubules are nucleated at the neuronal centrosome, and then released for transport into axons and dendrites. Here we sought to determine whether the microtubule-severing protein known as katanin mediates microtubule release from the neuronal centrosome. Immunomicroscopic analyses on cultured sympathetic neurons show that katanin is present at the centrosome, but is also widely distributed throughout the neuron. Microinjection of an antibody that inactivates katanin results in a dramatic accumulation of microtubules at the centrosome, indicating that katanin is indeed required for microtubule release from the centrosome. However, the antibody also causes an inhibition of axon outgrowth that is more immediate than expected on this basis alone. It may be that katanin severs microtubules throughout the cell body to keep them sufficiently short to be efficiently transported into developing processes. Consistent with this idea, there were significantly fewer free ends of microtubules in the cell bodies of neurons that had been injected with the katanin antibody compared with controls. These results indicate that microtubule-severing by katanin is essential for releasing microtubules from the neuronal centrosome, and also for regulating the length of the microtubules after their release.

Microtubule release from the centrosome.

Although microtubules (MTs) are generally thought to originate at the centrosome, a number of cell types have significant populations of MTs with no apparent centrosomal connection. The origin of these noncentrosomal MTs has been unclear. We applied kinetic analysis of MT formation in vivo to establish their mode of origin. Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that noncentrosomal MTs in cultured epithelial cells arise primarily by constitutive nucleation at, and release from, the centrosome. After release, MTs moved away from the centrosome and tended to depolymerize. Laser-marking experiments demonstrated that released MTs moved individually with their plus ends leading, suggesting that they were transported by minus end-directed motors. Released MTs were dynamic. The laser marking experiments demonstrated that plus ends of released MTs grew, paused, or shortened while the minus ends were stable or shortened. Microtubule release may serve two kinds of cellular function. Release and transport could generate the noncentrosomal MT arrays observed in epithelial cells, neurons, and other asymmetric, differentiated cells. Release would also contribute to polymer turnover by exposing MT minus ends, thereby providing additional sites for loss of subunits. The noncentrosomal population of MTs may reflect a steady-state of centrosomal nucleation, release, and dynamics.

A composite model for establishing the microtubule arrays of the neuron.

Neurons generate two distinct types of processes, termed axons and dendrites, both of which rely on a highly organized array of microtubules for their growth and maintenance. Axonal microtubules are uniformly oriented with their plus ends distal to the cell body, whereas dendritic microtubules are nonuniformly oriented. In neither case are the microtubules attached to the centrosome or any detectable structure that could establish their distinct patterns of polarity orientation. Studies from our laboratory over the past few years have led us to propose the following model for the establishment of the axonal and dendritic microtubule arrays. Microtubules destined for these processes are nucleated at the centrosome within the cell body of the neuron and rapidly released. The released microtubules are then transported into developing axons and dendrites to support their growth. Early in neuronal development, the microtubules are transported with their plus ends leading into immature processes that are the common progenitors of both axons and dendrites. This sets up a uniformly plus-end distal pattern of polarity orientation, which is preserved in the developing axon. In the case of the dendrite, the plus-end-distal microtubules are joined by another population of microtubules that are transported into these processes with their minus-ends leading. Implicit in this model is that neurons have specialized machinery for regulating the release of microtubules from the centrosome and for transporting them with great specificity.

Microtubules released from the neuronal centrosome are transported into the axon.

There is controversy concerning the source of new microtubules required for the development of neuronal axons. We have proposed that microtubules are released from the centrosome within the cell body of the neuron and are then translocated into the axon to support its growth. To investigate this possibility, we have developed an experimental regime that permits us to determine the fate of a small population of microtubules nucleated at the neuronal centrosome. Microtubules within cultured sympathetic neurons were depolymerized with the anti-microtubule drug nocodazole, after which the drug was removed. Microtubules rapidly and specifically reassembled from the centrosome within three minutes of nocodazole removal. At this point, low levels of vinblastine, another anti-microtubule drug, were added to the culture to inhibit further microtubule assembly while not substantially depolymerizing the small population of microtubules that had already assembled at the centrosome. Within minutes, released microtubules were apparent in the cytoplasm, and many of these had already translocated to the cell periphery by ten minutes. By one hour, virtually all of the microtubules had been released from the centrosome and were concentrated at the cell periphery. With increasing time, these microtubules appeared within and progressively farther down developing axons. Nonneuronal cells within the culture also reassembled microtubules at the centrosome, but only a small portion of these microtubules were released. These observations indicate that microtubules were released from the neuronal centrosome and transported into growing axons, and that microtubule release and relocation from the centrosome are especially active in neurons compared to nonneuronal cells.

Steric inhibition of cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin motility by MAP2

Using several in vitro motility assays, we found that motility driven by the microtubule (MT) motors, kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein, could be inhibited by MAP2 but not by tau protein or the MT-binding proteolytic fragment of MAP2. In MT gliding assays, even the presence of one MAP2 molecule per sixty-nine tubulin dimers caused an inhibition of about 75% of MT motility at low concentrations of both motors. The percent inhibition of motility decreased with increasing concentration of either motor, suggesting that the inhibition was the result of competition for access to the MT surface. The decrease in the number of moving MTs with MAP2 was correlated with an increase in the frequency of release of moving MTs from the motor-coated glass. In assays of in vitro vesicular organelle motility and formation of ER networks, the presence of MAP2 inhibited small vesicle movements and to a lesser extent ER network formation. To determine if competition for specific sites on the MT or coating of the MT surface inhibited motility, we used tau protein and the chymotryptic MT-binding fragments of MAP2 to coat MTs. No inhibition was observed and there was even an increase in the number of attached and moving MTs in the gliding assay with tau-coated MTs. Because MAP2, tau and the chymotryptic MT-binding fragments of MAP2 bind to the same domain on tubulin, masking of the MT surface sites does not appear responsible for the inhibition of motility by MAP2. Rather, we suggest that the sidearm of MAP2 interfered with the interaction of motors with MTs and caused a dramatic increase in the rate of MT release. In vivo, MAP2 could play a major role in the generation of cellular polarity even at substoichiometric levels by inhibiting transport on microtubules in specific domains of the cytoplasm.