Abstract Study question What is sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by micro TESE and the clinical outcomes using testicular sperm in couples with the history of cryptorchidism? Summary answer NOA couples with the history of cryptorchidism had a higher SRR by micro TESE but lower clinical outcomes by ICSI compared of unexplained NOA. What is known already Undescended testis (UT) which is exposed to a higher temperature compared with the scrotal temperature is associated with impairment of germ cell maturation, and progressive Leydig and Sertoli cell atrophy, and subsequent infertility in adulthood. There have been very few studies of ICSI with a focus on, or large enough numbers to examine, the specific outcomes associated with male factor infertility, however improvement in sperm retrieval techniques including micro TESE and micromanipulation techniques, such as ICSI, has led to excellent fertilization and pregnancy outcomes of treatment cycles. Study design, size, duration We performed a retrospective study based on two reproduction centers in Japan and evaluated 1521 azoospermic patients in our clinics between September 2013 and December 2022. We investigated SRR by micro TESE in these patients and therefore aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the significance of ICSI outcomes with embryonic development in NOA couples with the history of cryptorchidism. Participants/materials, setting, methods We evaluated SRR of micro TESE, two pronuclei (2PN) oocyte rates, blastocyst development, good-quality blastocyst (Grade 3BB and above on day 5 by the Gardner scoring), and clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer (ET) in 72 NOA cases with the history of UT, 953 cases of unexplained NOA, not including after orchidopexy, Klinefelter syndrome, cryptozoospermia, mumps orchitis, and 284 cases of obstructive azoospermia (OA). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests. Main results and the role of chance SRR of first attempt micro TESE in UT (44/56=78.6%) was higher than unexplained NOA (160/748=21.4%) (p < 0.001). Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved in 13 of 22 (59.1%) UT group and 36 of 226 (15.9%) unexplained NOA who had previously undergone micro TESE with no sperm found. No correlation was found between serum FSH, LH, and T level with the success of sperm retrieval. Testicular volume and patient age at orchidopexy also did not affect the SRR for micro TESE. 2PN oocytes, blastocysts development, and good-quality blastocysts rates were 45.5%, 47.4%, and 18.9% in UT, 51.2%, 45.0%, and 20.9% in unexplained NOA, and 62.6%, 52.1%, and 23.7% in OA, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates per ET were 29.3% in UT, 32.3% in unexplained NOA, and 41.6% in OA. Significant differences were only observed in 2PN oocytes between unexplained NOA and OA (p < 0.05) and clinical pregnancy between UT and unexplained NOA (p < 0.05), and OA and unexplained NOA (p < 0.01). Several UT patients showed a very small number of spermatozoa and even only immotile sperm of retrieved by micro TESE. Limitations, reasons for caution We included the patients only after a surgery of cryptorchidism, but not a delayed testicular descent without surgery. The cohort size of this study is not small, however, our screened population of azoospermic patients may be biased. Wider implications of the findings This study shows a high impact in micro TESE and ICSI outcomes with embryonic development for the NOA couples with the history of cryptorchidism. Our study emphasizes that history of cryptorchidism provides clinically valuable prognostic information to couples considering surgical sperm retrieval. Trial registration number not applicable