Lumbar Microdiscectomy Research Articles

Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Comparison of lumbar microdiscectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy outcomes: a single-center experience.

Lumbar microdiscectomy (LMD) is still the gold-standard treatment for lumbar disc herniations with progressive neurological deficits that are refractory to conservative treatment. With improvement of endoscopic systems in recent years, endoscopic discectomy techniques have been developed as an alternative to LMD. The unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) technique is one of these endoscopic techniques, and its popularity has increased in recent years because it does not require high-cost specialized endoscopes, many microsurgical instruments are compatible with this system, and it is similar to LMD in terms of anatomical orientation. This study compared results between LMD and UBE techniques in patients with lumbar disc herniations performed by the same spine surgeons at a single center. The data of patients with lumbar disc herniation who were operated on with LMD and UBE techniques were retrospectively reviewed. The data obtained were statistically evaluated. The operative video of one of the patients who underwent UBE was edited for demonstration. Between January 2021 and June 2022, 93 patients were operated on for lumbar disc herniation. LMD was performed in 39 patients, and UBE was performed in 54 patients. There were no significant differences in the complications, recurrence, postoperative back and leg pain, patient satisfaction rates, and quality of life index results of the patients in the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the LMD group. In the UBE group, estimated blood loss was lower and postoperative hospitalization was shorter. Although LMD is still the gold-standard treatment for lumbar disc herniation, the results of UBE are comparable to those of LMD, and it may be a good alternative for spine surgeons who prefer minimally invasive surgery.

Factors Influencing Recurrence Rates and Surgical Outcomes in Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Study of 130 Patients in Turkey.

BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation surgery, specifically lumbar microdiscectomy, shows recurrence in 3-24% of patients, necessitating potential re-operations. This study focuses on the outcomes and recurrence causes in 130 cases of lumbar disc herniations. These cases were managed by a single surgeon at a single center, offering a unique perspective on a common issue in neurosurgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved 130 patients treated for lumbar disc herniations. Analysis considered various factors: age, sex, symptoms, surgical level, complications, pre- and postoperative pain levels, and quality of life indices. RESULTS Of the 130 cases analyzed, all underwent initial surgery by the same surgeon or sought treatment from this surgeon after recurrence. Inclusion criteria were based on radiologic and clinical indications for re-operation. The demographic split was 76 males (56.4%) and 54 females (43.6%). A notable finding was a higher recurrence rate in males and patients under 45 years, although the sex difference was not statistically significant. The average age was 47.5 years. Significant changes were noted in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) levels during follow-ups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the effectiveness of lumbar microsurgery in treating recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Techniques such as medial facet utilization and laminectomy border expansion show promise. However, determining instability rates requires long-term patient follow-up. Our findings contribute valuable insights into surgical approaches and patient outcomes in recurrent lumbar disc herniation cases.

The impact of being overweight or obese on 12 month clinical recovery in patients following lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe proportion of patients who undergo lumbar microdiscectomy due to lumbar radiculopathy who are also overweight or obese is high. However, whether high body mass index (BMI) affects clinical outcomes is not well-studied. PURPOSETo investigate the difference in the clinical course between normal weight, overweight, and obese patients with radiculopathy who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physical therapy and to evaluate whether high BMI is associated with poor recovery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up was conducted in a multidisciplinary clinic. PATIENT SAMPLEWe included 583 patients (median [IQR] age: 45 [35–52] years; 41% female) with clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy, consistent with magnetic resonance imaging findings, who underwent microdiscectomy followed by postoperative physical therapy. OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes were leg pain and back pain intensity measured with a visual analogue scale, disability measured with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 3 and 12-month follow-ups, and complications. METHODSPatients were classified as being normal weight (46.9%), overweight (38.4%), or obese (14.7%). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the difference in the clinical course of pain and disability between the three BMI categories. The association between BMI and outcomes was evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTSAll three patient groups experienced a significant improvement in leg pain, back pain, and disability over 3 and 12-month follow-up. Patients who were overweight, obese, or normal weight experienced comparable leg pain (p=.14) and disability (p=.06) over the clinical course (p=.14); however, obese patients experienced higher back pain (MD=−6.81 [95%CI: −13.50 to −0.14]; p=.03). The difference in back pain scores was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONSIn the first year following lumbar microdiscectomy, patients demonstrated clinical improvements and complications that were unrelated to their preoperative BMI.

The Duration of Symptoms Influences Outcomes After Lumbar Microdiscectomies: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.

Retrospective Cohort. We investigate whether duration of symptoms a patient experiences prior to lumbar microdiscectomy affects pain, lifestyle, and return to work metrics after surgery. A retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy undergoing microdiscectomy was conducted using a statewide registry. Patients were grouped based on self-reported duration of symptoms prior to surgical intervention (Group 1: symptoms less than 3months; Group 2: symptoms between 3months and 1year; and Group 3: symptoms greater than 1year). Radicular pain scores, PROMIS PF Physical Function measure (PROMIS PF), EQ-5D scores, and return to work rates at 90days, 1year, and 2years after surgery were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. There were 2408 patients who underwent microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation for radiculopathy with 532, 910, and 955 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Postoperative leg pain was lower for Group 1 at 90days, 1year, and 2years compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). Postoperative PROMIS PF and EQ-5D scores were higher for Group 1 at 90days, 1year, and 2years compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). Patients with prolonged symptoms prior to surgical intervention experience smaller improvements in postoperative leg pain, PROMIS PF, and EQ-5D than those who undergo surgery earlier. Patients undergoing surgery within 3months of symptom onset have the highest rates of return to work at 1year after surgery.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing one- and two-level minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.

Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is one of the most common lumbar spine conditions treated surgically, often through a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) microdiscectomy approach. This technique attempts to reduce damage to the paraspinal muscular-ligamentous envelope. However, there are currently limited data regarding comparative outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for one- and two-level MIS discectomies. The aim of this study was to quantify comparative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing one-level and two-level MIS lumbar microdiscectomy for HNP using PROMs. The authors performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing MIS lumbar microdiscectomy between 2004 and 2019 for the primary diagnosis of HNP at a single academic institution. All patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected to establish baselines between cohorts. PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were used to examine the patient's perception of operative success. Bivariate and multivariate linear/logistic regression analyses were used to compare one- and two-level discectomies. The bivariate analysis included the t-test and chi-square test, which were used to assess continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. A total of 293 patients underwent one-level (n = 250) or two-level (n = 43) MIS discectomies. The mean follow-ups for the one- and two-level cohorts were 50.4 (SD 35.5) months and 61.6 (SD 39.8) months, respectively. Fewer female patients underwent two-level discectomies, and BMI and operative duration were higher in the two-level group (p < 0.001). Recurrent herniation requiring reoperation was recorded at rates of 6.80% and 11.6% in the one- and two-level groups, respectively (p = 0.270). Pre- and postoperative PROMs were largely similar between the cohorts; however, patients undergoing one-level discectomy had greater improvement in leg pain, and a significantly greater proportion of these patients achieved MCID for the leg pain visual analog scale score (p < 0.001). At the 1-year clinical follow-up, patients who underwent two-level discectomy had significantly less improvement in leg pain scores with lower achievement of MCID for leg pain improvement than patients undergoing one-level procedures. At the 1-year follow-up, there were no other significant differences in PROMs between the two cohorts. Given these findings, patients should be counseled regarding the anticipated outcomes to better manage expectations. Further studies are warranted to examine the long-term clinical outcomes associated with single- and multilevel MIS discectomy.

Risk factor of residual leg numbness after lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Although patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) can achieve significant relief from lower back and leg pain after lumbar microdiscectomy, a few patients complain of discomfort due to residual leg numbness (RLN). This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for RLN after lumbar microdiscectomy. We prospectively collected and analyzed patients with LDH who underwent microdiscectomy between September 2016 and December 2020. All included patients had preoperative LN symptoms. Patients with RLN were defined as those with LN at the last follow-up. The relationships between RLN and sex, age, body mass index (BMI), current smoking status, diabetes mellitus, revision surgery, preoperative LN Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, duration of preoperative LN, RLN at discharge, sagittal range of motion (SROM), Modic change, disc Pfirrmann grade were analyzed. The RLN was observed in 33.5% (112/334) of patients at the last follow-up. No significant differences were observed in age, sex, BMI, current smoking status, or diabetes between the RLN and non-RLN groups. The preoperative LN NRS score, preoperative LN duration, rate of RLN at discharge, and revision surgery were significantly higher in the RLN group than those in the non-RLN group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the preoperative LN NRS score, duration of preoperative LN, RLN at discharge, revision surgery, and SROM as risk factors for RLN in the long-term follow-up. Patients with higher preoperative LN NRS scores and SROM, longer preoperative LN duration, RLN at discharge, and revision surgery were more likely to experience RNL after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters and Gait Asymmetry in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation, Treated With Microdiscectomy: A Prospective, Observational Study.

The aim of this study was to emphasize on the interaction of spatial and temporal gait parameters and analyse the gait asymmetry in the patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) before and after microdiscectomy. This was a prospective, observational study conducted on 59 cases of LDH planned for lumbar microdiscectomy, and healthy control group with 54 participants for analysis was performed prior to surgery and 15 days after surgery. The spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured using a "Win-Track" gait analysis platform system. All the participants walked barefoot for 10 times with their normal walking speed in the same day. The 3 flawless walking data were recorded and the arithmetic means were computed. The gait symmetry index was used to calculate the walking asymmetry. The pain intensity of the patients was recorded shortly before performing the analysis by a visual analogue scale. In the postoperative assessment LDH patients had significantly shorter temporal parameters, longer spatial parameters, faster walking speed, and more cadence than the preoperative assessment (p < 0.05). There were improvements in the asymmetry values of the postoperative gait parameters compared to the preoperative values, but these differences were not significant (p > 0.05). In addition, there was a significant difference in all parameters in terms of gait asymmetry between the postoperative assessment and the healthy controls (p < 0.05). These results can guide the patient-specific evaluating and implementation of gait rehabilitation programs, and design protocols before or after surgery in the LDH patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Multifidus Muscle in Patients with Low Back Pain after Microlumbar Discectomy Surgery.

Cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the multifidus muscle (MFM) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the extent of injury and atrophy of the MFM in patients with negative treatment outcomes following microlumbar discectomy (MLD). Negative treatment outcome was determined by pain score improvement of <50% compared to baseline. Patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 were evaluated at <4 weeks, 4-24 weeks, and >24 weeks postoperatively, respectively. The associations between the follow-up, surgery time and the changes in the MFM were evaluated. A total of 79 patients were included, with 22, 27, and 30 subjects in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The MFM SIR of the ipsilateral side had significantly decreased in groups 2 (p = 0.001) and 3 (p < 0.001). The ipsilateral MFM CSA significantly decreased postoperatively in groups 2 (p = 0.04) and 3 (p = 0.006). The postoperative MRI scans found significant MFM changes on the ipsilateral side in patients with negative treatment outcomes regarding pain intensity following MLD. As the interval to the postoperative MRI scan increased, the changes in CSA of the MFM and change in T2 SIR of the MFM showed a tendency to increase.

High-Frequency Bipolar Coagulation Limits Epidural Fibrosis in Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

We propose a vast study to examine the effect of high-frequency bipolar coagulation used in the operating room to prevent the development of epidural fibrosis after lumbar microdiscectomy. A total of 1004 participants were divided into two groups: no high-frequency bipolar coagulation (NC group) and high-frequency bipolar coagulation (C group). Postoperative epidural fibrosis, infection rates, reoperation status, and dural injury complications during the operation were recorded. Considering the epidural fibrosis rates of the two groups, epidural fibrosis was seen in 10.6% of the patients in the NC group. In contrast, it was seen in only 6.2% of the patients in the C group. The complication of epidural fibrosis that develops after lumbar microsurgery operations both impairs patient comfort and brings with it the complications of reoperation. After performing hemostasis with bipolar, coagulating the annulus may effectively reduce epidural fibrosis and prevent reoperation.

LOMBER MİKRODİSKEKTOMİ AMELİYATINDA AMELİYAT SONRASI HIZLANDIRILMIŞ İYİLEŞME (ERAS) PROTOKOLLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ

Aim: This study aimed to asses the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in the lumbar discectomy surgeries. Methods: Data obtained from 92 patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy surgery at a single institution between January 2021 and January 2023. Then, the patients were divided into two groups: ERAS protocol group (n=60), and conventional surgery group (n=32). Results: The mean age of the patients was 49.4±14 years. Among these, 31 were females, and 61 were males. The demographic, surgical and outcome parameters of two groups were compared. There were statistically significant decreases in length of stay and spondylodiscitis rates in the ERAS protocol group. Length of stay was found 25.52±12.53 hours in ERAS group, and 34±20.06 hours in conventional surgery group (p=0.002). Spondylodiscitis rates were 3.3% and 15.6% in the ERAS and conventional surgery groups, respectively (p=0.034). Conclusions: This study revealed that ERAS protocol reduces length of stay in hospital, and spondylodiscitis rates in lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. We conclude that ERAS protocols should be encouraged and applied more widely in spine surgeries.

Microlumbar Discectomy vs Minimally Invasive Tubular Microdiscectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis

Background and Aim: Lumbar disc prolapse is a common cause of backache and radicular symptoms in lower limbs. Different surgical options have been described to compare the functional outcome, complications, and recurrence following surgery for lumbar disc prolapse by classical microlumbar discectomy (MLD) and minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy. The advantages of one procedure over the other were also analyzed. Methods and Materials/Patients: A prospective, observational study conducted over a period of 1 year in the Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, among patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation by either microlumbar discectomy or minimally invasive surgery using a tubular retractor system. Ninety-nine patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed and tabulated for the outcome. Results: The two groups did not show a statistical difference in terms of functional outcome, complications, or recurrence rate. However, the need for post-operative analgesics, blood loss, and hence hospitalization was less in the tubular discectomy group. Conclusion: Both procedures are equally effective in terms of surgical results. However, the advantages and the subtle tendency of the patients to adopt “keyhole” make the tube an attractive option.

122. Predictors and postoperative complication risks for revision discectomies following primary lumbar microdiscectomy

122. Predictors and postoperative complication risks for revision discectomies following primary lumbar microdiscectomy

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Versus Microdiscectomy Without Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Prospective Comparative Study.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) versus standard revision diskectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation (RLDH). RLDH is the most common cause of redo surgery after a microdiscectomy. Commonly, in patients without evidence of spinal instability, many surgeons would simply redo microdiscectomy, while others proceed to a redo microdiscectomy with arthrodesis. According to the literature, there is no evidence of what the best management of an RLDH would be. This study involved 90 patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy in the past and were now experiencing a new lumbar disk herniation for the first time. The patients were divided into two groups, each with 45 patients: group A received standard revision microdiscectomy, whereas group B received revision microdiscectomy with MIS TLIF.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, operating time, blood loss, duration of hospital stay, costs, and complications were all prospectively recorded in a database and examined. Back and leg discomfort were measured using the visual analog scale. The mean total postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score across the groups exhibited no statistically significant difference, nor did the preoperative clinical and epidemiological data. Although postoperative leg pain was comparable in both groups, postoperative lower back pain in group A was much worse than that in group B. Additional revision surgery was necessary for six individuals in group A. Group A had higher rates of dural rupture and postoperative neurological impairment. Group A experienced much less intraoperative blood loss, longer operation times, and postoperative hospital stays. In patients with RLDH, revision microdiscectomy is effective. In comparison with conventional microdiscectomy, MIS TLIF reduces intraoperative risk of dural rupture or neural injury, postoperative incidence of mechanical instability or recurrence, and postoperative lower back pain. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, comparative study.

A Retrospective Study of Far Lateral Midline Microlumbar Discectomy in 20 Patients at a Single Center in Turkey.

BACKGROUND Microdiscectomy is a minimally-invasive surgical technique for treating far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH). This retrospective study from a single center in Turkey aimed to evaluate midlinelumbar discectomy in 20 patients with far lateral lumbar disc herniation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected clinical data of 20 patients (11 men, 9 women) operated for FLDDH between January 2006 and January 2022. Patients' age, sex, surgical level, examination findings, motor deficit, duration of operation, complications during the operation and preoperative/postoperative 6 month visual analogue Scala (VAS), preoperative/postoperative 6th month Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated. RESULTS The patients were 11 men (55%) and 9 women (45%), with a mean age of 52.08±11.21 years. The mean duration of symptoms before the operation was 3.4 weeks. Laseque sign positivity was found in 86.4% of the patients. Motor deficit was present in 30% of the patients. After 6-month follow-up, preoperative VAS value decreased from 9.35±0.75 to 0.84±0.75. Preoperative and postoperative VAS score averages were significantly different (P=0.0001). Operation ODI values were 73.63±3.76 before and after surgery, and decreased to 14.81±3.63 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The term distal lateral disc herniation was first defined in the literature in 1974 when the disc was seen in a different location than the normal location compared to the facet. Far lateral disc herniation can be operated on successfully with midline skin incision.

Back pain and radicular pain after lumbar microdiscectomy

PurposeIt is generally expected that lumbar microdiscectomy affects radicular leg pain, but not so much local back pain. The primary objective was to evaluate if the trajectories of changes in pain severity follow similar patterns for back and radicular leg pain after lumbar microdiscectomy. The secondary objective was to investigate the associations between some preoperative parameters and the patterns of these trajectories.MethodsRegister-based retrospective study of 353 patients undergoing microdiscectomy in the lumbar spine. Linear mixed modelling was applied.ResultsThe average age of the participants was 46 years and 44% were women. The developmental trajectories were similar for both back and leg pain. Pain level decrease during the first year after the surgery, slightly worsening later. No statistically significant interactions were detected of preoperative pain duration or severity, sex or age on the shapes of the trajectories. For every analyzed grouping factor, the 95% confidence intervals overlapped at every postoperative time point with one exception – worse preoperative back pain was statistically significantly associated with worse pain at three months and at the end of the two-year follow-up.ConclusionAfter microsurgical discectomy, developmental curves for both back and radicular leg pain demonstrated similar patterns. Pain intensity decreased during the first year after the surgery. and slightly increased after that remaining, however, below the preoperative level. Age, sex, preoperative pain duration or preoperative intensity of leg pain were not associated with significant differences in the trajectories of pain severity after the surgery. In this study, severe preoperative back pain was the only factor, which was significantly associated with worse postoperative trajectory of pain intensity.

Propensity matched outcome analysis following microdiscectomy versus interlaminar endoscopic discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation

PurposeThe main purpose of the study is to perform a propensity-matched functional outcome analysis following microdiscectomy (MD) versus interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) for L5-S1 disc herniation. Although many studies have compared endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy, few have compared the outcomes of microdiscectomy (MD) and interlaminar endoscopic discectomy (IELD) at the L5-S1 level. MethodsThis is a propensity-matched analysis of 100 patients (50 MD patients, 50 IELD patients) based on baseline covariates with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained from EMR during follow-up visits. Back pain and sciatic pain were assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-B and VAS-L). Functional outcome was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score and 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score. Data were obtained at baseline (pre-op) and at 0, 1, 3, and 12 months post-operatively. ResultsMean operative time was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the IELD group (44 min) compared to the MD group (59 min). Mean VAS-B at the immediate and 1-month postoperative period was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the IELD group (0.36, 0.24) when compared with the MD group (1.74, 1.16). There was no significant difference between IELD and MD groups with regard to improvement in sciatic pain (VAS-L). ODI scores at 1 month and 3 months post-operative period were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the IELD group (30.1, 23.2) when compared with the MD group (41, 27.5). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to VAS-B, ODI, and SF-12 at 1-year follow-up. ConclusionOur findings indicate that the IELD group achieved better immediate and early postoperative outcomes despite no significant difference at one-year follow-up.

Understanding crossovers and potential ways to mitigate the problem: Lessons from influential trials on lumbar microdiscectomy

BackgroundLumbar microdiscectomy is the most frequent surgical intervention used in the treatment of sciatica from herniated lumbar discs. Many discectomy trials have been plagued with an excessive number of crossovers that have rendered results inconclusive. MethodsWe review the design and results of influential lumbar microdiscectomy trials. We also discuss the various strategies that have been used to decrease the number of crossovers or to mitigate the effects of crossovers on analyses. ResultsRandomized trials on lumbar discectomy were affected by crossover rates of 8% to 42%. Various strategies that have been used to decrease that number or to mitigate the effects on results include: patient selection, blinding (placebo-controlled trials), an immediate access to surgery for the surgical group (but limited access to surgery for the conservative group), shortening the follow-up period necessary to reach the primary outcome measure, postponing crossovers to surgery after determination of the primary outcome, and modifying the primary outcome measure to include treatment failures. Crossovers should be anticipated and compensated for by increasing the number of participants. ConclusionNon-adherence to randomly allocated management options can deprive trials of the statistical power needed to inform clinical care. Crossovers and ways to mitigate related problems should be anticipated at the time of trial design.

Microdiscectomy Insurance Medical Necessity Criteria Are Inconsistent and Unnecessarily Restrictive.

Microdiscectomy for patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy refractory to conservative therapy has significantly better outcomes than continued nonoperative management. The North American Spine Society (NASS) outlined specific criteria to establish medical necessity for elective lumbar microdiscectomy. We hypothesized that insurance providers have substantial variability among one another and from the NASS guidelines. A cross-sectional analysis of US national and local insurance companies was conducted to assess policies on coverage recommendations for lumbar microdiscectomy. Insurers were selected based on their enrollment data and market share of direct written premiums. The top 4 national insurance providers and the top 3 state-specific providers in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania were selected. Insurance coverage guidelines were accessed through a web-based search, provider account, or telephone call to the specific provider. If no policy was provided, it was documented as such. Preapproval criteria were entered as categorical variables and consolidated into 4 main categories: symptom criteria, examination criteria, imaging criteria, and conservative treatment. The 13 selected insurers composed roughly 31% of the market share in the United States and approximately 82%, 62%, and 76% of the market share for New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, respectively. Insurance descriptions of symptom criteria, imaging criteria, and the definition of conservative treatment had substantial differences as compared with those defined by NASS. Although a guideline to establish medical necessity was developed by NASS, many insurance companies have created their own guidelines, which have resulted in inconsistent management based on geographic location and selected provider. Providers must be cognizant of the differing preapproval criteria needed for each in-network insurance company in order to provide effective and efficient care for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Lomber mikrodiskektomi ameliyatı geçiren hastalarda alt torasik erektör spina bloğunun postoperatif ağrı yönetimine etkisi

Purpose: Lumbar disk hernia is very common reason for spinal surgery and usually treats with surgical interventions. The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to determine the effect of low thoracic ultrasound guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative pain management in lumbar microdiscectomy surgery.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: Totally 42 adults scheduled for elective lumbar microdiscectomy surgery and assigned into two groups as Group ESP and Group Control. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, fentanil 2µg/kg and maintained with total intravenous anesthesia (propofol 4-8 mg/kg/h and remifentanil 0.03-0.05 µg/kg/min), N2O/O2 mixture %60/40 for all patients. When patients were positioned at prone, ESP or sham block performed bilaterally. ESP performed with bupivacain 0.5% 15 mL+lidocain 2% 5 mL in ESP group and saline 20 mL for sham group at the T10 level of spine. The postoperative analgesia provided with morphine 0.1 mg/kg intravenously and diclofenac Na 75 mg intramuscularly at last 30 minutes of surgery for all patients. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, meperidine requirements and patients’ satisfaction were recorded. &#x0D; Results: There were significant differences between Group ESP and Group Control in meperidine requirement, VAS scores at rest and leg movement and patients’ satisfaction. Time to first analgesic need was median 62.5 min (interquartile range 5-180) in Group ESP and median 7.50 min (interquartile range 5-10) in Group Control.&#x0D; Conclusion: ESP can significantly reduce postoperative pain scores (VAS at rest and leg movement), meperidine requirement and can provide better patients’ satisfaction, postoperatively.