Vegetation restoration is an effective measure for restoring degraded ecosystems. Soil carbon mineralization, a crucial indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of vegetation restoration, is essential in soil carbon cycling. However, the response of soil carbon mineralization to different vegetation restoration types remains unclear. In this study, grassland (Leymus chinensis and Stipa bungeana), shrubland (Corethrodendron fruticosum), and forestland (Ulmus pumila) with 20 years of consistent restoration in the Xilingol sandy grassland were selected to determine the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil carbon mineralization. The results showed that the soil cumulative carbon dioxide emissions (CCE) and microbial respiration rate (SMR) in grassland and forestland were significantly higher than those in shrubland, while soil carbon mineralization efficiency (CME) and microbial metabolic quotient (MQ) were significantly lower than those in shrubland. Furthermore, soil organic carbon (SOC) and its fractions were influenced considerably by vegetation restoration types, with grassland exhibiting the highest SOC content. The ratios of soil total effective nutrients (C/N, N/P, and C/P) and the content of active organic carbon (DOC, MBC, EOC, and POC) can effectively reflect the changes in soil carbon mineralization and the stability of SOC pools. The variations in CCE were influenced by litter biomass, macroaggregates organic carbon, mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), while the changes in SMR were affected by aboveground biomass (AGB), soil total nitrogen and phosphorus ratios (N/P), and microaggregate organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon. The changes in CME were affected by AGB, N/P, pH, MAOC, and DOC, while the changes in MQ were influenced by AGB, N/P, DOC, MAOC, and easily oxidizable organic carbon. Given the higher carbon sequestration benefits and soil quality improvement capability of naturally restored grassland, this study suggests that grassland could be considered the primary vegetation restoration type in the Xilingol sandy grassland.
Read full abstract