Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire Score Research Articles

Percutaneous Pinning Versus ORIF For Treatment Of Extraarticular Metacarpal Fractures

Objectives: Metacarpal fractures are common, and several surgical treatment methods have been described. This study aims to compare the clinical and economic aspects of two different surgical methods, closed reduction and K-wire fixation (CRPF) and open reduction and plate screw fixation (ORIF). Methods: Between January 2009 and March 2014, 51 patients who received surgical treatment for metacarpal fractures were retrospectively evaluated. Of them, 36 patients (29M, 7F) performed CRPF, and 15 (12M, 3F) performed ORIF. Patients were followed up for an average of 17.6 weeks. All patients were assessed according to the union, operation time, complications, cost-effectiveness, and the Michigan hand outcome questionnaire scores. Results: The mean operation time was 13.7 minutes (5-37 minutes) in the CRPF group and 32.2 minutes (23-62 minutes) in the ORIF group (p<0.05). The mean union time was 5.4 weeks (4-9 weeks) in the CRPF group and four weeks (3-8 weeks) in the ORIF group (p<0,05). Hospital expenses were found to be, on average, 257.5 USD (45.8-311 USD) in the CRPF group and 660 USD (454.9-1074.6 USD) in the ORIF group (p<0,05). The mean Michigan Hand Surgery Outcome Questionnaire results were 86.4% (66-98) in the CRPF group and 68.7% (62-83) in the ORIF group (p<0,05). Conclusion: We recommend CRPF because of its shorter operation time, better functional scores, and cost-effectiveness. Type of study/level of evidence: Level III; Causal comparative retrospective study

Thumb Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty With a Surface Replacing Implant: Two-Year Results

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes of thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthroplasty. In this prospective pilot study, we included patients who received a surface replacing implant at the thumb IP joint. Patients rated their pain at rest on a numeric rating scale (0-10) and completed the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. The range of motion of the IP joint was also measured. If the patient acceptable symptom state was inadequate (i.e., pain at rest ≤ 1.5), the reasons for the remaining symptoms were descriptively presented. Of the 13 patients who underwent arthroplasty, 1 withdrew participation and 1 was considered for arthrodesis because of a dislocated implant. Therefore, the study included 11 patients with a median age of 67 years. The median pain at rest decreased from 6 preoperatively to 0 at 2 years, and the preoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score increased from 38 to 58 at follow-up. The total range of motion of the IP joint was 45° at 2 years. Patient acceptable symptom state was not achieved in 4 patients including a heavy manual worker and a patient with severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Based on the inconsistency of the results, we conclude that thumb IP joint arthroplasty with a surface replacing implant is rarely indicated; it could be an alternative in patients who place great importance on precision tasks. For patients who either have high demands for a powerful pinch grip, the high physical demands of a manual job, or rheumatoid disease, IP joint arthrodesis should be preferred. Therapeutic IV.

Contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for certain digits to functional outcomes after traumatic digit amputations: A comparative study based on multicenter prospective cohort

BackgroundTraumatic digit amputations can result in significant impairment. Optimal surgical treatment is unclear for certain digits in various amputation patterns. Our aim was to compare the contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for each particular digit to functional outcomes. Materials and methodsProspective cohort study at three tertiary hospitals was conducted in China. Eligible participants were 3192 patients with traumatic digit amputations enrolled from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2018. The primary outcome was Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) scores 2 years after initial surgery. Secondary outcome was score on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). ResultsOf 3192 enrolled patients, 2890 completed the study. Main-effect linear regression showed that participants with replantation of thumb, index, long, and ring (proximal to the proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joint) fingers had significantly better MHQ scores compared to participants with the corresponding finger revision amputation. DASH results were comparable. Finger-finger interaction analyses conducted with multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) revealed that the small finger and ring finger had the smallest and greatest interactions with other fingers, respectively. After stratification by amputation level of thumb, index finger, or long finger, linear regression showed that replantation of the ring finger distal to the PIP joint resulted in better MHQ and DASH when the thumb or long finger was also traumatically amputated proximal to the IP/PIP joint. ConclusionsReplantation of the thumb, index, long, and ring (proximal to PIP joint) fingers is preferable to revision amputation, regardless of amputation pattern. Replantation of the ring finger amputated distal to PIP was beneficial only when the thumb or long finger was amputated proximal to IP/PIP joint. Replantation or revision amputation of the small finger was indistinguishable in terms of functional outcome. Future investigations and clinical decisions should take into account the role of finger-finger interactions.

Evaluation of burned hand function after enzymatic debridement

Hand burns are common injuries that can result in long-term impairment of hand function. Enzymatic debridement (ED) prevents damage to the viable dermis due to the procedure's selectivity and has become an option for obtaining an accurate depth assessment and enabling wound re-epithelialization with less skin graft use. We conducted a prospective study from July 2015 to July 2018, which enrolled patients with deep partial-thickness hand burns and treated them with ED using bromelain. After a specified period, we assessed the patients' hand function, using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) to assess their disabilities and activities of daily life, respectively. We assessed the hand joint range of motion using a goniometer and assessed scar quality with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). We analyzed 72 patients with 90 burned hands at 3 months and, at the final assessment, 69 patients with 86 burned hands. Fire was the most common cause of the burns. Bromelain allowed for early debridement (73.6% during the first 24h). At the 3-month evaluation, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 2.35 and 97.9%, respectively, with a high inverse correlation between the 2 types of scores (Spearman's rho, -0.78; p<.001). The mean wrist flexion and extension were 85.7 and 80°, respectively, the mean metacarpophalangeal flexion was 88.3°, the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion was 112.9°, and the thumb opposition was 77°. The mean VSS score was 2.87. At the final evaluation, with a minimum follow-up of 391 days, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 0.18 and 99.71%, respectively. ED with bromelain in deep partial-thickness hand burns resulted in normal values at 3 months and at over 1 year of follow-up, with complete restoration of function and quality of life and good scar results.

Outcomes and recommendations for revision of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty.

This study investigated revision surgery for the thumb after failed trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and defined a revision concept. Twenty-four patients with 25 affected thumbs were examined at a mean of 5.5years after their last revision operation. Pain during daily activities was 2.7 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, pain at rest was 1.6 and the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score was 63. Although 68% of patients indicated that their thumb was better than before primary surgery, the outcome after revision surgery was less favourable than that reported for primary trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. We defined a revision algorithm to use as a guide for patients with residual symptoms after resection arthroplasty. The main reason for revision, symptomatic impingement of the thumb metacarpal, should be treated with resection of the metacarpal base and scaphotrapezoidal joint. An existing interposition should be revised, or a new interposition should be used, preferably with an autologous tendon or alternately with an allograft.Level of evidence: IV.

Using Rasch Analysis to Validate the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial.

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure that has been validated in many upper extremity disorders using classic test theory. Rasch measurement analysis is a rigorous method of questionnaire validation that offers several advantages over classic test theory and was used to assess the psychometric properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. This study used Rasch analysis to evaluate the questionnaire for distal radius fractures in older adults. The incidence and costs of distal radius fractures are rising, and reliable assessment tools are needed to measure outcomes in this growing concern. Rasch analysis was performed using 6-month assessment data from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial. Each domain in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was independently analyzed for threshold ordering, person-item targeting, item fit, differential-item functioning, response dependency, unidimensionality, and internal consistency. After collapsing disordered thresholds and removing any misfitting items from the model, five domains (Function, Activities of Daily Living, Work, Pain, and Satisfaction) demonstrated excellent fit to the Rasch model. The Aesthetics domain demonstrated high reliability and internal consistency but had poor fit to the Rasch model. Rasch analysis further supports the reliability and validity of using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire to assess hand outcomes in older adults following treatment for distal radius fractures. Results from this study suggest that questionnaire scores should be interpreted in a condition-specific manner, with more emphasis placed on interpreting individual domain scores, rather than the summary Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score.

Multi-site evaluation of advanced practice hand therapy clinics for the management of patients with trigger digit

Study DesignProspective cohort design. BackgroundPatient time on Australian public hospital surgical outpatient department (SOPD) waitlists often exceeds clinical recommendations for chronic hand conditions. Diversion to allied health is an alternative option, however evidence regarding patient and organizational outcomes in hand therapy is lacking. Purpose of the StudyTo evaluate clinical and organizational efficacy, patient outcomes and satisfaction of diversion of referrals for patients with trigger digit (TD) from SOPD waitlists to Advanced Practice Hand Therapy (APHT) at 3 Australian hospitals. MethodsData was collected from eligible patients with TD through chart reviews and telephone satisfaction surveys. Data included number of patients requiring SOPD review, repeat referral to SOPD in the 12 months following APHT discharge, patient-rated outcomes, satisfaction scores, wait times to SOPD review and conversion to surgery-rates. Mann Whitney-U, t-test, Pearson's chi-squared test and a Binary Logistic Regression analysis were performed. Results104 patients completed APHT treatment. Seventy patients (67%) did not require return to the SOPD waitlist. Repeat referral to SOPD within 12 months of APHT discharge occurred for only 1 patient. Patients requiring SOPD review after APHT treatment were seen within target time frames and demonstrated 88% conversion to surgery-rates. Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores showed greater improvement in those not requiring SOPD review (P< .001~25.9 vs 4.2). Regression analysis identified a negative association between initial total Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores and unfavorable discharge outcomes (OR 0.96, P= .007). Most (81%-93%) patients indicated satisfaction with the APHT service. ConclusionDiversion of referrals for TD from SOPD to APHT is an effective waitlist management strategy, with the propensity to reduce waiting times, improve patient flow, whilst resulting in favorable clinical and patient-rated outcomes and satisfaction.

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pillar pain after open carpal tunnel release: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study

BackgroundPillar pain may develop after carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS). This prospective double-blinded randomized trial investigated the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in pillar pain relief and hand function improvement.MethodsThe sample consisted of 60 patients with post-CTRS pillar pain, randomized into two groups. The ESWT group (experimental) received three sessions of ESWT, while the control group received three sessions of sham ESWT, one session per week. Participants were evaluated before treatment, and three weeks, three months, and six months after treatment. The pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Hand functions were assessed using the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire (MHQ).ResultsThe ESWT group showed significant improvement in VAS and MHQ scores after treatment at all time points compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Before treatment, the ESWT and control groups had a VAS score of 6.8 ± 1.3 and 6.7 ± 1.0, respectively. Three weeks after treatment, they had a VAS score of 2.8 ± 1.1 and 6.1 ± 1.0, respectively. Six months after treatment, the VAS score was reduced to 1.9 ± 0.9 and 5.1 ± 1.0, respectively. The ESWT group had a MHQ score of 54.4 ± 7.7 before treatment and 73.3 ± 6.8 six months after. The control group had a MHQ score of 54.2 ± 7.1 before treatment and 57.8 ± 4.4 six months after.ConclusionsESWT is an effective and a safe non-invasive treatment option for pain management and hand functionality in pillar pain.

Madelung Deformity: Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis With a Neo-DRUJ.

Madelung deformity is a rare wrist anomaly that causes considerable pain while restricting function. In this study, we describe a radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis with a neo-distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) in Madelung deformity patients with an abnormal sigmoid notch and compare results to patients after a reverse wedge osteotomy. Six wrists underwent RSL arthrodesis with a neo-DRUJ in a two-phase approach: (1) modified RSL arthrodesis with triquetrectomy; and (2) distal scaphoidectomy. Seven wrists underwent a reverse wedge osteotomy procedure. There were no differences found in postoperative pain, grip strength, or range of motion (ROM), apart from extension, which was decreased after RSL arthrodesis with a neo-DRUJ. Quality of life and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores were similar. Although clinical outcome parameters are not different among the two groups, the RSL arthrodesis with construction of a neo-DRUJ could prove a valid treatment option for a subset of patients with a severely affected sigmoid notch.

Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release

To compare the short-term outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), including patient-reported outcomes, pain and satisfaction scores, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use. We included all patients over 18 years of age undergoing carpal tunnel release at a single hand center between January 2018 and December 2019. The carpal tunnel release method was driven by variations in surgeon practice. Data from patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) questionnaires and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaires and data on patient-reported pain levels, satisfaction with care, return to work, and postoperative prescription pain medication use were collected at preoperative visits and the first follow-up visit between postoperative days 7 and 14. We included 678 (586 ECTR and 92 OCTR) patients. The median age was 58 years, and 75% of the patients were women. At early follow up, patients who underwent OCTR reported significantly lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores than those who underwent ECTR (median, 32 vs 36 points, respectively) but similar postoperative PROMIS pain interference, global physical health, global mental health, and brief Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire scores. The postoperative pain and satisfaction scores were similar between the 2 groups. In multivariable models, patients who underwent OCTR had 62% lower odds of returning to work and 30% greater odds of remaining on a postoperative pain prescription at the first follow-up visit. This study found no evidence suggesting the definitive superiority of 1 surgical technique with regard to clinical outcomes in the early postoperative period. However, OCTR was associated with lower postoperative PROMIS upper-extremity scores of unclear clinical significance, higher odds of remaining on pain medication, and lower odds of returning to work by the first postoperative visit. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release may be preferred in patients who need to return to work within the first 2 weeks after the procedure. Therapeutic IV.

Joint Distraction for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: 2-Year Follow-up Results of 20 Patients.

Background Joint distraction is a fairly new treatment for patients with symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA). A previous pilot study of five patients showed that CMC1 joint distraction is technically feasible. The current study presents the results of CMC1 joint distraction in 20 patients with a 2-year follow-up period. Purposes The primary study aim was to assess if patients with CMC1 OA have better physical function and less pain 2 years after CMC1 joint distraction. Second, we assessed the number of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures at each follow-up time point. Furthermore, this study sought differences on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the CMC1 joint before and after distraction. Adverse events were noted and reported. Methods Twenty patients (median age of 54 years) with symptomatic CMC1 OA and an established indication for a trapeziectomy were enrolled. An external distractor device was placed over the CMC1 joint and left in situ for 8 weeks. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), and grip strength were recorded preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results Two years after joint distraction, physical function and pain scores had improved significantly compared with baseline: DASH from 48 to 17, MHQ from 56 to 83, and VAS for pain from 50 to 18 mm. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) reached an MCID in DASH and MHQ scores. One patient was not satisfied with treatment outcome and chose to proceed with a trapeziectomy 14 months after initial distraction therapy. Conclusions This study demonstrates that CMC1 joint distraction can postpone more invasive surgical interventions (e.g., trapeziectomy) for at least 2 years. Larger comparative studies are needed to assess the value of CMC1 joint distraction in the treatment of CMC1 OA. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV, prospective case series study.

Repeat limited fasciectomy is a safe and effective treatment for recurrence of Dupuytren's disease.

The results of surgery for Dupuytren's disease can be compromised by the potential for disease recurrence and loss of function. Selecting which patients will benefit from repeat surgery, when to operate, and what procedure to undertake requires judgement and an understanding of patient expectations and functional needs. We undertook this study to investigate patient outcomes and satisfaction following repeat limited fasciectomy for recurrent Dupuytren's disease. We prospectively identified all patients presenting with recurrence of Dupuytren's disease who were selected for surgical treatment with repeat limited fasciectomy surgery between January 2013 and February 2015. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and again at a minimum of five years postoperatively. We identified 43 patients who were carefully selected for repeat fasciectomy involving 54 fingers. Patients with severe or aggressive disease with extensive skin involvement were not included; in our practice, these patients are instead counselled and preferentially treated with dermofasciectomy. The primary outcome measured was change in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score. Secondary outcomes were change in finger range of motion, flexion contracture, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) values, and overall satisfaction. There was a significant improvement in MHQ scores, across all domains, with a mean overall score increase of 24 points (p < 0.001). The summed flexion contracture across the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) reduced from means of 72.0° (SD 15.9°) to 5.6° (SD 6.8°) (p < 0.001). A significant increase in maximal flexion was seen at the MCPJ (p < 0.001) but not the PIPJ (p = 0.550). The mean overall satisfaction score from the visual analogue scale was 8.9 (7.9 to 10.0). Complications were uncommon although five fingers showed reduced sensibility at final follow-up. Our study shows that repeat limited fasciectomy for selected patients presenting with recurrence of Dupuytren's disease can be an effective and safe treatment resulting in excellent patient-reported outcomes and levels of satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(5):946-950.

Measurement properties of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population

Purpose This study aimed to use Rasch analysis to test the content, scoring, and measurement properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Methods MHQ scores from 196 patients with hand and wrist conditions were collected in an outpatient hand rehabilitation facility. Rasch analysis was conducted to assess the fit statistics of MHQ to confirm the scaling structure of disability subscales, and to identify differential item functioning. Results The MHQ did not fit with the Rasch model (χ2 = 2376.78, df = 74, p < 0.001), and most thresholds of item responses were disordered. The original scoring algorithm derived from 5-point Likert response options was adjusted to 3-point Likert (10 items) and 4-point Likert (11 items) based on the visual inspection of the thresholds map. Differential item functioning was present in the revised scale based on the age, sex, and dominant hand. Only 3 revised subscales of the MHQ including activities daily living (one hand), aesthetics, and satisfaction showed acceptable fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality was achieved in all revised subscales. Conclusions The overall MHQ had a substantial misfit from the Rasch model. Despite efforts of item reduction and rescoring, we did not reach a satisfactory solution. This calls into question the validity of the statistical evaluations performed on this scale using the traditional scoring. Implications for rehabilitation The MHQ was designed to measure different dimensions of pain and disability but demonstrates multiple measurement problems that undermine it use in present form. It is not appropriate to sum all 37 items of the MHQ into a single score. Three subscales of activities daily living (one hand), aesthetics, and satisfaction can provide unidimensional subscales scores with interval level scaling if scored with our proposed Rasch-based revised scoring. The 27-item version of the MHQ is shown to have strong psychometric properties for administration with patients with hand injuries; however, it requires further validation.

Patients With Higher Treatment Outcome Expectations Are More Satisfied With the Results of Nonoperative Treatment for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study

ObjectiveTo investigate how satisfaction with treatment outcome is associated with patient mindset and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) scores at baseline and 3 months in patients receiving nonoperative treatment for first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA). DesignCohort study SettingA total of 20 outpatient locations of a clinic for hand surgery and hand therapy in the Netherlands. ParticipantsPatients (N=308) receiving nonoperative treatment for CMC-1 OA, including exercise therapy, an orthosis, or both, between September 2017 and February 2019. InterventionsNonoperative treatment (ie, exercise therapy, an orthosis, or both) Main Outcome MeasuresSatisfaction with treatment outcomes was measured after 3 months of treatment. We measured total MHQ score at baseline and at 3 months. As baseline mindset factors, patients completed questionnaires on treatment outcome expectations, illness perceptions, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis and mediation analysis to identify factors associated with satisfaction with treatment outcomes. ResultsMore positive pretreatment outcome expectations were associated with a higher probability of being satisfied with treatment outcomes at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.25). Only a relatively small part (33%) of this association was because of a higher total MHQ score at 3 months. None of the other mindset and hand function variables at baseline were associated with satisfaction with treatment outcomes. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that patients with higher pretreatment outcome expectations are more likely to be satisfied with treatment outcomes after 3 months of nonoperative treatment for CMC-1 OA. This association could only partially be explained by a better functional outcome at 3 months for patients who were satisfied. Health care providers treating patients nonoperatively for CMC-1 OA should be aware of the importance of expectations and may take this into account in pretreatment counseling.

Factors affecting return to work after surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

This study aimed to identify factors contributing to the timing of return to work after surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis and to calculate the costs of lost productivity. We included 627 patients with paid employment who underwent trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition. Time to return to work was measured through filling online questionnaires and analysed using survival analysis at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Patients also filled in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Costs of lost productivity were calculated using the human capital method. After 1 year, 78% of the patients returned to work. The median time to return to work was 12 weeks. Factors that significantly affected the time to return to work were occupational intensity (light, moderate or heavy physical labour), whether the dominant hand was treated and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire work score and hand function score of the unoperated side at baseline. The costs of lost productivity were estimated at €11,000 on the patient level, resulting in €16.8 million on the Dutch population level per year.Level of evidence: II

Surface replacing arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint using the CapFlex-PIP implant: a prospective study with 5-year outcomes.

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes in patients after proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using the surface replacing implant, CapFlex-PIP. Ninety-two prosthesis were implanted and 65 patients with 68 implants were available for follow-up. The brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score improved significantly from 45 (SD 15) before surgery to 71 (SD 17) at 5years. On the numeric rating scale, pain during activities decreased significantly from 6.4 (SD 1.9) to 1.8 (SD 1.9). Range of motion of the joints increased significantly from 45° (SD 21) to 54° (SD 24). An axis deviation of more than 5° was found in 65% of the joints before surgery, but only in 25% at 5years. Soft tissue reoperations were performed on eight patients. Four out of 92 implants underwent revision for stiffness or implant loosening. In three implants, the distal component migrated without needing revision. Overall, the CapFlex-PIP implant demonstrates favourable medium-term results in surface replacing arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint.Level of evidence: IV.

Simplified Kirschner‑wire-based dynamic external fixator for unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fractures.

Ligamentotaxis is a well-established treatment modality for treating challenging articular fractures. Many devices have been evolved to apply this principle to complex proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures. Although they gave satisfactory results, these devices were sometimes costly, complex and cumbersome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term functional and radiological outcomes of treating complex intra-articular PIPJ fractures using a simplified, preloaded Kirschner‑wire (K‑wire)-based dynamic external fixator. Twenty consecutive patients with intraarticular PIPJ fractures, who fulfilled the study selection criteria, have been treated during 2018 and included in this prospective study after the approval of the responsible institutional ethics committee. Plain radiographs were used for assessing fracture reduction, congruity and healing. The visual analogue sore (VAS) and the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) were used for functional evaluation. PIPJ range of motion (ROM) and hand grip-strength were also assessed. At the final follow-up, all patients had no residual pain. The average PIPJ-ROM was 76.4 ± 23.51°, and the average grip-strength was 85 ± 13.95% as compared to the healthy side. The mean normalized MHQ score was 83 ± 12.63points, with 4, 13, and 3 patients had excellent, good, and fair results retrospectively. Complications included pin tract infection (one case), stress fracture related to the applied wires (one case), and flexion contractures (four cases; three of them were symptomatic). The used fixator technique is simple, reliable, available, reproducible, time-saving and cost-effective for managing complex PIPJ fractures while allowing early joint mobilization, which proven effective in achieving high satisfactory functional results.

Assessment of responsiveness of four hand-related scales in stroke patients.

Self-reporting scales are commonly utilized in determining appropriate treatment strategies and follow-up in hand-related disorders. Responsiveness is described as the ability of a scale to detect clinically significant changes. We aimed to evaluate responsiveness of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Duruöz Hand Index (DHI), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and ABILHAND questionnaire in stroke patients. Fifty-one stroke patients were assessed in this descriptive study. Participants received conventional stroke rehabilitation program consisting of 30 sessions. Brunnstrom stages of the stroke patients were recorded before and after treatment. MHQ, DHI, DASH, ABILHAND questionnaire and patient satisfaction scores were filled in by participants before and after the conventional rehabilitation program. Significant improvements were found in MHQ, DHI, DASH, ABILHAND, patient satisfaction scores and Brunnstrom motor recovery stages after the rehabilitation program (p < 0.001). Responsiveness values of the scales were calculated as MHQ (effect size (ES) = - 0.74; standardized response mean (SRM) = - 1.25), DHI (ES = 0.64; SRM = 1.22), DASH (ES = 0.71; SRM = 1.01), and ABILHAND (ES = - 0.55; SRM = - 1.22). Our study revealed that MHQ, DHI, DASH and ABILHAND are responsive scales in detecting treatment-related changes in stroke patients. MHQ, DHI, DASH and ABILHAND can be used in the evaluation of treatment responses in stroke patients.

Cross-finger Flap to the Thumb: Quest for an Alternate Donor.

Background Distal thumb injuries are managed by multiple local and regional flaps. The cross-finger flap (CFF) is one versatile flap used to cover such defects. The donor finger to the thumb is classically described to be the index finger (IF). However, with the index finger being the second most important finger, it causes further debilitation of the already injured hand. Our aim was to find an alternate donor finger to spare the index finger. Methods and Materials A prospective observational study was conducted on 10 patients with distal thumb injuries who were admitted between November 2018 and July 2019. Ring finger (RF) was used as donor for CFF in all the cases. The subjects were assessed for first web space angle, Kapandji score, total range of movement (TRM) of long fingers, and global hand function using Michigan hand outcome questionnaire (MHQ) after flap division. Results There was no first web contracture and TRM of IF remained unaffected. However, TRM of RF was significantly reduced. But this being a relatively unimportant finger, there was no significant reduction in global hand function, as evaluated by the MHQ score. Conclusion The ring finger is a good alternative for index finger as donor for CFF to the thumb, because it provides adequate tissue along with comfortable positioning and easy maintenance of local hygiene. Moreover, it preserves global hand function by sparing the IF.

Correlation of HISS and Strickland Score with the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in hand injuries

The widely used Hand Injury Severity Score (HISS) has intrinsic drawbacks like inability to score vascular status and questionable correlation with Disability of Arm, shoulder and Hand. We compared it with the Strickland score which is easier to calculate and has provision for evaluation of vascular status. We assessed correlation of both the scores with the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ). In a prospective study of 1574 patients admitted with hand injuries, we recorded their HISS and Strickland scores and followed them up for a year and later interviewed for MHQ score. Statistical correlation was done comparing the HISS and Strickland score with the MHQ using the SPSS package. Majority of these injuries were in manual labourers (47.5%) with agricultural or industrial background with a mean age of 25 years (18-26 years). Using the One-way ANOVA test we found a significant correlation between the HISS and MHQ (P Value<0.001). Using the Unpaired T-test, statistically significant association (P<0.001) was seen between the Strickland score and MHQ. The correlation between HISS and Strickland Score done by One-way ANOVA Test was also found to be significant (P Value<0.001). On evaluating the group of patients with a Strickland score >10, we observed that the MHQ was almost similar between those who underwent amputation with those who underwent a successful salvage, though not statistically significant. HISS and Strickland score correlated significantly with each other and with the MHQ. Strickland score was easy and quicker to determine the salvagability of hand injury. However, small group of patients who may benefit from salvage in spite of a high Strickland score where factors like patient's age, occupation, comorbid health condition, motivation, expenses, and social environment needs to be taken into account in decision making.