Μg Of Vaccine Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of an inactivated virus-particle vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, BIV1-CovIran: randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial

ObjectiveTo report the efficacy, safety, and exploratory immunogenicity findings of two 5 µg doses of the BIV1-CovIran vaccine.DesignRandomised, placebo controlled, double blind, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial.SettingIn six cities of...

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Combined Intramuscular/Intranasal Recombinant Spike Protein COVID-19 Vaccine (RCP) in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 55 Years Old: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a combined intramuscular/intranasal recombinant spike protein COVID-19 vaccine (RCP). Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I trial. Three vaccine strengths were compared with an adjuvant-only preparation. It included two intramuscular and a third intranasal dose. Eligible participants were followed for adverse reactions. Specific IgG, secretory IgA, neutralizing antibodies, and cell-mediated immunity were assessed. Results: A total of 153 participants were enrolled (13 sentinels, 120 randomized, 20 non-randomized open-labeled for IgA assessment). No related serious adverse event was observed. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 95% CI for serum neutralizing antibodies compared with placebo two weeks after the second injection were 5.82 (1.46-23.13), 11.12 (2.74-45.09), and 20.70 (5.05-84.76) in 5, 10, and 20 µg vaccine groups, respectively. The GMR for anti-RBD IgA in mucosal fluid two weeks after the intranasal dose was 23.27 (21.27-25.45) in the 10 µg vaccine group. The humoral responses were sustained for up to five months. All vaccine strengths indicated a strong T-helper 1 response. Conclusion: RCP is safe and creates strong and durable humoral and cellular immunity and good mucosal immune response in its 10 µg /200 µL vaccine strengths. Trial registration: IRCT20201214049709N1.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Betuvax-CoV-2, an RBD-Fc-Based SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Vaccine: Preliminary Results of the First-in-Human, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

In the phase I/II clinical trial, 116 healthy adult men and women, ages 18-58, were enrolled: 20 in Stage I, and 96 in Stage II. In Stage I, 20 µg of the vaccine was administered intramuscularly on day 2, and either 5 µg (group 1) or 20 µg (group 2) on day 30. In Stage II, 20 µg of the vaccine was administered intramuscularly on day 2, and either 5 µg (group 3) or 20 µg (group 4) on day 30. In group 5, both injections were replaced with placebo. The primary outcome measures were safety (number of participants with adverse events throughout the study) and antigen-specific humoral immunity (SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies measured by ELISA and CMIA). Antigen-specific cell-mediated immunity and changes in neutralizing antibodies (detected with a SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay) were measured as a secondary outcome. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Identifier: NCT05270954). Both vaccine formulations (20 µg + 5 µg and 20 µg + 20 µg) were safe and well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild, and no serious adverse events were detected. On day 51,anti-SARS-CoV-2 total and IgG antibody titers and anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher in the vaccine groups (both formulations) than in the placebo. A more pronounced CD4+-mediated immune response was observed in the group of volunteers administered with the 20 + 20 μg vaccine formulation. RBD-Fc-based COVID-19 "Betuvax-CoV-2" vaccine in doses (20 + 5 µg and 20 + 20 µg) demonstrated an excellent safety profile and induced a strong humoral response. Further research on the protective effectiveness of the "Betuvax-CoV-2" vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 is on its way.

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Tolerance and Immunogenicity in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients Aged 5-11 Years Old-Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a devastating impact on the world’s population in the years 2020−2022. The rapid development of vaccines enabled a reduction in the mortality and morbidity of COVID-19, but there are limited data about their effects on immunocompromised children. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the mRNA BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biontech) vaccine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Material and methods: Two cohorts of 34 children after allo-HSCT and 35 healthy children aged 5−11 years were vaccinated with two doses of the mRNA BNT162b2 (10 µg) vaccine. All children were evaluated for adverse effects with electronic surveys and the immunogenicity of the vaccine was assessed with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer measurements. Results: All reported adverse events (AEs) were classified as mild. The most common AE was pain at the injection site. All the other AEs (both local and systemic) were rarely reported (<15% patients). Both groups showed a similar response in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG production. Patients after allo-HSCT that were undergoing immunosuppressive treatment presented a poorer immunological response than patients off of treatment. Time since HSCT, patient age, lymphocyte count, and total IgG concentration did not correlate with initial/post-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers. Most patients who were eligible for a third dose of the vaccine had an excellent humoral response observed after two vaccine doses. Conclusions: The COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine is very well tolerated and highly immunogenic in 5−11-year-old children after HSCT. Children >2 years of age after HSCT who did not receive immunosuppressive treatment presented excellent antibody production after two doses of the vaccine, but children on immunosuppression may require a more intense vaccination schedule.

Humoral and cellular immunogenicity and efficacy of a coxsackievirus A10 vaccine in mice

ABSTRACT Coxsackievirus A10 (CV-A10) has become one of the major pathogens of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), and studies on the vaccine and animal model of CV-A10 are still far from complete. Our study used a mouse-adapted CV-A10 strain, which was lethal for 14-day-old mice, to develop an infected mouse model. Then this model was employed to establish an actively immunized-challenged mouse model to evaluate the efficacy of a formaldehyde-inactivated CV-A10 vaccine, which was prepared from a Vero cell-adapted strain. CV-A10 vaccine at a dose of 0.5 or 2.0 μg was inoculated intraperitoneally in neonatal Kunming mice on the third and ninth day. Then the mice were challenged on day 14. The survival rate of mice immunized with 0.5 or 2.0 μg vaccine were 90% and 100%, respectively, while all Alum-inoculated mice died. Compared to those in the two vaccinated groups, the Alum-inoculated mice showed severe pathological damage, strong viral protein expression and high viral loads. The antisera from vaccinated mice showed high level of neutralizing antibodies against CV-A10. Meanwhile, three potential T cell epitopes located at the carboxyl-terminal regions of the VP1 and VP3 were identified and exhibited CV-A10 serotype-specific. The humoral and cellular immunogenicity analysis showed that immunization with two doses of the vaccine elicited CV-A10 specific neutralizing antibody and T cell response in BALB/c mice. Collectively, these findings indicated that this actively immunized-challenged mouse model will be invaluable in future studies on CV-A10 pathogenesis and evaluation of vaccine candidates.

A Hemagglutinin 1 Carrying Plant-Based Virus-like Particle Vaccine Generates an Efficacious Cellular Response by Exploiting IL-1 Signaling in Both Adult and Aged Mice.

Inactivated influenza vaccines have struggled to provide consistent protection in older individuals. Circumventing immune senescence, an aging of the immune response characterized by weak humoral responses to vaccines, and unchecked inflammation during infection require novel immunization strategies. Plant-based virus-like particles (VLPs) bearing recombinant hemagglutinin proteins have been shown to provide protection in older animals in preclinical challenge studies, despite eliciting relatively low or absent humoral responses. The nature of the cellular response induced by these vaccines and its evolution during infection have not yet been fully characterized, however. Using a murine model that recapitulates features of human immune senescence, we assessed T cell responses to vaccination with a VLP bearing the hemagglutinin of H1N1/California 07/2009 (H1-VLP) before and after challenge in young and aged BALB/c mice (2 and 18 mo old, respectively). We report that two i.m. doses of H1-VLP (3 μg) vaccine 21 d apart generated H1-specific Th1 and Th2 cells associated with the prevention of prolonged pulmonary inflammation and mortality in both adult and aged mice. While investigating the regulation of cellular immunity, we identified a unique IL-1R1+ tissue-adapted regulatory T cell population in the lungs of both H1-VLP-vaccinated adult and aged mice, suggesting a novel regulatory T cell population associated with vaccine-mediated protection. Collectively, this study provides preclinical evidence that the plant-based H1-VLP vaccine may act, in part, by preventing exacerbated immune responses against influenza A.

Safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent virus-like particle vaccine against western, eastern, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, randomised clinical trial

Western (WEEV), eastern (EEEV), and Venezuelan (VEEV) equine encephalitis viruses are mosquito-borne pathogens classified as potential biological warfare agents for which there are currently no approved human vaccines or therapies. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an investigational trivalent virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine, western, eastern, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis (WEVEE) VLP, composed of WEEV, EEEV, and VEEV VLPs. The WEVEE VLP vaccine was evaluated in a phase 1, randomised, open-label, dose-escalation trial at the Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18-50 years with no previous vaccination history with an investigational alphavirus vaccine. Participants were assigned to a dose group of 6 μg, 30 μg, or 60 μg vaccine product and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the WEVEE VLP vaccine with or without aluminium hydroxide suspension (alum) adjuvant by intramuscular injection at study day 0 and at week 8. The primary outcomes were the safety and tolerability of the vaccine (assessed in all participants who received at least one administration of study product) and the secondary outcome was immune response measured as neutralising titres by plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT) 4 weeks after the second vaccination. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03879603. Between April 2, 2019, and June 13, 2019, 30 trial participants were enrolled (mean age 32 years, range 21-48; 16 [53%] female participants and 14 [47%] male participants). Six groups of five participants each received 6 μg, 30 μg, or 60 μg vaccine doses with or without adjuvant, and all 30 participants completed study follow-up. Vaccinations were safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported symptoms were mild injection-site pain and tenderness (22 [73%] of 30) and malaise (15 [50%] of 30). Dose-dependent differences in the frequency of pain and tenderness were found between the 6 μg, 30 μg, and 60 μg groups (p=0·0217). No significant differences were observed between dosing groups for any other reactogenicity symptom. Two adverse events (mild elevated blood pressure and moderate asymptomatic neutropenia) were assessed as possibly related to the study product in one trial participant (60 μg dose with alum); both resolved without clinical sequelae. 4 weeks after second vaccine administration, neutralising antibodies were induced in all study groups with the highest response seen against all three vaccine antigens in the 30 μg plus alum group (PRNT80 geometric mean titre for EEEV 60·8, 95% CI 29·9-124·0; for VEEV 111·5, 49·8-249·8; and for WEEV 187·9, 90·0-392·2). Finally, 4 weeks after second vaccine administration, for all doses, the majority of trial participants developed an immune response to all three vaccine components (24 [83%] of 29 for EEEV; 26 [90%] of 29 for VEEV; 27 [93%] of 29 for WEEV; and 22 [76%] of 29 for EEEV, VEEV, and WEEV combined). The favourable safety profile and neutralising antibody responses, along with pressing public health need, support further evaluation of the WEVEE VLP vaccine in advanced-phase clinical trials. The Vaccine Research Center of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health funded the clinical trial. The US Department of Defense contributed funding for manufacturing of the study product.

Evaluation of a recombinant five-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine: The randomized, single-centre phase 1a/1b clinical trials

BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen that causes hospital and community infections. To control Staphylococcus aureus infection and reduce the usage of antibiotics, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant five-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (rFSAV) in healthy adults. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1a study and a randomized, open-label phase 1b study. In phase 1a, we randomly allocated 144 healthy participants in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive the low-(60 μg), middle-(120 μg), and high-dose (240 μg) vaccine or placebo at day 0, 3, 7 and 14. In phase 1b, 144 healthy participants were randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive 0–3–7, 0/0–7, 0/0–3–7, 0/0–7–14 regimens to estimate the optimal strategy. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of solicited adverse events post-vaccination. The immunogenicity endpoints included the level of specific antibodies to five antigens after vaccination, as well as the cellular immune responses and functional antibodies. ResultsThere were 31 (86%), 30 (83%), and 32 (89%) of 36 participants in the low-, middle-, and high-dose group reported solicited adverse events, respectively, most of the adverse events were mild or moderate. In phase 1b, the dose-adjusted rFSAV (90 μg) showed a better safety profile in the four immune procedures, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The antigen-specific binding antibodies started to increase at day 7 and reached the peak around day 14 to 21. The cellular immune responses and functional antibodies also were substantially above background levels. ConclusionsrFSAV is safe, well tolerated in healthy adults, elicits rapid and robust specific humoral and cellular immune responses with unconventional immunization procedure in phase 1a and 1b. It deserves to be noted and further explored.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02804711 and NCT03966040.

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated virus particle vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, BIV1-CovIran: findings from double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase I and II clinical trials among healthy adults

ObjectiveAssessing safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated whole virus particle vaccine.DesignSingle-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase I (stage I: 18–50, stage II: 51–75 years), phase II (18–75 years) clinical trials.Setting29 December...

Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, and immune persistence of a two-dose schedule, in healthy adults: interim results from two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials

BackgroundLarge-scale vaccination against COVID-19 is being implemented in many countries with CoronaVac, an inactivated vaccine. We aimed to assess the immune persistence of a two-dose schedule of CoronaVac, and the immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, in healthy adults aged 18 years and older.MethodsIn the first of two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials, adults aged 18–59 years in Jiangsu, China, were initially allocated (1:1) into two vaccination schedule cohorts: a day 0 and day 14 vaccination cohort (cohort 1) and a day 0 and day 28 vaccination cohort (cohort 2); each cohort was randomly assigned (2:2:1) to either a 3 μg dose or 6 μg dose of CoronaVac or a placebo group. Following a protocol amendment on Dec 25, 2020, half of the participants in each cohort were allocated to receive an additional dose 28 days (window period 30 days) after the second dose, and the other half were allocated to receive a third dose 6 months (window period 60 days) after the second dose. In the other phase 2 trial, in Hebei, China, participants aged 60 years and older were assigned sequentially to receive three injections of either 1·5 μg, 3 μg, or 6 μg of vaccine or placebo, administered 28 days apart for the first two doses and 6 months (window period 90 days) apart for doses two and three. The main outcomes of the study were geometric mean titres (GMTs), geometric mean increases (GMIs), and seropositivity of neutralising antibody to SARS-CoV-2 (virus strain SARS-CoV-2/human/CHN/CN1/2020, GenBank accession number MT407649.1), as analysed in the per-protocol population (all participants who completed their assigned third dose). Our reporting is focused on the 3 μg groups, since 3 μg is the licensed formulation. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352608 and NCT04383574.Findings540 (90%) of 600 participants aged 18–59 years were eligible to receive a third dose, of whom 269 (50%) received the primary third dose 2 months after the second dose (cohorts 1a-14d-2m and 2a-28d-2m) and 271 (50%) received a booster dose 8 months after the second dose (cohorts 1b-14d-8m and 2b-28d-8m). In the 3 μg group, neutralising antibody titres induced by the first two doses declined after 6 months to near or below the seropositive cutoff (GMT of 8) for cohort 1b-14d-8m (n=53; GMT 3·9 [95% CI 3·1–5·0]) and for cohort 2b-28d-8m (n=49; 6·8 [5·2–8·8]). When a booster dose was given 8 months after a second dose, GMTs assessed 14 days later increased to 137·9 (95% CI 99·9–190·4) for cohort 1b-14d-8m and 143·1 (110·8–184·7) 28 days later for cohort 2b-28d-8m. GMTs moderately increased following a primary third dose, from 21·8 (95% CI 17·3–27·6) on day 28 after the second dose to 45·8 (35·7–58·9) on day 28 after the third dose in cohort 1a-14d-2m (n=54), and from 38·1 (28·4–51·1) to 49·7 (39·9–61·9) in cohort 2a-28d-2m (n=53). GMTs had decayed to near the positive threshold by 6 months after the third dose: GMT 9·2 (95% CI 7·1–12·0) in cohort 1a-14d-2m and 10·0 (7·3–13·7) in cohort 2a-28d-2m. Similarly, in adults aged 60 years and older who received booster doses (303 [87%] of 350 participants were eligible to receive a third dose), neutralising antibody titres had declined to near or below the seropositive threshold by 6 months after the primary two-dose series. A third dose given 8 months after the second dose significantly increased neutralising antibody concentrations: GMTs increased from 42·9 (95% CI 31·0–59·4) on day 28 after the second dose to 158·5 (96·6–259·2) on day 28 following the third dose (n=29). All adverse reactions reported within 28 days after a third dose were of grade 1 or 2 severity in all vaccination cohorts. There were three serious adverse events (2%) reported by the 150 participants in cohort 1a-14d-2m, four (3%) by 150 participants from cohort 1b-14d-8m, one (1%) by 150 participants in each of cohorts 2a-28d-2m and 2b-28d-8m, and 24 (7%) by 349 participants from cohort 3-28d-8m.InterpretationA third dose of CoronaVac in adults administered 8 months after a second dose effectively recalled specific immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, which had declined substantially 6 months after two doses of CoronaVac, resulting in a remarkable increase in the concentration of antibodies and indicating that a two-dose schedule generates good immune memory, and a primary third dose given 2 months after the second dose induced slightly higher antibody titres than the primary two doses.FundingNational Key Research and Development Program, Beijing Science and Technology Program, and Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China.TranslationFor the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Tom Nolan’s research reviews—19 November 2021

#### No surprises for Pfizer The phase II/III double-blind randomised controlled trial of Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine in 5-11 year olds has been published in NEJM.1 It contains another classic covid...

Immunogenicity after CoronaVac vaccination.

This study aimed to investigate the seropositivity of CoronaVac-SinoVac vaccination in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) risk factors and comorbidities. Immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody responses were examined on the 21st day after the second dose of CoronaVac-SinoVac 6 μg vaccine on the 28th day. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels were measured by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in vaccinated health care workers (n=134) (Group I), vaccinated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (+) who had coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) disease (n=21) (Group II), and unvaccinated PCR (+) (n=28) (Group III) participants. Subgroups were formed in Group I according to the presence of COVID-19 risk factors and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and asthma/allergy) and demographic data. Seropositivity rates were 95.5, 100, and 89.3% for Groups I, II, and III, respectively. IgG antibody levels were found significantly higher in the group between the ages of 20-30 in group I compared to those aged 31-50 and over 50 (both p<0.01). It was found significantly higher in normal-weight individuals than in the overweight and obese group (both p<0.01). IgG antibody levels were found significantly lower in people with cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus compared with those who did not (p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). There was a negative correlation between IgG antibody response values and body mass index and age in Group I (r= -0.336, p<0.001 and r= -0.307, p<0.001, respectively). IgG antibody values decrease with age and with increasing body mass index. The presence of comorbidities (i.e., diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease) decreased COVID-19 IgG antibody values.

Safety and Immunogenicity of an Anti–Zika Virus DNA Vaccine

BackgroundAlthough Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is typically self-limiting, other associated complications such as congenital birth defects and the Guillain–Barré syndrome are well described. There are no approved vaccines against ZIKV infection.MethodsIn this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a synthetic, consensus DNA vaccine (GLS-5700) encoding the ZIKV premembrane and envelope proteins in two groups of 20 participants each. The participants received either 1 mg or 2 mg of vaccine intradermally, with each injection followed by electroporation (the use of a pulsed electric field to introduce the DNA sequence into cells) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks.ResultsThe median age of the participants was 38 years, and 60% were women; 78% were White and 22% Black; in addition, 30% were Hispanic. At the interim analysis at 14 weeks (i.e., after the third dose of vaccine), no serious adverse events were reported. Local reactions at the vaccination site (e.g., injection-site pain, redness, swelling, and itching) occurred in approximately 50% of the participants. After the third dose of vaccine, binding antibodies (as measured on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were detected in all the participants, with geometric mean titers of 1642 and 2871 in recipients of 1 mg and 2 mg of vaccine, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies developed in 62% of the samples on Vero-cell assay. On neuronal-cell assay, there was 90% inhibition of ZIKV infection in 70% of the serum samples and 50% inhibition in 95% of the samples. The intraperitoneal injection of postvaccination serum protected 103 of 112 IFNAR knockout mice (bred with deletion of genes encoding interferon-α and interferon-β receptors) (92%) that were challenged with a lethal dose of ZIKV-PR209 strain; none of the mice receiving baseline serum survived the challenge. Survival was independent of the neutralization titer.ConclusionsIn this phase 1, open-label clinical trial, a DNA vaccine elicited anti-ZIKV immune responses. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. (Funded by GeneOne Life Science and others; ZIKA-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02809443.)

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV, in people younger than 18 years: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial

BackgroundAlthough SARS-CoV-2 infection often causes milder symptoms in children and adolescents, young people might still play a key part in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. An efficacious vaccine for children and adolescents could therefore assist pandemic control. For further evaluation of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine candidate BBIBP-CorV, we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of BBIBP-CorV in participants aged 3–17 years.MethodsA randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was done at Shangqiu City Liangyuan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Henan, China. In phases 1 and 2, healthy participants were stratified according to age (3–5 years, 6–12 years, or 13–17 years) and dose group. Individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV infection were excluded. All participants were randomly assigned, using stratified block randomisation (block size eight), to receive three doses of 2 μg, 4 μg, or 8 μg of vaccine or control (1:1:1:1) 28 days apart. The primary outcome, safety, was analysed in the safety set, which consisted of participants who had received at least one vaccination after being randomly assigned, and had any safety evaluation information. The secondary outcomes were geometric meant titre (GMT) of the neutralising antibody against infectious SARS-CoV-2 and were analysed based on the full analysis set. This study is registered with www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2000032459, and is ongoing.FindingsBetween Aug 14, 2020, and Sept 24, 2020, 445 participants were screened, and 288 eligible participants were randomly assigned to vaccine (n=216, 24 for each dose level [2/4/8 μg] in each of three age cohorts [3–5, 6–12, and 13–17 years]) or control (n=72, 24 for each age cohort [3–5, 6–12, and 13–17 years]) in phase 1. In phase 2, 810 participants were screened and 720 eligible participants were randomly assigned and allocated to vaccine (n=540, 60 for each dose level [2/4/8 μg] in each of three age cohorts [3–5, 6–12, and 13–17 years]) or control (n=180, 60 for each age cohort [3–5, 6–12, and 13–17 years]). The most common injection site adverse reaction was pain (ten [4%] 251 participants in all vaccination groups of the 3–5 years cohort; 23 [9·1%] of 252 participants in all vaccination groups and one [1·2%] of 84 in the control group of the 6–12 years cohort; 20 [7·9%] of 252 participants in all vaccination groups of the 13–17 years cohort). The most common systematic adverse reaction was fever (32 [12·7%] of 251 participants in all vaccination groups and six [7·1%] of 84 participants in the control group of the 3–5 years cohort; 13 [5·2%] of 252 participants in the vaccination groups and one [1·2%] of 84 in the control group of the 6–12 years cohort; 26 [10·3%] of 252 participants in all vaccination groups and eight [9·5%] of 84 in the control group of the 13–17 years cohort). Adverse reactions were mostly mild to moderate in severity. The neutralising antibody GMT against the SARS-CoV-2 virus ranged from 105·3 to 180·2 in the 3–5 years cohort, 84·1 to 168·6 in the 6–12 years cohort, and 88·0 to 155·7 in the 13–17 years cohort on day 28 after the second vaccination; and ranged from 143·5 to 224·4 in the 3–5 years cohort, 127 to 184·8 in the 6–12 years cohort, and 150·7 to 199 in the 13–17 years cohort on day 28 after the third vaccination.InterpretationThe inactivated COVID-19 vaccine BBIBP-CorV is safe and well tolerated at all tested dose levels in participants aged 3–17 years. BBIBP-CorV also elicited robust humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection after two doses. Our findings support the use of a 4 μg dose and two-shot regimen BBIBP-CorV in phase 3 trials in the population younger than 18 years to further ascertain its safety and protection efficacy against COVID-19.FundingNational Program on Key Research Project of China, National Mega projects of China for Major Infectious Diseases, National Mega Projects of China for New Drug Creation, and Beijing Science and Technology Plan.TranslationFor the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Immunogenicity and persistence of high-dose recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus in China: A randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled trial

ObjectivesTo explore the immunogenicity and persistence of the 60 µg hepatitis B vaccine in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). MethodsWe conducted a randomised controlled trial for adults infected with HIV. A total of 182 patients were randomly allocated to receive 20 µg (IM20 group) or 60 µg (IM60 group) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at months 0, 1, and 6 to assess the immunogenicity and were followed-up from month 7 to 42 to assess long-term immunogenicity. ResultsOur data showed that the response rate and geometric mean concentration (GMC) of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in the IM60 group at month 7 were higher than those in the IM20 group (P > 0.05). The GMC of anti-HBs among the two groups decreased rapidly during the follow-up period (P > 0.05). Survival analysis showed that 25% of patients with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL were 20 months in the IM60 group and 9.3 months in the IM20 group. ConclusionThe three-dose 60 µg hepatitis B vaccine showed partially better immunogenicity and persistence than the three-dose 20 µg vaccine. Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03316807.

Multimode CaCO3/pneumolysin antigen delivery systems for inducing efficient cellular immunity for anti-tumor immunotherapy

Along with the clinical success of tumor immunotherapy, development of tumor vaccines has attracted more and more attention, the key of which is to induce efficient tumor antigen-specific cellular immunity. This usually relies on using intelligent antigen delivery systems to realize the cytoplasmic delivery and cross-presentation of exogenous tumor antigens to CD8+ T cells. In this study, multi-functional vaccine adjuvant pneumolysin (PLY) and carrier calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nanoparticles are combined by physical absorption of PLY onto CaCO3 nanoparticles to construct multimode antigen delivery systems CaCO3/PLY to induce cellular immunity for tumor vaccines. Here, both CaCO3 nanoparticles and PLY were adopted to induce the lysosomal escape, cytoplasmic delivery and cross-presentation of exogenous antigens to enhance cellular immunity. Based on this, minimalist tumor vaccines were prepared in a one-pot method through physical adsorption of model antigen ovalbumin (OVA) and PLY onto CaCO3 nanoparticles, termed as OVA/CaCO3/PLY. The in vitro results showed that OVA/CaCO3/PLY (5 μg) vaccine formulation promoted antigen cross-presentation by inducing effective lysosome escape and cytoplasmic delivery of the antigen protein OVA. The in vivo immunization results show that OVA/CaCO3/PLY (5 μg) vaccine formulation significantly enhanced cellular and humoral immunity. The anti-tumor assays demonstrate that OVA/CaCO3/PLY (5 μg) vaccine formulation displayed significantly effective preventive and therapeutic anti-tumor efficacy. Collectively, both CaCO3 nanoparticles and an appropriate dose of PLY contributed to strong anti-tumor cellular immunity. The multimode antigen delivery system CaCO3/PLY (5 μg) offers a promising platform for the construction of efficient tumor vaccines.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tandem-repeat dimeric RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) against COVID-19 in adults: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials

Immune persistence induced by three doses of 60 μg hepatitis B vaccine in non-responders following standard primary vaccination in Chinese adults

ABSTRACT This study consisted of two rounds of cross-sectional observations designed to evaluate the persistence of immune protection induced high antigen content hepatitis B (HB) vaccine at 60 μg/1.0 ml formulations administered at a three-dose schedule (Days 0, 28, and 56) in non-responders to routine HB vaccination. In the original phase 3 study, we enrolled 1091 healthy participants (16–60 years old) seronegative for antibody against HB surface antigen (anti-HBs) after primary vaccination. Participants were randomized (2:2:1) to receive three booster doses of HB vaccine containing 60 μg, 30 μg, or 10 μg of antigen per dose 28 days apart. In the group receiving the 60 μg HB vaccine, 428 participants’ serum samples were available at pre-vaccination and 28 days after each vaccine dose and were included in immunogenicity analysis. With two written informed consents, we collected blood samples from 276 (67.2%) participants in 2014 and 239 (58.2%) in 2019, who had completed the full course of revaccination and reached the seropositive (anti-HBs≥10 mIU/ml) standard in the 60 μg vaccine group of the original phase 3 study. The HBV seropositive rate was found to decrease from 96.0% in 28 days after receiving the third dose of 60 μg HB vaccine, to 48.2% in 2014, and to 40.6% in 2019, with anti-HBs GMC of seropositive individuals was 584.0 mIU/ml, 142.4 mIU/ml, and 169.1 mIU/ml, respectively. Analysis of 181 vaccinees who had serologic test results available both in 2014 and in 2019, and results revealed a dynamic trend in anti-HBs titer similar to that for the whole immune persistence cohort. Of paramount importance, the serologic test results found that 24.9% (45/181) participants had higher anti-HBs concentrations in 2019 than in 2014, this could be interpreted as natural boosters, secondary to HBV exposure without infection because protected. In conclusion, protective antibody persists about 11 years after immunization of Chinese non-responders with 3 doses of 60 μg HB vaccine. Booster doses of vaccine do not seem necessary to ensure long-term protection.

Immune Efficacy of different immunization doses of divalent combination DNA vaccine pOPRL+pOPRF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

At present, there is no vaccine available against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common zoonotic pathogenic bacterium. In a previous study, the authors prepared a divalent combination DNA vaccine, pOPRL+pOPRF, which exhibited good protective efficacy. To explore the optimal immunization dose of this divalent combination DNA vaccine, in the present study, chickens were vaccinated with 25, 50, 100, and 200 µg doses. The levels of serum antibody, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and interleukin-2 (IL-2) were determined, and lymphocyte proliferation assays were performed. After challenge with virulent P. aeruginosa, the protective efficacy was evaluated. Following vaccination, the serum antibodies, stimulation index values, and concentrations of IFN-γ and IL-2 were significantly higher in chickens vaccinated with 100 and 200 µg vaccines than in those vaccinated with 25 and 50 µg doses (P<0.05). IFN-γ and IL-2 concentrations in chickens immunized with 100 µg vaccine were slightly higher than those in chickens immunized with 200 µg vaccine, although the difference was not statistically significant. The protective rates were 55%, 65%, 85%, and 85% with 25, 50, 100, and 200 µg of the pOPRL+pOPRF DNA vaccine, respectively. Thus, the immune efficacy of the pOPRL+pOPRF DNA vaccine increased with an increase in immunization dose, but this does not imply that a higher dose necessarily achieves a better outcome. The optimal immunization dose of pOPRL+pOPRF DNA vaccine in chickens was 100 µg.

Safety and immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of an open-label, Phase 1 clinical trial.

BackgroundA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is of high urgency. Here the safety and immunogenicity induced by a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full length spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 are described.MethodsINO-4800 was evaluated in two groups of 20 participants, receiving either 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg of vaccine intradermally followed by CELLECTRA® EP at 0 and 4 weeks. Thirty-nine subjects completed both doses; one subject in the 2.0 mg group discontinued trial participation prior to receiving the second dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04336410.FindingsThe median age was 34.5, 55% (22/40) were men and 82.5% (33/40) white. Through week 8, only 6 related Grade 1 adverse events in 5 subjects were observed. None of these increased in frequency with the second administration. No serious adverse events were reported. All 38 subjects evaluable for immunogenicity had cellular and/or humoral immune responses following the second dose of INO-4800. By week 6, 95% (36/38) of the participants seroconverted based on their responses by generating binding (ELISA) and/or neutralizing antibodies (PRNT IC50), with responder geometric mean binding antibody titers of 655.5 [95% CI (255.6, 1681.0)] and 994.2 [95% CI (395.3, 2500.3)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. For neutralizing antibody, 78% (14/18) and 84% (16/19) generated a response with corresponding geometric mean titers of 102.3 [95% CI (37.4, 280.3)] and 63.5 [95% CI (39.6, 101.8)], in the respective groups. By week 8, 74% (14/19) and 100% (19/19) of subjects generated T cell responses by IFN-ɣ ELISpot assay with the median SFU per 106 PBMC of 46 [95% CI (21.1, 142.2)] and 71 [95% CI (32.2, 194.4)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. Flow cytometry demonstrated a T cell response, dominated by CD8+ T cells co-producing IFN-ɣ and TNF-α, without increase in IL-4.InterpretationINO-4800 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability and was immunogenic in 100% (38/38) of the vaccinated subjects by eliciting either or both humoral or cellular immune responses.FundingCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).