Mg In Japanese Patients Research Articles

Phase I study for ridaforolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

PurposeRidaforolimus is a non-prodrug mTOR inhibitor. The safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of oral ridaforolimus were assessed in Japanese patients with refractory solid tumors.MethodsRidaforolimus (20 or 40 mg) was administered as a single dose on Day 1, followed by once daily dosing five times a week for a 3-week cycle beginning on Day 8. Full PK sampling was performed on Days 1 and 26.ResultsThirteen patients (7 at 20 mg and 6 at 40 mg) were enrolled. The median treatment duration was 82 days. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, hypertriglyceridemia, and proteinuria. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 stomatitis at 20 mg, and grade 3 anorexia and vomiting at 40 mg). Four patients had grade 1 interstitial pneumonitis. Ridaforolimus in the whole blood was rapidly absorbed and slowly eliminated with a half-life of approximately 56–58 h after a single dose. Two patients (with non-small cell lung cancer and angiosarcoma, respectively) achieved a partial response, and five patients (one with thymic cancer and four with soft tissue sarcomas) had a stable disease for ≥16 weeks.ConclusionsRidaforolimus was well tolerated up to a dose of 40 mg in Japanese patients. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed for patients with solid tumors. Further investigation at this dose is warranted.

A phase I study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

The objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of panobinostat (LBH589) when administered as a single agent to adult patients with advanced solid tumors or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma whose disease had progressed despite standard therapy or for whom no standard therapy existed. Panobinostat was administered orally once daily on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week. A total of 13 patients were treated with one of three initial doses: 10 mg (n = 3), 15 mg (n = 4), or 20 mg (n = 6). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 12 evaluable patients. The most frequently reported adverse events, regardless of whether they were related to the study drug, were diarrhea and nausea in 10 patients (76.9%). Thrombocytopenia was reported in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). Five of 11 patients (45.4%) had stable disease. Panobinostat administered orally once daily on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week was well tolerated at doses up to 20 mg in Japanese patients. Dose escalation did not proceed after exploration of the 20 mg dose due to emerging global clinical data at that time.

Beneficial Effect of Increasing the Dose of Tamsulosin to 0.4 mg in Japanese Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Objective: Tamsulosin is often administered at a dose of 0.2 mg in Japan, Korea, and elsewhere in Asia, while a dose of 0.4 mg is more common in the West. In order to determine the higher dose might also be appropriate in the North-East Asian setting, we studied whether the effect of increasing the dose to 0.4 mg in Japanese patients who had dysuria associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Patients and Methods: Twenty-two cases with a voiding volume ≥ 100 ml assessed by uroflowmetry out of 31 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and an IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) ≥ 8 whose symptoms were controlled with 0.2 mg of tamsulosin were entered into this study. We evaluated IPSS and QOL (quality of life) score, urinary flow parameters and residual urine volume before and 4 weeks after increasing the dose of tamsulosin.Results: Statistical analyses performed using the Wilcoxon test showed no significant alteration in IPSS total score or QOL score with the increased dose, but Qmax (maximum urinary flow rate) improved from 10.1 ± 5.5 ml/s to 12.1 ± 6.5 ml/s (p = 0.013), and residual urine volume improved from 37.6 ± 26.4 ml to 22.2 ± 24.3 ml (p = 0.012). Two of the 31 patients complained of new symptoms; 1 complained of breast pain and the other complained of dizziness.Conclusions: From the lack of side effects of more than moderate grade in the present study, increasing the dose of tamsulosin might be recommended before switching patients to other drugs.

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral enzastaurin (LY317615) in advanced solid tumors

Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor that targets the protein kinase C (PKC) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathways to induce apoptosis and suppress proliferation of various cancer cell lines. This phase I study evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of enzastaurin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and determined the recommended dose for phase II. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients received enzastaurin orally once daily until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Enzastaurin was started at 250 mg/day followed by stepwise dose increases based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Twenty-three patients (seven patients: 250 mg; six patients: 375 mg; six patients: 500 mg; four patients: 750 mg) were enrolled and received enzastaurin. The major tumor types were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 5) and breast cancer (n = 3). No DLT was reported at doses of 500 mg or less. Because two DLT (grade 2 QTc prolongation lasting for a week) were observed at 750 mg enzastaurin, this was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. Multiple daily doses at 500 mg achieved the target plasma concentration to inhibit PKC activity (1400 nmol/L). Enzastaurin was well tolerated up to 500 mg in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended dose for phase II was determined to be 500 mg daily for a 28-day cycle on the basis of safety and plasma exposures.

Dose-ranging efficacy of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Sitagliptin is an oral, potent, highly selective, once-daily DPP-4 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To assess the dose-ranging efficacy and safety/tolerability profile of once-daily sitagliptin 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg in Japanese patients with T2DM. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 363 Japanese patients with inadequate glycemic control (HbA(1c)=6.5-10%; FPG< or =270 mg/dL) were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to placebo, sitagliptin 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg q.d. for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA(1c) at Week 12. At Week 12, treatment with sitagliptin at all doses tested provided significant (p<0.001) reductions in HbA(1c) (-0.69 to -1.04%) from baseline (7.49 to 7.65%) relative to placebo. Sitagliptin significantly (p<0.001) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG; -15.9 to -23.2 mg/dL) and 2-hour postprandial glucose (2-hr PPG; -40.3 to -65.0 mg/dL) relative to placebo, in a dose-dependent manner. At doses > or =50 mg, differences in HbA(1c), FPG, and 2-hr PPG between the sitagliptin groups were not statistically significant. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated with a low and similar incidence of hypoglycemia and minimal weight gain relative to placebo. Treatment with sitagliptin for 12 weeks provided significant and clinically meaningful reductions in HbA(1c), FPG, and 2-hr PPG across the dose range studied and was generally well tolerated in Japanese patients with T2DM.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—ED PHARMACOTHERAPY: A Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in Japanese Patients with Severe Erectile Dysfunction

Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with documented efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in men with severe ED. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 10 and 20 mg measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) among patients with severe ED (EF domain score = 1-10) in a Japanese placebo-controlled study (PCT). We also analyzed the efficacy of the two doses in men with severe ED post hoc by pooling data from three tadalafil clinical trials that evaluated these doses using a similar study design (three placebo-controlled trials), and evaluated (post hoc) the presence of organic comorbidities in patients with different levels of response to tadalafil 10 or 20 mg. Mean change in the IIEF-EF domain and mean per-patient changes in percent "yes" responses to SEP Question 2 (SEP2) and Question 3 (SEP3). Patients with severe ED in the Japanese study experienced numerically greater increases (improvements) when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (14.3 vs. 12.4; P = 0.355), SEP2 (60% vs. 57%; P = 0.781), and SEP3 (61% vs. 49%, P = 0.196). When sufficiently powered, these observations reached statistical significance in the three PCTs: patients with severe ED experienced greater increases when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (13.6 vs. 10.4; P = 0.014) and SEP3 (56% vs. 43%, P = 0.019). Both doses were well tolerated. Patients with severe ED, and especially those with an organic comorbidity, may derive greater clinical benefits from tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg.

Bicalutamide 80 mg combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) versus LHRH-A monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer: findings from a phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients

To compare combination therapy with bicalutamide 80 mg and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) versus LHRH-A alone in Japanese men with untreated advanced prostate cancer. A total of 205 patients with stage C/D prostate cancer were randomized to either LHRH-A+once-daily oral bicalutamide 80 mg or placebo. Primary study variables have been reported previously. Secondary variables included: time to achieve prostate-specific antigen < or = 4 ng/ml, time-to-treatment failure (TTTF), time-to-disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), adverse events and adverse drug reactions. Following combination therapy with bicalutamide 80 mg, there were significant (P<0.001) advantages over LHRH-A alone in terms of TTTF and TTP, but the difference in the interim OS was not statistically significant. First-line combination therapy with bicalutamide 80 mg in Japanese patients with advanced prostate cancer offers significant benefits over LHRH-A alone, with respect to TTTF and TTP. Follow-up for OS continues.

Phase 1 study of atrasentan (ABT627), novel endothelin receptor-A antagonist, in Japanese patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer

14602 Background: Endothelin (ET)-1 and its primary receptor, the ETA receptor, contribute to tumor cell growth, survival, angiogenesis and invasion. Atrasentan is a highly potent, selective ETA receptor antagonist. This study assessed safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) in Japanese patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Methods: This open-label, single-center Phase I trial evaluated the safety and PK of escalating oral atrasentan doses (2.5, 10 or 20 mg) given daily on day 1 and day 4 through 27 (except day 2 and 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 3 or greater adverse events related to study drug. Results: Eighteen patients, aged 54–74 (median; 66) were treated in cohorts of 6 patients each. The compliance of all patients was 100%. The most common toxicities were rhinitis, peripheral edema, headache, hypotension and anemia, all of which were well tolerated. These events were consistent with the anticipated vasodilatory effects or with a hemodilution effect of the study drug. DLTs were not observed. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed following oral administration of 2.5 to 20 mg, maximum plasma concentrations averaged from 0.4 to 0.8 hours. After peaking, plasma concentrations declined bi-exponentially with a terminal half-life of approximately 25 hours. In the 10 mg dosing group, the steady-state maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC0–24h) averaged 135.5 ng/mL and 533 ng h/mL, respectively. The Cmax and AUC values generally increased linearly with increasing dose after single- and multiple-dose administration. Compared to baseline, PSA decreased 50% or more in 1 patient (20 mg) and increased 25% or more in 10 patients (2.5 mg;2, 10 mg;5, 20 mg;3). The PSA of the remaining 7 patients (2.5 mg;4, 10 mg;1, 20 mg;2) ranged from &lt; 25% increase to &lt; 50% decrease. Fourteen patients continued on study drug in an extension study. Conclusions: Atrasentan is well tolerated, with no dose-limiting adverse events observed up to 20 mg in Japanese patients. The main adverse events are consistent with the vasodilatory effect of the drug. PK are linear and dose-proportional; the half-life is appropriate for once-daily dosing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.