AbstractInterpreting gravity anomalies caused by fault formations is associated with hydrocarbon systems, mineralized areas and hazardous zones and is the main goal of this research. To achieve an effective and robust model over the geologically faulted structures from gravity anomalies, we present a nature‐inspired hybrid algorithm, which synergizes the physics of the particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm with variable inertia weights. The basic principle of developed particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm method is to synergistically use the exploratory strengths of gravitational search algorithm with the exploitation capacity of particle swarm optimization in order to optimize and enhance the effectiveness by both algorithms. The technique has been tested on synthetic gravity data with varying settings of noises over geologically faulted structure before being applied to field data taken from Ahiri‐Cherla and Aswaraopet master fault present in Pranhita–Godavari valley, India. The optimization process is further refined through normalized Gaussian probability density functions, confidence intervals, histograms and correlation matrices to quantify uncertainty, stability, sensitivity and resolution. When dealing with field data, the true model is never known; in these circumstances, the quality of the outcome can only be inferred from the uncertainty in the mean model. The research utilizes a 68.27% confidence intervals to identify a location where the probability density function is more dominant. This region is then used to evaluate the mean model, which is expected to be more appropriate and closer to the genuine model. Correlation matrices further provide a clear demonstration of the strong connection between layer parameters. The results suggest that particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm is less affected by model parameters and yields geologically more consistent outcomes with little uncertainty in the model, aligning well with the available results. The analysed results show that the method we came up with works well and is stable when it comes to solving the two‐dimensional gravity inverse problem. Future research may involve extending the approach to three‐dimensional inversion problems, with potential improvements in computational efficiency and search accuracy for global optimization methods.