Metformin For Prevention Research Articles

The Effectiveness of Metformin in Diabetes Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, and prevention strategies play a crucial role in reducing its burden. Metformin has been widely studied as a potential intervention for diabetes prevention, but its overall effectiveness and impact on various populations remain unclear. This study aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the effectiveness of metformin in diabetes prevention. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for articles published from inception to June 2023. The reference lists of the included studies were also searched to retrieve possible additional studies. Any quantitative data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. A P-value of 0.05 was adopted as the significance threshold. Our analysis included 17 studies with a total sample size of 30,474. Our meta-analysis included two key analyses. First, the meta-analysis evaluating the effects of metformin on prediabetes demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.80), indicating a 35% lower odds of developing T2DM among individuals with prediabetes who received metformin interventions compared to control groups. Secondly, the meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of metformin interventions in preventing T2DM yielded a significant reduction in the risk of developing the disease. The pooled risk ratio was 0.58 (95% CI 0.44-0.77), indicating a 42% lower risk of developing T2DM in individuals receiving metformin interventions compared to those in non-metformin intervention groups. These findings provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of metformin in preventing the progression of prediabetes to T2DM and reducing the overall incidence of the disease. The review demonstrated that metformin is effective in reducing the risk of developing diabetes mellitus among individuals at risk for the disease. The findings highlight the potential of metformin as a valuable intervention for diabetes prevention, particularly in high-risk populations.

Efficacy of metformin in prevention of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a serious clinical problem with no approved drug for prevention. This study aimed to examine the neuroprotective effect of metformin against paclitaxel-induced PN in breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients with confirmed breast cancer diagnosis who were planned to receive paclitaxel were randomized to receive either metformin or placebo. Both groups received the standard chemotherapy protocol for breast cancer. Patients started metformin/placebo 1week before paclitaxel initiation and continued study interventions thereafter for nine consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the incidence of development of grade two or more paclitaxel-induced sensory PN. The PN was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE). Patients' quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACTGOG-Ntx) subscale. Pain severity was measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). Serum levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) and neurotensin (NT) were measured at baseline and at the end paclitaxel treatment. Results: A total of 73 patients (36 in the metformin arm and 37 in the control arm) were evaluated. The cumulative incidence of development of grade two or more PN was significantly lower in the metformin arm (14 (38.9%) than the control arm (28 (75.7%); p = 0.001). At the end of paclitaxel treatment, patients' QoL was significantly better in the metformin arm [median (IQR) FACTGOG-Ntx subscale of (24.0 (20.5-26.5)] compared to the control arm (21.0 (18.0-24.0); p = 0.003). The metformin arm showed lower "average" and "worst" pain scores than those detected in the control arm. At the end of the paclitaxel treatment, there was a significant difference in the median serum NGF levels between the two arms, favoring metformin (p < 0.05), while NT serum levels were deemed comparable between the two study arms (p = 0.09). Conclusion: The use of metformin in breast cancer patients offered a marked protection against paclitaxel-induced PN, which translated to better patient QoL. Clinical Trial Registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05351021, identifier NCT05351021.

Efficacy of Prophylactic Use of Metformin in Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Nondiabetic Obese Pregnant Women

Background & Objective: Maternal obesity can increases pregnancy consequences like postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, need for cesarean section, neonatal death, and fetal macrosomia. In this study, the efficacy of prophylactic use of metformin to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus in nondiabetic pregnant women with obesity was examined.Materials & Methods: This study was a clinical trial. Totally, 340 pregnant women who were in the first trimester were referred to the gynecology clinic of Motahhari hospital in Urmia after ensuring the absence of underlying diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, kidney, liver, and cardiovascular disease, without a history of allergy to metformin, in case of a singleton pregnancy, and Body Mass Index (BMI) above 30 were allocated to two equal groups. The intervention group was given 1000 mg of metformin, and the control group was given a placebo. Demographic information, including age, gravity, parity, live birth, birth, and maternal weight, previous delivery method, abortion, delivery method with its cause, polyhydramnios, NICU hospitalization, gestational age, mortality, and neonatal anomalies was also recorded. The results were analyzed using SPSS version 26.Results: In the control group, 15 mothers (9.4%) out of 160 people, and in the intervention group, 13 mothers (8.1%) had gestational diabetes (P < /i>=0.692). In the intervention group, the mean insulin dose was 10.8 ±3 units; in the control group, the mean insulin dose was 21.2±15.7 units (P=0.048). Twenty patients (6.7%) out of 297 obese patients and 8 patients (34.8%) in the morbid obesity group had diabetes (P < /i><0.001). In the control group, the mean weight of mothers was 8.04±2.5 kg; in the intervention group, it was 5.2±2.3 kg during pregnancy (P < /i><0.001). Gestational diabetes, delivery method, death one week after birth, preterm birth, polyhydramnios, and intensive care unit were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: Metformin in pregnant women with a BMI>30 deals with low maternal weight, reduced birth weight, and reduced insulin dose in diabetic mothers.

Role of metformin in prevention and prognosis of breast cancer

Dear Editor, Metformin is a hypoglycemic drug of the class biguanides used as the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The drug acts by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, decreasing intestinal absorption of glucose and circulating insulin. It has also been suggested that the drug indirectly increases insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose utilization. Data from the World Health Organization (WHO) shows that breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women, with an incidence of 1.7 million cases in 2012 (25 % of all female cancers). It is the fifth leading cause of death from cancer overall.1 A clinical trial conducted in 2019 elaborated that metformin altered host metabolism proving to be a substitute for a fasting-like mechanism that affects cancer cells' metabolism and growth environment of cancer cells including an increase in beta-OH-butyric acid (BHBA).2 It was further corroborated by a research that found an inverse relationship between metformin and BC. This is accomplished by boosting the activity of AMP-dependent protein kinase, which suppresses the mTOR-associated oncogenic signalling pathway. This induces S phase arrest and apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Data from 18,527 participants brought about 2,680 participants who used metformin at least three months before the diagnosis of BC. A multivariate study showed that this was negatively associated with BC risk (0.821, 0.726-0.912, p=0.002).3 A favourable response on disease-free survival and overall survival in BC patients with T2DM. The number of CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS) has been increased with the use of metformin engendering anti-carcinogenic effects.4 In the last 15 years, we have seen a drastic change in the demographics of BC, with an estimated increase of 70.7 to 130.6% in 2020 and 2025 relative to 2015 in the 30-34 age group in Pakistan.5 There has been a significant increase in T2DM along with increased use of metformin for its treatment which thus raises a question about the efficacy of the drug in a neoadjuvant setting for BC on Pakistani society. Further research, especially clinical trials, needs to be conducted in Pakistan including but not limited to a correlation of metformin use and incidence of BC.

Metformin in aging and aging-related diseases: clinical applications and relevant mechanisms.

Aging is a natural process, which plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases, i.e., aging-related diseases, such as diabetes, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, obesity and other metabolic abnormalities. Metformin, the most widely used antidiabetic drug, has been reported to delay aging and display protective effect on attenuating progression of various aging-related diseases by impacting key hallmark events of aging, including dysregulated nutrient sensing, loss of proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered intercellular communication, telomere attrition, genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, stem cell exhaustion and cellular senescence. In this review, we provide updated information and knowledge on applications of metformin in prevention and treatment of aging and aging-related diseases. We focus our discussions on the roles and underlying mechanisms of metformin in modulating aging and treating aging-related diseases.

Lifestyle intervention is superior to metformin in prevention of microvascular complications of diabetes in women, but socioeconomic barriers may lead to use of combination

A clinical decision report using: Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Long-term effects of lifestyle intervention or metformin on diabetes development and microvascular complications over 15-year follow-up: The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(11):866-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00291-0 for a patient with pre-diabetes who is concerned about the prevention of microvascular complications through lifestyle intervention while managing her busy schedule as a traveling house cleaner.

ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ МЕТФОРМИНА В ТЕРАПИИ И ПРОФИЛАКТИКЕ ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССЫ ТЕЛА И ОЖИРЕНИЯ, АССОЦИИРОВАННОГО С ПРИЕМОМ АНТИПСИХОТИЧЕСКИХ ПРЕПАРАТОВ, У ЖЕНЩИН: ОТКРЫТОЕ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОЕ ПРОСПЕКТИВНОЕ ПЛАЦЕБО-КОНТРОЛИРУЕМОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

Background: The prevalence of obesity and metabolic abnormalities is increased patients with mental disorders receiving psychopharmacotherapy, which significantly impairs their treatment adherence. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin in prevention and treatment obesity and overweight in patients with mental disorders receiving antipsychotics. Materials and methods : This was an open-label, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of female patients with mental disorders (age, 18 to 50). The patients were randomized into two groups in a 2:1 ratio: the treatment group received metformin and the control group received placebo. Metformin was administered at a starting dose of 500 mg daily, with subsequent up-titration every 2 weeks when necessary, up to 2000 mg daily. The treatment duration was 6 months. Results: Baseline BMI in the treatment group (N=62) was 27,3 [24,0; 30,4] kg/m 2 ; it decreased to 26,0 [22,5; 30,5] kg/m 2 , p < 0.0001, Wilсoxon test) after 6 months of treatment. The patients receiving metformin decreased their body weight by 3 [-6; 0] kg, or -4,0 [-8; 0] %. In the placebo group (N=30), the baseline BMI was 27,5 [24,0; 32,0] kg/m 2 and increased to 28,2 [25,8; 34,0] kg/m 2 at 6 month (p=0.001, Wilсoxon test), or 3 [1; 6] kg. After 6 months of treatment, the difference in BMI between the metformin and placebo groups was significant (26,0 и 28,2 kg/m 2 , respectively, р=0,027, Mann-Withney test). Six (6) of 62 patients treated with metformin had side effects and were switched to an equivalent dose of prolonged release metformin, with reduction of side effects in 5 of them. Conclusions: The use of metformin in patients with mental disorders receiving antipsychotics allows for reduction or stabilization of body weight in 80% of cases, with ≥5% decrease of body weight in 44% of patients. It is recommended to start metformin at a dose of 500 mg daily with subsequent up-titration of up to 2000 mg if necessary.

Efficacy of metformin for treatment and prevention of antipsychotic-induced overweight and obesity in women: an open-label, randomized, prospective placebo-controlled study

Background:The prevalence of obesity and metabolic abnormalities is increased patients with mental disorders receiving psychopharmacotherapy, which significantly impairs their treatment adherence.Aims:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin in prevention and treatment obesity and overweight in patients with mental disorders receiving antipsychotics.Materials and methods: This was an open-label, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of female patients with mental disorders (age, 18 to 50). The patients were randomized into two groups in a 2:1 ratio: the treatment group received metformin and the control group received placebo. Metformin was administered at a starting dose of 500 mg daily, with subsequent up-titration every 2 weeks when necessary, up to 2000 mg daily. The treatment duration was 6 months.Results:Baseline BMI in the treatment group (N=62) was 27,3 [24,0; 30,4] kg/m2; it decreased to 26,0 [22,5; 30,5] kg/m2, p &lt; 0.0001, Wilсoxon test) after 6 months of treatment. The patients receiving metformin decreased their body weight by 3 [-6; 0] kg, or -4,0 [-8; 0] %. In the placebo group (N=30), the baseline BMI was 27,5 [24,0; 32,0] kg/m2and increased to 28,2 [25,8; 34,0] kg/m2at 6 month (p=0.001, Wilсoxon test), or 3 [1; 6] kg. After 6 months of treatment, the difference in BMI between the metformin and placebo groups was significant (26,0 и 28,2 kg/m2, respectively, р=0,027, Mann-Withney test). Six (6) of 62 patients treated with metformin had side effects and were switched to an equivalent dose of prolonged release metformin, with reduction of side effects in 5 of them.Conclusions:The use of metformin in patients with mental disorders receiving antipsychotics allows for reduction or stabilization of body weight in 80% of cases, with ≥5% decrease of body weight in 44% of patients. It is recommended to start metformin at a dose of 500 mg daily with subsequent up-titration of up to 2000 mg if necessary.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Metformin for Frailty Prevention

We are conducting a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of metformin for frailty prevention. Participants are adults aged 65+ years with pre-diabetes assessed by 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Those who are frail (Fried criteria) are excluded. Participants are randomized to metformin (maximum dose of 2,000 mg/day) vs. placebo and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome is frailty (category and score); secondary outcomes are physical performance and function (short physical performance battery, 6-minute walk, lower extremity strength), systemic and skeletal muscle tissue inflammation, muscle insulin signaling, insulin sensitivity (insulin clamp), glucose tolerance (OGTT), and body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Safety assessments occur every 3 months; frailty, systemic inflammation, and OGTT are assessed at baseline and every 6 months, and insulin clamp with muscle biopsies are assessed at baseline and every 12 months. To date, 85 subjects have been randomized; 120 completers are planned. Mean age is 72.8 ± 5.7 years, 55.3% are male, and 43.5% were Hispanic. Mean BMI is 30.2±5.8 kg/m2, waist circumference is 104.4 ±15.5 cm, fasting glucose is 102.3 ± 10.0 mg/dL, Hemoglobin A1c is 5.8 ±0.3, and glucose at 2 hours during OGTT is 167.3 ± 17.8 mg/dL. Metformin is being examined in this study as a potential therapeutic agent to prevent frailty in older adults with pre-diabetes. Findings from this trial may have future implications for the screening and potential treatment of pre-diabetes in older patients with metformin for the prevention of frailty.

Metformin use in prediabetes: is earlier intervention better?

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of metformin in diabetes prevention in a prediabetic population across a range of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels at baseline. A secondary aim was to assess the effectiveness of metformin in preventing diabetes in those participants where impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was relatively more pronounced as opposed to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Participants randomised to metformin and placebo arms in the Diabetes Prevention Program study were stratified into cohorts according to level of FPG at baseline. Cumulative incidence of diabetes for the different cohorts was assessed. Change in FPG, insulin sensitivity, and levels of fasting insulin and proinsulin for the different cohorts were also calculated. The largest reductions in incidence of diabetes and FPG occurred within prediabetic persons with a higher level of FPG at baseline. Metformin was able to stabilise insulin sensitivity in every stratified sub-cohort except one. Sub-cohorts which had higher levels of insulin sensitivity at baseline experienced the largest increases in insulin sensitivity. Metformin reduced the incidence of diabetes by 43% (RR 0.57, CI 0.4-0.9) in those prediabetic persons whose IFG was more pronounced compared to a 26% (RR 0.74 CI 0.7-0.8) when all participants in the study were included. The largest reductions in both incidence of diabetes and FPG occurred in prediabetic persons with a higher level of FPG at baseline. Metformin was able to stabilise insulin sensitivity and was more effective in persons with more pronounced IFG.

An experimental study to evaluate the role of aspirin and metformin in prevention of depression in rats

Background: Depression was seen to be associated with an increased level of inflammatory biomarkers along with the disturbance in the monoamine neurotransmitter system. Current therapies are mostly focussed on the neurotransmitters imbalance but due to increasing cases of treatment failure there is a need to shift our treatment focus to other potential therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the preventive role of aspirin and metformin in stress induced model of depression in wistar rats.Methods: Fifty four wistar rats were randomly divided into nine groups as normal control, experimental control, aspirin (30 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg), metformin (50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg), two combination groups and imipramine (15 mg/kg). Depression model was created by the induction of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for consecutive 28 days. Behavioural assessment was done by evaluating immobility time in forced swim test (FST) and sucrose preference ratio (SPR) in sucrose preference test. The data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) test using SPSS software. P&lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Results: The CUMS led to an increase in immobility time and decrease in SPR. Aspirin and Metformin alone and their combinations showed statistically significant response in preventing the immobility time to increase (p&lt;0.001) and SPR to decrease (p&lt;0.001). However the response of Aspirin was comparable with Imipramine but the response of Metformin was not as significant as of Imipramine (p&gt;0.05).Conclusions: Aspirin and metformin might have a potential role in the prevention of depression.

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF METFORMIN FOR FRAILTY PREVENTION: STUDY DESIGN AND BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

Inflammation and insulin resistance are major predictors of frailty. Here we describe the study design of an ongoing double-blind, randomized controlled trial of metformin for frailty prevention. Subjects are adults aged 65+ years with pre-diabetes assessed by 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Those who are frail (Fried criteria) are excluded. Participants are randomized to metformin (maximum dose of 2,000 mg/day) vs. placebo and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome is frailty (category and score); secondary outcomes are physical performance and function (short physical performance battery, 6-minute walk, lower extremity strength), systemic and skeletal muscle tissue inflammation, muscle insulin signaling, insulin sensitivity (insulin clamp), glucose tolerance (OGTT), and body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Safety assessments occur every 3 months; frailty, systemic inflammation, and OGTT are assessed at baseline and every 6 months, and insulin clamp with muscle biopsies are assessed at baseline and every 12 months. To date, 51 subjects have been randomized; 120 completers are planned. Mean age is 73.4 ±5.7 years, 43% are female, and 39% Hispanic. Mean BMI is 30.5 ±5.5 kg/m2, waist circumference is 105 ±13.1 cm, fasting glucose is 102.3 ±8.8 mg/dL, Hemoglobin A1c is 5.8 ±0.3, and glucose at 2 hours during OGTT is 168.5 ±20.4 mg/dL. Metformin is being examined in this study as a potential therapeutic agent to prevent frailty in older adults with pre-diabetes. Findings from this trial may have future implications for the screening and potential treatment of pre-diabetes in older patients with metformin for the prevention of frailty.

Metformin In Prevention of Lupus Nephritis

Metformin In Prevention of Lupus Nephritis

Role of metformin in prevention of premature luteinization in fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a randomized controlled trial

Role of metformin in prevention of premature luteinization in fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a randomized controlled trial

Anti-cancer Effects of Metformin: Recent Evidences for its Role in Prevention and Treatment of Cancer.

Metformin is widely used for management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Recently growing evidences have shown its anti-cancer effects. The results are mainly from observational studies and thus few information is available concerning the mechanisms of action. This paper reviews recent available evidences for anti-cancer effects of metformin. The effects of metformin in specific cancers including colorectal, prostate, pancreatic, renal, cervical, endometrial, gastric, lung, breast, and ovarian cancer are reviewed. Adenosine Monophosphate (AMP)-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) plays an important role in mechanism of action of metformin. The anti-cancer mechanisms of metformin include direct and indirect effects. The direct effects of metformin include AMPK-independent and AMPK-dependent effects whereas decrease in glucose level, hyperinsulinemia, and Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) level are considered its indirect effects. Metformin also decreases both pro-inflammatory cytokines and Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF- κB) and improves the immune response to cancer cells. Although the results of recent trials confirm the efficacy of metformin in prevention and treatment of different cancers, the evidences are not adequate enough.

Abstract 1266: Metformin represses esophageal carcinogenesis in NMBzA-treated rat model through inhibiting AMPK/mTOR and Stat3 signaling pathways

Abstract Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive tumor types because of its invasiveness and metastatic potential. Metformin is one of the most used diabetic drugs for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the world. The role of metformin in prevention of the development and progression of a variety of human tumors has been studied. However, the detailed mechanisms have not yet been fully understood. In the present study, we investigated the effects of metformin on the suppression of esophageal carcinogenesis in a rat model, in which F344 rats were treated with N-nitroso-N-methylbenzylamine (NMBzA 0.30 mg/kg s.c.) three times per week for 35 weeks to induce esophageal tumors. To monitor the effects of metformin in this model, one group of rats were administered with metformin (3 g/L) in the drinking water at the first NMBzA injection. Our results showed that although there was no significant difference in body weight in rats of different groups, rats treated with NMBzA and metformin together significantly reduced the tumor formation and tumor volume when compared with rats treated with NMBzA alone. Statistic analyses demonstrated that the tumor numbers was reduced in NMBzA-treated rats received metformin to an average of 1.85 ± 1.09 tumors per rat when compared with 10.85 ± 3.86 (P &amp;lt; 0.001) in rats without metformin, while the tumor volume was decreased from 70.79 ± 41.65 mm3 per rat without metformin administration to 8.64 ± 13.45 mm3 (P &amp;lt; 0.001) with metformin administration. In addition, 7 out of 24 rats in the NMBzA-treated group died before week 35 but no rats died in the other groups. Furthermore, immunoblotting analysis indicated that p-mTORSer2448, p-Stat3Tyr705, and Cyclin D1 protein levels significantly decreased, while p-AMPKThr172 significantly increased in tumors obtained from rats treated with NMBzA and metformin when compared with tumors obtained from rats treated with NMBzA alone. Thus, our results indicated that metformin suppressed NMBzA-induced esophageal carcinogenesis via inhibition of the AMPK/mTOR and Stat3 signaling pathways. Together, our study suggested that metformin might have a potential use for treatment and prevention of esophageal cancer. Citation Format: Hongjun Fan, Zhigeng Zou, Xiying Yu, Liping Guo, Wei Jiang, Shih-Hsin Lu. Metformin represses esophageal carcinogenesis in NMBzA-treated rat model through inhibiting AMPK/mTOR and Stat3 signaling pathways [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1266. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1266

Use of Insulin Glargine and Metformin for Prevention of Diabetes and its Cardiovascular Complications

Use of Insulin Glargine and Metformin for Prevention of Diabetes and its Cardiovascular Complications

Metformin in prevention and treatment of antipsychotic induced weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundMost antipsychotics are associated with weight gain and other metabolic complications. Several randomized trials have shown metformin to be effective, but this still hasn’t been included in clinical guidelines on managing antipsychotic induced weight gain.MethodsAll double blind placebo controlled trials assessing the efficacy of metformin in the treatment of antipsychotic induced weight gain were included. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE were searched for the period January 2000-December 2015. Meta-analysis was carried out using the random effects model.ResultsMeta analysis of 12 published studies with a total of 743 patients found that in patients treated with antipsychotics, metformin treatment resulted in significantly better anthropometric and metabolic parameters than placebo. The mean change in weight was −3.27 kg (95 % CI −4.66 to −1.89) (Z = 4.64, p < 0.001). Metformin compared to placebo resulted in significant reduction in BMI [−1.13 kg/m2 (95 % CI −1.61 to −0.66)] and insulin resistance index [−1.49 (95 % CI −2.40 to −0.59)] but not fasting blood sugar [−2.48 mg/dl (95 % CI −5.54 to 0.57].ConclusionThis meta-analysis confirms that metformin is effective in treating antipsychotic induced weight gain in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1049-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

METFORMIN FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA: POSSIBLE MECHANISMS AND FUTURE RESEARCHES

METFORMIN FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA: POSSIBLE MECHANISMS AND FUTURE RESEARCHES

Metformin for Prevention and Treatment of Colon Cancer: A Reappraisal of Experimental and Clinical Data.

In the 70-80th of last century, it has been shown that the antidiabetic biguanide drugs phenformin (PF) and buformin (BF) can exert an inhibitory action on carcinogenesis in animal models and increase from 5 to 10-years survival of cancer patients. Since 2005, after first evidence publication of the capacity of metformin (MF), another biguanide, to prevent development of malignant tumors in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and suppress tumorigenesis in mice, the burst of studies started in this field focused on breast, pancreas, prostatic, endometrial and some other cancers. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most prevalent among digestive system cancers. In this mini-review are presented the available data on the capacity of antidiabetic biguanide drugs to prevent colorectal carcinogenesis and growth in vitro and in vivo in experimental models and clinical observations.