Metastatic Patients Research Articles

ASO Author Reflections: It Does Not Matter Whether Radical Prostatectomy is Performed in High-Risk Localized Disease or at the Oligometastatic Stage.

Radical prostatectomy (RP) alone has traditionally been considered insufficient for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRPC) owing to the frequent need for adjuvant salvage radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) following surgery. Previously, systemic therapy, such as ADT, was the standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients; RP was not considered viable for these patients. However, since 2015, there has been a recognition that metastatic PC patients can be categorized based on the extent of their metastases, leading to the consideration of RP for some metastatic cases. In recent years, the concept of cytoreductive RP has gained traction; studies suggest that it may improve survival rates in metastatic PC patients through mechanisms, such as tumor debulking and enhancement of the immune response. A meta-analysis of retrospective studies has shown that cytoreductive RP is associated with higher cancer-specific survival rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year intervals compared with systemic therapy alone. In our study, which followed HRPC and oligometastatic PC patients for an average of 46 months, we observed biochemical recurrence in 17.8% of HRPC and 13% of oligometastatic patients, with overall survival rates of 96.4% and 87%, respectively. Although prospective or randomized studies are still lacking, current retrospective studies, including our own, suggest promising outcomes for RP in HRPC and oligometastatic patients. With the increasing prevalence of robotic surgery, improved pelvic anatomy observation, and growing surgical confidence, the realization of prospective randomized study results may not be far off.

LINC00365 as a potential biomarker for total nephrectomy in advanced-stage renal cell carcinoma patients

BackgroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most frequent urological cancers globally that has a good prognosis in the early tumor stages. However, there is a poor prognosis in metastatic RCC patients. Therefore, it is needed to evaluate the molecular biology of RCC progression to introduce the efficient diagnostic and therapeutic markers in these patients. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have key roles in regulation of molecular mechanisms during RCC progression. In the present study, we assessed the levels of LINC00365 expressions in RCC patients to suggest that as a tumor marker in these patients. MethodsFifty fresh RCC tumor tissues and their normal margins were collected to assess the levels of LINC00365 expressions and probable correlations with clinicopathological features of RCC patients. ResultsThere was significant LINC00365 up regulation in females compared with males (p=0.050). Among the RCC patients with total nephrectomy, there was a significant LINC00365 up regulation in advanced stage compared with primary stage tumors (p=0.035). RCC patients older than 60 years old who were undergone the total nephrectomy had also significant LINC00365 up regulation compared with RCC patients younger than 60 years old (p=0.039). Conclusionsgiven the significant increase in LINC00365 expression in advanced stage RCC tumors and patients over 60 years old who had total nephrectomy; it could serve as a useful diagnostic marker in screening programs for old high-risk individuals. It was also noticed that female RCC patients had elevated levels of LINC00365 expressions in their tumor samples, suggesting its potential use as a gender-specific diagnostic marker for high-risk females. Nevertheless, evaluating the levels of LINC00365 in serum samples of RCC patients is necessary to suggest that as a reliable diagnostic marker in clinical settings.

Effects of Concurrent Administration of Spironolactone in Veterans with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Receiving Abiraterone: A Real-World Retrospective Study.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States with low survival rates once metastasized. Abiraterone is approved for use in castrate-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer and is used extensively in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. Spironolactone, a diuretic used to treat heart failure, edema, ascites, and hypertension, may increase androgen levels and reduce effectiveness of abiraterone when used concurrently to treat prostate cancer patients. While previous case studies support this, no large epidemiology studies have been conducted. The current study utilizes the large, VA prostate cancer data core and evaluates the effect of concomitant spironolactone on efficacy of abiraterone treatment in metastatic prostate cancer patients. The study selected 18,943 veterans with metastatic prostate cancer on abiraterone treatment. Of these, 581 patients (3.1%) were also on concomitant spironolactone. The concomitant treatment group, abiraterone + spironolactone, significantly differed from the abiraterone-only group in body mass index, prevalence rates of heart failure and liver disease, and being previously treated with docetaxel. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to balance sample sizes and baseline traits between the two treatment groups, abiraterone versus abiraterone + spironolactone. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare 5-year overall survival and all-cause mortality outcomes, respectively, between the two groups. After propensity score matched, the abiraterone + spironolactone group was treated with abiraterone significantly longer than the abiraterone-only group (mean ± standard deviation days 549.0 ± 552.3 vs. 435.5 ± 474.1; p = 0.0002) and had a higher 5-year overall survival rate (44% vs. 37%; p = 0.0116). Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer treated with abiraterone + spironolactone also had a lower 5-year all-cause mortality compared to those only on abiraterone (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence intervals 0.61-0.96; p = 0.012). This large VA observational study suggests that concomitant use of spironolactone does not compromise cancer control or survival of metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone.

Treatment approaches and survival outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a single-center comparative study.

Geriatric patients account for nearly half of new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. This study compares clinicopathological features, treatments, outcomes, and frailty in elderly (≥ 70) and younger (< 70) CRC patients at our center. Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic or de novo metastatic CRC between January 2015 and April 2024 were included. Demographic, pathological, and survival data were retrospectively collected. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 25, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Of the 414 non-metastatic CRC patients, 26.6% were aged ≥ 70. Elderly patients received less perioperative chemotherapy (60% vs. 81.6%, P < 0.001) and had more dose reductions (41.6% vs. 19.2%, P < 0.001). Frailty reduced perioperative chemotherapy in elderly non-metastatic patients (54.5% vs. 92.1%, P < 0.001) but did not affect dose reduction (37.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.764) or treatment duration (median 24weeks for both groups, P = 0.909). In metastatic patients, frailty shortened chemotherapy duration (9.5 vs. 15.5weeks, P = 0.129). Elderly patients had lower 5- and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates (64.7%, 60.1% vs. 83.0%, 78.8%, P = 0.004). In the de novo metastatic cohort (135 patients), age did not affect OS (19.4 vs. 17.3months, P = 0.590) or PFS (9.8 vs. 7.5months, P = 0.209). Rectal cancer (HR: 2.751, P = 0.005) and early chemotherapy termination (HR: 4.138, P < 0.001) worsened OS in non-metastatic CRC, while absence of RAS (HR: 2.043, P = 0.047), BRAF mutations (HR: 8.263, P = 0.010), and metastasectomy (HR: 3.650, P = 0.036) improved OS in metastatic CRC. Age does not independently worsen CRC survival, though early chemotherapy discontinuation impacts outcomes. Reduced-dose chemotherapy or monotherapy can help minimize adverse effects in elderly patients.

Assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X compared to taxane chemotherapy in taxane-chemo-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-labelled prostate specific membrane antigen ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X, referring with "PSMA-X" to a generic PSMA chemical compound) inhibitors has emerged as a viable treatment option in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients having previously progressed on taxane and androgen receptor inhibitors. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the therapeutic efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X compared to taxane chemotherapy in taxane-chemo-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Searches in several bibliographic databases were made using relevant key words, and articles published up to March 2024 were included. The endpoints included prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. PSA50 was defined as the median proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% decline in serum PSA from baseline. A meta-analysis of the PSA50 response rate (proportion meta-analysis) was performed, generating pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). From the initially selected 8,414 studies published between 2019 and 2023, 24 were included in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X treated group and 17 in the taxane treated group. Our findings show that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X RLT yielded comparable PSA50 responses in taxane-naïve patients versus those receiving taxane chemotherapy, despite considerable study heterogeneity. Notably, the taxane-naïve group had more extensive pretreatment. This meta-analysis combines the largest cohorts of taxane-naïve mCRPC patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X RLT and taxane-treated mCRPC. It underscores similar PSA50 response rates in both groups, suggesting a potential role for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X RLT in taxane-naïve patients who cannot or choose not to undergo chemotherapy.

Estimated cost of VEGFR TKI associated adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

IntroductionThe majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receive one or more VEGFR TKI agents, alone or in combination with an immune-oncology (IO) agent or an mTOR inhibitor. To date, the cost of adverse events (AEs) common to VEGFR TKIs has not been quantified. This study estimated the potential impact of differences in VEGFR TKI AE profiles on treatment cost efficiency in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting.MethodsPatients with documented mRCC who were treated with VEGFR TKI therapies between Jan 2015 and Mar 2021 were identified using EMR. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the first occurrence of each class effect AE. Patients were matched to 3rd party insurance claims, and costs associated to TKI AEs within 90 days of index event were captured. Average per patient AE cost data was calculated and applied to published incidence data to estimate regimen-specific AE total cost burden within a hypothetical commercial plan for mRCC patients undergoing treatment in the R/R setting.ResultsThe highest total cost for AE management was attributed to lenvatinib and everolimus use at $13,303, followed closely by sunitinib at $13,092. Tivozanib treatment was associated with the lowest total cost of AE management at $7,523, driven by the relatively lower incidence of certain high-cost AEs.ConclusionsThe estimated costs of managing VEGFR TKI class-effect AEs were lowest with tivozanib, and highest with lenvatinib and everolimus, indicating potentially differential healthcare resource burden by TKI regimen. The use of tivozanib in the 3 L + mRCC setting suggests potential costs offsets when compared to other TKI regimens.

Real-world treatment patterns, biomarker testing, and clinical outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the immunotherapy era

BackgroundTreatment for first-line (1L) metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC) changed with the introduction of immunotherapy. We describe treatment utilization and clinical outcomes in a real-world mNSCLC cohort in a 2.7-million-member state-mandated health provider.MethodsNewly diagnosed mNSCLC patients initiating systemic anti-cancer treatment (January 2017–December 2020) were identified from the National Cancer Registry. Real-world time on treatment (rwToT) was defined as the length of time between the first and last administration date of treatment. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up (cutoff: 30 June 2021).ResultsAmong 843 patients, 85% had adenocarcinoma (NSQ) and 15% had squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) histology: of these, 43% and 26% were women, median age was 67 and 69 years, and 55% and 48% had 0–1 ECOG performance status, respectively (missing: 27% and 30%, respectively). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 27.1 months (95% CI: 24.7–29.6). NSQ patients with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PDM) (N = 147) or combination (PDC) (N = 194) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC, N = 133). Median rwToT was 4.5 (95% CI: 3.5–7.6), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.6–7.6), and 2.3 (95% CI: 2.1–3.0) months, respectively; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0–1, rwToT was 9.4 (95% CI: 5.0–20.8), 7.1 (95% CI: 5.0–10.1), and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.2–4.1) months, respectively. Median rwOS from 1L was 12.5 (95% CI: 9.9–17.9), 14.8 (95% CI: 10.5–19.4), and 9.1 (95% CI: 7.1–11.5) months; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0–1, median rwOS was 25.1 [95% CI: 14.9–not reached (NR)], 17.6 (95% CI: 14.3–NR), and 11.3 (95% CI: 9.2–21.3) months, respectively. For ECOG PS 0–1 and PD-L1 ≥50% patients, median rwOS was 25.1 months (95% CI: 13.9–NR) and NR for PDM and PDC, respectively. For ECOG PS 0–1 and PD-L1 &amp;lt;50% patients, median rwOS was 14.3 (95% CI: 10.1–NR) and 11.2 (95% CI: 9.1–21.3) months for PDC and PBC, respectively.ConclusionOur real-world data support the benefit of single-agent PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high expression or PD-1 inhibitor combination for all patients diagnosed with mNSCLC with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations, initiating 1L treatment.

Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Relationship with Clinicopathological Risk Factors and Prognostic Indices in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. ctDNA has emerged as a promising biomarker for CRC management, offering real-time insights into tumor burden and genetic mutations. This study investigates the correlation between CEA levels, ctDNA, clinicopathological factors, and treatment outcomes in early and advanced CRC patients. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed data from CRC patients, including early-stage disease and metastatic disease. ctDNA levels, demographic data, and clinical parameters such as CEA, inflammatory indexes, and tumor characteristics were evaluated to determine correlations with treatment outcomes. Results: The study included 20 patients, with 60% diagnosed at the metastatic stage. The study found no statistically significant correlation between ctDNA levels and disease stage, recurrence, or overall survival. While CEA and ctDNA levels were measured, they did not demonstrate a significant relationship with treatment outcomes. Notably, ctDNA levels were higher in metastatic patients, though this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Despite its potential, the integration of ctDNA as a routine biomarker in CRC care faces challenges, including variability in measurement techniques and cost-effectiveness. However, ctDNA's ability to guide personalized treatment strategies and monitor disease recurrence holds promise. The study's findings align with previous research, suggesting ctDNA as a poor prognostic indicator, though further research is needed. ctDNA represents a significant advance in CRC management, offering non-invasive, real-time insights into tumor dynamics. Ongoing research is expected to solidify its role in personalized treatment planning, potentially leading to more effective and tailored therapies for CRC patients.

Cancer Therapy-Induced Encephalitis

Encephalitis associated with cancer therapies is a rare but serious complication that can significantly impact patients’ quality of life and it requires prompt identification and management. Over the past two decades, immunotherapy—particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors—has become a cornerstone of cancer treatment, with up to half of metastatic cancer patients in economically developed countries now receiving these therapies. The widespread adoption of immunotherapy has led to improved survival rates and long-term remissions, even in patients with advanced metastatic disease. However, as immune modulators, these therapies can trigger a range of immune-related adverse events, including a variety of novel neurological toxicities. Among these, encephalitis is of particular concern due to its potential severity, which can compromise treatment outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on this condition, highlighting optimal diagnostic strategies and management approaches to mitigate the risk of significant morbidity, while also comparing encephalitis induced by immunotherapy with that caused by traditional chemotherapies and targeted oncologic treatments.

Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, both as monotherapy and in combination with other (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) TKIs, compared with other TKIs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. We searched for relevant studies from inception to February 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Eligible studies reported on the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib alone or in combination with other TKIs versus other TKIs for metastatic RCC. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Lenvatinib, especially in combination therapies, significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.54, P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P<0.001) compared with other TKIs. Quality of life analyses showed mixed results, with EQ-5D demonstrating significant improvement (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.90-1.53, P<0.001), while EORTC QLQ-C30 was not statistically significant. ORR analysis indicated a higher likelihood of achieving a complete or partial response with lenvatinib (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.15-2.93, P=0.00). The analysis of total AEs above grade 3 showed no significant difference between lenvatinib and other TKIs (OR: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.06, P=0.26). Lenvatinib significantly enhances survival outcomes in metastatic RCC patients compared with other TKIs. While associated with various adverse events, its safety profile is comparable to other TKIs.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-EGFR Therapy Rechallenge in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a significant portion of patients presenting with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Resistance to initial anti-EGFR therapy, a key treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic CRC, remains a major challenge. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic CRC who have progressed after prior treatments. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies involving patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic CRC who received anti-EGFR therapy as a rechallenge. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using the DerSimonian/Laird random effect model, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses. Fourteen studies were included with 520 patients; 50.3% were male, and the median age was 63years old. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) ranged between 2.4 and 4.9months, while the median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 5 to 17.8months. Our pooled analysis demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 17.70% (95% CI, 8.58-26.82%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 61.72% (95% CI, 53.32-70.11%), both with significant heterogeneity (I2, 84% and 80%, respectively; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, cetuximab showed an ORR of 18.31% (95% CI, 4.67-31.94%), and panitumumab an ORR of 10.9% (95% CI, 0.00-26.82%), while the combination of both resulted in an ORR of 29.24% (95% CI, 0.00-65.84%). For DCR, cetuximab resulted in 62.1% (95% CI, 49.32-74.87%), panitumumab in 63.05% (95% CI, 52.13-73.97%), and the combination in 60.34% (95% CI, 31.92-88.77%), all with significant heterogeneity. Adverse events included anemia (15.39%), diarrhea (4.20%), hypomagnesemia (6.40%), neutropenia (22.57%), and skin rash (13.22%). Rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic CRC patients shows moderate efficacy with manageable safety profiles. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and monitoring to optimize outcomes. Further studies are warranted to refine strategies for maximizing the therapeutic benefits of anti-EGFR rechallenge.

Intrathecal anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic melanoma patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD): real-world data and evidence.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a severe complication of melanoma with a very poor prognosis. Despite improved treatment strategies and prolonged survival, the incidence of LMD has increased over the past decade. This real-world study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal anti-PD-1 treatment in melanoma patients with LMD. Melanoma patients with LMD diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology were treated with intrathecal infusions of nivolumab 20mg once every 2 weeks (n = 5) or pembrolizumab 20mg once every 3 weeks (n = 3), alongside systemic therapy. Patients received a median of 5.5 treatment cycles (range 2-9). Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on all treated patients. From June 2022 to February 2023, eight patients were treated, including four with cutaneous melanoma, two with acral melanoma, and two with primary leptomeningeal melanoma. All patients exhibited linear or small nodular enhancement of the leptomeninges on MRI. Four patients had concurrent parenchymal brain metastases. Tumor cells were identified in six patients by CSF cytology, and two patients underwent leptomeningeal biopsy for pathological diagnosis. According to the RANO-LM criteria, five patients responded to treatment with symptom improvement and reduction or disappearance of linear enhancement on MRI, while three patients developed progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 20.7 weeks (range 8.1-45.3 weeks), the median OS and median intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS) for intrathecal anti-PD-1 treatment were 21.1 and 16.1 weeks, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2, including headache (grade 1, n = 1; grade 2, n = 2) and low back pain (grade 1, n = 1). In this real-world study, intrathecal anti-PD-1 treatment demonstrated potential clinical benefits and was well tolerated in metastatic melanoma patients with LMD.

Risk stratification model for foreseeing overall survival in Chinese patients with initially metastatic small-cell lung cancer.

The study was outlined to develop and approve a nomogram and chance stratification demonstrate for foreseeing overall survival of Chinese patients with at first metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We collected information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database approximately Chinese SCLC patients with at first distant metastases between 2010 and 2015. Patients with incomplete data about the follow-up time or clinicopathological information were excluded. The included patients were randomized into the training and validation set. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed. By integrating the significant variables screened, a prescient nomogram and risk stratification model were developed. In addition, we collected 198 small-cell lung cancer patients with metastasis at diagnosis from the case database of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine as an external validation cohort. In all, 421 patients were screened from the SEER database. Multivariate examination showed that age (P = .049), sex (P = .001), grade (P = .008), chemotherapy (P = .001), liver metastasis (P = .001), and pleural invasion (P = .012) were independent prognostic factors. The C-indicator of the nomogram to anticipate overall survival was higher than that of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis classification system (0.75 vs 0.543; P < .001). A risk stratification model was encouraged to be created to precisely classify patients into 2 prognostic bunches. The survival rates anticipated by the nomogram appeared to have critical qualifications from the Kaplan-Meier curves in the entire SEER cohort. Calibration curves and survival predictions also showed strong accuracy and consistency in the external validation cohort. The nomogram provided a clear prognostic superiority over the traditional Tumor Node Metastasis system. It could help clinicians make individual risk predictions for initially metastatic Chinese SCLC cancer patients and give necessary treatment recommendations.

Predictive markers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to chemotherapy and the predictive role of clinical parameters in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were rechallenged. The study included 113 metastatic NSCLC patients who had initially responded to ICIs and platinum-based chemotherapy, either in combination in the first line or sequentially in the first and second line, but later experienced disease progression. Of those patients, 52 later received ICI rechallenge and 61 were exposed to chemotherapy. In the rechallenge cohort, the median age was 67 years, 38 patients were men (73.1%), 26 (50.0%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Patients who underwent ICI rechallenge had longer overall survival (OS) compared to those who received chemotherapy (12.9 months vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.008). Multivariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS revealed that poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS; PFS: P = 0.013 and OS: P = 0.037), absence of objective response during initial ICI therapy (PFS: P = 0.014 and OS: P = 0.028), and baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3.8 (PFS: P = 0.001 and OS: P = 0.003) were negative predictive factors of ICI rechallenge. The three parameters were included in a risk model named as the NEO score, which stratified patients who received ICI rechallenge into two predictive groups. Patients with ECOG PS 0-1, objective response during initial ICI treatment, and NLR < 3.8 (favorable group) had longer PFS (8.6 months vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001) and OS (16.6 months vs. 5.5 months, P < 0.001) compared to those with absence of all three markers (poor group). There was no association between the NEO score and survival outcomes in patients who did not undergo rechallenge. ICI rechallenge showed a survival benefit, particularly in NSCLC patients with NLR < 3.8, good ECOG PS, and objective response.

Rectal Cancer in Young Adults: A Single Center Experience.

Purpose: Individuals below the age of 40 make up only 3%-11% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. In this study, we aimed to review clinicopathological characteristics of rectal cancer in young adults. Methods: Rectal adenocancer patients aged ≤40 were included in this study from Antalya Training and Research Hospital. A single-arm descriptive study was designed. Results: There were 85 patients in the final analyses (n = 85). The median age was 37 (19-40). Mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet-cell carcinoma rates were 11.8% for each. Twenty patients (24.4%) had high-grade cancer. Fourteen patients (16.5%) had CRC history in a first-degree relative. None of the patients were diagnosed through a screening test. Of the 85 patients, 41 (48.2%) were stage 3 and 23 (27.1%) were stage 4 at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-four (54.8%) of the 62 nonmetastatic patients had neoadjuvant and 27 (43.5%) had adjuvant treatment because of having an upfront surgery before presentation. In the nonmetastatic population, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 69.7 ± 6.5%. De-novo metastatic underwent chemotherapy, and biological agents were administered when feasible. KRAS mutation rate was 56.5% among metastatic patients. The median progression-free survival for the first-line treatment was 11.2 months (5.7-16.6), and the median overall survival was 22.3 months (15.4-29.1). Conclusion: We demonstrated that rectal cancer is usually diagnosed at late stages in young individuals which is compatible with the previous reports. Low cancer awareness in young patients and their caregivers and adverse histological features were advocated as the reason for the diagnostic delay. However, future studies may elucidate the reason behind the common diagnosis at advanced stages.

Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey.

Novel therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have improved patient outcomes. However, there is uncertainty on the optimal selection of therapeutic agents for subsequent lines of therapy. We conducted a comprehensive review of published evidence from pivotal clinical trials and recent guidelines for the treatment of mCRPC. We further identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research. Key considerations to help guide treatment selection for patients with mCRPC include personal treatment history, individual clinical characteristics, symptoms, prognosis, availability of clinical trials, and other patient-specific factors. Genetic testing and prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted imaging are important tools to evaluate candidacy for newer therapeutic options such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, alone or in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. This article provides an overview of the evolving treatment landscape of mCRPC, discussing guideline-recommended treatment options and data from key clinical trials, while highlighting ongoing trials that may impact the future treatment landscape. Recommendations for optimal treatment sequencing based on individual patient factors are provided.

Treatment Strategies' Impact on Progression-Free Survival According to RMST Function in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study from Romania.

Background: This retrospective study investigates the impact of various treatment strategies on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a significant global health issue. Methods: We employed the restricted mean survival time (RMST) to evaluate how different treatments affect PFS over a defined period. The study included 225 patients with mCRC who were treated between 2015 and 2023 at the Oncology Department of Colțea Clinical Hospital in Bucharest. To assign KRAS status, mutation data from exons 2, 3, and 4 of the KRAS gene were required. Eligibility criteria included a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, a valid RAS mutation test from a solid biopsy, radiological confirmation of stage IV disease by computed tomography, and at least one line of systemic treatment in the metastatic setting. Results: Our analysis revealed a small difference in PFS based on KRAS status, but this difference was not statistically significant. Neither sex nor the urban versus rural environment impacted PFS; however, the data indicated that educational level affected survival outcomes. Conclusions: Consistent with existing literature, our findings showed no survival benefit from locoregional treatments such as surgery of the primary tumor or curative radiotherapy at diagnosis. In contrast, resection of hepatic metastases was associated with improved survival outcomes.

P1.09A.03 Concurrent Combination of EGFR-TKIs and Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

P1.09A.03 Concurrent Combination of EGFR-TKIs and Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

A 14-year retrospective of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer treatment at one comprehensive cancer center: Impact of the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and trastuzumab-emtansine sequence versus trastuzumab on overall survival.

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies represent a significant improvement in the treatment of the HER2 + metastatic cancer, which is associated with a worse prognosis. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) data in patients treated with trastuzumab + pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in the second line of metastatic treatment (Arm A) versus patients treated with trastuzumab alone (Arm B). Progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line metastatic patients was also compared in both arms. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients from February 2008 to August 2022. OS and PFS of both arms were described and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and CHIMIO prescribing software. Results: The total duration of metastatic treatment of the 82 patients was significantly longer in the arm A (43.2 ± 28 months vs 33.6 ± 28.9 months), as was the median time to death (59 vs 52 months). The OS data showed a significant reduction in the risk of death in the arm A (Hazard Ratio = 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval [0.37-0.94]; p = 0.02). No difference was shown for PFS. Conclusion: The trastuzumab/pertuzumab/T-DM1 combination showed a significant improvement in OS. Our results are in line with the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA studies, but long-term responders in the arm A may have impacted our results. The absence of difference in term of PFS in first metastatic line may be explained by a selection bias, as patients in the arm A potentially have more aggressive forms.

Rationale for irradiation of persisting oligo-skeletal metastases to improve survival of metastatic neuroblastoma patients with a poor response to chemotherapy: A retrospective study.

Persistent metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG)-positive skeletal metastases post induction in high-risk neuroblastoma correlate with a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential rationale for a prospective randomized study evaluating the impact on event-free survival of the irradiation of residual oligo-skeletal metastases. Patients over 1year with a stage M neuroblastoma treated between 2000 and 2020 at Gustave Roussy were identified. Patients with a positive mIBG scan at diagnosis and persistent skeletal metastases after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) were included. Data were retrospectively collected and mIBG scans reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians. Persistent skeletal uptake after HDC was observed in 30/201 patients (15%). Four patients reached a complete response at the end of maintenance treatment and did not relapse (median follow-up [FU] 8years [1.8-11.8]), while two patients had progressive disease during maintenance. Among the 24 patients with persistent skeletal uptakes at the end of treatment, seven had a persistent response (median FU 8.2years [4-15.6]). Median SIOPEN (International Society of Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma) scores post consolidation and at the end of treatment were, respectively, 2 [1-6] and 2 [0-4] for patients with persistent responses compared to 4 [1-28] and 2 [1-17] for patients with progressive diseases. Median SIOPEN score at progression was 34 [2-56]. Our study underlines that only a minority of patients had persistent skeletal mIBG-positive scans after HDC. Recurrence mainly occurred in disease sites present at diagnosis that cleared with chemotherapy. On-therapy control of the disease is the main challenge. These results highlight the complexity of conducting a randomized study exploring this strategy.