Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies Research Articles

Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Type 1 Immunohistochemical Expression in Carcinomas of Gynecologic Origin.

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is a new reportedly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for carcinomas of breast origin, including triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2) tumors. In our practice, we have observed a subset of cases of nonmammary carcinomas that are positive for TRPS1, with higher frequency in cytology effusion samples with metastatic gynecologic malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of TRPS1 in a large tissue cohort of Müllerian carcinomas. We retrospectively retrieved 105 cases of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gynecologic tumors from our surgical pathology archives. Cases corresponded to tumors of tubo-ovarian (17 high-grade serous carcinomas, 3 low-grade serous carcinomas, 2 clear cell carcinomas, and 8 endometrioid adenocarcinomas), endometrial (25 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 8 serous carcinomas, 6 clear cell carcinomas, 12 carcinosarcomas, 1 dedifferentiated carcinoma, and 1 mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma), cervical (6 human papillomavirus [HPV]-associated squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs], 11 HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinomas, and 2 HPV-independent gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas), and vulvar (2 HPV-independent SCCs and 1 HPV-associated SCC) origins. Immunohistochemistry for TRPS1 was performed in whole tissue sections and assessed for positivity (≥5% of nuclear labeling), distribution (focal: 5% to 49%, diffuse: 50% to 100%), and intensity (1+, 2+, 3+) in tumor cells. Positive TRPS1 staining was observed in 51.4% (54/105) of cases. Most tumors (64.8%) demonstrated diffuse labeling, while focal in 35.2%. Among positive cases, the intensity was predominantly 1+ (57.4%), followed by 2+ (33.3%) and 3+ (9.2%). Tumors with a high percentage of positivity overall consisted of tubo-ovarian (70%) and endometrial carcinomas (58.4%). TRPS1 immunostain is often expressed in gynecologic carcinomas. Awareness of this phenomenon is crucial when evaluating challenging cases in which the differential diagnosis includes a malignancy of breast origin, to avoid misclassification of the primary site.

Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 (H101) in Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundTo assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant human adenovirus type 5 (H101) in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic gynecologic malignancies.MethodsThe study retrospectively enrolled patients with persistent/recurrent/metastatic gynecologic malignancies who received H101-containing treatment at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2021. H101 was injected intratumorally into target lesions and dosage was calculated based on tumor diameter once a day for five consecutive days. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Safety was the exploratory endpoint. Depending on prior treatment, patients received H101 either as monotherapy or as a combination therapy.ResultsTotally, 29 patients were enrolled in the study. Median follow-up was 6.3 months (range: 3.2-27.9) from data analysis cut-off on December 31, 2021. The LC rate at 3 months was 44.8%, while ORR was 72.4%. Median DOR and PFS rates were not determined. The DOR rate, PFS rate at 6 and 12 months were 88.1%, 74.6% and 70.5%, 62.2%, respectively. Responses were observed in all four cancer types. Most treatment-related adverse events (90.5%) were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being fever (70%). Clinically significant adverse events were uncommon (7.9% in grade 3 and 1.6% in grade 4). No treatment-related deaths occurred.ConclusionOur study showed that H101 (either monotherapy or combination therapy) has promising efficacy and favorable safety in patients with persistent, recurrent, metastatic gynecologic malignancies.

Hormonal Therapy for Gynecological Cancers: How Far Has Science Progressed toward Clinical Applications?

Simple SummaryThe most common therapies for severe and recurrent gynecological cancers are hormone therapy and chemotherapy, and responsiveness to therapy is a key component in prognosis and survivability. Hormone therapy has recently been demonstrated to be an excellent cancer treatment approach. Hormone treatment for gynecological cancers is taking drugs that decrease hormone levels or impede their biological activity, halting or slowing cancer progression. Hormone therapy works by suppressing the multiplication of cancer cells triggered by hormones. Hormonal therapy, such as progestogens or tamoxifen, is frequently recommended for patients with hormone-sensitive recurrent or metastatic gynecological cancers, but response rates and therapeutic effects are inconsistent. Therefore, we discuss the pathogenesis of gynecological malignancies from the hormonal landscape and the use of hormonal therapies toward clinical applications.In recent years, hormone therapy has been shown to be a remarkable treatment option for cancer. Hormone treatment for gynecological cancers involves the use of medications that reduce the level of hormones or inhibit their biological activity, thereby stopping or slowing cancer growth. Hormone treatment works by preventing hormones from causing cancer cells to multiply. Aromatase inhibitors, anti-estrogens, progestin, estrogen receptor (ER) antagonists, GnRH agonists, and progestogen are effectively used as therapeutics for vulvar cancer, cervical cancer, vaginal cancer, uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer. Hormone replacement therapy has a high success rate. In particular, progestogen and estrogen replacement are associated with a decreased incidence of gynecological cancers in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV). The activation of estrogen via the transcriptional functionality of ERα may either be promoted or decreased by gene products of HPV. Hormonal treatment is frequently administered to patients with hormone-sensitive recurring or metastatic gynecologic malignancies, although response rates and therapeutic outcomes are inconsistent. Therefore, this review outlines the use of hormonal therapy for gynecological cancers and identifies the current knowledge gaps.

A phase I trial of nab-paclitaxel/bevacizumab (AB160) nano-immunoconjugate therapy for metastatic gynecological malignancies: MC1371 (NCT02020707).

e18097 Background: AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with bevacizumab (BEV) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing high levels of vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Both taxanes (GOG-0129C, GOG-0126R, GOG-0127V) and BEV (GOG-0229E, AURELIA, GOG-0227C) have demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer (EC), ovarian cancer (OC), and cervical cancer (CC), respectively. Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted in patients with EC, platinum-resistant OC and CC who had prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AB160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 125 mg/m2 with BEV at 50 mg/m2. There were 2 higher dose levels: DL2 (NP at 150 mg/m2 with BEV at 60 mg/m2) and DL3 (NP at 175 mg/m2 with BEV at 70 mg/m2). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade (G) 4 neutropenia or anemia, PLT < 25,000, serum creatinine ≥2 times baseline, G2-4 neurologic toxicity or G3-4 non-hematologic toxicities. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using RECIST criteria. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine women 41 – 74 years of age (median 57) have enrolled (5 with EC and 4 with OC); data are available for the first 8. No DLTs have been observed among the 3 women enrolled on DL1, 3 women on DL2, and 2 women on DL3. All 3 patients on DL3 continue on treatment. The other 6 patients have discontinued due to adverse reactions (3), progression (2), and patient choice (1). The median number of cycles administered is 6 (4-14). The most common severe (G3/4) toxicities include neutropenia (37.5%) and leukopenia (25%). There have been 5 partial responses (62.5%): 1 on DL1 and 2 each on DL2 and DL3. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusions: AB160 therapy is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with previously treated metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Further clinical testing is being pursued in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02020707.

Metastatic gynecologic malignancies: advances in treatment and management.

Gynecologic cancers comprise of mostly uterine, ovarian, and cervical malignancies and are responsible for 95,000 new cases annually in the United States. Uterine cancer is the most common and the number of new cases and mortality has been increasing. Cervical cancer has decreased due to screening, early detection, and treatment of pre-invasive cancers. However, ovarian cancer remains the most lethal because of advanced stage at diagnosis and drug resistance. The metastatic spread pattern differs amongst these cancers, with uterine and cervical cancer found mostly in the primary organ and ovarian cancer disseminating throughout the peritoneum and upper abdomen at presentation. The primary treatment of ovarian cancer typically involves surgery followed by systemic therapy for more advanced disease. Previously, systemic chemotherapy with platinums, taxanes, doxorubicin, topotecan, and gemcitabine has been the standard in either upfront or recurrent setting. With molecular and genetic breakthroughs, we now have over eight new indications and five novel biologic therapies including antiangiogenics, poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, and immunotherapies approved over the last 3years. In this review, we will examine the biology of gynecologic cancer metastasis and focus on new treatment options for these cancers with a focus on ovarian cancer.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of gynecologic malignancies in Israeli population to reveal potentially clinically relevant genomic alterations and opportunities for targeted therapies.

e16578 Background: Treatment options for relapsed and refractory metastatic gynecologic malignancies have limited success. Given the scant availability of mechanism-based clinical trials in Israel,...

Gastrointestinal Toxicity After Robotic Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Treatment of Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies

Gastrointestinal Toxicity After Robotic Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) for Treatment of Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies

Hematological Toxicity After Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery for Treatment of Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies

To evaluate hematological toxicity after robotic stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) for treatment of women with metastatic abdominopelvic gynecologic malignancies. A total of 61 women with stage IV gynecologic malignancies treated with abdominopelvic SBRT were analyzed after ablative radiation (2400 cGy/3 divided consecutive daily doses) delivered by a robotic-armed Cyberknife SBRT system. Abdominopelvic bone marrow was identified using computed tomography-guided contouring. Fatigue and hematologic toxicities were graded by retrospective assignment of common toxicity criteria for adverse events (version 4.0). Bone marrow volume receiving 1000 cGy (V10) was tested for association with post-therapy (median 32 days [25%-75% quartile, 28-45 days]) white- or red-cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and platelet counts as marrow toxicity surrogates. In all, 61 women undergoing abdominopelvic SBRT had a median bone marrow V10 of 2% (25%-75% quartile: 0%-8%). Fifty-seven (93%) of 61 women had received at least 1 pre-SBRT marrow-taxing chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Bone marrow V10 did not associate with hematological adverse events. In all, 15 grade 2 (25%) and 2 grade 3 (3%) fatigue symptoms were self-reported among the 61 women within the first 10 days post-therapy, with fatigue resolved spontaneously in all 17 women by 30 days post-therapy. Neutropenia was not observed. Three (5%) women had a grade 1 drop in hemoglobin level to <10.0 g/dL. Single grade 1, 2, and 3 thrombocytopenias were documented in 3 women. Abdominopelvic SBRT provided ablative radiation dose to cancer targets without increased bone marrow toxicity. Abdominopelvic SBRT for metastatic gynecologic malignancies warrants further study.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery for Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies

Background: Recurrent gynecologic cancers are often difficult to manage without significant morbidity. We conducted a phase II study to assess the safety and the efficacy of ablative robotic stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) in women with metastatic gynecologic cancers. Methods: A total of 50 patients with recurrent gynecologic cancer who had single or multiple (≤4) metastases underwent robotic-armed Cyberknife SBRT (24Gy/3 daily doses). Toxicities were graded prospectively by common toxicity criteria for adverse events (version 4.0). SBRT target responses were recorded following RECIST criteria (version 1.0). Rates of clinical benefit for SBRT and non-radiosurgical disease relapse were calculated. Disease-free and overall survivals were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for prognostic variables. Findings: SBRT was safely delivered, with 49 (98%) of 50 patients completing three prescribed fractions. The most frequent grade 2 or higher adverse events attributed to SBRT included fatigue (16%), nausea (8%), and diarrhea (4%). One (2%) grade four hyperbilirubinemia occurred. SBRT target response was 96% (48 of 50 patients). A 6-month clinical benefit was recorded in 34 [68% (95% CI, 53.2, 80.1)] patients. No SBRT targeted disease progressed. Non-radiosurgical disease relapse occurred in 31 (62%) patients. Median disease-free survival was 7.8 months (95% CI, 4.0, 11.6). Median overall survival was 20.2 months (95% CI, 10.9, 29.5). Interpretation: SBRT safely controlled metastatic gynecologic cancer targets. Given an observed high rate of non-radiosurgical disease relapse, a phase I trial assessing co-administration of SBRT and cytotoxic chemotherapy is underway. Funding: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center.

18FDG-PET/CT Definition of Clinical Target Volume for Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery Treatment of Metastatic Gynecologic Malignancies.

The objective of the current article was to evaluate 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose 18F-FDG) as measured by positron emission tomography for delineation of abdominopelvic gross tumor volumes (GTV) for stereotactic body radiosurgery treatment (SBRT) of metastatic gynecologic cancers. A retrospective review of SBRT was conducted in 27 women with stage IV gynecologic cancers recurring in para-aortic lymph nodes. Robotic SBRT involved 2400 cGy in 3 consecutive 800 cGy daily fractions prescribed to a 3.0 mm expanded planning tumor volume (PTV) defined by both CT-based and 18F-FDG-based GTVs. In this study, 18F-FDG-based GTVs led to significantly larger PTVs in all 27 women, than if they had been based on CT GTVs alone (P < 0.001). Enlarged PTVs may have resulted from the breathing-induced target motion during the time of 18F-FDG image acquisition smearing 18F-FDG signal over a greater anatomic dimension. Ultimately, SBRT-target local control, based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria, was 96% (26 of 27), and associated with minor reversible toxicity. The use of 18F-FDG to define SBRT target volumes warrants further interrogation in SBRT clinical trials.

Usefulness of imaging-guided catheter drainage and talc sclerotherapy in patients with metastatic gynecologic malignancies and symptomatic pleural effusions.

The purpose of our study was to assess the usefulness of imaging-guided catheter drainage and talc sclerotherapy in patients with metastatic gynecologic malignancies and symptomatic pleural effusions and to assess the affect of ascites on the success rate of this treatment. Twenty-five patients (mean age, 63 years) with metastatic gynecologic malignancies who had 26 symptomatic effusions treated at our institution over a 4-year period with imaging-guided catheter drainage and talc sclerotherapy were included in this study. Response to treatment was assessed by comparing pre-, immediate post-, and 30-day postsclerotherapy chest radiographs. Response to the treatment was graded as complete (no reaccumulation), partial (accumulation above immediate post- but below presclerotherapy level), or no response (reaccumulation to or above the presclerotherapy level). The presence of ascites on CT (n = 23), sonography (n = 1), direct intraoperative visualization (n = 1), or at physical examination (n = 1) was also noted. Of the 25 patients, 13 patients with 14 treated malignant effusions survived at least 30 days after sclerotherapy and formed the final study group. The remaining patients either died (n = 11) or were lost to follow-up (n = 1). At 30 days, 12 of the 14 treated effusions showed complete responses and one showed a partial response. The overall response rate was 86%. Abdominal ascites was present at the time of treatment in 11 patients (79%) and did not affect the success rate (p > 0.999). Imaging-guided catheter drainage and talc sclerotherapy are an effective treatment for symptomatic pleural effusions in patients with metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Ascites does not adversely affect the response to pleurodesis.

Expression of the CD44 adhesion molecule in primary and metastatic gynecologic malignancies and their cell lines.

CD44 is a cell-surface molecule that has been shown to have several splicing isoforms. In various human tumors, such as primary colon and breast tumors, and their metastases, alterations of CD44 isoform expression have been reported. The present study was performed to investigate CD44 alternative transcript splicing in gynecologic malignancies. We performed reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of CD44 splice variant expression on mRNA transcripts from ovarian carcinomas (six primary and 15 metastatic tumors) from 21 patients and from cervical carcinomas (25 primary and two metastatic tumors) from 25 patients. We also performed this analysis on five different ovarian carcinoma cell lines established from ascitic fluid and primary tumors, and two cervical carcinoma cell lines. We included eight normal female genital tissue specimens and one additional placenta specimen in our RT-PCR analysis for comparison with CD44 expression of carcinomas. The CD44H isoform was amplified in all of the specimens. None of eight normal tissue specimens, including myometrium and ovary, expressed CD44R1 transcripts. But the CD44R1 transcript was expressed in 2/6 (33.3%) primary ovarian carcinomas and in 7/15 (46.6%) metastatic ovarian carcinomas. In cervical carcinoma, 13/25 (52.0%) primary tumors and 2/2 (100.0%) metastatic tumors expressed CD44R1. The CD44R1 transcript was expressed increasingly during ovarian and cervical tumor progression (P = 0.026 and P = 0.002, respectively). In conclusion, the frequency of CD44R1 transcript expression increased during ovarian and cervical carcinoma progression, and analysis of CD44 splice variants may be useful in detecting primary and metastatic gynecologic malignancies.

Analysis of fine-needle aspirates for HPV by PCR may be useful in diagnosis of metastatic gynecologic malignancies

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA has been shown by molecular hybridization studies to persist in both recurrent and metastatic disease in tumors of the female genital tract. We report here the use of the polymerase chain reaction to identify HPV DNA in material from fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of recurrent or metastatic lesions to document the primary malignancy arising in the lower genital tract. Fine-needle aspirates of suspected recurrent or metastatic tumors were obtained from nine patients with carcinoma of the lower genital tract and five patients with malignancies that have not been associated with HPV. DNA was extracted from the FNA and tissue block, when available, and amplified with HPV 6, HPV 16, and HPV 18 specific primers. In eight of the nine tumors from the lower genital tract, HPV DNA was identified in both the primary and metastatic lesions. In every case the HPV genotype was identical. One cervical carcinoma and five non-HPV associated tumors were negative for papillomavirus DNA. This study demonstrates that molecular hybridization techniques can be useful in identifying the source of a metastasis and have the potential to diagnose the presence of metastatic disease by detecting HPV DNA even when the cytologic criteria are equivocal.