Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Research Articles

Phase 1 study of BDTX-1535, an oral 4th generation covalent EGFR inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Preliminary dose escalation results.

2068 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) gene is the most frequently altered oncogenic driver in glioblastoma (GBM). In-frame deletion alterations (e.g., EGFRvIII) and missense mutations co-occur in the setting of EGFR gene amplification and are characterized as a hallmark of disease pathogenesis in GBM. BDTX-1535 is an oral, highly potent, brain penetrant, selective, irreversible 4th generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets EGFR alterations in GBM and NSCLC. Preliminary results of the Phase 1 dose escalation study (NCT05256290) of patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM) are presented here. Methods: BDTX-1535-101 is a first-in-human study that enrolled patients with either rGBM harboring EGFR alterations following standard of care or patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC that progressed on prior EGFR TKIs. Using an adaptive Bayesian optimal interval design in the Phase 1 part, patients were enrolled at increasing dose cohorts and were treated daily for 21-day cycles until treatment discontinuation. The primary objective was to determine the BDTX-1535 recommended Phase 2 dose based on the overall safety, PK, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity. Results: Twenty-seven patients with rGBM were enrolled in the Phase 1 cohort that consisted of 54 patients in total including 27 patients with NSCLC. Patients were treated across seven dose levels (15mg – 400mg QD). The mean age of patients with rGBM was 58.7 years (range 41-85) with 96% of patients with previous temozolomide (TMZ) treatment and a median of 2 lines of prior therapy (range 1-4). The most common all-grade treatment-related AEs across all cohorts were rash (78%), diarrhea (41%), fatigue (15%), stomatitis (11%), decreased appetite (11%), nausea (11%) and paronychia (11%). Gr 3 TRAEs ≥ 10% included rash (19%) reported at 300 or 400 mg QD doses. Plasma exposure of BDTX-1535 increased dose proportionally and had a half-life of ~15h, supporting once daily dosing. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is 300 mg QD. Among 19 evaluable patients for response based on RANO criteria, 1 confirmed partial response was observed and 8 patients achieved stable disease. Five patients remained on BDTX-1535 with stable disease for an extended period (>5 months) who previously performed poorly on TMZ with short treatment duration, and 1 patient continues on BDTX-1535 after 16 months of treatment. Conclusions: BDTX-1535 was well-tolerated up to 300mg daily, which is the MTD, and promising preliminary clinical activity was observed in patients with rGBM after relapse on standard of care treatment. Given the inability to reconfirm EGFR status at the time of treatment with BDTX-1535 in this Phase 1 trial, further exploration of BDTX-1535 in a “window of opportunity” study is ongoing (NCT06072586). Clinical trial information: NCT05256290 .

Infusion-Related Reaction Management With Amivantamab for EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation NSCLC: A Practical Guide for Advanced Practitioners

Many targeted therapies to treat genetic mutations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been developed. Amivantamab (Rybrevant), a bispecific antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021 for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC EGFR exon 20 insertions, whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Amivantamab is administered intravenously weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks starting at Week 5, as 1,050 mg (body weight [BW] < 80 kg) or 1,400 mg (BW ≥ 80 kg), with the first dose split over 2 days. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are common with amivantamab and may present as chills, dyspnea, nausea, chest discomfort, and vomiting. To aid in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of IRRs, we evaluated infusion duration, IRR timing, and IRR severity in this post hoc analysis of patients who received amivantamab in CHRYSALIS. Infusion duration decreased over time, with a median infusion time at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) of 4.70 hours (1,050 mg) and 5.08 hours (1,400 mg), decreasing to 2.20 and 2.25 hours, respectively, by C1D22. Of the 273 IRRs, 98% occurred on C1D1 or C1D2, with median onset and time to resolution of 60 minutes. Most IRRs occurred during the infusion, were low grade, and were manageable with intervention strategies or treatment modifications. Advanced practitioners are critical in preventing, diagnosing, and managing IRRs, including educating patients and families, accurately administering infusions, prescribing premedications, and closely monitoring for IRRs.

Mobocertinib: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations represent ~6%-12% of all EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. First-, second-, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have limited clinical activity against EGFR ex20ins mutations. Mobocertinib is a first-in-class oral EGFR TKI that selectively targets in-frame EGFR ex20ins mutations in NSCLC; accelerated approval in the United States was granted for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutations whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Accelerated approval was based on the results from the three-part, open-label, multicenter, pivotal phase I/II nonrandomized clinical trial (NCT02716116) that enrolled 114 patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR ex20ins mutation-positive NSCLC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and received mobocertinib at the recommended dosage of 160 mg once daily. At the November 1, 2021, data cutoff date, the confirmed objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC) was 28%, median duration of response was 15.8 months, median progression-free survival per IRC was 7.3 months, and median overall survival was 20.2 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal- and skin-related. The phase III EXCLAIM-2 study evaluated mobocertinib versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC; however, the primary end point was not met, resulting in initiating voluntary withdrawal of mobocertinib worldwide. This mini-review article summarizes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, key clinical trials, and clinical efficacy and safety data for mobocertinib.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Podcast Discussion.

Patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are widely treated with osimertinib, the preferred first-line treatment option. However, disease progression inevitably occurs, driven by EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent mechanisms of resistance. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment following progression with osimertinib but responses to platinum-based chemotherapy are transient. Salvage therapies, which are used after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy, have poor clinical outcomes in addition to substantial toxicity. In this podcast, we discuss the current treatment landscape and emerging therapeutic options for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease has progressed following treatment with osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy.Podcast audio available for this article.

Using Radiomics to Differentiate Brain Metastases From Lung Cancer Versus Breast Cancer, Including Predicting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status.

We evaluated the feasibility of using multiregional radiomics to identify brain metastasis (BM) originating from lung adenocarcinoma (LA) and breast cancer (BC) and assess the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Our experiment included 160 patients with BM originating from LA (n = 70), BC (n = 67), and other tumor types (n = 23), between November 2017 and December 2021. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. A total of 1967 quantitative MRI features were calculated from the tumoral active area and peritumoral edema area and selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression with 5-fold cross-validation. We constructed radiomic signatures (RSs) based on the most predictive features for preoperative assessment of the metastatic origins, EGFR mutation, and HER2 status. Prediction performance of the constructed RSs was evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The developed multiregion RSs generated good area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identifying the LA and BC origin in the training (AUCs, RS-LA vs RS-BC, 0.767 vs 0.898) and validation (AUCs, RS-LA vs RS-BC, 0.778 and 0.843) cohort and for predicting the EGFR and HER2 status in the training (AUCs, RS-EGFR vs RS-HER2, 0.837 vs 0.894) and validation (AUCs, RS-EGFR vs RS-HER2, 0.729 vs 0.784) cohorts. Our results revealed associations between brain MRI-based radiomics and their metastatic origins, EGFR mutations, and HER2 status. The developed multiregion combined RSs may be considered noninvasive predictive markers for planning early treatment for BM patients.

Safety, Tolerability, and Antitumor Activity of Zipalertinib Among Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertions.

Although several agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, toxicities related to the inhibition of wild-type (WT) EGFR are common with these agents and affect overall tolerability. Zipalertinib (CLN-081, TAS6417) is an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a novel pyrrolopyrimidine scaffold leading to enhanced selectivity for EGFR ex20ins-mutant versus WT EGFR with potent inhibition of cell growth in EGFR ex20ins-positive cell lines. This phase 1/2a study of zipalertinib enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Seventy-three patients were treated with zipalertinib at dose levels including 30, 45, 65, 100, and 150 mg orally twice a day. Patients were predominantly female (56%), had a median age of 64 years, and were heavily pretreated (median previous systemic therapies 2, range 1-9). Thirty six percent of patients had received previous non-ex20ins EGFR TKIs and 3/73 (4.1%) patients received previous EGFR ex20ins TKIs. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade included rash (80%), paronychia (32%), diarrhea (30%), and fatigue (21%). No cases of grade 3 or higher drug-related rash or diarrhea were observed at 100 mg twice a day or below. Objective responses occurred across all zipalertinib dose levels tested, with confirmed partial response (PR) observed in 28/73 (38.4%) response-evaluable patients. Confirmed PRs were seen in 16/39 (41%) response-evaluable patients at the dose of 100 mg twice a day. Zipalertinib has encouraging preliminary antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile, including low frequency of high-grade diarrhea and rash.

Phase II trial of lazertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (M+), metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with asymptomatic or mild symptomatic brain metastases after failure of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (KCSG LU20-15).

9054 Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases occur not infrequently, ultimately devastating consequences in advanced EGFR M+ NSCLC. Lazertinib, a 3rd-generation (G) EGFR-TKI, has shown potent antitumor activity in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We conducted a phase II single-arm study of lazertinib in EGFR M+ NSCLC patients (pts) having CNS metastases to evaluate its CNS activity. Methods: The patients exhibiting CNS progression upon 1st or 2nd-G EGFR-TKIs with least one measurable CNS lesion were enrolled. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in evaluable for response set (ERS). Secondary endpoints included iORR without T790M mutation, overall ORR (oORR), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) in ERS. Overall survival (OS) and safety analyses were performed in pts who received at least one dose of lazertinib. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration was measured as exploratory biomarker study. Results: Of 40 pts enrolled, 38 were evaluable for tumor response. Nineteen pts harbored exon 19 deletion and 21 pts for exon 21 L858R and 30% of pts had radiologic evidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LM) with 2 cytological confirmed cases. Forty-five percent of pts received afatinib as first line treatment, followed by 42.5% of gefitinib and 12.5% of erlotinib. Baseline plasma samples of all the 40 patients obtained for liquid-based next-generation sequencing (Guardant360) and T790M was found in 5 pts prior to lazertinib treatment. iORR was 57.9% (22/38). iORR with T790M-negative, oORR, and DCR were 54.5%, 39.5%, and 97.4%, respectively. With median follow-up of 13.6 months, median iPFS and OS were not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) emerged in 85.0% of pts with most common TRAEs being skin rash (50.0%) and paresthesia (42.5%). Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 10.0%. The CSF penetration rates of lazertinib and its metabolite (YH26334) were 46.2% and 33.1%, respectively in paired CSF and plasma samples, suggesting high CNS penetration efficacy. Conclusions: Lazertinib has substantial CNS activity regardless of T790M status against the progression of intracranial metastases ± LM during the treatment of 1st or 2nd-G EGFR-TKIs in metastatic EGFR M+ NSCLC pts. These results suggest that using lazertinib instead of brain local treatment would be a potential strategy in EGFR M+ NSCLC, who progressed on CNS metastases after prior EGFR-TKI. Clinical trial information: NCT05326425 . [Table: see text]

Osimertinib rechallenge in advanced EGFR non-small cell lung cancer patients.

e21196 Background: Treatment after front line osimertinib (osi) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a clinical challenge. Interval chemotherapy after osi may eradicate clones responsible for EGFR tyrosine kinase (TKI) resistance, which may re-sensitize the tumor to EGFR inhibition. We describe outcomes of metastatic EGFR NSCLC patients who undergo osi rechallenge. Methods: NSCLC patients with confirmed EGFR mutation were retrospectively reviewed from a single institutional database from 1/2010-12/2022. We identified patients who received osi after interval therapy following initial osi progression. Patient characteristics and tumor type were collected via chart review. Response was determined using RECIST 1.1. Results: Seventeen patients with osi rechallenge after initial progression were identified. Median age at time of osi rechallenge was 62 yrs (range 42-73). Patients were predominantly female (n = 11, 65%), white (n = 9, 53%) and Asian (n = 8, 47%), never smokers (n = 13, 77%). Patients had either del19 mutation (n = 10, 59%) or L858R mutation (n = 7, 41%). Twelve patients (71%) received a 1st or 2nd generation EGFR TKI (erlotinib n = 10, afatinib n = 2) prior to initial osi; eight patients (47%) had confirmed T790M mutation. Eight patients (47%) had CNS metastases prior to osi rechallenge. Twelve patients (71%) had ECOG 0-1 at time of rechallenge. Patients had a median of 4 (range 2-5) lines of therapy prior to osi rechallenge. Median time between initial osi discontinuation and osi rechallenge was 13.8 months (range 3.2-50.7). In the interim, 17 patients (100%) received chemotherapy, 2 (12%) received immunotherapy monotherapy, 3 (18%) received antibody drug conjugate, and 1 (6%) received TKI. Sixteen patients had follow-up restaging CT scans; 1 died before restaging imaging was obtained. Two patients achieved partial response (PR) (13%), and 6 patients had stable disease (SD) as the best response (38%). Median duration of initial osi was 13.9 months (range 1.9-26.4), and median duration of osi rechallenge was 3.6 months (range 1.0-10.3). Patients who had PR/SD were on osi for 7.5 months (range 2.7-10.3). Ten (59%) patients received osi rechallenge for at least 3 months duration, and 6 (35%) received osi rechallenge for at least 6 months duration. Conclusions: Osi rechallenge is a potential option for advanced EGFR NSCLC patients to obtain disease control at later lines of therapy. Further research is needed to characterize mechanisms of targeted therapy resistance and better select patients who can benefit from EGFR TKI re-exposure.

Radiomics of Spinal Metastases Originating From Primary Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer or Breast Cancer and Ability to Predict Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation/Ki-67 Levels.

The aims of the study are to explore spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics to differentiate spinal metastases from primary nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or breast cancer (BC) and to further predict the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and Ki-67 expression level. In total, 268 patients with spinal metastases from primary NSCLC (n = 148) and BC (n = 120) were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients underwent spinal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI before treatment. Two- and 3-dimensional radiomics features were extracted from the spinal MRI images of each patient. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were applied to identify the most important features related to the origin of the metastasis and the EGFR mutation and Ki-67 level. Radiomics signatures (RSs) were established using the selected features and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We identified 6, 5, and 4 features from spinal MRI to develop Ori-RS, EGFR-RS, and Ki-67-RS for predicting the metastatic origin, EGFR mutation, and Ki-67 level, respectively. The 3 RSs performed well in the training (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves: Ori-RS vs EGFR-RS vs Ki-67-RS, 0.890 vs 0.793 vs 0.798) and validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves: Ori-RS vs EGFR-RS vs Ki-67-RS, 0.881 vs 0.744 vs 0.738) cohorts. Our study demonstrated the value of spinal MRI-based radiomics for identifying the metastatic origin and evaluating the EGFR mutation status and Ki-67 level in patients with NSCLC and BC, respectively, which may have the potential to guide subsequent individual treatment planning.

Management of cutaneous toxicities under amivantamab (anti MET and anti EGFR bispecific antibody) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20ins: towards a proactive, multidisciplinary approach

Contexte.The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is mutated in 10–15% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. At metastatic stage EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used front line for patients harboring targetable mutations. Novel anti-EGFR therapies are being developed. Amivantamab is a bispecific anti-EGFR and anti-MET antibody with expected skin toxicities. ObjectiveWe developed here guidelines for prevention and treatment of cutaneous toxicities under amivantamab according to our experience at Institut Curie. Materiel & MethodThe first patients with metastatic lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20ins mutation, included in the phase 1 CHRYSALIS trial and cured at Institute Curie from November 1st 2019 until December 31st 2021 were selected for this work. Retrospectively, all cutaneous adverse events were registered and classified according to the CTCAE 6.0 classification, and actions we implemented to minimize and treat these adverse events were collected. We then developed guidelines based on these datas. ResultsA total of seven patients started amivantamab as monotherapy. The two most frequent dermatological adverse events were: acneiform rash and paronychia (100 % of patients). Other adverse events presented by the patients were reported: modification of hair growth with hypertrichosis in 50 % of men (n = 1/2) and hirsutism in 80 % of women (n = 4/5); skin abrasion of the scalp in 71 % (n = 5/7); and skin fissure in 57 % (n = 4/7). We recommend first a rigorous inspection of the skin and teguments to determine the risk rate to have dryer skin under treatment; second a prevention of paronychia/acneiform rash/and skin fissures with prophylactic tetracycline, skin moisturizing, and hygienic measures starting at least 14 days before treatment initiation; third a particular attention to the psychological impact of skin toxicities with access to psychological support. ConclusionWe propose here guidelines for the management of dermatological toxicities under amivantamab with a multidisciplinary approach for the proactive management of cutaneous toxicities with a focus on preventive actions.

1130P Real-world data of osimertinib (osi) for the treatment of metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts), with a focus on age, body mass index (BMI) and trough levels

For pts with metastatic NSCLC and a sensitizing EGFR mutation, osi is standard treatment, either in first line (1L) or beyond (2L+, if T790M+). Limited osi efficacy data is available in relation to plasma trough levels, as well as elderly or those with low or high BMI. Retrospective Dutch multicentre (two academic, one non-academic) study. Eligible: pts ≥18 years, with metastatic EGFR+ NSCLC regularly treated with osi. Start date of osi was used as index date, data was extracted from medical files. Primary endpoint: progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1) and disease control rate (DCR). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare different subgroups for age, BMI and steady state plasma trough levels (Cmin,SS), measured <3 months (m) before disease progression (age [<70 / ≥70], BMI [<18.5 / 18.5 – 24.9 / 25.0 – 29.9 / >30] and plasma trough level [<149 / 149 – 259 / >259]). In total 294 pts were included: mean age 67 years (range = 29 – 87 years), mean BMI 25.3 (range = 17.6 – 67.1), 35% male, 90% Caucasian, 54% exon 19 deletion, 30% L858R, 17% other. Osi was given in 1L (n = 118, 40%), 2L (n = 134, 46%) or beyond (3L+, n=42, 14%). Median PFS was 14.6 m (95% CI = 10.2 – 20.0) (1L), 13.7 m (95% CI = 11.1 – 15.6) (2L) and 8.7 m (95% CI = 5.1 – 12.7) (3L+). ORR and DCR were similar in all lines (1L: 68% and 96%, 2L: 62% and 93% and 3L+: 69% and 91%). Pts ≥70 years at osi start achieved similar PFS and OS compared to pts <70 years (PFS: aHR = 0.93; 0.68 – 1.28; OS: aHR = 1.14; 0.77 – 1.68). Low BMI (<18.5) led to lower absolute effectiveness (PFS and OS), but not statistically significant, due to the low number of pts in the subgroup (n = 8). A high plasma trough concentration was associated with lower PFS (aHR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.10 – 3.37). PFS and OS with 1L osi were lower compared to those found in the FLAURA trial, while in 2L survival was slightly longer in daily practice. Age was not associated with PFS, while a low BMI and a high Cmin,SS may be correlated with worse treatment outcomes on osi.

P2.01-02 Delivery of Concurrent Extracranial Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Osimertinib for Oligoprogressive EGFR Mutated Stage IV NSCLC

Osimertinib is a third generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) and is considered first line therapy for patients with metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) NSCLC with exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R. Osimertinib has demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to first generation TKI’s. However, during the course of their disease many patients develop oligoprogressive disease (OPD): <=3 metastatic lesions with otherwise controlled systemic disease.

EP08.02-153 The Efficacy and Safety of EGFR-TKIs plus Anlotinib in Maintenance Therapy for Oligoprogressive Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutant NSCLC

In recent years, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been successfully developed and marketed globally. EGFR-TKIs is recommended for first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC because of its advantages of convenience, better efficacy and higher quality of life compared with traditional inpatient chemotherapy. Unfortunately, resistance to EGFR-TKIs will inevitably occur eventually. Currently, there are few options for further targeted therapy after drug resistance.

Effectiveness and safety of Osimertinib on non-small cell lung cancer therapy

Lung cancer is a disease causing millions of deaths around the globe without adequate means of medical treatment. As one subtype of lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is commonly treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Yet, cancer cells adapt and resist rapidly to TKIs and constant updates are required. Osimertinib (AZD9291) is the latest generation of EGFR-TKI designed to inhibit EGFR mutation and T790M, a second-site genetic mutation responsible for EGFR-TKI resistance. Nearly two-thirds of NSCLC patients who are EGFR mutation-positive and experience resistance after being treated with an EGFR-TKI develop the T790M mutation, for which there have been limited treatment options. Osimertinib arises as a potent drug against metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC. Osimertinib has undergone an elevated FDA approval process to the market. This review summarizes clinical trials of different phases to illustrate the effectiveness of Osimertinib against NSCLC, as well as variable mutations in Osimertinib resistant patients. Further studies are required to address Osimertinib’s toxicity as well as treatments against resistance to Osimertinib.

EE153 Budget Impact Analysis of Introducing Mobocertinib for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States from the Payer Perspective

Amivantamab and mobocertinib received accelerated approval by the US FDA in May and September 2021, respectively, for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Before May 2021, there were no approved targeted treatments for this underserved population. This study quantifies the budget impact (BI) of introducing mobocertinib in a US payer health plan.

Efficacy and safety of ASK120067 (limertinib) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M-mutated non–small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, phase IIb study.

9106 Background: ASK120067 (Limertinib) is a newly developed third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both sensitizing EGFR and EGFR T790M mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASK120067 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study conducted at 62 hospitals across China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutations in tumor tissue or blood plasma who progressed after first or second generation EGFR TKIs or with primary EGFR T790M mutations were enrolled. Patients received ASK120067 160mg orally twice daily, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Safety was assessed according to CTCAE 4.03. Results: Between June 24th, 2019 and Feb 25th, 2021 301 patients were enrolled and received ASK120067 treatment. All patients entered the full analysis set (FAS) and safety set (SS). A total of 99 (32.9%) patients had central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline. By the data cutoff date on Sep 9th, 2021, 76 (25.2%) remained on treatment. The median follow-up time was10.4 (range 0.3-26.3) months. Based on FAS, the IRC-assessed ORR was 68.8% (95%CI 63.2%-74.0%) and DCR was 92.4% (95%CI 88.8%-95.1%). The median PFS was 11.0 (95%CI 9.7-12.4) months, median DOR was 11.1 (95%CI 9.6-13.8) months, and median OS was not reached (NR) (95%CI 19.7 months-NR). Objective responses were achieved across all pre-specified subgroups. For 99 patients with CNS metastases, the ORR was 64.6% (95%CI 54.4%-74.0%), median PFS was 9.7 (95%CI 5.9-11.6) months, and median DOR was 9.6 (95%CI 8.1-15.2) months. For 41 patients who had evaluable CNS lesion, the confirmed CNS-ORR was 56.1% (95%CI, 39.7%-71.5%) and median CNS-PFS was 10.6 (95%CI 5.6-NE) months. In SS, 289 (96.0%) patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR), with the most common being diarrhea (81.7%), anemia (32.6%), rash (29.9%) and appetite decrease (28.2%). Grade ≥3 ADRs occurred in 104 (34.6%) patients, and the most common included diarrhea (13.0%), hypokalemia (4.3%), anemia (4.0%) and rash (3.3%). ADRs leading to dose interruption and dose discontinuation occurred 24.6% and 2% of patients, respectively. No ADR leading to death occurred. Conclusions: ASK120067 demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03502850.

An Analysis of 5-Level Version of EQ-5D Adjusting for Treatment Switching: The Case of Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M-Positive Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Osimertinib

ObjectivesTreatment switching from control to treatment after disease progression is common in oncology trials. Analyses of survival data typically adjust for this bias, but such adjustments are rarely performed in analyses of patient-reported outcomes. This analysis aimed to examine the impact of adjusting for treatment switching on estimated treatment effects on 5-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) utilities and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The AURA3 trial (NCT02151981) was a randomized controlled trial comparing osimertinib with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (standard care) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor mutant- and T790M-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer whose disease has progressed with previous epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. MethodsDescriptive analyses were used to compare treatment arms. The primary analysis used a 2-stage least squares instrumental variable regression to estimate treatment effect adjusting for treatment crossover. Time to deterioration, defined from baseline to minimally important deterioration in EQ-5D-5L utility, was assessed using a rank preserving structural failure time model. ResultsIntention-to-treat analysis of imputed data showed incremental QALYs for osimertinib of 0.23 at 60 weeks. Accounting for treatment switching increased this to 0.52 in the primary analysis and to 0.63 QALYs in sensitivity analysis at 150 weeks. Time to deterioration analysis showed longer health-related quality of life maintenance with osimertinib, of 12.76 weeks, although this was at the borderline of statistical significance (acceleration factor, ψ = −0.275; 95% confidence interval −0.50 to 0.00). ConclusionsThis analysis demonstrates methods to adjust for treatment switching in the analysis of EQ-5D-5L from clinical trials. Failure to account for crossover substantially underestimated the QALY gain for osimertinib.

Pancytopenia During Osimertinib Treatment in a Patient with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundOsimertinib is an irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical trials, osimertinib has exhibited excellent activity and less toxicity compared to gefitinib, erlotinib and standard chemotherapy.Case PresentationHerein, we describe the case of a 69-year-old man who received first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Suspected osimertinib-induced pancytopenia together with a partial treatment response was assessed after 10 days of therapy. Osimertinib was resumed at 40 mg daily a month later while the patient exhibited durable stable disease. No other adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn the current case, first-line treatment with osimertinib at 80 mg daily in a patient with EGFR-mutated NSCLC resulted in severe pancytopenia and a rapid treatment response. Dose reduction to 40 mg daily resulted in excellent activity without any further adverse events. Osimertinib could be safely resumed at a reduced dose even after pancytopenia.

Aumolertinib: A Review in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; Ameile®) is an oral, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for mutant EGFR over wild-type EGFR. It has been developed for the treatment of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the phase3 AENEAS trial conducted in Chinese patients, aumolertinib as first-line treatment significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DoR) compared with gefitinib in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC; overall survival (OS) data from this study are immature. In the phase1/2 APOLLO trial, aumolertinib showed good clinical activity (based on objective response rate, PFS, DoR and OS) in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC who had progressed on or after prior EGFR-TKI therapy. Aumolertinib has a generally manageable tolerability profile; adverse events associated with wild-type EGFR inhibition (e.g. rash and diarrhoea) were less frequent with aumolertinib than gefitinib in AENEAS. Thus, aumolertinib is a promising new option for both first-line and second-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Possibility of brigatinib‐based therapy, or chemotherapy plus anti‐angiogenic treatment after resistance of osimertinib harboring EGFR T790M‐cis‐C797S mutations in lung adenocarcinoma patients

BackgroundThere was no standard treatment for patients who acquired resistance to osimertinib mediated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M‐cis‐C797S. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between different therapeutic strategies and survival outcomes among these patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 46 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR T790M‐cis‐C797S after osimertinib progression from January 1, 2017 to October 31, 2020. Among them, 13 patients received brigatinib‐based therapy, 23 patients received chemotherapy in combination of anti‐angiogenics or not, and 10 patients received other targeted treatments like dacomtinib, bevacizumab, or a combined therapy of osimertinib and other targeted drugs.ResultsCompared to other targeted therapy, brigatinib‐based therapy (median progression‐free survival [mPFS]: 4.40 vs. 1.63 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–0.73, p = 0.001) and chemotherapy‐based treatment (mPFS: 4.70 vs. 1.63 months, HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06–0.50, p < 0.001) presented a better survival outcome and there was no significant difference between brigatinib‐based therapy and chemotherapy‐based treatment (mPFS: 4.40 vs. 4.70 months, HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.57–2.67, p = 0.58). Chemotherapy combined with anti‐angiogenics achieved a better efficacy than only chemotherapy (mPFS: 5.50 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11–0.83, p = 0.02). Patients carrying EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation had a longer PFS than those who harboring EGFR exon 21 p.L858R mutation (4.57 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06–0.54, p = 0.001), no matter they received brigatinib‐based therapy (mPFS: 5.00 vs. 3.23 months, HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.01–0.96, p = 0.05) or chemotherapy‐based treatment (mPFS: 7.23 vs. 1.03 months, HR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01–0.49, p < 0.001).ConclusionBrigatinib‐based therapy and chemotherapy plus anti‐angiogenics could be considered beyond progression from osimertinib therapy. For patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion/T790M/cis‐C797S mutation, the clinical efficacy was superior to patients harboring EGFR exon 21 p.L858R/T790M/cis‐C797S mutation.