Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Research Articles

Metastases and Recurrence Risk Factors in Endometrial Cancer-The Role of Selected Molecular Changes, Hormonal Factors, Diagnostic Methods and Surgery Procedures.

The presence of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) is a key problem in treatment failure associated with reduced overall survival rates. The most common metastatic location is the pelvic lymph nodes, and the least common is the brain. The presence of metastasis depends on many factors, including the molecular profile of cancer (according to the TCGA-Genome Atlas), the activity of certain hormones (estrogen, prolactin), and pro-inflammatory adipocytokines. Additionally, an altered expression of microRNAs affecting the regulation of numerous genes is also related to the spread of cancer. This paper also discusses the value of imaging methods in detecting metastases; the primary role is attributed to the standard transvaginal USG with the tumor-free distance (uTFD) option. The influence of diagnostic and therapeutic methods on EC spread is also described. Hysteroscopy, according to the analysis discussed above, may increase the risk of metastases through a fluid medium, mainly performed in advanced stages of EC. According to another analysis, laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with particular attention to avoiding risky procedures (trocar flushing, tissue traumatization, preserving a margin of normal tissue) was not found to increase the risk of EC dissemination.

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration in a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer developed after two cycles of palliative chemotherapy: a clinical case

A clinical case of an atypical course of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration that occurred during chemotherapy in a patient with an established diagnosis of metastatic endometrial cancer is presented.

Clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations during endocrine therapy for advanced hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma

ObjectiveEndocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in HR + metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AI or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma.MethodologyThis single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR + endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AI or M. Analyses were performed before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy.ResultsTwenty-two patients were included: 13 were treated with AI, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 152 days (min 47 – max 629) with AI and 155 days (min 91-max 1297) with M. Under AI, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy (p = 0.16).ConclusionESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AI or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated.

P271 - Case report: Uncommon presentation of metastatic endometrial cancer with synchronous adrenal and renal involvement

P271 - Case report: Uncommon presentation of metastatic endometrial cancer with synchronous adrenal and renal involvement

Pyroptosis: the dawn of a new era in endometrial cancer treatment.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a malignancy of the inner epithelial lining of the uterus. While early-stage EC is often curable through surgery, the management of advanced, recurrent and metastatic EC poses significant challenges and is associated with a poor prognosis. Pyroptosis, an emerging form of programmed cell death, is characterized by the cleavage of gasdermin proteins, inducing the formation of extensive gasdermin pores in the cell membrane and the leakage of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18), consequently causing cell swelling, lysis and death. It has been found to be implicated in the occurrence and progression of almost all tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated that regulating tumor cells pyroptosis can exploit synergies function with traditional tumor treatments. This paper provides an overview of the research progress made in molecular mechanisms of pyroptosis. It then discusses the role of pyroptosis and its components in initiation and progression of endometrial cancer, emphasizing recent insights into the underlying mechanisms and highlighting unresolved questions. Furthermore, it explores the potential value of pyroptosis in the treatment of endometrial cancer, considering its current application in tumor radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Management of metastatic endometrial cancer: physicians' choices beyond the first line after approval of checkpoint inhibitors.

Endometrial cancer (EC) represents 3.4% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases and is responsible for 2.1% of all cancer-related deaths. Approximately 10%-15% of women with EC are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, resulting in a reported 5-year survival rate of only 17% for those with distant metastases. A better understanding of its molecular features has ushered in a new era of immunotherapy for the treatment of EC, allowing for alternative therapeutic approaches, even in cases of advanced disease. We administered a multi-choice online survey for Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) members. The questionnaire was available for 2 months, starting in October 2022. Our objective was to evaluate the current attitude of incorporating molecular characterization of EC into routine clinical practice, appraise the implementation of newly available therapies, and compare the outcomes with the previous survey conducted in April-May 2021 to ascertain the actual changes that have transpired during this recent time period. The availability of molecular classification in Italian centers has changed in 1 year. Seventy-five percent of centers performed the molecular classification compared with 55.6% of the previous survey. Although this percentage has increased, only 18% performed all the tests. Significant changes have occurred in the administration of new treatments in EC patients in MITO centers. In 2022, 82.1% of the centers administrated dostarlimab in recurrent or advanced MMR-deficient (dMMR) EC experiencing disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, compared to only 24.4% in 2021. In 2022, 85.7% of the centers already administrated the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination as a second-line therapy for MMR-proficient (pMMR) patients with advanced or recurrent EC who had progressed from first-line platinum-based therapy. Both the therapeutic and diagnostic scenarios have changed over the last couple of years in MITO centers, with an increased prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors and use of the molecular classification.

The oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer metastasizing to the adrenal gland and kidney: from case to analysis.

To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer metastasis to the adrenal gland and kidney, based on a case study and review of the literature. A systematic review of the medical literature was performed to identify articles about metastatic endometrial cancer to the adrenal gland and kidney from 1975 until 2021. A 55-year-old female patient was admitted to our center. On pelvic examination, a mass protruding out of the cervix was observed, which was shown to be endometrioid carcinoma on biopsy. Disease stage was IVB, based on radiological and pathological results and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was given. After therapy, the patient underwent type 2 hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total omentectomy and lymph node dissection. Left nephrectomy, left adrenalectomy and left hemicolectomy were also performed because the conglomerate tumor invaded the left kidney, left adrenal gland, and left colon mesentery. Pathological findings were consistent with metastasis of endometrioid carcinoma in the left adrenal gland, left kidney parenchyma and hilum. Metastasis of endometrial cancer to the adrenal gland and kidney is extremely rare and metastasis to the kidney has been reported in only two previous cases. When there is an intraperitoneal spread of endometrial cancer, as well as ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery without leaving a residual tumor should be undertaken andshould include adrenalectomy and nephrectomy, if necessary.

Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and the 2023 FIGO Staging: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Pathologists.

This commentary explores the complexities of the FIGO 2023 staging system and the inclusion of The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) molecular classification in the management of endometrial cancer. It highlights the importance of histology as a prognostic tool, while scrutinizing the merits and demerits of its application to aggressive endometrial cancers. The commentary review sheds light on the recent introductions of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis size in cancer staging. It outlines the difficulties in differentiating between synchronous and metastatic endometrial and ovarian cancers, underlining their implications on treatment strategies. Furthermore, the commentary discusses the integration of molecular classifications within the FIGO 2023 framework, emphasizing the pivotal yet challenging implementation of the pathogenic POLE mutation test. The commentary concludes by reaffirming the vital role of pathologists in executing the FIGO 2023 staging system.

Should we abandon hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer? Outcomes of recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer treated with systemic progestins.

The objective of this study is to determine primary survival endpoints in women with recurrent and metastatic endometrial carcinoma (RMEC) treated with progestins. A retrospective chart review was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital using electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RMEC between 2000 and 2019, endometrioid histology, and ≥one line of progestin treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 2342 cases reviewed, 74 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six (88.0%) patients received megestrol acetate and 9 (12.0%) received a progestin alternative. The distribution of tumors by grade was: 1: 25 (33.3%), 2: 30 (40.0%), and 3: 20 (26.7%). The PFS and OS for the entire study sample was 14.3 months (95% CI 6.2-17.9) and 23.3 months (14.8-36.8), respectively. The PFS for patients with Grade 1-2 RMEC was 15.7 months (8.0, 19.5), compared to 5.0 months (3.0, 23.0) with Grade 3 disease. The OS for patients with Grade 1-2 versus Grade 3, was 25.9 months (15.3, 40.3) versus 12.5 months (5.7, 35.9), respectively. Thirty-four (45.9%) and 40 (54.1%) patients were treated with 0 and ≥1 line of chemotherapy. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed. This real-world data on RMEC suggests there is a role for progestins in select subgroups of women. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed.

Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022–2023 : Prise en charge du cancer de l'endomètre métastatique et/ou en rechute

Recommendations for clinical practice Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023 : Management of advanced/relapsing endometrial cancer Since the first recommendations in 2020 concerning metastatic and/or relapsed endometrial cancer, new treatment options have shown a benefit on patients' life expectancy, justifying their update. In first line, the choice will be made between chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or hormone therapy with progestin, depending on tumor characteristics (histological type, grade, expression of hormone receptors, rate of progression). In case of a dMMR tumors, the use of immunotherapy within the framework of a therapeutic trial is an option. Beyond first-line chemotherapy, current standard treatment consists of the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib, regardless of MMR status. Close clinical and biological monitoring is however necessary given the potential toxicity. Chemotherapy retains its place either as monotherapy (paclitaxel or doxorubicin) in the event of failure or contraindication to pembrolizumab-lenvatinib, or in combination with carboplatin in the event of a long free interval and pMMR tumor. The numerous ongoing clinical trials evaluating new therapeutic targets or strategies adapted to molecular or histological types should allow further improvements the prognosis of patients with metastatic endometrial cancer.

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer.

TPS5626 Background: There are currently no approved maintenance therapies for metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer, which carries a dismal long-term prognosis. The PARP inhibitor drug class has demonstrated significant clinical benefit as a maintenance therapy for patients with germline/somatic BRCA mutations or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancers. However, BRCA mutations are not common in endometrial cancer. Loss of function of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN has been demonstrated in greater than 80% of endometrioid endometrial cancers 1. PTEN loss of function is well known to lead to activation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway but has also been shown to lead to defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair of double strand breaks 2. Specifically, PTEN silencing leads to decreased RAD51 foci formation. Based on this mechanism, in vitro data on endometrial cancer cell lines has demonstrated sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Notably, sensitivity of PARP inhibition in PTEN loss of function is independent of microsatellite instability (MSI) 3. Methods: This is a multi-center phase II, placebo controlled, double-blinded study of the use of rucaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer. A maximum of 138 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive rucaparib at starting dose of 600mg BID dosing vs. placebo. Standard dose reductions of known toxicities will be followed based on FDA approved indications of rucaparib. Patients will remain on therapy until progression of disease or toxicity induced discontinuation. Eligible patients will have Stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer and must have received one or two prior lines of chemotherapy. All histologic subtypes, including carcinosarcoma will be included. Treatment arms will be stratified on histology, number of lines of prior therapy, and complete vs partial response to prior line of therapy. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. To date, 79 patients have been enrolled. 1. Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(11):924-930. 2. Shen WH, Balajee AS, Wang J, et al. Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Cell. 2007;128(1):157-170. 3. Dedes KJ, Wetterskog D, Mendes-Pereira AM, et al. PTEN deficiency in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(53):53ra75. Clinical trial information: NCT03617679 .

TROPiCS-03: A phase 2 basket study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors—Early analysis in pts with advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer (EC).

5610 Background: Pts with advanced/metastatic EC who progressed on or after platinum (PT)-based and anti–PD-(L)1 therapies have a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. SG is a Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate. In the open-label, phase 1/2 IMMU-132-01 basket study, SG monotherapy resulted in a 22% objective response rate (ORR) with a manageable safety profile in 18 pts with metastatic EC who had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior standard therapeutic regimen (Bardia et al. Ann Oncol. 2021). Here, we report early data in pts with advanced/ metastatic disease from the EC cohort of the TROPiCS-03 Ph2 study. Methods: TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, Ph 2 basket study in pts with metastatic solid tumors. Adult pts in the EC cohort progressed after prior PT-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 directed therapy [requirement for PD-(L)1 progression added in amendment], had ECOG PS 0-1 and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min. Pts received 10 mg/kg of SG on D1 and D8 of a 21-D cycle. The primary endpoint was ORR by investigator’s assessment per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator’s assessment, overall survival, and safety. The safety population included pts who received ≥1 dose of SG; the efficacy population included pts receiving ≥1 dose of SG and had ≥13 weeks of follow-up. Results: As of data extraction on October 11, 2022, 28 pts received ≥1 dose of SG. Median study follow-up was 5.3 mo (range, 0.4-13.1); median age 69 y (range, 44-83), 57% ECOG PS 1,14% microsatellite instability high. Pts received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-6); 100% received prior PT-based chemotherapy, 61% prior immunotherapy, 54% prior targeted agents, and 11% prior hormonal therapy. In 20 pts with ≥13 weeks of follow-up, ORR was 25% (95% CI, 8.7-49.1). Regarding best overall response, all responses were partial response (PR). In addition, stable disease (SD) was 40% and progressive disease was 15%; CBR (confirmed complete response + PR + SD ≥ 6 mo) was 35% (95% CI, 15.4-59.2). Median PFS was 5.6 mo (95% CI, 2.3 mo-not reached [NR]) and median DOR was NR (95% CI, 2.76 mo-NR; n = 5). Treatment was ongoing for 50% of pts. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 64% of pts; most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were neutropenia (25%), febrile neutropenia (14%), and diarrhea (14%). Discontinuation rate due to TRAEs was 7%. While on treatment, two deaths occurred due to causes unrelated to SG. Conclusions: Preliminary findings showed encouraging efficacy of SG with a manageable toxicity profile in a pretreated population with advanced/metastatic EC. Safety signals were consistent with the known SG safety profile. This early analysis will be updated with the full dataset. Clinical trial information: NCT03964727 .

Targeted Treatment of Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Focus on Pembrolizumab.

Endometrial cancer (EC) accounts for 2% of all new cancers. Advanced forms have a poor prognosis with barely 17% 5-year survival. The last few years improved our knowledge of EC with a new molecular classification derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). They are now divided between POLE mutant, Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) or deficient in Mismatch Repair System (dMMR), TP53 mutant and no specific molecular profile. Until now, treatments for advanced EC have included conventional platinum-based chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. The revolution in oncology represented by the advent of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) has also led to a major advance in the management of recurrent and metastatic EC. Pembrolizumab, a well-known anti PD-1, has firstly been approved as monotherapy in the second-line setting for dMMR/MSI-H advanced EC. More recently, a combination of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab offered a new effective option in the second line setting irrespectively of the MMR status, giving a new opportunity for these patients who had no actual standard of care before. This combination is currently being evaluated as frontline therapy. Despite exciting results, the main problem in identifying solid biomarkers remains unresolved and further investigations are required. New original combinations of pembrolizumab with other drugs including chemotherapy, poly ADPribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP-i) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being tested and promise exciting new therapeutic evolutions in a close future.

Preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of COM701 + BMS-986207 + nivolumab in patients with recurrent, metastatic MSS endometrial cancer.

5595 Background: There is a high unmet medical need for the treatment of patients [pts] with microsatellite stable [MSS], recurrent, metastatic, endometrial cancer [EC]. We reported encouraging preliminary antitumor activity with the triple combination of COM701 + BMS-986207 + nivolumab in patients with platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer [1]. COM701 is a novel, 1st-in-class immune checkpoint inhibitor [ICI] that binds to PVRIG, a DNAM-1 axis member, leading to activation of T-and NK-cells; BMS-986207 is an ICI of TIGIT. Nivolumab is an ICI of PD-1. We hypothesized that in pts with EC, the triple combination would demonstrate antitumor activity with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. We present encouraging preliminary results. Methods: As part of an expansion cohort, we enrolled 9 patients [pts] with EC. All pts received COM701 20 mg/kg + BMS-986207 480 mg + nivolumab 480 mg all IV Q4W. Primary objectives were safety/tolerability, with secondary objective of antitumor activity in pts with EC. Key inclusion criteria: Age ≥ 18 yrs, measurable disease, MSS by IHC or genomic testing, ≤2 prior systemic cytotoxic therapies, prior PD-1/PD-L1 permissible. Key exclusion criteria: prior receipt of anti-PVRIG, anti-TIGIT. Investigator assessed responses were per RECIST v1.1, safety per CTCAE v5.0. Results: Median age 71yrs, median of 2 prior lines of therapy, prior PD-1/PD-L1 3/9 [33%]. All pts received prior cytotoxic therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) 2/9 [22%] pts; 2 pts with SD. Disease control rate [CR + PR + SD] 4/9 [44%]. There were 2 pts with confirmed PR; 1 of these pts was refractory to prior receipt of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab [best response assessment of progressive disease]. Treatment related AEs were reported in 6/9 [67%] pts, the majority 4/6 [67%] were Grade 1 [1 pt each with chills, pyrexia, back pain and pruritus, lipase increased]. No new safety signals are reported. Conclusions: The combination of COM701 + BMS-986207 + nivolumab demonstrates encouraging preliminary signal of antitumor activity in pts with EC including in a pt refractory to prior exposure to lenvatinib + pembrolizumab. The triplet combination has a favorable safety/tolerability profile. Additional data analyses and pt follow up are ongoing and will be presented at the conference. Data extract 01/24/2023. 1. Moroney JW, Yeku O et al. Triple blockade of the DNAM-axis with COM701 + BMS-986207 + nivolumab demonstrates preliminary antitumor activity in patients with platinum resistant OVCA. Annals of Oncology (2022) 16 (suppl_1): 100104-100104. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100104. Clinical trial information: NCT04570839 .

Role of ketogenic diet in the management of cancer: A systematic review.

e24042 Background: Cancer is 2nd leading cause of death (1 in every 5) in the United States followed by heart disease. Use of ketogenic diet (KD)- high-fat & low-carbohydrate diet, allows fatty acids to become the obligatory source of cellular energy which can help in decreasing the tumor cell growth. Aim of this study was to evaluate role of KD in different types of cancer. Methods: We performed a systematic review using PRISMA protocol to identify articles describing the role of the ketogenic diet in cancer patients in PubMed. Keywords like cancer, neoplasm, tumor, KD, and intermittent fasting (IF) were used & filters like full text, English, human, observational studies, & clinical trials (CTs) were applied between 2018-2022. Results: Of the 362 studies after using filters only 22 studies were CTs. Of these 22, 12 studies were excluded & 10 studies were included in this study. [Table 1] We found CTs describing role of KD, IF or standard diet (SD) in brain cancer, non-metastasized rectal cancer, high-grade glioma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer, ovarian and endometrial cancer. KD was describes as an accompanying measure for patients undergoing standard-of-care therapy that helps to improve the quality of life, survival & acceptable safety and tolerability. KD may augment the antitumor effects of classic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Conclusions: Role of KD is described in depth, but majority RCT results were heterogeneous in nature to provide quantitative measures of survival timeline, outcomes, & recovery. Thus, more human prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness & safety of KD.[Table: see text]

ENGOT-EN20/GOG-3083/xport-EC-042: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial of selinexor in maintenance therapy after systemic therapy for patients with P53 wild-type, advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

TPS5627 Background: Patients (pts) with first-line metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is an oral XPO1 inhibitor, which leads to nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins, including p53. Selinexor is FDA-approved for use in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and has shown clinical activity in previously treated, advanced EC. Molecular characterization of EC is critical in directing treatment for advanced and recurrent disease. Of the EC molecular subtypes, TP53 wild type (wt) tumors represent 50% of advanced and recurrent tumors. A recent phase 3 study in maintenance after chemotherapy found that, despite the primary endpoint (PFS) not reaching statistical significance, prolonged PFS of oral once-weekly selinexor versus placebo (13.7 months and 3.7 months, respectively) was observed in a prespecified exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with advanced or recurrent TP53wt EC. Methods: XPORT-EC-042 (NCT05611931) is a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selinexor as maintenance therapy in pts with TP53wt advanced or recurrent EC, who have achieved a partial response or complete response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 after completing at least 12 weeks of platinum combination chemotherapy ±immunotherapy for primary stage IV or recurrent disease. Eligible pts must be ≥18 years of age, have histologically confirmed EC, and TP53 wt disease based on NGS sequencing assessed by Foundation Medicine. Pts will be randomized 1:1 with either selinexor 60 mg or placebo once weekly in 28-day cycles until progressive disease, toxicity, or 3 years if in complete response. A total of 220 pts will be enrolled at sites across the United States, Canada, Europe, and Israel. The primary objective is to compare PFS in pts treated with selinexor compared to placebo based on RECIST v1.1 criteria as assessed by the Investigator. Key secondary objective is overall survival. Other secondary objectives are safety, time to first subsequent therapy, time to second subsequent therapy, time from randomization until the second progression event (PFS2), and PFS by a blinded independent central review. Patient enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05611931 .

A randomized phase II study comparing single-agent olaparib, single-agent cediranib, and the combinations of cediranib/olaparib, olaparib/durvalumab (MEDI4736), cediranib/durvalumab (MEDI4736), and olaparib/AZD5363 (capivasertib) in women with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic endometrial cancer.

TPS5629 Background: Identifying new approaches for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) is a priority. A platform study design allows for a faster investigation of novel drug combinations. NRG-GY012 is an ongoing platform study investigating drug combinations with the PARP inhibitor olaparib (O) and the anti-angiogenic agent cediranib (C). Results from the first set of arms established improved PFS for combination cediranib/olaparib over C alone, but did not meet its prespecified statistical significance. In this second set of arms, based on preclinical data, we are investigating the combination of O with an AKT inhibitor (capivasertib), O with durvalumab and C with durvalumab compared to the reference arm of C alone. Methods: This is a multicenter randomized four arm study for patients with recurrent, metastatic or persistent EC. Patients are randomized 1:1:1:1 to cediranib PO 30 mg Daily; olaparib 300 mg PO BID and capivasertib 400mg 4 day on/3 off schedule; olaparib 300 mg PO BID and durvalumab 1500mg q28 days; or the combination of cediranib 20 mg PO Daily 5 days on/2 days and durvalumab 1500mg q28. All treatment cycles are 28 days. Primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). The study is powered to detect a doubling in median PFS from 3.6 (based on cediranib alone) to 7.2 months with 90% power, using a one-sided test with α = 0.05 per comparison. Forty patients will be enrolled per arm, with an interim futility analysis planned at 50% information time. Eligibility includes endometroid, serous, and mixed histology EC; at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy (no more than 2 lines for metastatic disease), prior endocrine or immunotherapy alone is allowed; prior treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is excluded. Archival tumor tissue and blood samples are being collected for translational studies. The study is open across the NRG network; 76 of a planned 168 patients are enrolled to date. Safety analysis at the time of 36 patients enrolled did not demonstrate any new safety signals and the study was approved to continue enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03660826 .

Tumor Microenvironment CD8 T and Treg Cells-related Genes Signature Distinguishes Distinct Prognosis and Targeted Therapies Response in Endometrial Cancer.

Although most endometrial cancer (EC) patients have a favorable prognosis, the overall survival (OS) of metastatic and recurrent EC could hardly be improved by the current chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to reveal the tumor microenvironment immune infiltration characteristics to elucidate the underlying mechanism of EC progression and guide clinical decisions. In the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort, Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed Tregs and CD8 T cells were prognosis-protective factors in OS of EC ( P <0.05). Weighted gene coexpression network analysis identified 2 gene modules closely correlated with Tregs and CD8 T-cell infiltration. We randomly split the TCGA EC cohort into the training and testing cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. An immune-related prognosis risk index (IRPRI), including NR3C1, E2F1, OTOG, TTK, PPP1R16B, and FOXP3, was established by univariate, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and multivariate Cox regression with area under the curve >0.67. Distinct clinical, immune, and mutation characteristics existed between IRPRI groups by multiomics analysis. Cell proliferation and DNA damage repair-related pathways were activated, and immune-related pathways were inactivated in the IRPRI-high group. Furthermore, patients in the IRPRI-high group had lower tumor mutation burden, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion scores, indicating a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy ( P <0.05), which was also validated in the TCGA testing cohort and independent cohorts, GSE78200, GSE115821, and GSE168204. Also, the higher mutation frequencies of BRCA1, BRCA2, and genes enrolled in homologous recombination repair in the IRPRI-low group predicted a good response to PARP inhibitors. Finally, a nomogram integrating the IRPRI group and prognosis significant clinicopathological factors for EC OS prediction was developed and validated with good discrimination and calibration.

Frequencies, clinicopathological features, and risk factors of type I and type II endometrial cancer; a retrospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy worldwide. The death rates for EC have increased by more than 100% over the past 2 decades. EC is subdivided into two types based on distinct histological and clinical features: type I and type II. Our study aims to determine the risk factors and clinicopathological features of both type I and type II EC and draw a comparison between the two types based on frequency, risk factors and clinicopathological features. Methods: It was a retrospective observational study including patients of a single tertiary care center. The study included Patients diagnosed, treated, and followed up for type I and type II endometrial cancer at the study center over the past 19 years from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2018. All the patients with metastatic endometrial cancer were excluded from the study. SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 376 patients were included in this study. Among these 343 (91.7) patients had endometroid adenocarcinoma (Type I) and 32 (8.3) had serous and clear cell tumor (type II). Type I EC had a mean age of 57.56 (SD±10.42) while patients with type II EC presented with a mean age of64.97 (SD±6.59). Hypertension and Diabetes were the most common comorbid in EC patients. HRT prior to EC was found to have an association with risk of EC. Compared to patients who were on HRT, patients who were not on HRT prior to diagnosis of EC had 80% less chance of developing endometrial cancer. (Confidence interval: 0.056-0.114, p=0.016). Conclusions: In summary our study demonstrates that both sub types of endometrial cancer have many risk factors that are similar to each other. Despite the difference between the population of both subgroups we were able to prove associations between risk factors and endometrial cancer. However further research is needed at provincial and national level with larger and relatively comparable sample sizes for both subgroups to recognize risk factors and numerically associate them to EC for Pakistani population.

Abstract 2470: ARG1 is potential prognostic biomarker for development of distant metastatic endometrial cancer in mice with Pten deficiency

Abstract Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. The most common histological type is endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). While the majority of patients present with early-stage and low-grade EEC and have an excellent prognosis, a subset has metastatic disease at presentation, or develops distant recurrence after initial treatment of the primary. However, the lack of prognostic biomarkers for metastatic EEC is a critical barrier. We have developed a genetically engineered mouse model for metastatic EEC that implicates coexistent Pten and Mig-6 mutations in EEC. Pten mutation in the uterus is not sufficient for distant metastasis, but mice with concurrent ablation of Mig-6 and Pten develop distant metastasis. Arginase 1 (ARG1) regulates the last step of the urea cycle, and an increase in ARG1 has been correlated as a poor prognostic factor in a variety of cancers including ovarian carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and neuroblastoma. In the present study, ARG1 expression was evaluated with immunohistochemistry in endometrial hyperplasia and cancer of mice with Pten mutation as well as Pten and Mig-6 double mutations. Our immunostaining analysis revealed that the expression of ARG1 in early stage of EEC from mice deficient in Mig-6 and Pten mutations significantly increased compared to Pten mutation in the uterus. High levels of ARG1 are associated with distant metastatic endometrial cancer. The results demonstrate that a high level of ARG1 is associated with poor prognosis in association with EEC of mouse. ARG1 has the potential to identify patients that require additional treatment at an early stage of endometrial cancer. Citation Format: Jae-Wook Jeong, Dinh Tran, Valery Rozen, Tae Hoon Kim, Jung-Yoon Yoo. ARG1 is potential prognostic biomarker for development of distant metastatic endometrial cancer in mice with Pten deficiency [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2470.