Metastatic Clear Renal Cell Carcinoma Research Articles

1705P Association between baseline radiological tumor burden (BRTB) and outcomes in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with first line (1L) immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens

1705P Association between baseline radiological tumor burden (BRTB) and outcomes in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with first line (1L) immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens

1691P Subcutaneous nivolumab (NIVO SC) vs intravenous nivolumab (NIVO IV) in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated efficacy and safety results from CheckMate 67T

1691P Subcutaneous nivolumab (NIVO SC) vs intravenous nivolumab (NIVO IV) in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated efficacy and safety results from CheckMate 67T

1710P Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study

1710P Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study

Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal cell Carcinoma in the Era of immunotherapy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BackgroundThe effectiveness of the clinical outcome of CN (Cytoreductive Nephrectomy) in cases of mccRCC (Metastatic Clear Cell Renal cell Carcinoma) is still uncertain despite two trials, SURTIME and CARMENA. These trials, conducted with Sunitinib as the standard treatment, did not provide evidence supporting the use of CN. MethodsWe queried the NCDB for stage IV mccRCC patients between the years of 2004 to 2020, who received (immunotherapy) IO with or without nephrectomy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated among three groups of IO alone, IO followed by CN (IOCN), CN followed by IO (CNIO). Cox models compared OS by treatment group after adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and facility variables. ResultsFrom 1,549,101 renal cancer cases, 7983 clear and nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma cases were identified. After adjusting for sociodemographic and health covariates, patients who received IO followed by CN or CN followed by IO had a respective 64% (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.30-0.43, P = .006] and 47% (aHR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.49-0.56, P = .001) mortality risk reduction respectively compared to patients who received IO alone. Compared to White adults, individuals who identified as Black exhibited 17% higher risk mortality (aHR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.06-1.30, P = .002). Patients who received CN prior to IO had a 59% associated mortality risk compared to patients who received IO followed by CN who had a lower risk, 35.7% (P < .001). ConclusionsPatients receiving CN regardless of sequence with IO did better than IO alone in this national registry-based adjusted analysis for mccRCC. Presently available data indicates that the combination of CN and IO holds promise for enhancing clinical results in patients with mRCC.

Single-cell RNA-seq reveals heterogeneity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and effect of anti-angiogenesis therapy in the pancreas metastatic lesion

Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma has heterogenous tumor microenvironment (TME). Among the metastatic lesions, pancreas metastasis is rare and controversy in treatment approaches. Here, extensive primary and metastatic lesion samples were included by single-cell RNA-seq to decipher the distinct metastasis TME. The hypoxic and inflammatory TME of pancreas metastasis was decoded in this study, and the activation of PAX8-myc signaling, and metabolic reprogramming were observed. The active components including endothelial cells, fibroblasts and T cells were profiled. Meanwhile, we also evaluated the effect of anti-angiogenesis treatment in the pancreas metastasis patient. The potential mechanisms of pancreatic tropism, instability of genome, and the response of immunotherapy were also discussed in this work. Taken together, our findings suggest a clue to the heterogeneity in metastasis TME and provide evidence for the treatment of pancreas metastasis in renal cell carcinoma patients.

Baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil-ratio and outcome in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab.

This study aims to evaluate neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) as a prognostic and/or predictive biomarker in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab. We performed a retrospective study on m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab (2012-2022). Baseline NER was calculated and correlated with clinical outcomes: response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Corresponding transcriptomic data were analysed. We included 201 m-ccRCC patients, 76 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and 125 with nivolumab. Baseline NER was statistically significantly associated with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Increased NER was associated with shorter PFS and OS in the total patient series and nivolumab-treated patients. In patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab, increased NER was only statistically significantly associated with shorter OS. The impact of baseline NER on PFS and OS was independent of IMDC risk stratification. No clear correlation was found between baseline NER and RECIST response or maximal tumour shrinkage. In two additional databases, NER was also associated with PFS and OS in first-line vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-receptor tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), but not to disease-free survival in the post-nephrectomy setting. Lower NER was associated with intratumoural molecular features possibly associated with better outcome on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Lower baseline NER is associated with better PFS and OS, independent of IMDC risk score, in m-ccRCC patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab or nivolumab. It correlates with intratumoural molecular features possibly associated with better outcome on immune checkpoint inhibitors. The predictive power of this biomarker is probably limited and insufficient for patient selection.

Avelumab plus axitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A real-world ambispective RAVE-Renal study.

117 Background: In a phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101randomized study, the combination of avelumab and axitinib demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; median 13.9 months) and objective response rate (ORR; 59.3%) among patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to FDA approval as a first-line therapy. In our ambispective observational RAVE-Renal study, real-world data were gathered to assess the practical application and outcomes associated with the use of avelumab and axitinib in clinical settings. Methods: Patients were recruited from 13 sites, with data collected anonymously online. Key inclusion criteria were untreated mRCC and a minimum age of 18 years. Safety and efficacy assessments were conducted in all patients who received at least one dose of avelumab and axitinib. The primary endpoints included ORR and PFS, while secondary endpoints encompassed overall survival (OS) and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: At the time of data cutoff (February 03, 2024), a total of 125 patients were enrolled and treated. Median age was 61 years (range, 37-74). Patients were predominantly men (74.3%), previously nephrectomised (81.4%), had 2 and more metastatic sites (77.1%) including bone (24.3%), liver (15.7%), and brain (3%) metastases. IMDC risk was evaluated in 102 patients. Among these patients, 36 (35.3%) were categorized as having favorable risk, 50 (49%) as intermediate risk, and 16 (15.7%) as poor risk. The median number of avelumab infusions was 7 (range, 1-29). Table summarizes efficacy and safety data. Conclusions: The real-world study of first-line avelumab and axitinib therapy reveals comparable ORR and PFS to those observed in the pivotal clinical trial among patients with mRCC. The combination was well tolerated. Further follow-up of patients in the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: KCRB01012022 . [Table: see text]

6 Durable response to immunotherapy-based regimens for IMDC favorable risk patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pooled analysis of four published randomized control phase 3 trials

Abstract Background An immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) backbone of either ICI doublet (ipilimumab-nivolumab [ipi-nivo]) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with ICI (such as axitinib-pembrolizumab [axi-pembro], cabozantinib-nivolumab [cabo-nivo], or lenvatinib-pembrolizumab [len-pembro]) is the current standard of care for previously untreated, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). The phase 3 trials that evaluated these four regimens were compared to sunitinib, with no direct head-to-head clinical trial data available. With at least 4-year follow up data available, we compared the long-term responders of the IMDC favorable risk patients enrolled in the four phase 3 trials (CheckMate 214, KEYNOTE-426, CheckMate 9ER, and CLEAR). Methods Pseudo individual patient data (IPD) was obtained from the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves using the graph digitizer software IPDfromKM R package to extract coordinates of points on the curves and applied the numerical algorithm to reconstruct survival results. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the favorable risk group for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing the experimental arms to sunitinib were extracted. Responses were measured at 24 (durable response [DR]) and 36 months (extreme durable response [EDR]) and long-term OS as OS ≥48 months. K-M method using the extracted IPD was used to estimate the survival rates at 24-month PFS, 36-month PFS, and 48-month OS. Then, we compared the survival rates at each time point using the generalized linear model for the survival rates at fixed time points obtained from the K-M method. Results Len-pembro was associated with the highest DR (57.2%) and EDR (44.5%), while ipi-nivo had the lowest DR (36.0%), and cabo-nivo had the lowest EDR (18.8%). There was no difference in 48 month-OS among regimens (p=0.11), ranging between 58.3% (cabo-nivo) and 70.6% (len-pembro). Comparing the sunitinib control arms among the four studies, a numerically higher PFS at 24 months (59%) and 36 months (40%) was observed in the CheckMate 214 trial compared to the ICI-TKI trials (25-35% and 15-20%, respectively). The 48-month OS for the sunitinib arms ranged from 55-70%, and no differences were observed among trials (p=0.55). Comparisons of survival rates for the immunotherapy arm on fixed time-points for IMDC favorable risk subset of patients Conclusions ICI-based regimens provided durable responses to a significant number of patients with favorable risk mccRCC. While TKI-ICI were associated with higher DR and EDR, no differences in OS at 48 months were observed compared to ipi-nivo or sunitinib for favorable risk disease. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes given the favorable prognosis of these patients. We acknowledge the limitations and caveats of cross-trial comparisons.

46 Radiological tumor burden is an independent risk factor for survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) treated with first line immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens

Abstract Background IO-based regimens (IO + IO or IO + VEGF inhibitor) represent current standard of care systemic therapies for the management of patients with mRCC. IMDC is the current standard to assess prognosis in patients with mRCC of clear cell histology. Baseline radiological tumor burden (BRTB) is a readily available measurement to calculate using routine CT-scans. Here we describe the utility of BRTB as prognostic factor in patients with mccRCC treated with first line IO-based regimens. Methods We reviewed data of 183 patients with mccRCC treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from August 2014 to October 2023 and who received ≥ 1 dose of an IO-based regimen (IO + IO or IO + VEGF inhibitor). Patients with available CT-scan reports within 1 month prior to first line treatment initiation were included in our analysis. BRTB was assessed by a single operator as the sum of all measurable lesions as listed on the RECIST v1.1 report. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF) and time to next therapy (TTNT). To evaluate the impact of BRTB on OS, TTF and TTNT, we used univariable and multivariable Cox regression models accounting for IMDC risk group, history of nephrectomy, and presence of either bone, liver, or brain metastases prior to first line initiation. Results A total of 150 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in our final analysis, of which 80% of patients were male (120/150). 9% (13/150) had favorable risk, 51% (77/150) had intermediate risk and 20% (30/150) had poor risk by IMDC criteria. Overall, 73% (109/150) of patients had nephrectomy prior to first line therapy initiation and 41% (61/150) had either brain, bone, or liver metastasis. Median follow-up was 44.8 months. Every 1 cm increase in BRTB was associated with a 5% increase in risk of death (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03 – 1.08; p &amp;lt; 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, radiological tumor burden was significantly associated with OS (HR: 1.04; 95%CI: 1.00 – 1.08; p = 0.03). After categorizing BRTB by tertiles, tertile 1 included 0 - 7.5 cm, tertile 2: 7.6– 15.3 cm and tertile 3: 15.4 – 47.7 cm. The 4-year OS estimates were 84% (95%CI: 74 – 97%), 60% (95%CI: 45 – 81%) and 43% (95%CI: 29 – 66%), respectively, for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertile (log-rank P &amp;lt; 0.0001). BRTB did not show a significant association with TTF on univariable (HR: 1.00; 95%CI: 0.99 – 1.01; p = 0.783), or multivariable analysis (HR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.97 – 1.01; p = 0.428). As for TTNT, BRTB also did not show a significant association on univariable (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.0 – 1.02; p = 0.234) or multivariable analysis (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.99 – 1.03; p = 0.453). Conclusions Baseline radiological tumor burden is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with mccRCC treated with first line immunotherapy-based regimens. However, tumor burden is not significantly associated with TTF or TTNT. Figure: Kaplan-Meier curves representing OS based on baseline radiological tumor burden assessed by RECIST v1.1 (Tertile 1: 0 - 7.5 cm; Tertile 2: 7.6 - 15.3 cm; Tertile 3: 15.4 – 47.7 cm). P value is derived from the log-rank test.

Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Combination Immunotherapy Clinical Trial (ARCITECT; HCRN GU 22-587)

Abstract Background First-line treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) often includes an anti-PD1 inhibitor in combination with either an anti-CTLA inhibitor (IO/IO) or a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (IO/TKI). Although some patients treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) (IO/IO) experience durable responses leading to treatment free intervals, over two-thirds experience disease progression. Resistance to Nivo (anti-PD1) monotherapy has been associated with increased presence of a subpopulation of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment. Botensilimab (Bot) is an IO agent that leverages novel FcyR-associated mechanisms of action to enhance T cell priming, deplete intratumoral Tregs and enhance myeloid activation. Combination botensilimab/balstilimab (Bot/Bal) (anti-CTLA/anti-PD1) has shown impressive anti-tumor activity in diseases where Nivo/Ipi has shown little to no efficacy. Methods ARCITECT is a phase II, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Bot/Bal relative to Nivo/Ipi. Patients with mccRCC (favorable, intermediate, or poor risk), no prior systemic therapy (including adjuvant or neoadjuvant), and at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1 are eligible for enrollment. 120 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to Arm A (Bot/Bal induction followed by Bal maintenance) or Arm B (Nivo/Ipi induction followed by Nivo maintenance) each for a maximum of 2 years. Stratification factors include IMDC risk groups and sarcomatoid histology. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. We hypothesize that Bot/Bal will lead to a superior ORR (55%) relative to Nivo/Ipi (40%). This trial has &amp;gt; 90% power to detect the alternative hypothesis while maintaining a one-sided significance level of not more than 0.10 using the exact binomial. The study will be monitored for early stopping in favor of the null hypothesis based on a Simon’s two stage design. In the first stage, 69 patients will be enrolled (Arm A:46 and Arm B:23). If at the end of the first stage, Arm A has either at least 18/42 (42.8%) of eligible patients responding or an ORR at least numerically equivalent to that for eligible patients in Arm B, then the trial will progress to the second stage. The primary endpoint will be met if there are 38/80 responders (ORR &amp;gt; 47.5%) in Arm A. Key secondary endpoints include landmark progression-free survival, treatment-free survival and rates of immune-related adverse events. Correlative studies will explore immune and molecular predictors of response and resistance to IO/IO in tumor and blood. Clinical trial information: NCT05928806. Results

70 Circulating leptin and immune-related transcriptomic patterns in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Obesity has been associated with better outcomes in localized and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), as well as improved survival on immunotherapy treatment. However, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. Leptin is an adipokine secreted by adipocytes, and circulating levels of leptin are higher in individuals with obesity. Additionally, leptin promotes inflammation and angiogenesis and has been proposed as pro-tumorigenic in colorectal and breast cancer. In this study, we examined how circulating leptin levels relate to both tumor and perinephric fat transcriptomic patterns in a cohort of ccRCC patients by evaluating the associations with body mass index (BMI), sex, and immune-related gene expression patterns. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 92 treatment-naïve ccRCC patients undergoing nephrectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Available data included circulating leptin from fasting blood samples, clinical characteristics from medical records, and, in a subset of patients, RNA sequencing from tumor and perinephric fat specimens. We analyzed differentially expressed genes (DEG) according to circulating leptin levels using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to describe pathways that were enriched in patients with high levels of leptin. We performed analysis for the whole cohort and stratified by sex based on differences in leptin levels. Results From the 92 patients with available peripheral leptin measurements, 51 and 44 had available tumor and perinephric fat RNA sequencing data, respectively. Of these, 64 (70%) were male, the median age was 60 years old, and most tumors were low grade and stage. Leptin distribution was significantly different in males than females, with circulating leptin levels of 7 ng/ml (IQR 4-14) and 22 ng/ml (IQR 9-52), respectively. Higher BMI was associated with higher leptin levels, with a correlation coefficient of 0.63 (p&amp;lt;0.001) in males and 0.77 (p&amp;lt;0.001) in females. GSEA of tumor DEGs by circulating leptin, showed upregulation of pathways related to adaptive immune activity in patients with higher leptin levels across sexes, although this association was attenuated in females. Strikingly, in the perinephric fat there were stark differences in opposite directions in female and male specimens, with females showing significantly enriched transcription of genes associated with B cell signaling, humoral and adaptive immune responses. Conclusions Higher leptin levels were associated with a modest increase of immune-related gene expression in the tumors in both males and females, but significantly different directional changes were observed in the perinephric fat. Circulating leptin may be involved in peritumoral immune responses which may link host factors to sex related tumor outcomes. Further studies should aim to address the relationship between leptin activity and the tumor and fat microenvironment. DOD CDMRP Funding: yes

A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat versus sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302)

BackgroundImmunotherapy-based combinations have emerged as standard therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 selective inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors, including mRCC.MethodsKEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302 was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03260894) that compared pembrolizumab plus epacadostat with sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for mRCC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC and had not received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily versus sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) or pazopanib 800 mg orally once daily. Original dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Enrollment was stopped when a phase 3 study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy did not meet its primary end point. This protocol was amended, and primary end point was changed to investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1.ResultsOne-hundred-twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 64) or sunitinib/pazopanib (n = 65). Median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 10.3 months (2.2–14.3) and 10.3 months (2.7–13.8) in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (31.3% [95% CI 20.2–44.1] and sunitinib/pazopanib (29.2% [18.6–41.8]). Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.4% and 42.9% of patients in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. One patient in the sunitinib/pazopanib arm died of septic shock (not treatment-related). Circulating kynurenine levels decreased in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat arm, but not to levels observed in healthy subjects.ConclusionsORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib as first-line treatment in patients with mRCC. Safety and tolerability appeared similar between treatment arms; no new safety concerns were identified. Antitumor responses observed in patients with RCC receiving pembrolizumab plus epacadostat may be driven primarily by pembrolizumab.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03260894.

A functional role for glycosylated B7-H5/VISTA immune checkpoint protein in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Increased expression of the B7 family of immune checkpoint proteins hinders tumor elimination by the immune system. Expression levels of the B7-H5 protein were found to be upregulated in clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). We here report the molecular, functional, and clinical characterization of B7-H5 from renal cancer cells and metastatic ccRCC tumors. B7-H5 was highly glycosylated and mainly expressed in the cell membrane. Mutagenic studies on B7-H5 identified the residues targeted by N-glycosylation and revealed an impact of B7-H5 glycosylation on protein expression levels and localization. B7-H5 knockdown decreased the cell proliferation and viability of renal cancer cells. We analyzed B7-H5 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrated leukocytes (TILs) in samples from metastatic ccRCC patients and found that B7-H5 expression on TILs correlated with syncronous metastases and poor outcomes. These results provide insights into the molecular properties and clinical impact of B7-H5 and support B7-H5 as a new immunotherapeutic target in metastatic ccRCC.

Epigenetic modification of PHLDA2 is associated with tumor microenvironment and unfavorable outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundA substantial proportion of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cannot derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus anti-angiogenic agent combination therapy, making identification of predictive biomarkers an urgent need. The members of pleckstrin homology-like domain family A (PHLDA) play critical roles in multiple cancers, whereas their roles in ccRCC remain unknown.MethodsTranscriptomic, clinical, genetic alteration and DNA methylation data were obtained for integrated analyses from TCGA database. RNA sequencing was performed on 117 primary tumors and 79 normal kidney tissues from our center. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis, gene set enrichment analysis were performed to explore transcriptomic features. Data from three randomized controlled trials (RCT), including CheckMate025, IMmotion151, JAVELIN101, were obtained for validation.ResultsMembers of PHLDA family were dysregulated in pan-cancer. Elevated PHLDA2 expression was associated with adverse clinicopathologic parameters and worse prognosis in ccRCC. Aberrant DNA hypomethylation contributed to up-regulation of PHLDA2. An immunosuppressive microenvironment featured by high infiltrates of Tregs and cancer-associated fibroblasts, was observed in ccRCC with higher PHLDA2 expression. Utilizing data from three RCTs, the association of elevated PHLDA2 expression with poor therapeutic efficacy of ICI plus anti-angiogenic combination therapy was confirmed.ConclusionsOur study revealed that elevated PHLDA2 expression regulated by DNA hypomethylation was correlated with poor prognosis and immunosuppressive microenvironment, and highlighted the role of PHLDA2 as a robust biomarker for predicting therapeutic efficacy of ICI plus anti-angiogenic agent combination therapy in ccRCC, which expand the dimension of precision medicine.

Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in Immunotherapy Utilization for Advanced Kidney and Bladder Cancer

ObjectivesImmunotherapy (IO) drugs have been increasingly utilized in locally advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UC). Multiple trials have demonstrated clear survival benefit, however, there are often barriers to access for these advanced therapies which has been demonstrated in other non-urologic malignancies. The goal of this study was to assess socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with the receipt of IO for advanced ccRCC and UC. Materials and methodsWe queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with stage IV ccRCC and UC. The study period was 2015 to 2020 for ccRCC (FDA approval date of IO) and 2017 to 2020 for UC (FDA approval date of broadened indication for IO, initial limited approval in 2016). The primary outcome of interest was receipt of IO therapy using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for relevant socioeconomic and demographic variables. ResultsWe identified 15,926 patients with stage IV ccRCC and 10,380 patients with stage IV UC of which 5,419 (34.0%) and 2,231 (21.5%) received IO therapy, respectively. IO utilization increased with each successive year. In both malignancies, treatment at a non-academic facility, education level, income, and insurance were independently associated with IO utilization. For ccRCC, black (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.64–0.93, P = 0.009) and Hispanic race (OR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.61–0.86, P = 0.006) were each associated with decreased IO utilization but there were no independent associations between race and receipt of IO in patients with UC. ConclusionsIn the era of FDA-approved IO therapy for advanced ccRCC and UC, this national cohort analysis suggests that IO utilization is increasing over time, but significant disparities exist based on income, education, and insurance status in both malignancies. Additionally, patients treated at non-academic facilities were less likely to receive IO therapy for these specific genitourinary malignancies. In ccRCC, additional disparities were seen black and Hispanic races which each were associated with lower odds of IO receipt. Identifying strategies to mitigate these differences and provide equitable access to IO therapy is of imperative need.

Immune Phenotype-Genotype Associations in Primary Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Matched Metastatic Tissue

Adjuvant immunotherapy has been recently recommended for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no tissue biomarkers to predict treatment response in ccRCC. Potential predictive biomarkers are mainly assessed in primary tumor tissue, whereas metastases (METs) remain understudied. To explore potential differences between genomic alterations and immune phenotypes in primary tumors and their matched METs, we analyzed primary tumors (PTs) of 47 ccRCC patients and their matched distant METs by comprehensive targeted parallel sequencing, whole-genome copy number variation analysis, determination of microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden. We quantified the spatial distribution of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and coexpression of the T-cell-exhaustion marker thymocyte selection-associated high mobility group box (TOX) by digital immunoprofiling and quantified tertiary lymphoid structures. Most METs were pathologically “cold.” Inflamed, pathologically “hot” PTs were associated with decreased disease-free survival, worst for patients with high levels of CD8+TOX+ T cells. Interestingly, inflamed METs showed a relative increase in exhausted CD8+TOX+ T cells and increased accumulative size of tertiary lymphoid structures compared with PTs. Integrative analysis of molecular and immune phenotypes revealed BAP1 and CDKN2A/B deficiency to be associated with an inflamed immune phenotype. Our results highlight the distinct spatial distribution and differentiation of CD8+ T cells at metastatic sites, and the association of an inflamed microenvironment with specific genomic alterations.

Concomitant Administration of VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase and Proton Pump Inhibitors May Impair Clinical Outcome of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer

IntroductionThe administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and MethodsTotal 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as “no concomitant PPIs (PPI−)” if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as “concomitant PPIs (PPI+)” if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given. ResultsEighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI− and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI− (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI− (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI− (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use.

Durability of Response with First-Line Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Compared to Checkpoint Inhibitor with VEGFR-TKI in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Over the past several years, four regimens incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors have become widely used in the front-line setting to treat metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: nivolumab with ipilimumab, axitinib with pembrolizumab, cabozantinib with nivolumab, and lenvatinib with pembrolizumab. These regimens all demonstrated favorable response rates and survival outcomes compared to sunitinib in phase III trials. As these data have matured, nivolumab with ipilimumab has been most clearly associated with durable long-term disease response and stable survival benefit. Moreover, responses obtained using nivolumab with ipilimumab are more likely to persist after treatment discontinuation compared to regimens containing a VEGFR-TKI. These outcomes underline the value of using nivolumab with ipilimumab to pursue durable response in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma metastasizing to the oral cavity: A diagnostic challenge of a case revealing an unusual clinical presentation

AbstractObjectiveDiagnosing lesions with unusual clinical presentation can be challenging, mostly for cases in which the inclusion of oral metastasis in the differential diagnosis is necessary.Materials and MethodsA 55‐year‐old man complaining of a large mass in the oral cavity was referred to the Hospital Dentistry Service. The patient reported bleeding episodes and pain, with a 5‐month evolution. Intraoral examination revealed a 5 cm tumour with purplish‐red and ulcerated focal areas at the right buccal mucosa. Differential diagnosis included malignant mesenchymal tumours, lymphoproliferative lesions, and metastasis of an occult primary lesion. Two biopsies were conducted, with the first one presenting an intense haemorrhage, and the second performed under general anaesthesia and difficult bleeding control.ResultsHistologic and immunohistochemical analysis diagnosed a clear cell carcinoma infiltration. A whole‐body CT scan reveals a renal tumour with multiple metastasis sites in the abdomen and bones. Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma was finally confirmed, and the patient was followed with palliative care for 4 months.ConclusionA challenging diagnosis of a rare metastatic lesion in the oral cavity was conducted after two procedures under difficult bleeding conditions.

Improved Survival in Contemporary Community-Based Patients With Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Active Treatment.

We hypothesized that the evolving treatment paradigms recommended based on phase III trials may have translated into improved overall survival (OS) in contemporary community-based patients with clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) undergoing active treatment. Within the SEER database, contemporary (2017-2020) and historical (2010-2016) patients with ccmRCC treated with either systemic therapy (ST), cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), or both (ST+CN) were identified. Univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models were used. Overall, 993 (32%) contemporary versus 2,106 (68%) historical patients with ccmRCC were identified. Median OS was 41 months in contemporary versus 25 months in historical patients (Δ=16 months; P<.001). In multivariable Cox-regression analyses, contemporary membership was independently associated with lower overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.8; P<.001). In patients treated with ST alone, median OS was 17 months in contemporary versus 10 months in historical patients (Δ=7 months; P<.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P=.005). In patients treated with CN alone, median OS was not reached in contemporary versus 33 months in historical patients (Δ=not available; P<.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P<.001). In patients treated with ST+CN, median OS was 38 months in contemporary versus 26 months in historical patients (Δ=12 months; P<.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P=.003). Contemporary community-based patients with ccmRCC receiving active treatment clearly exhibited better survival than their historical counterparts, when examined as one group, as well as when examined as separate subgroups according to treatment type. Treatment advancements of phase III trials seem to be applied appropriately outside of centers of excellence.