Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Research Articles

177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Versus Docetaxel in Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized, Controlled Trial.

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 has been previously demonstrated to be noninferior to docetaxel in achieving a biochemical response in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) for a phase 2 randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Forty chemotherapy-naïve, PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients were randomly assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n = 20) or docetaxel (n = 20). Thirty-five patients received treatment per the protocol. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox regression model. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 33.4 mo. In intention-to-treat analysis, the median OS for the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel arms was 15.0 mo (95% CI, 9.5-20.5 mo) and 15.0 mo (95% CI, 8.1-21.9 mo), respectively (P = 0.905). In per-protocol analysis, the median OS was 19.0 mo (95% CI, 12.3-25.7 mo) versus 15.0 mo (95% CI, 8.1-21.9 mo), respectively (P = 0.712). No significant difference in OS was observed between the 2 arms across the analyzed subgroups. Conclusion: Long-term outcomes with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 administered earlier in the prechemotherapy setting are comparable to those with docetaxel.

Improved Quality of Life in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Consecutive Cycles of 177Lu-PSMA I&T.

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving consecutive cycles of 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) using the reliable and validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire. In addition, differences in HRQoL between patients with early discontinuation of treatment because of disease progression and patients who were defined as eligible for treatment continuation were analyzed. Methods: In total, 60 mCRPC patients were included in this analysis. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire was completed at baseline, before each treatment cycle up to the sixth treatment cycle, and at the time of PSMA-ligand PET/CT scans after the second and fourth treatment cycles. QoL assessment included global health status, functional scales, and symptom burden during treatment. Results: Global health was significantly improved at the second and fourth cycles of 177Lu-PSMA RLT (P = 0.014 and P = 0.039, respectively). In line with this, role and emotional functioning showed significant improvements at the second and fourth treatment cycles (role functioning, P = 0.045 and P = 0.048, respectively, and emotional functioning, P = 0.035 and P = 0.007, respectively). In addition, compared with baseline, fatigue and pain were significantly alleviated at the second and fourth treatment cycles (pain, P = 0.035 and P = 0.034, respectively, and fatigue, P = 0.042 and P = 0.041, respectively). Other aspects of HRQoL, even if not significantly improved, remained stable over time, except for deterioration of fatigue at the study's end (P = 0.014) and reduction of dyspnea at the second treatment cycle (P = 0.012). Patients with early discontinuation of treatment showed a concordant decline in HRQoL. Conclusion: mCRPC patients showed significant improvement in HRQoL in the course of treatment with 177Lu-PSMA RLT. Furthermore, patients with early discontinuation of treatment showed an analogous decline in HRQoL.

MFast-SeqS-based aneuploidy score in circulating cell-free DNA is a prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer.

Multiple prognostic biomarkers, including circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts, exist in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, but none of them have been implemented into daily clinical care. The modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system (mFast-SeqS), which yields a genome-wide aneuploidy score, is able to reflect the fraction of cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) within cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and may be a promising biomarker in mCRPC. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of dichotomized aneuploidy scores (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) as well as CTC counts (< 5 vs. ≥ 5) in 131 mCRPC patients prior to treatment with cabazitaxel. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 50 similarly treated mCRPC patients. We observed that, similar to the dichotomized CTC count [HR: 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI);1.84-4.62], dichotomized aneuploidy scores (HR: 3.24; CI: 2.12-4.94) significantly correlated with overall survival in mCRPC patients. We conclude that a dichotomized aneuploidy score from cfDNA is a prognostic marker for survival in mCRPC patients within our discovery cohort and in an independent mCRPC validation cohort. Therefore, this easy and robust minimally-invasive assay can be readily implemented as a prognostic marker in mCRPC. A dichotomized aneuploidy score might also be used as a stratification factor in clinical studies to account for tumour load.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis on Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Disease Progression.

The positivity rate of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) varies among patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), complicating its incorporation into regular practice. This retrospective study analyzed the ctDNA sequencing results of 100 mPC patients from May 2021 to March 2023 to identify the factors associated with positive ctDNA. Three custom gene panels were used for sequencing. Overall, 63% of the patients exhibited tier I/II somatic alterations, while 12% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations. The key genes that were altered included AR, TP53, RB1, PTEN, and APC. Mutations in BRCA1/2, either germline or somatic, were observed in 21% of the patients. Among the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, the ctDNA-positive samples generally showed higher median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and were more likely to be at the radiographic and clinical progressive disease stages, although they were not significantly associated with PSA progression. Our results suggest that ctDNA analysis could detect meaningful genetic changes in mPC patients, especially during disease progression.

Excellent Response to Full-Dose 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Transplant Kidney : A Step Ahead.

177 Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown very encouraging results in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with acceptable adverse events. The adverse events of RLT are mainly limited to salivary glands and kidneys. However, there is dearth of available data of RLT in transplanted kidney patients with mCRPC. Here is a case of 68-year-old mCRPC patient with history of renal transplant who underwent 4 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT (~7.4 GBq/cycle). Posttherapy serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate remained stable along with excellent response and symptomatic improvement, thus demonstrating the safety of full dose of 177 Lu-PSMA in renal transplant patients.

Early biochemical and radiographic response after one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate very early radiographic PSMA PET response after one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T radioligand therapy (RLT) of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to assess its role in predicting overall response and survival.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 40 mCRPC patients who were treated with a median of 3 (2–9) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT cycles. Biochemical response was based on the relative change of serum PSA according to PCWG3 criteria, while radiographic response referred to the relative change of PSMA-derived total viable tumor volumes expressed as total lesion PSMA (TLP).ResultsAfter one cycle of RLT, biochemical partial response (PR) was seen in 8/40 (20.0%), stable disease (SD) in 22/40 (55.0%), and progressive disease (PD) in 10/40 (25%) patients. In PSMA PET, very early molecular PR was observed in 12 (30.0%), SD in 19 (47.5%), and PD in 9 (22.5%) subjects. The PSA and TLP nadir were achieved after a median of 1 (1–5) and 2 (1–6) cycles, respectively. Nineteen (47.5%) patients showed overall biochemical PR, 11 (27.5%) had SD, and 10 (25%) experienced PD. In PSMA-directed PET, 4 patients experienced molecular complete response (CR), 24 (60.0%) had PR, 4 (10.0%) SD, and 8 (20.0%) PD. Early biochemical or radiographic response was not associated with longer overall survival (OS). Overall biochemical responders had a nearly significantly longer median OS (22.7 months) than non-responders (14.4 months, p = 0.08). Early PSA progression was associated with shorter OS (12.2 months), compared to biochemical SD/PR (18.7 months, p = 0.09).ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort, there was no association between early PSMA PET radiographic response and overall survival; hence, treatment should not be prematurely discontinued. In contrast, early PSA progression after one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT was an indicator of overall progression and poor clinical outcome.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety results of 177Lu-PSMA therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: first experience of a developing South Asian Country.

Metastatic castration resistant-prostate cancer (mCRPC) is deadly condition that remains incurable despite various therapies. Initial studies have shown promising results with Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 177 Lu-PSMA) therapy for advanced prostate cancer. However, most of the published efficacy and safety data is retrospective. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety results of 177 Lu-PSMA therapy in mCRPC patients after 2 cycles. Twenty-five patients of mCRPC, treated with standard care treatment were enrolled for 2 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and Analgesic Quantification Scale (AQS) for efficacy and hemoglobin, total leukocyte, platelets and serum creatinine for toxicity were recorded pre and post-therapy. Paired sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. Treated patients with mean PSA level of 157 ng/ml received mean dose of 6.84 GBq of 177 Lu-PSMA. For PSA, partial response (PR) was seen in 11/25 (44%), stable disease (SD) in 8/25 (32%) and progressive disease (PD) in 6/25 (24%) patients. Grade 1 and 2 hemoglobin toxicity was seen in 5/25 (20%) and 6/25 (24%) patients respectively. No patient developed grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicities. Grade 1 and 2 nephrotoxicity was seen in 1 patient each. Statistically significant difference was seen in ECOG, VAS and AQS scores ( P < 0.001). No significant nephrotoxicity was observed ( P = 0.558). Efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-PSMA therapy after 2 cycles have shown significant PSA response and pain palliation in heavily pretreated mCRPC patients.

Enzalutamide Prior to Radium-223 Is Associated with Better Overall Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Compared to Abiraterone-A Retrospective Study.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a progressive stage of prostate cancer that often spreads to the bone. Radium-223, a bone-targeting radiopharmaceutical, has been shown to improve the overall survival in mCRPC in patients without visceral metastasis. However, the impact of prior systemic therapy on the treatment outcome of mCRPC patients receiving radium-223 remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the optimal choice of systemic therapy before radium-223 in mCRPC patients. The study included 41 mCRPC patients who received radium-223 therapy, with 22 receiving prior enzalutamide and 19 receiving prior abiraterone. The results showed that the median overall survival was significantly longer in the enzalutamide group than in the abiraterone group (25.1 months vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.049). Moreover, the number of patients requiring blood transfusion was higher in the abiraterone group than in the enzalutamide group (9.1% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.16). The study also found that the number of doses of Radium-223 received was significantly associated with overall survival (≥5 vs. <5, HR 0.028, 95%CI 0.003-0.231, p = 0.001). Our study provides insights into the optimal treatment choice for mCRPC prior to radium-223, indicating that enzalutamide prior to radium-223 administration may have better outcomes compared to abiraterone in mCRPC patients without visceral metastasis.

Feasibility of home-based exercise training during adjuvant treatment for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (EXACT)

BackgroundExercise is an effective adjuvant therapy that can alleviate treatment-related toxicities for men with prostate cancer (PC). However, the feasibility of delivering exercise training to men with advanced disease and the wider impact on clinical outcomes remain unknown. The purpose of the EXACT trial was to determine the feasibility and effects of home-based exercise training in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).MethodsPatients with mCRPC receiving ADT + an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) were prescribed 12 weeks of home-based, remotely monitored, moderate intensity, aerobic and resistance exercise. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment, retention and adherence rates. Safety and adverse events were monitored throughout, with functional and patient-reported outcomes captured at baseline, post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up.ResultsFrom the 117 screened, 49 were deemed eligible and approached, with 30 patients providing informed consent (61% recruitment rate). Of those who consented, 28 patients completed baseline assessments, with 24 patients completing the intervention and 22 completing follow-up (retention rates: 86% and 79% respectively). Task completion was excellent throughout, with no intervention-related adverse events recorded. Self-reported adherence to the overall intervention was 82%. Exercise training decreased mean body mass (−1.5%), improved functional fitness (> 10%) and improved several patient-reported outcomes including clinically meaningful changes in fatigue (p = 0.042), FACT-G (p = 0.054) and FACT-P (p = 0.083), all with moderate effect sizes.ConclusionHome-based exercise training, with weekly remote monitoring, was feasible and safe for men with mCRPC being treated with an ARPI. Given that treatment-related toxicities accumulate throughout the course of treatment, and as a result, negatively impact functional fitness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), it was positive that exercise training improved or prevented a decline in these clinically important variables and could better equip patients for future treatment. Collectively, these preliminary feasibility findings support the need for a definitive, larger RCT, which downstream may lead to the inclusion of home-based exercise training as part of adjuvant care for mCRPC.

Prognostic value of a baseline prognostic nutritional index for patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) integrates both nutritional and immune indicators and provides promising prognostic value for various malignancies. However, there is still no specific consensus relating to the precise relationship between the pretreatment PNI and the survival outcome of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Here, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of PNI for patients with PCa. We used the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and CNKI databases to identify and retrieve eligible articles that were published in any language up to the 1st March 2023. Our analysis considered hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) published in the included studies. Data synthesis and analysis were conducted using Stata 15.1 software. A total of ten studies featuring 1631 cases were included in our quantitative analysis. Analysis showed that a low PNI at baseline was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.40-3.34; p = 0.01), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 2.17; 95% CI 1.63-2.89; p < 0.001). Owing to high levels of heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analysis based on disease staging, sample size, and cutoff value; we found that disease staging may have been the source of the heterogeneity. A low pretreatment PNI was associated with poor survival outcomes for both metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. A low pretreatment PNI was significantly correlated with a worse OS and PFS in patients with PCa. A low pretreatment PNI may act as a reliable and effective predictor for the prognosis of patients with PCa. Further well-designed studies should be performed to fully evaluate the prognostic performance of this novel indicator for PCa.

Tumor Volume on PSMA PET as a Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Cabazitaxel.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of 68 Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving second-line chemotherapy with cabazitaxel. All patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent a PSMA PET/CT within 8 weeks before initiating the cabazitaxel treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The whole-body PSMA total tumor volume (PSMA-TV) was measured for each patient. Other factors such as prostate-specific antigen, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase were recorded. A log-rank cutoff finder was used to define the PSMA-TV optimal cutoff. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. In total, 32 patients were included, receiving a median of 6 cycles of cabazitaxel (range, 2-10). After a median follow-up of 12 months, 28 patients presented disease progression, and 18 died. Baseline PSMA-TV presented a significant association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.035 and P = 0.002, respectively). Optimal PSMA-TV cutoffs were 515 mL for PFS and 473 mL for OS. Patients with low volume presented longer PFS and OS than those with high volume: median PFS, 21 versus 12 weeks, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.33; P = 0.017); and median OS, 24 versus 8.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.21; P = 0.002). On the multivariable analyses, PSMA-TV remained an independent predictor of OS ( P = 0.016). Our results show that total tumor volume measured on PSMA PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with cabazitaxel. High PSMA-TV before treatment initiation is associated with shorter PFS and OS.

Lutetium-177 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-617 Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Results of Single-Center Experience.

Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 is a novel alternative therapeutic option in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, especially useful for patients who do not respond to standard therapy methods. The aim of this study was to define the efficacy and safety profile of lutetium-177 prostate- specific membrane antigen-617 treatment in a group of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Study group included 34 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (median, 69.6 ± 7.7 years) who were treated with lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 therapy (22/34; 4 courses, 12/34; 2 courses). Patients were evaluated by physical examination, Eastern coop- erative oncology group performance status, gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emis- sion tomography/computed tomography, brief pain inventory-short form questionnaire, biochemical tests, and complete blood counts. Treatment response and adverse effects were examined by brief pain inventory scores, SUVmax values, biochemical tests, and complete blood counts. Independent variables were analyzed statistically (significance; P < .05). The Eastern cooperative oncology group performance was grade 0 in 5/34 (14.7%), grade 1 in 25/34 (73.5%), and grade 2 in 4/34 (11.8%) patients. Distribution of patient numbers according to brief pain inven- tory scores (score: <1, scores: 1-4, and scores: 5-10) was 2, 10 and 22 at the beginning, 6, 16 and 12 after the second course, and 10, 10 and 2 after the fourth course of treatment, respectively. Serum prostate-specific antigen decreased in 15 of 22 patients (68%) (P < .05). Before and after the treatment, we found a substan- tial decrease in SUVmax values (22.3 vs. 11.8, P < .001) and brief pain inventory scores (score ≥ 5; 22/34 pts vs. 0/22 pts). The counts of white blood cells (P < .05), hemoglobin (P < .05), and thrombocytes (P = .001) were all significantly lower at the conclusion of the therapy. The most important adverse events were severe leukopenia (1/34 pts; 2.29 × 103/μL) and thrombocytopenia (3/34 pts; 32 000, 36 000, 32 000 106/L). Q1 Conclusion: We found that lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 therapy is a promising treatment method for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapy, according to our biochemical, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and pain score outcomes.

The role of the caregiver in older patients with advanced prostate cancer: results from the ADHERE Prospective Study of the Meet-URO network.

To assess caregivers' characteristics and influence of the presence or absence of the caregiver on clinical outcomes of older (≥70 years) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZ). Patients from the Meet-URO 5 ADHERE study were assessed with a 5-item caregiver evaluation questionnaire focusing on the presence, age, degree of kinship, working status and qualification of the caregiver. We investigated the association between the presence of a caregiver and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of enrolled patients. No differences were found in the main clinical characteristics between patients with or without a caregiver, except for a lower median G8 score (p = 0.0453) in the caregiver group. A longer radiographic PFS (rPFS) was observed in the group without a caregiver, with a trend towards more prolonged overall survival (OS) in the same group. Our work suggests a detrimental effect of caregivers in managing older mCRPC patients treated with ABI or ENZ, especially those identified as frail by the geriatric G8 screening score. Further work is needed to identify and address patients' vulnerability areas, which could have a detrimental effect on prognosis.

Efficacy of Systemic Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients With Visceral Metastasis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis.

There are limited pooled data showing the impact of visceral metastasis on oncologic outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapies. We aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with or without visceral metastasis. Three databases were queried in July 2022 for randomized, controlled trials analyzing metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapy (androgen receptor signaling inhibitor and/or docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy) to standard of care. We analyzed the association between presence of visceral metastases and efficacy of systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. The main and secondary outcomes of interest were overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. Formal meta-analysis using fixed-effect model and network meta-analysis using random-effect model with a frequentist approach were conducted. We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) guidelines. Overall, 12 and 8 randomized, controlled trials were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to standard of care improved overall survival in patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) as well as in those without (pooled HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.72; no differences in both across- and within-trial approach; P = .13 and P = .06, respectively). On the other hand, the progression-free survival benefit from androgen receptor signaling inhibitor + androgen deprivation therapy was significantly lower in patients with visceral metastasis using across-trial approach (P = .03), while it did not reach statistical significance using within-trial approach (P = .14). Analysis of treatment ranking in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer showed that darolutamide + docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy had the highest likelihood of improved overall survival irrespective of visceral metastasis. In post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to androgen deprivation therapy significantly improved overall survival in both patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and those without (pooled HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55-0.72). No randomized, controlled trials reported the differential oncologic outcomes stratified by lung vs liver metastases. Despite aggressive clinical behavior and worse trajectory of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with visceral metastasis, the effectiveness of novel systemic therapies is similar in both metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with and without visceral metastasis. Further well-designed studies with detailed visceral metastatic sites and number will enrich the clinical decision-making.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors for first-line abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PurposeTo investigate the survival outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving first-line novel androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs) and prognostic factors for patient survival.MethodsThis retrospective study obtained data from 202 patients who started abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide as first-line therapy for mCRPC between 2016 and 2021 from a single academic center. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) defined as the interval from the start of ARAT to death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study period. The secondary endpoints were PSA decline, PSA nadir, and time to nadir (TTN) after ARATs. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were applied for depicting OS. Cox proportional hazards model with inversed probability of treatment weighing-adjustment was used to validate the effect of patient, disease, and treatment response factors on OS.ResultsAmong 202 patients, 164 patients were treated with first-line ARATs alone and 38 patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median OS was not reached in patients with first-line ARATs alone and was 38.8 months in those with subsequent chemotherapy after failure from ARATs. OS was not different between the use of abiraterone and enzalutamide, though enzalutamide showed a higher rate of PSA decline ≧ 90% (56% versus 40%, p = 0.021) and longer TTN (5.5 versus 4.7 months, p = 0.019). Multivariable analysis showed that PSA nadir > 2 ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR) 7.04, p < 0.001] and TTN<7 months (HR 2.18, p = 0.012) were independently associated with shorter OS. Patients with both of these poor prognostic factors had worse OS compared to those who had 0–1 factors (HR 9.21, p < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients with mCRPC who received first-line ARATs had better survival if they had a PSA nadirleqq2 ng/mL or a TTNgeqq7 months. Further study is needed to determine if an early switch in therapy for those in whom neither is achieved may impact OS.

The Impact of PSMA PET-Based Eligibility Criteria Used in the Prospective Phase II TheraP Trial in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioligand Therapy.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown encouraging results for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II TheraP study. The inclusion criteria for that study comprised a pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan showing sufficient tumor uptake using a predefined threshold and the absence of 18F-FDG-positive, PSMA ligand-negative tumor lesions. However, the prognostic value of these PET-based inclusion criteria remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of mCRPC patients treated with PSMA RLT using TheraP as well as other TheraP-based PET inclusion criteria. Methods: First, patients were dichotomized into 2 groups whose PSMA PET scans did (TheraP contrast-enhanced PSMA [cePSMA] PET-positive) or did not (TheraP cePSMA PET-negative) fulfill the inclusion criteria of TheraP. Notably, unlike in TheraP, 18F-FDG PET was not performed on our patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline), PSA progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were compared. Additionally, patients were further dichotomized according to predefined SUVmax thresholds different from those used in TheraP to analyze their potential impact on outcome as well. Results: In total, 107 mCRPC patients were included in this analysis (TheraP cePSMA PET-positive, n = 77; TheraP cePSMA PET-negative, n = 30). PSA response rates were higher in TheraP cePSMA PET-positive patients than in TheraP cePSMA PET-negative patients (54.5% vs. 20%, respectively; P = 0.0012). The median PSA progression-free survival (P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.0007) of patients were significantly longer in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group than in the TheraP cePSMA PET-negative group. Moreover, being in the TheraP cePSMA PET-positive group was identified as a significant prognosticator of longer OS (P = 0.003). The application of different SUVmax thresholds for a single hottest lesion demonstrated no influence on outcome in patients eligible for PSMA RLT. Conclusion: Patient selection for PSMA RLT according to the inclusion criteria of TheraP led to a better treatment response and outcome in our preselected patient cohort. However, a relevant number of patients not fulfilling these criteria also showed substantial rates of response.

Conditional survival does not improve over time in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing docetaxel.

To investigate the conditional overall survival (OS) ofmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy. We used deidentified patient-level data from the Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge database and the control arm of the ENTHUSE 14 trial. We identified 2158 chemonaïve mCRPC patients undergoing docetaxel chemotherapy in the five randomized clinical trials. The 6-month conditional OS was calculated at times 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months from randomization. Survival curves of each group were compared using the log-rank test. Patients were then stratified into low- and high-risk groups based on the median predicted value of our recently published nomogram predicting OS in mCRPC patients. Nearly half (45%) of the study population was aged between 65 and 74 years. Median interquartile range prostate-specific antigen for the overall cohort was 83.2 (29.6-243) ng/mL, and 59% of patients had bone metastasis with or without lymph node involvement. The 6-month conditional survival rates at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for the entire cohort were 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92-94), 82% (95% CI: 81-84), 76% (95% CI: 73-78), 75% (95% CI: 71-78), and 71% (95% CI: 65-76). These rates were, respectively, 96% (95% CI: 95-97), 92% (95% CI: 90-93), 84% (95% CI: 81-87), 81% (95% CI: 77-85), and 79% (95% CI: 72-84) in the low-risk group and 89% (95% CI: 87-91), 73% (95% CI: 70-76), 65% (95% CI: 60-69), 64% (95% CI: 58-70), and 58% (95% CI: 47-67) in the high-risk group. The conditional OS for patients undergoing docetaxel chemotherapy tends to plateau over time, with the main drop in conditional OS happening during the first year from initiating docetaxel treatment. That is the longer a patient survives, the more likely they are to survive further. This prognostic information could be a useful tool for a more accurate tailoring of both follow-up and therapies. In this report, we looked at the future survival in months of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer on chemotherapy who have already survived a certain period. We found that the longer time that a patient survives, the more likely they will continue to survive. We conclude that this information will help physicians tailor follow-ups and treatments for patients for a more accurate personalized medicine.

Factors associated with thrombocytopenia in patients treated with pegfilgrastim.

Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor approved in Japan for the prevention of neutropenia caused by antineoplastic agents. Severe thrombocytopenia was reported with pegfilgrastim, however, the factors associated with thrombocytopenia are unclear. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with thrombocytopenia in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) with cabazitaxel. This study included metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who received pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of FN with cabazitaxel. The timing and severity of thrombocytopenia and factors associated with the reduction rate of platelets were examined in patients who received pegfilgrastim for the primary prevention of FN during the first course of cabazitaxel and by multiple regression analysis. Thrombocytopenia was most common within 7 days of pegfilgrastim administration, with 32 cases of grade 1 and 6 cases of grade 2 as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the reduction rate of platelets after pegfilgrastim administration was significantly positively correlated with monocytes. In contrast, the presence of liver metastases and neutrophils was significantly negatively correlated with the reduction rate of platelets. Thrombocytopenia due to pegfilgrastim administered as primary prophylaxis for FN with cabazitaxel was most likely to occur within one week after pegfilgrastim administration, suggesting that monocytes, neutrophils, and liver metastases were associated with a reduction in platelets.

Presence of somatic/germline homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations and outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) receiving first-line (1L) treatment stratified by BRCA status.

5003 Background: Understanding of the association between HRR mutations and outcomes in mCRPC pts is limited. This analysis investigated the prevalence and outcomes of pts with/out HRR mutations (somatic and/or germline), stratified as BRCA, non-BRCA, or HRR non-BRCA, who initiated 1L mCRPC treatment with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or taxane. Methods: Eligible pts from PROREPAIR-B (NCT03075735), PROSENZA (NCT02922218), PROSTAC (NCT02362620), and PROSABI (NCT02787837) studies underwent paired somatic/germline DNA analyses using a custom NGS panel that included ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, PALB2, RAD51B, and RAD54L. Those with pathogenic (likely) mutations in ≥1 allele of ≥1 gene were considered deficient (HRR). rPFS, PFS2, and OS were reported for BRCA, non-BRCA, and HRR non-BRCA subgroups; associations between mutations and outcomes were assessed using inverse probability weighted Cox models, which balanced the baseline (BL) characteristics between subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p values are presented. Results: Of 729 pts, 223 (30.6%) were HRR, including 96 (13.2%) BRCA. 60.4% of pts were treated with NHT and 39.6% with taxane in 1L; 80.7% received at least second-line treatment. Median age at BL was 72.2 years, 63.5% had Gleason &gt;7, 53.1% had ECOG ≥1, and 13.3% presented with visceral metastases. BL characteristics after adjustment were similar (standard mean difference: &lt;0.1 in HRR and maximum 0.11 for all pts). BRCA pts had significantly worse rPFS, PFS2, and OS than non-BRCA pts; BRCA pts also had significantly worse PFS2 and OS than HRR non-BRCA pts. There were no significant differences between the outcomes of somatic and germline BRCA pts. Conclusions: BRCA pts, regardless of somatic/germline origin, had significantly worse rPFS, PFS2, and OS than the total non-BRCA population and significantly worse PFS2 and OS than non-BRCA pts in the HRR subgroup. It is crucial to screen early for HRR mutations, particularly in BRCA1/2, to begin timely, targeted mCRPC treatment and improve prognosis.[Table: see text]

Transcriptome Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

The clinical utility of circulating tumor cells (CTC) as a non-invasive multipurpose biomarker is broadly recognized. The earliest methods for enriching CTCs from whole blood rely on antibody-based positive selection. The prognostic utility of CTC enumeration using positive selection with the FDA-approved CellSearchTM system has been demonstrated in numerous studies. The capture of cells with specific protein phenotypes does not fully represent cancer heterogeneity and therefore does not realize the prognostic potential of CTC liquid biopsies. To avoid this selection bias, CTC enrichment based on size and deformability may provide better fidelity, i.e., facilitate the characterization of CTCs with any phenotype. In this study, the recently FDA-approved Parsortix® technology was used to enrich CTCs from prostate cancer (PCa) patients for transcriptome analysis using HyCEADTM technology. A tailored PCa gene panel allowed us to stratify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings suggest that targeted CTC transcriptome profiling may be predictive of therapy response.