Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Research Articles

The HALP score as a prognostic factor in metastatic biliary cancer.

Biliary tract cancers are serious diseases and new biomarkers may be useful for the optimal management and prediction of these cases. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, a novel composite marker, in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients with biliary tract cancers were analyzed retrospectively. Laboratory values, patient and disease characteristics, and survival rates were evaluated. The diagnostic impact of the HALP score was assessed with regression analyses. The study included 106 individuals with metastatic biliary tract cancer. Based on the median HALP score, ≥ 2.22 was considered a high score and < 2.22 was considered low. The overall average survival time was found to be 11.4months. Patients with low HALP scores had median overall survival of 9.5months, while those with high HALP scores had median overall survival of 15.9months. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, CA19-9 level, and HALP score remained significant predictors of overall survival. The HALP score appears to be a useful prognostic marker in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer.

53P Envafolimab and chidamide in combination with GEMOX as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer (B-Enefits/SCOG-B001): A single-arm, exploratory, phase II trial: Interim report

53P Envafolimab and chidamide in combination with GEMOX as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer (B-Enefits/SCOG-B001): A single-arm, exploratory, phase II trial: Interim report

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with pretreated metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC). The study was a phase 2 randomized trial with Simon's optimal two-stage design requiring 36 evaluable patients per group after second stage. Sixty-one patients were included from September 2018 to January 2022 and randomized (1:1) to receive SBRT (15 Gy × 1 on day 1 to a primary or metastatic lesion) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 2 weeks) with/without ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Decision to continue accrual into the second stage depended on the CBR from the first stage. Forty-two patients received SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab with a CBR of 31.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.6-47.1]. Five patients (11.9%) achieved partial response with median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.1-21.5). Nineteen patients received SBRT/nivolumab. This group was closed after the initial stage based on a CBR of 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3-33.1). Adverse events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (31%) and 3 (16%) patients in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab and SBRT/nivolumab groups, respectively. One patient died from immune-related hepatitis in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab group. Combining SBRT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab is well tolerated, feasible, and shows response in a subgroup of patients with mBTC.

FDA Approval Summary: Durvalumab and Pembrolizumab, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer.

On September 2, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved durvalumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC). On October 31, 2023, the FDA approved pembrolizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine for the same indication. Approvals were based on two randomized, multiregional, placebo-controlled trials that randomly allocated patients to receive durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966) in combination with chemotherapy or placebo in combination with chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in both studies. In both studies, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS was demonstrated. In the TOPAZ-1 trial, the median OS of patients receiving durvalumab was 12.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.1-14.0] and 11.5 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.5) in patients receiving placebo [hazard ratio (HR), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.97)]. In the KEYNOTE-966 trial, the median OS of patients receiving pembrolizumab was 12.7 months (95% CI, 11.5-13.6) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.9-11.6) in patients receiving placebo [HR, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95)]. The addition of checkpoint inhibitors to standard of care chemotherapy for this indication did not reveal any new adverse event signals, and the safety profile was generally consistent with the known clinical experience with durvalumab, pembrolizumab, and the backbone chemotherapy regimen. The approvals of durvalumab and pembrolizumab in combination with standard of care cisplatin and gemcitabine for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BTC add two new therapeutic options for these patients.

Evaluating Debio 1347 in Patients with FGFR Fusion-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors from the FUZE Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Basket Trial.

This multicenter phase II basket trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of Debio 1347, an investigational, oral, highly selective, ATP-competitive, small molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-3, in patients with solid tumors harboring a functional FGFR1-3 fusion. Eligible adults had a previously treated locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic biliary tract (cohort 1), urothelial (cohort 2), or another histologic cancer type (cohort 3). Debio 1347 was administered at 80 mg once daily, continuously, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and incidence of adverse events. Between March 22, 2019, and January 8, 2020, 63 patients were enrolled and treated, 30 in cohort 1, 4 in cohort 2, and 29 in cohort 3. An unplanned preliminary statistical review showed that the efficacy of Debio 1347 was lower than predicted, and the trial was terminated. In total, 3 of 58 evaluable patients had partial responses, representing an objective response rate of 5%, with a further 26 (45%) having stable disease (≥6 weeks duration). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (35%) of 63 patients, with the most common being hyperphosphatemia (13%) and stomatitis (5%). Two patients (3%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Debio 1347 had manageable toxicity; however, the efficacy in patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions did not support further clinical evaluation in this setting. Our transcriptomic-based analysis characterized in detail the incidence and nature of FGFR fusions across solid tumors. See related commentary by Hage Chehade et al., p. 4549.

Real-life data on biliary tract cancers in France: The nested Amber study from the French ACABi GERCOR PRONOBIL retro-prospective, observational cohort

Background and aimsTo gather real-life data on biliary tract cancer (BTC) in France, an ambispective ACABi GERCOR Pronobil cohort was initiated. This nested study, Amber, utilized data from this cohort to document clinical practices in this setting. MethodsInclusion criteria encompassed patients with locally advanced/metastatic BTC managed between 2019 and 2021 in nine French referral hospitals. Objectives included describing demographic and clinical data, treatments outcomes (safety and efficacy), and overall survival. ResultsOf the 138 patients (median age 65 years, a balanced sex ratio) included, most displayed ECOG 0–1 (83 %), at least one comorbidity (79 %), and had intrahepatic (56 %) and metastatic (82 %) BTC. Among surgically-resected patients, 60 % received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly capecitabine (67 %). CisGem, the primary first-line palliative chemotherapy (69 %), showed a 23 % objective response rate, a median progression-free survival of 5.3 months, and a median overall survival of 13.4 months. Second-, third-, and fourth-line were given to 75 % (FOLFOX: 35 %, targeted therapy: 14 %), 32 %, and 13 % of patients. In total, 67 % of patients had a molecular profile (IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions: accounting for 21 % each in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). ConclusionBTC patients were predominantly treated according to international recommendations. The obtained demographic, tumor, and molecular data were consistent with existing literature.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: A large real-life worldwide population

BackgroundThe TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a global multicenter retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes. MethodsWe included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin at 39 sites in 11 countries (Europe, the United States, and Asia). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results666 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 15.1 months and median PFS was 8.2 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 32.7 %, with stable disease in 45.2 % of patients. High baseline CEA levels, ECOG PS > 0, metastatic disease, and NLR > 3 were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92.9 % of patients (grade >2: 46.6 %). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 20.0 % (grade >2: 2.5 %). Three deaths (0.5 %) were deemed treatment-related, none linked to immunotherapy. Common irAEs were rash (8.2 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2), itching (10.3 % all grades; 0.2 % grade >2), and hypothyroidism (5.1 % all grades; 0.3 % grade >2). Durvalumab discontinuation rate due to AEs was 1.5 %.ESMO-recommended genes were analyzed and no outcome differences were found. A comparative analysis with a historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone confirmed the positive survival impact of durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine. ConclusionThis first global real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer. NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547. Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group. The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer. Servier and AIO-Studien.

Zanidatamab in previously-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC): Overall survival (OS) and longer follow-up from the phase 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 study.

4091 Background: For patients with BTC that has progressed after first-line therapy, prognosis is poor with a median OS of 6-9 months with subsequent chemotherapy. Zanidatamab is a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody that binds to two non-overlapping HER2 domains and crosslinks neighboring HER2 proteins. In the primary analysis of the phase 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 trial, after a median follow-up of 12.4 months (data cutoff: October 10, 2022), zanidatamab showed encouraging antitumor activity (41% confirmed objective response rate [cORR]) with rapid and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated HER2+ BTC. OS data were immature at that time. Here, we report updated analyses, including OS. Methods: HERIZON-BTC-01 (NCT04466891) is an ongoing phase 2b trial assessing zanidatamab (20 mg/kg IV Q2W) in patients with HER2/ERBB2 gene amplification and immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ or 3+ (Cohort 1; HER2+); or 0 or 1+ (Cohort 2) locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic BTC (gallbladder cancer, intra/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) who received prior gemcitabine-containing treatment. The primary endpoint was cORR. Select secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), OS, and frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs). Updated efficacy analyses include only Cohort 1; safety analyses include Cohorts 1 and 2. Results: As of the data cutoff (July 28, 2023), median (range) follow-up was 21.9 (16-34) months. In the 80 patients in Cohort 1 (HER2+), treatment was ongoing for 9 (11%) patients and 20 (25%) patients remained on the study. cORR was unchanged from the primary analysis (n = 33; 41%) with 1 additional complete response (n = 2; 2.5%). The median DoR (95% CI) increased approximately 2 months to 14.9 (7.4, not reached) months. Median OS (95% CI) was 15.5 (10.4, 18.5) months; 12-month OS (95% CI) was 56.2% (44.3, 66.5). Among all 87 patients (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), 18 (21%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). The most common grade 3 TRAEs (occurring in &gt; 2 patients) were diarrhea (4 [5%]); anemia (3 [3%]), and ejection fraction decreased (3 [3%]). Only one patient had a grade 4 TRAE (aspartate aminotransferase increased). There were no deaths due to TRAEs. Serious AEs occurred in 8 (9%) patients; 2 (2%) patients discontinued treatment due to an AE (pneumonitis and ejection fraction decreased; 1 patient each). Conclusions: With close to 2 years of median follow-up, zanidatamab demonstrated a median OS of 15.5 months and a median duration of response of 14.9 months (an increase compared with the initial report) in previously-treated patients with HER2+ BTC; a patient population with significant unmet need. With additional follow-up, safety remained manageable. A phase 3 trial of zanidatamab in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic BTC is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT04466891 .

A phase II study of liposomal irinotecan-based chemotherapy with or without PD-1 inhibitor in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.

e15077 Background: Clinical outcomes for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients (pt) progressed on first-line therapy remain dismal. Liposomal irinotecan (LI) (HE072) is a formulation encapsulating I in a lipid bilayer vesicle and was approved in China in September 2022. It was used with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer progressing on gemcitabine treatment. We conducted an phase II study to investigate HE072 in combination with 5-FU and LV with or without a novel PD-1 inhibitor SG001 in patients with advanced BTC progressed on prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Methods: This is a multi-center, non-randomized, open label phase II study in pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BTC. Key inclusion factors were ECOG PS 0-1, prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, evidence of disease progression with at least one measurable lesion and adequate haematological/organ function. Key exclusion factor was brain metastases. Pts were treated with liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2) plus LV (400 mg/m2f) and 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) with or without SG001 (240mg) IV every 2 weeks for up to 2 years in absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments based on RECIST 1.1 were performed every 6 weeks by investigators. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: As of April 25, 2023, 17 BTC pts were enrolled into liposomal irinotecan-based chemotherapy arm (n = 7) and liposomal irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus SG001 arm (n = 10). ORR and DCR were 14.3% and 71.4% for chemotherapy arm, 20% and 40% for chemotherapy+ SG001 arm. Median OS and PFS for chemotherapy arm was 11.5(95% CI, 3.9-NE) and 4.2(95% CI, 1.4-NE) months, and for chemotherapy+PD-1 arm was 15.3 (95% CI, 3.6-17.0) and 3.8(95% CI, 1.4-6.9) months. All pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The incidence of grade≥3 TRAEs was 58.8%(10/17), which occurred in 57% (4/7) of pts treated in chemotherapy arm vs 60% (6/10) in chemotherapy+SG001 arm. Among all patients, the most frequent grade ≥3 TRAEs were fatigue (29.4%), neutropenia (23.5%) and leukopenia (23.5%). One grade 4 TRAE leading to dose reduction in liposomal irinotecan was febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy arm. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggested that liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU and LV was well-tolerated and showed promising and durable clinical activity in advanced BTC pts progressed on first-line treatment. Combined use of SG001 further improved clinical outcome in these pts without increased toxicity. Combination of liposomal irinotecan, 5-FU, LV and PD-1 inhibitor is a treatment strategy which is worthy of further exploration.

The safety and efficacy of ivonescimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.

4095 Background: Despite that PD-1/L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have been approved as first-line(1L) treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the overall survival benefit remains limited, particularly for patients with gallbladder cancer. Ivonescimab, a tetrameric bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF, has the potential to produce complementary and synergistic anti-tumor effects through both pathways. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ivonescimab in combination with chemotherapy in advanced BTC. Methods: This was an open-label, multi-center phase II study in patients with unresectable locally advanced and metastatic BTC. Ivonescimab was administered every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles, along with gemcitabine and cis-platinum. After that, ivonescimab monotherapy was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), time-to-response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: As of Nov 26, 2023, a total of 22 pts with advanced BTC were enrolled in the study. The median age was 65.0 years (range, 47-75), 81.8% of patients had ECOG of 1. All patients had initially unresectable disease status, 54.5% of patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 4.5% of patients had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 40.9% of patients had gallbladder cancer at baseline. The median follow-up time was 10.7 months, and the median exposure time of ivonescimab was 7.2 months. A total of 86.4% (19/22) of patients experienced at least one grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), but none led to discontinuation treatment or death. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs with a frequency of at least 10% included white blood cell count decreased (50.0%), neutrophil count decreased (50.0%), anemia (40.9%), platelet count decreased (22.7%), and hypertension (13.6%). The ORR by investigator assessment was 63.6% (14/22) regardless of PD-L1 status, with an ORR of 77.8% (7/9) for gallbladder cancer patients specifically. The DCR was 100% (22/22). The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.9), with a 6-month PFS rate of 84.2% (95% CI, 58.7-94.6). The median OS was 16.8 months (95% CI, 9.8- NE), with a 9-month OS rate of 81.8% (95% CI, 58.5-92.8). Conclusions: Ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy as 1L treatment demonstrated promising efficacy in pts with advanced BTC. Further trials to validate the efficacy and safety are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05214482 .

Genomic and biomarker analysis of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy treated for patients with metastatic BTC cancer: A real world study.

e16373 Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases with dismal prognosis. The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial and KENOTE 966 reported a survival benefit with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy (GemCis,GC) in patients with advanced BTC. Consequently, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has become a new standard care for advanced BTC. Understanding the association between genomic alterations and immunotherapy outcomes of BTC could further improve the clinical benefits. Therefore, we conducted this real-world study in China. Methods: This study included 47 patients with metastatic BTC treated with PD-1/PD-L1(ICI) antibodies in combination with chemotherapy from January 2019 to January 2023 in Medical Oncology department of Chinese PLA General Hospital. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR). The exploration endpoint was genomic and biomarker analysis. Genomic tumor DNA was isolated from 30 patients and used for targeted next-generation sequencing genes to identify the genomic profiles. Results: 47 patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus with chemotherapy in first line were enrolled in this study. The median PFS were 5.4m (95%CI,4.4-6.3), ORR and DCR was 21.3% and 83.0%, respectively. Patients were grouped into two group:AS+PD1(n=34) group and GC+ICI(n=13) group. In the AS(Albumin paclitaxel+S1)+PD1 group, mPFS was 5.0m (95%CI 3.8-6.1), ORR were 20.6% and DCR were 79.4% as we reported previously. In the GC+ ICI, mPFS was 7.9m (95%CI 4.7-11.1), ORR was 23.1% and DCR was 92.3%. There was no difference in terms of PFS, ORR and DCR between two groups. With regard to biomarker analysis, PD-L1 expression positive were 16 patients, which of mPFS were 4.2m and ORR were 18.8%, otherwise 12 patients were PDL1 expression negative, of whom mPFS were 9.1m and 33.3% as unexpected. Average TMB were 4.5mt/MB for MSS type patients. There is no difference of PFS between TMB high(&gt;4.5mt/MB) or low(&lt;4.5mt/MB). As for genomic analysis, the most common gene alterations were TP53(N=13, 43%))KRAS(N=8, 26.7%), NTRK1\2\3(N=8, 26.7%), IDH1/2(N=6, 20%), PIK3CA(N=6, 20%), BRCA2(N=5, 16.7%). MDM2(N=5,16.7%), BRAF(N=4,13.3%). The mutations are mainly concentrated in the DDR (20) pathway followed by the RTK-RAS (16), TP53 (13), CPF (9), FA (9), HRR (9), and PI3K (8) pathways. Compared between long term survival(PFS&gt;5.4m)and short term survival(PFS&lt;5.4m), MDM2 was only predictor for short survival(p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Compared to AS+pd-1, patients received GP+ ICI numerically had better outcomes. It seems PD-L1 and TMB were not good predictors to select patients who can more benefit from immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. MDM2 mutation suggest patients tend to less active to immunotherapy-based modality.

Cadonilimab in combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BicureX): A phase II, single-arm clinical trial.

e16158 Background: PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment has been proven to be effective in improving the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, there is still considerable demand for further improvement of BTC patients’ prognosis. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4, a bi-specific antibody) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with advanced BTC in first -line treatment. Methods: In this phase II, single-arm trial, we will enroll 65 patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC/ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Participants received Cadonilimab (10 mg/kg, days 1, every three weeks) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, Q3W), and cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, Q3W) for up to eight cycles, followed by Cadonilimab (10 mg/kg, days 1, Q3W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment response was evaluated with image-based assessment according to response evaluation criteria insolid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. by two experienced experts and further explored multiple methods, such as 3D visualisation and Spectral computed tomography Scan. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included associations between response, molecular characteristics, and the immune microenvironment. Results: Between June 30, and January 31, 2024, a total of 30 patients have undergone at least one imaging evaluation. 66.7% of these patients were diagnosed with ICC, 23.3% with GBC, and 10% with ECC. The mean age was 58.4 years, and 60% of the patients were male. 24 (80%) patients had metastasis. Among them, 1 (3.3%) patient acheived complete response (CR), 15 (50%) patients had partial response (PR) and 8 (26.7%) patients presented with stable disease (SD). The ORR was 53.3% and the DCR was 80%. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were rash (80%) and anaemia (76.7%). Grade 3 TRAEs were observed in 66.7% of the patients. The most frequent grade 3 TRAEs were anaemia (33.3%), and leukocytopenia (33.3%). No grade 4 or 5 events were observed. All patients were microsatellite stable (MSS), and the median TMB was 2.88 (0-109.44) Muts/Mb. Conclusions: Cadonilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin shown a promising efficacy and acceptable safety profile as first-line treatment for advanced BTC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05978609 .

Effect of triplet regimen (single-agent chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) on survival compared to chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: A retrospective analysis.

e16132 Background: TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials have demonstrated the survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Although the ABC‐06 study proved the benefits of FOLFOX in 2nd line therapies, the efficacy is limited. There is no consensus regarding the optimal therapy regimen, and more effective therapeutic options are needed. This retrospective analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of a triplet regimen compared to standard chemotherapy in 2nd line BTC. Methods: Pts &gt; 18 years, with ECOG PS 0/1, histologically confirmed metastatic BTC and progression on 1st line Gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. A triple regimen was referred as Cohort A: tislelizumab and other anti-PD-1 antibody, capecitabine or S-1 plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs, lenvatinib or anlotinib). Standard chemotherapy was Cohort B: mFOLFOX or irinotecan plus capecitabine. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed treatment and clinical information from 121 pretreated BTC pts from Oct. 2021 to Oct. 2023, with a median age of 60 (range 36-82) years and 48% (58) of the pts were female. Among them, 86 patients received the triple regimen, while 35 patients received standard chemotherapy. Pts’characteristics were well balanced between the two groups in terms of gender, age, ECOG score, primary site, CEA, CA199, or presence of distant metastasis. According to the RECIST1.1 criteria, 1 pt achieved CR and 31 pts had PR in the triple treatment cohort, ORR reached 37.2% (95%CI 27.0-48.3%), which was significantly higher than the 2.8% (95%CI 0.1-14.9%) in the standard chemotherapy cohort (p &lt; 0.0001). Accordingly, the DCR of the two groups were 89.5% (95%CI 81.1-95.1%) and 71.4% (95%CI 53.7-85.4%) respectively. As of Oct 31, 2023, all patients developed progression, and the median PFS in cohort A was 6 months, compared to 2.0 months in cohort B (HR, 0.29, 95%CI 0.16-0.52, p &lt; 0.0001). 64 patients of cohort A and 28 patients of cohort B developed death. The median OS in cohort A was 16.0 months, compared to 6.0 months in cohort B (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19~0.64, p &lt; 0.0001). Any grade TRAEs occurred in 54.7% pts of cohort A and 42.9% of cohort B. Most common grade 3 TRAEs were hypohepatia (19.8%), hand-foot syndrome (11.6%), gastrointestinal reaction (1.2%) in cohort A, and hypohepatia (8.6%), hand-foot syndrome (2.9%) in cohort B. Conclusions: The retrospective analysis suggests that the triple regimen as second-line treatment for advanced BTC pts may help improve the efficacy and survival, and is worthy of further prospective exploration.

Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study

In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis. TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235. From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. Maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 250 (74%) of 338 participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 257 (75%) of 342 in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The most common maximum grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (70 [21%] vs 86 [25%]), anaemia (64 [19%] vs 64 [19%]), and neutropenia (63 [19%] vs 68 [20%]). Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed robust and sustained overall survival benefit with no new safety signals. Findings continue to support the regimen as a standard of care for people with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer. AstraZeneca.

Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Durvalumab in Adults with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: Evidence to Date.

Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have historically been managed with chemotherapy but, in recent years, this treatment paradigm has begun to shift with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors in addition to standard of care chemotherapy. The tumor microenvironment of BTC may be enriched with regulatory T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression in some patients. Durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin, has now received United States Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of advanced BTC. Regulatory approval was based on the Phase III, randomized TOPAZ-1 trial that demonstrated survival benefit with addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy was well tolerated, and a subset of patients were able to achieve a durable response, with a 2-year overall survival rate of 23.6%. However, limitations remain in identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Future study should aim to identify biomarkers predictive of substantial benefit, as well as the role of immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with targeted therapies and radiotherapy in the management of advanced BTC.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1. In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes. Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group. The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. AstraZeneca.

Abstract 5132: Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers

Abstract Background: Biliary tract cancer, typically diagnosed at advanced stages with a poor prognosis, has witnessed a glimmer of hope in the progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Yet, their limited response rates necessitate the search for effective biomarkers to refine patient selection. Methods: A total of 125 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) who received first-line ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) were prospectively enrolled. All baseline samples from 125 patients underwent targeted DNA sequencing, with an additional 62 patients undergoing RNA sequencing, and 85 patients had accessible mIHC data. The associations between molecular characteristics and the response to chemoimmunotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The cohort had a median age of 63 years (range from 34 to 82) and 52.8% (66/125) were male, including 54 with gallbladder cancer, 57 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 14 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months for the entire cohort, with the median PFS and OS of 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.2-7.9) and 11.8 months (95%CI: 10.3-14.8), respectively. The most mutated genes were TP53 (64/125, 51.2%), KRAS (34/125, 27.2%), ERBB2 (18/125, 14.4%), and ARID1A (17/125, 13.6%). Mutations of TP53 (51.2%, p = 0.042), BRCA2 (4.8%, p = 0.002), cytokine genes (6.4%, p = 0.004), and high tumor mutation burden (p = 0.072) demonstrated significant correlation with chemoimmunotherapy response. KRAS G12D mutations (PFS: P &amp;lt; 0.001; OS: P = 0.034) and ARID1A loss-of-function mutations (PFS: P = 0.009; OS: P = 0.012) were adverse survival factors, while high CXCL9 or CTLA4 expression was associated with response (CXCL9, P = 0.014; CTLA4, P = 0.067), improved PFS (CXCL9, P = 0.018; CTLA4, P = 0.008), and longer OS (CXCL9, P = 0.010; CTLA4, P = 0.008) under chemoimmunotherapy. Patients were classified into three subtypes using the identified survival biomarkers. Among them, Type I patients, characterized by the absence of KRAS G12D or ARID1A mutations but expressing high levels of CTLA4 or CXCL9, demonstrated the best outcomes under chemoimmunotherapy. Interestingly, further RNA analysis suggested that elevated CXCL9 expression correlated with heightened immune checkpoint expressions, including CTLA4, PD-L1, and PD-1 (all P &amp;lt; 0.001), as well as increased tumor microenvironment immune activity, findings validated in two additional independent patient cohorts both internal and external. Conclusions: Our study revealed predictive biomarkers relevant to the response and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Citation Format: Jieer Ying, Qi Xu, Jiaojiao Ni, Hanlin Chen, Chaoqun Li, Yanru Xie, Qinhong Zheng, Jianying Jin, Junrong Yan, Xiaoying Wu, Qiuxiang Ou, Li Yuan, Wei Zhuo, Haimeng Tang. Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5132.