Metastasis-free Interval Research Articles

Prognostic value of clinical and radiomic parameters in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma.

Approximately every second patient with uveal melanoma develops distant metastases, with the liver as the predominant target organ. While the median survival after diagnosis of distant metastases is limited to a year, yet-to-be-defined subgroups of patients experience a more favorable outcome. Therefore, prognostic biomarkers could help identify distinct risk groups to guide patient counseling, therapeutic decision-making, and stratification of study populations. To this end, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 101 patients with newly diagnosed hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma by using Cox-Lasso regression machine learning, adapted to a high-dimensional input parameter space. We show that substantial binary risk stratification can be performed, based on (i) clinical and laboratory parameters, (ii) measures of quantitative overall hepatic tumor burden, and (iii) radiomic parameters. Yet, combining two or all three domains failed to improve prognostic separation of patients. Additionally, we identified highly relevant clinical parameters (including lactate dehydrogenase, thrombocyte counts, aspartate transaminase, and the metastasis-free interval) at first diagnosis of metastatic disease as predictors for time-to-treatment failure and overall survival. Taken together, the risk stratification models, built by our machine-learning algorithm, identified a comparable and independent prognostic value of clinical, radiological, and radiomic parameters in uveal melanoma patients with hepatic metastases.

Prognosis of isolated locoregional recurrence after early breast cancer with immediate breast reconstruction surgery: a retrospective multi‑institutional study.

The prognosis in patients with breast cancer with isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) without simultaneous distant metastases after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognosis in this patient population. This multi-institutional retrospective observational study evaluated 3295 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent IBR at 12 Japanese medical facilities between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016. The outcome measures were the prognostic factors for ILRR after IBR, 5-year distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI), and 5-year overall survival (OS). Mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy was performed in 3295 patients. ILRR occurred in 70 patients, and the median observation period from ILRR diagnosis was 39.3months. Of the 70 patients, 9 (12.9%) had axillary lymph node recurrence (ALNR) at the time of ILRR diagnosis. The 5-year DMFI and OS rates after ILRR were 92.4% and 91.2%, respectively. Pathological lymph node metastasis at primary surgery (P = 0.041) and ALNR (P = 0.022) at ILRR were significantly associated with DMFI in the univariate analysis. ALNR was the only independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.041). Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT; P = 0.022) and ALNR (P = 0.043) were significantly associated with OS in the univariate analysis, and both PMRT (P = 0.010) and ALNR (P = 0.028) were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis for OS. Although patients with breast cancer who had ILRR after IBR have favorable prognosis, ALNR may lead to poor prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the prognosis of these patients.

Abstract PO3-05-02: Impact of hormone receptor expression level in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the large French ESME cohort

Abstract Background: In patients (pts) with early breast cancer (BC), the level of expression of estrogen receptor (ER) evaluated by immunohistochemistry is prognostic and predictive while progesterone receptor (PR) expression has an additional prognostic value. Allred scoring combines the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of staining. It is widely used for treatment choice for early BC. In metastatic setting, its role is less defined. Methods: The ESME database is a French National cohort of all consecutive pts who initiated a first-line treatment for metastatic BC (MBC) between January 2008 and December 2020 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCT03275311). For this study, we selected pts with HER2- MBC, known ER expression and intensity percentages, known PR status and who received endocrine-based therapy as first-line metastatic treatment. Primary objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and first line progression-free survival (PFS1) under endocrine therapy according to ER and PR expression level. ER expression was defined using Allred score on the last available tumor sample. PR status was defined using a positive (≥10%)vs negative ( < 10%) threshold. Secondary objective was to evaluate clinical PFS1 whether de novo or recurrent MBC and according to type of first line therapy (mono- vs combined endocrine therapy). Results: In the ER+ ± PR+/HER2- population, 8269 pts had information on ER percentage and staining intensity. Median follow-up was 53.4 months (95%CI [51.9; 54.7]). Allred score distribution, OS and PFS1 are described in table 1. Median OS was 43.1 months [41.1; 45.0] for the PR- group compared with 52.3 months [50.5; 54.4] for the PR+ group. After adjustments, patients with a PR- tumour had still a worse prognosis (HR=1.20, 95%CI [1.12-1.28], p<0.001). Median PFS1 was 10.2 months[9.6; 10.8]and 14.8 months[14.2; 15.4] for pts with PR- vs PR+ tumour (HR=1.36 (1.29-1.43), p<0.001) and PR status remained significant prognostic factor independently of de novo or recurrent status and association or not with a targeted therapy. Conclusion: ER expression evaluated using the Allred scoring, as well as PR positivity, retain prognostic value in first-line MBC patients. Table 1 : OS and PFS according to Allred status, de novo status and type of endocrine therapy. * Selected variables on multivariate model include PR status, age, SBR grade, histological subtype, number of metastatic site, type of metastasis (non visceral, visceral, brain visceral), HER 2 (0 vs 1-2), metastatic-free interval, mono- vs combined endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Marie Alexandre, Florence Castan, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Audrey Mailliez, Etienne Brain, Thomas Bachelot, Monica Arnedos, Florence Dalenc, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Vincent Massard, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Anca Berghian, Aude-marie Savoye, Jean-Sébastien frenel, Lise Bosquet, Suzette Delaloge, William Jacot. Impact of hormone receptor expression level in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the large French ESME cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-02.

Abstract PO2-05-14: Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers with low expression of hormone receptors: real world evidence from the French ESME cohort

Abstract Background: HER2-negative breast cancers expressing low (1-9 %) immunohistochemistry levels of hormone receptors (HR, estrogen and progesterone receptors), remain an uncertain category, being considered either as triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) or HR-positive (HR+) tumors across guidelines or approvals. The issues regarding this clinical subgroup are both prognostic, with the need of a better definition of their clinical outcome, as well as predictive. Methods: The ESME database is a French National cohort of all consecutive patients who initiated a first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from 2008 on, in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Patients with HER2-negative (0 to 2+, ISH negative) MBC and known estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) expression levels were selected. Primary objective was to evaluate crude overall survival (OS) in HER2-/HR-low (ER and PR 0-9 and not TNBC) MBC pts compared with those with TNBC and HR+ disease defined by ER and PR < 1%, and ER ± PR ≥ 10%, respectively. In these 3 populations, predefined secondary objectives were to evaluate PFS under first line chemotherapy (CT), to describe clinical characteristics and the distribution of genetic abnormalities identified at the time of MBC diagnosis. Results: Out of 30,459 patients in the ESME database initiating their MBC treatment between 01/2008 and 01/2021, 19109 patients (2113 TNBC; 228 HR-low; 16768 HR+) were eligible for this analysis. Median follow-up was 58.0 months (95%CI [56.6; 59.0]). Median OS were 15.7 months [15.0-16.8], 19.1 months [15.5-22.4] and 44.6 months [43.8-45.5] in the TNBC, HR-low and HR+ subgroups, respectively. The multivariable analysis adjusted on age at MBC diagnosis, pathological grade and subtype, metastatic-free interval, number and sites of metastases and HER2 status (0 vs. 1-2+), identified no significant OS difference between HR-low and TNBC subgroups (HR=0.95, 95%CI 0.79-1.14), while HR+ patients had a better OS than TNBC patients (reference) (HR=0.50, 95%CI 0.47-0.53). Of these 19109 pts, 8910 received first-line CT regimen (1960 TNBC; 195 HR-low; 6755 HR+): taxanes-based: 66.7%, anthracyclines-based: 32.9%, capecitabine: 18%. Median PFS under first line CT were 5.3 (5.1-5.6), 5.1 (4.1-6.2) and 10.2 months (9.9-10.6) for TNBC, HR-low and HR+ subgroups, respectively. In the multivariable analysis adjusted on the same variables, the HR-low subgroup had a statistically poorer PFS compared to TNBC (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49). On the other hand, the HR+ subgroup had a better PFS than the TNBC (HR=0.74, 95%CI [0.70; 0.78]). Baseline germline BRCA1 mutations (at MBC diagnosis) were present in 4.5% of the TNBC cases, 2.6% of the HR-low cases, and 0.4% of the HR+ cases. The distribution of germline BRCA2 mutations was more homogeneous between the three groups (0.9% of TNBC cases, 1.3% of HR-low cases and 1.1 % of HR+ cases). Conclusions: In this large cohort, patients with HER2-negative, HR-low MBC seem to share similar general prognosis, oncogenetic features and PFS under standard chemotherapy treatment with TNBC patients. Citation Format: Marie Alexandre, Ludovic Gauthier, Audrey Mailliez, Thibault DE LA MOTTE ROUGE, Thomas Bachelot, Monica Arnedos, Florence Dalenc, Etienne Brain, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Vincent Massard, Isabelle Desmoulins, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Christelle Levy, Anthony Gonçalves, Marianne Leheurteur, Thierry Petit, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Lise Bosquet, Suzette Delaloge, William Jacot. Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers with low expression of hormone receptors: real world evidence from the French ESME cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-14.

Incidence and outcome of brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the French ESME cohort

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer that metastasizes to the brain. Particularly up to half of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may develop brain metastases over the course of the disease. Nevertheless, little is known about the prevalence and the outcome of brain and leptomeningeal metastases (BLMM) in HER2-low BC. We compared the cumulative incidence of BLMM and associated outcomes among patients with HER2-low, HER2-negative (HER2-) and HER2+ mBC. This cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) mBC database and included patients treated for mBC between 2012 and 2020 across 18 French comprehensive cancer centers and with known HER2 and hormone receptor (HR) status. The cumulative incidence of BLMM after metastatic diagnosis was estimated using a competing risk methodology with death defined as a competing event. 19 585 patients were included with 6118 (31.2%), 9943 (50.8%) and 3524 (18.0%) being HER2-low, HER2- and HER2+ mBC, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.7-49.3 months], BLMM were reported in 4727 patients: 1192 (25.2%) were diagnosed with BLMM at first metastatic diagnosis and 3535 (74.8%) after metastatic diagnosis. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, histological grade, metastases-free interval and HR status showed that the risk of BLMM at metastatic diagnosis was similar in patients with HER2- compared to HER2-low mBC [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.00 (0.86-1.17)] and higher in those with HER2+ compared to HER2-low [OR (95% CI) 2.23 (1.87-2.66)]. Similar results were found after metastatic diagnosis; the risk of BLMM was similar in HER2- compared to HER2-low [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) (95% CI) 1.07 (0.98-1.16)] and higher in the HER2+ group [sHR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.41-1.73)]. The prevalence and evolution of BLMM in HER2-low mBC are similar to those in patients with HER2- tumors. In contrast to patients with HER2+ mBC, the prognosis of BLMM remains dismal in this population.

Prognostic value of serum tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase‑5b for bone metastasis in patients with resectable breast cancer.

Bone metastasis significantly affects the quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer, and can shorten overall survival. Identifying patients with early-stage breast cancer at high risk for bone metastasis and preventing bone metastasis may lead to a better quality of life and prolonged survival. The present study investigated whether serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), a bone turnover marker, can be a prognostic factor for bone metastasis. Female patients who underwent resectable breast surgery between May 2002 and August 2006 were consecutively investigated. A total of 304 patients with a median follow-up of 3,722 days were retrospectively analyzed. TRACP-5b levels in sera prepared from patients' blood drawn preoperatively without any presurgical treatments were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The cutoff of TRACP-5b levels, in order to separate patients into high and low TRACP-5b groups, was set at median (347 mU/dl). The associations of clinicopathological factors, including TRACP-5b, with bone metastasis-free interval (BMFI), which was defined as the duration between surgery and the diagnosis of bone metastasis at any time point, were examined. Multivariate analysis of various clinicopathological features revealed that lymph node metastasis and histological grade were independent factors associated with BMFI (P=0.017 and 0.030, respectively). In patients with node-positive breast cancer (n=114), a high TRACP-5b level and a high grade were significantly and independently associated with worse BMFI (log-rank P=0.041 and 0.011, respectively). In conclusion, these findings indicated that TRACP-5b may predict bone metastasis in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

Clinicopathological and Genomic Identification of Breast Cancers with No Impact on Mortality.

Implementing mammogram screening means that clinicians are seeing many breast cancers that will never develop metastases. The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of breast cancer patients who did not present events related to long-term breast cancer mortality, taking into account diagnosis at breast screening, absence of palpability and axillary involvement, and genomic analysis with PAM50. To identify them, a retrospective observational study was carried out selecting patients without any palpable tumor and without axillary involvement, and a genomic analysis was performed with PAM50. The probability of distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI) of 337 patients was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) at 20 years and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00) in 95 patients (28%) with available PAM50 tests. In 22 (23.15%) luminal A tumors and in 9 (9.47%) luminal B tumors smaller than 1 cm, and in HER2 and basal type tumors, there were no metastatic events (20-year DMFI of 1.00). Patients with nonpalpable breast cancer found at screening with negative nodes are at very low risk. It is possible to identify subgroups without metastatic events by determining the intrinsic subtype and tumor size less than 1 cm. Therefore, de-escalation of treatment should be considered.

Molecular and Clinical Portrait of HER2-low Invasive Lobular Carcinomas

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) have a low frequency of ERBB2 amplification, therefore restricting the use of conventional anti-HER2 therapies for this histologic special type. Conversely, ILCs with low HER2 overexpression may represent a broader target for the use of emerging antibody drug conjugate therapies targeting HER2, since these treatments have proven effective in HER2-low breast cancers. Very scarce data about HER2-low ILCs have been so far published, although these tumors could have different prevalence and histomolecular specificities compared with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Our aims in that context were to decipher the clinicopathological and molecular features of a large series of HER2-low ILCs. Comparative evaluation of HER2-low prevalence was done based on a retrospective series of 7970 patients from Institut Curie, with either primary invasive lobular (N = 1103) or no special type (N = 6867) invasive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive ILCs were performed on a subgroup of 251 patients who underwent surgery for a primary ILC between 2005 and 2008. The mutational profile of these 251 cases was determined from RNAseq data. Compared with HER2-negative IBC-NSTs, the HER2-negative ILCs were found to display a higher frequency of HER2-zero cases (59.4% vs 53.7%) and a lower frequency of HER2-low (40.6% vs 46.3%) (P < .001). Clinicopathological features associated with HER2-low status (vs HER2-zero) in ILC were older age, postmenopausal status, nonclassic ILC histological types, higher grade, proliferation, and estrogen receptor expression levels. Survival curve analysis showed a significantly lower risk of local recurrence for HER2-low (vs HER2-zero) ILCs, but no association was found between HER2 status and either breast cancer–specific survival or distant metastasis-free interval. ERBB3 was the unique mutated gene exclusively associated with HER2-low ILCs yet being mutated at a low frequency (7.1%) (false discovery rate < 0.05). In conclusion, HER2-low ILCs exhibit their own particularities, both on clinical–pathological and molecular levels. Our findings call for larger multicenter validation studies.

Pathological Complete Response as Outcome Modifier in Breast Cancer Patients and Brain Metastasis.

Breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM) has dreadful outcomes. Various factors influencing outcomes are age, receptors status, number of distant metastases, performance status, leptomeningeal metastasis, chemotherapies, and whole brain radiation dose. This study aimed to find outcome-modifying factors in BCBM. Clinical, demographic, subtype, and pathological response of primary brain imaging characteristics of BCBM patients were correlated with brain metastasis-free interval and survival after brain metastasis was studied from January 2020 to March 2022. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients had the earliest presentation for brain metastases (mean 45.4years) vs luminal B (mean 57.93years). Both brain metastasis-free interval (BMFI) and brain metastasis overall survival (BMOS) were maximum in HER2-positive subtype (mean 22.8 and 11.55months) and least in TNBC patients (mean 9.8 and 2.12months), respectively. Low-graded prognosis assessment (GPA) score and leptomeningeal metastasis were associated with the worst outcomes. BMFI and BMOS in patients with pathological complete response (PCR) were at 28.5 and 15.1months, in partial response were 18.5 and 7.66months, and with stable or progressive disease were 11 and 1.36months, respectively. In the present study, PCR was the only modifiable parameter that changed breast cancer outcomes with brain metastasis and leptomeningeal metastasis was associated with the worst outcomes. Our study favors that PCR has prognostic importance.

Identification of VWA5A as a novel biomarker for inhibiting metastasis in breast cancer by machine-learning based protein prioritization

Distant metastasis is the leading cause of death in breast cancer (BC). The timing of distant metastasis differs according to subtypes of BCs and there is a need for identification of biomarkers for the prediction of early and late metastasis. To identify biomarker candidates whose abundance level can discriminate metastasis types, we performed a high-throughput proteomics assay using tissue samples from BCs with no metastasis, late metastasis, and early metastasis, processed data with machine learning-based feature selection, and found that low VWA5A could be responsible for shorter duration of metastasis-free interval. Low expression of VWA5A gene in METABRIC cohort was associated with poor survival in BCs, especially in hormone receptor (HR)-positive BCs. In-vitro experiments confirmed tumor suppressive effect of VWA5A on BCs in HR+ and triple-negative BC cell lines. We found that expression of VWA5A can be assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on archival tissue samples. Decreasing nuclear expression of VWA5A was significantly associated with advanced T stage and lymphatic invasion in consecutive BCs of all subtypes. We discovered lower expression of VWA5A as the potential biomarker for metastasis-prone BCs, and our results support the clinical utility of VWA5A IHC, as an adjunctive tools for prognostication of BCs.

Abstract A001: Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): A randomized comparative multicenter phase II trial

Abstract Background: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Neoadjuvant therapy is a rapidly emerging concept that needs to be explored and validated in terms of therapeutic options and survival benefit. In this setting, preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) seems to be feasible and can be followed by radiation therapy with promising benefit for patients in terms of R0 resection, local control and survival. However, the best therapeutic sequence is not yet known and the role of adding high-dose SBRT to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant strategy requires assessment in randomized trials. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact and efficacy of adding isotoxic high-dose SBRT (iHD-SBRT) to neoadjuvant mFFX in patients with borderline resectable PDAC. Methods: This is a randomized comparative multicentre phase II trial, planning to enrol patients (n= 256) diagnosed with a borderline resectable biopsy-confirmed PDAC. Patients will receive 4 cycles of mFFX (or 6 doses of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel [Gem/Nab-P] in case of intolerance). After full disease restaging, non-progressive patients will be randomized for receiving either 4 additional mFFX cycles (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm A), or 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) + iHD-SBRT (35 to 55Gy in 5 fractions) + 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm B). Then curative surgery will be performed followed by adjuvant chemotherapy according to patient’s condition. The co-primary endpoints are R0 resection and disease-free survival after the complete sequence strategy. The secondary endpoints include resection rate, overall survival, locoregional failure/distant metastasis free interval, pathologic complete response, toxicity, postoperative complications and quality of life assessment. Discussion: This trial will help define the best neoadjuvant treatment sequence for borderline resectable PDAC and aims to evaluate if a total neoadjuvant treatment integrating iHD-SBRT improves the patients’ oncological outcomes. Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT05083247) on October 19th, 2021, and in the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) EU CT database (2022-501181-22-01) on July 2022. The first patient was included on March 24, 2023. Citation Format: Christelle Bouchart, Julie Navez, Ivan Borbath, Karen Geboes, Timon Vandamme, Jean Closset, Luigi Moretti, Pieter Demetter, Marianne Paesmans, Jean-Luc Van Laethem. Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): A randomized comparative multicenter phase II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A001.

Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body Radiation Therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): study protocol for a randomised comparative multicenter phase II trial

BackgroundFor patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. Surgery is generally followed by postoperative chemotherapy associated with improved survival, yet neoadjuvant therapy is a rapidly emerging concept requiring to be explored and validated in terms of treatment options and oncological outcomes. In this context, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) appears feasible and can be safely integrated into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) with promising benefits in terms of R0 resection, local control and survival. However, the optimal therapeutic sequence is still not known, especially for borderline resectable PDAC, and the role of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting needs to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials. The aim of the STEREOPAC trial is to assess the impact and efficacy of adding isotoxic high-dose SBRT (iHD-SBRT) to neoadjuvant mFFX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) in patients with borderline resectable PDAC.MethodsThis is a randomised comparative multicentre phase II trial, planning to enrol patients (n = 256) diagnosed with a borderline resectable biopsy-confirmed PDAC. Patients will receive 4 cycles of mFFX (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P). After full disease restaging, non-progressive patients will be randomised for receiving either 4 additional mFFX cycles (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm A), or 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) + iHD-SBRT (35 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions) + 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm B). Then curative surgery will be performed followed by adjuvant chemotherapy according to patient’s condition. The co-primary endpoints are R0 resection and disease-free survival after the complete sequence strategy. The secondary endpoints include resection rate, overall survival, locoregional failure / distant metastasis free interval, pathologic complete response, toxicity, postoperative complications and quality of life assessment.DiscussionThis trial will help define the best neoadjuvant treatment sequence for borderline resectable PDAC and aims to evaluate if a total neoadjuvant treatment integrating iHD-SBRT improves the patients’ oncological outcomes.Trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT05083247) on October 19th, 2021, and in the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) EU CT database (2022-501181-22-01) on July 2022.

Whole Breast Irradiation in Comparison to Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer-A Direct and Network Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Trials.

Multiple randomized trials have established adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) as the standard approach after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early-stage breast cancer. The omission of WBI has been studied in multiple trials and resulted in reduced local control with maintained survival rates and has therefore been adapted as a treatment option in selected patients in several guidelines. Omitting ET instead of WBI might also be a valuable option as both treatments have distinctly different side effect profiles. However, the clinical outcomes of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI have not been formally analyzed. We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI in low-risk breast cancer patients with publication dates after 2000. We excluded trials using any form of chemotherapy, regional nodal radiation and mastectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using a two-step process. First, we extracted all available published event rates and the effect sizes for overall and breast-cancer-specific survival (OS, BCSS), local (LR) and regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free interval, contralateral breast cancer, second cancer other than breast cancer and mastectomy-free interval as investigated endpoints and compared them in a network meta-analysis. Second, the published individual patient data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) publications were used to allow a comparison of OS and BCSS. We identified three studies, including a direct comparison of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI (n = 1059) and nine studies randomizing overall 7207 patients additionally to BCS only and BCS + WBI + ET resulting in a four-arm comparison. In the network analysis, LR was significantly lower in the BCS + WBI group in comparison with the BCS + ET group (HR = 0.62; CI-95%: 0.42-0.92; p = 0.019). We did not find any differences in OS (HR = 0.93; CI-95%: 0.53-1.62; p = 0.785) and BCSS (OR = 1.04; CI-95%: 0.45-2.41; p = 0.928). Further, we found a lower distant metastasis-free interval, a higher rate of contralateral breast cancer and a reduced mastectomy-free interval in the BCS + WBI-arm. Using the EBCTCG data, OS and BCSS were not significantly different between BCS + ET and BCS + WBI after 10 years (OS: OR = 0.85; CI-95%: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.369) (BCSS: OR = 0.72; CI-95%: 0.38-1.36; p = 0.305). Evidence from direct and indirect comparison suggests that BCS + WBI might be an equivalent de-escalation strategy to BCS + ET in low-risk breast cancer. Adverse events and quality of life measures have to be further compared between these approaches.

Abstract P4-02-20: Utility of the 70-gene signature and 10 year follow up in patients with early-stage breast cancer in a single institution study

Abstract Introduction: Genomic tests are routinely used by clinicians to guide treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer (EBC). The 70-gene MammaPrint assay (MP) assesses the risk of distant recurrence in untreated patients with EBC and categorizes the tumors as High Risk (HR, MP index: -1 to ≤0) or Low Risk (LR, &amp;gt;0 to +1). The LR category is further divided into Low but non-UltraLow (LNUL; &amp;gt;0 to ≤0.355) and UltraLow Risk (UL; &amp;gt;0.355 to 1). Here, we report the risk of distant recurrence by MP and 10-year outcomes in patients with EBC diagnosed at Magee Women’s Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 259 women diagnosed with EBC between 2005 and 2008, who received a MP result, were included. Patient clinical and tumor characteristics were collected. The median FU was 13.1 year among patients with clinical data. Treatment received, 10-year Distant Metastasis Free Interval (DMFI) and 10-year Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS) are reported according to the MP groups. Differences in DMFI and BCSS between MP risk groups were assessed by log-rank. Patients were treated at the physician’s discretion. Treatment was started prior to obtaining MammaPrint results. Results: Among the 259 patients, 69% were post-menopausal women (mean [range] age: 58 [31-81] years) and diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative tumors (90%), grade 1 or 2 (64%), and without lymph node invasion (93%). In this cohort, 69% (n = 159) had a MP LR result and 31% (n = 100) had a MP HR result. Overall, 14% (n = 35) of patients had a MP UL risk of recurrence of whom 74% (n = 26/35) were post-menopausal women. Substantially more patients received chemotherapy in the HR group (57%, n = 57) compared with the LR group (15%, n = 24) (table). Considering that treatment was initiated before MammaPrint results were known, MP results might have allowed chemotherapy de-escalation in in 15% (n = 24) of patients with a MP LR. Similarly, in the 39% (n = 39) of women with a MP HR treated with endocrine therapy only, knowledge of MP results could have provided important information to add chemotherapy to the treatment plan.. In the MP UL group, 74 % (n = 26) of patients were treated with endocrine therapy only compared with those who received chemotherapy (9%, n = 3) and no adjuvant treatment (9%, n = 3). The 10-year DMFI and 10-year BCSS were higher in the LR compared with the HR group (table). When further stratifying the MP LR group in LNUL and UL, the 10y DMFI was 0.97 (95% CI; 0.94 – 1.00) and 1.00 for the MP LNUL and UL groups, respectively. Within the first 10 years, 8 of the 10 distant recurrences observed were in the MP HR group, and 2 were in the MP LNUL group. Among the 18 recorded deaths, 5 were breast cancer-related, 4 in the MP HR and 1 in the MP LR (LNUL) groups. Discussion: In this single-institution retrospective analysis, all patients showed excellent BCSS and DMFI outcomes confirming the ability of MP to correctly predict the good prognosis (LR) and poor prognosis (HR) in patients with EBC. In this analysis, as observed in other cohorts, women with a MP UL risk result had an excellent prognosis at 10 years while being treated mostly with endocrine therapy only. Taken together, with the low endocrine therapy adherence reported in the literature, these data suggest that patients with a MP UL result may be candidates for further treatment de-escalation to optimize the risk/benefit ratio of endocrine therapy in future studies. Table 1. Clinical outcomes and treatment received in patients stratified by MammaPrint results * Patients were treated at the physician’s discretion a p = 0.011, MP LR vs MP HR. b p = 0.032, MP UL vs LNUL vs HR. c p = 0.061 MP LR vs MP HR. d p = 0.170, MP UL vs LNUL vs HR. Citation Format: Azadeh Nasrazadani, Juan L. Gomez Marti, Margaret Q. Rosenzweig, Meghan McGuire, Katie Quinn, Josien Haan, Alexandre Houzelle, Rohit Bhargava, William Audeh, Adam M. Brufsky. Utility of the 70-gene signature and 10 year follow up in patients with early-stage breast cancer in a single institution study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-20.

Performance of the Matsumiya scoring system in cervical cancer patients with bone metastasis: an external validation study.

Accurate prognostic prediction of survival in cervical cancer patients with bone metastasis is important for treatment planning. We aimed to externally validate the Matsumiya scoring system using external patient data. We collected a retrospective cohort of patients with cervical cancer diagnosed with bone metastasis at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2016. The Matsumiya score was composed of 5 predictors, including the presence of extraskeletal metastasis, ECOG performance status, history of previous chemo- or radiotherapy, the presence of multiple bone metastasis, and bone metastasis-free interval < 12months. Harrell's C-statistics and score calibration plots were used to evaluate the score performance. We also reconstructed the development study to estimate apparent performance values for comparison during external validation. A total of124 cervical cancer patients with bone metastasis were included in this study. The 13-, 26-, and 52-week survival probabilities in the validation study were 70.1%, 50.5%, and 25.7%, respectively. Several differences were identified between development and validation studies regarding clinical characteristics, case-mix, and predictor-outcome associations. Harrell's C-statistics in the development and validation study were 0.714 and 0.567. The score showed poor agreement between the observed and the predicted survival probabilities in the validation study. Score reweighting and refitting showed only modest improvement in performance. A prognostic scoring system by Matsumiya et al. performed poorly in our cohort of Thai cervical cancer patients with bone metastasis. We suggested that the score should be sufficiently updated before being used.

Determinants of Long-Term Survival in Metastatic Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma

To build and validate a prognostic model that predicts long-term overall survival (OS) in metastatic choroidal and ciliary body melanoma (CCBM) to facilitate patient counseling and planning, reporting, and interpreting clinical trials. Retrospective cohort study with validation. We analyzed predictors of intermediate (IMT; 25-<42 months) and long-term (LT; ≥42 months) OS in a Finnish nationwide cohort of 330 patients with metastatic CCBM. Short-term (<25 months), IMT, and LT survival were compared with pairwise and ordinal logistic regression. A single-center cohort of 259 patients from Italy was used for validation. Models were compared with a deviance test. Median OS was 12 and 17 months in the building and validation datasets, respectively; 40 (12%) and 31 (9%) compared with 44 (17%) and 32 (12%) patients were IMT and LT survivors, respectively. Alkaline phosphatase or lactate dehydrogenase level never exceeded 2 times the upper normal limit (UNL) in either LT cohort. Conditional to both being ≤2 times the UNL, distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI) >42 months (odds ratio [OR] 4.09-4.64; P < .001) paired with age <60 years (OR 3.23; P=.002), having no symptoms (OR 4.19; P=.005), and the largest diameter of the largest metastasis <30 mm (Tumor, Node, Metastasis stage M1a; OR 3.05; P=.001) independently predicted higher odds of surviving longer (IMT or LT) without model preference. These results were confirmed in the validation dataset. Alkaline phosphatase or lactate dehydrogenase >2 times the UNL essentially precluded LT survival. The most robust predictor otherwise was DMFI >42 months, followed by age <60 years, absence of symptoms, and Tumor, Node, Metastasis stage M1a.

Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier.

Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.

Clinico-pathologic factors associated with the occurrence of early and late metastatic spread in a cohort of breast cancer patients.

Distant metastatic spread in breast cancer patients is a complex phenomenon involving several prognostic factors. We focused our analysis on early metastatic breast cancer (EMBC) (occurring during the first 36 months) versus late metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) (occurring beyond 3 years) in order to ascertain their possible differential predictive factors. diagnostic, surgical, and follow-up data were assessed for consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery between 1997 and 2019. We analysed the predictive factors for distant metastasis using both univariate and multivariate analysis. The median follow-up for this cohort of 2708 patients was 89 months. The median metastasis-free interval (FMI) for metastasis patients was 38 months (17 months for EMBC group and 76 months for LMBC group). Distant metastases developed in 12.9% (350/2708); 48% (168/350) of them as EMBC and 52% (182/350) as LMBC. Loco-regional recurrence and nodal extracapsular extension were the only common predictors for both. EMBC and LMBC appeared as two separate conditions, with a different outcome. In the EMBC group, tumour proliferation related factors were significant (histological grade, tumour size, body mass index), whereas for LMBC, other slow-acting factors seemed to be involved (screening program, tumour burden, bilateral tumour).

Peripheral Inflammatory Indexes Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) as Prognostic Biomarkers in Advanced Solitary Fibrous Tumour (SFT) Treated with Pazopanib.

Simple SummaryPazopanib treatment in advanced solitary fibrous tumour patients, assessed in the prospective GEIS-32 phase II clinical trial, has shown longer progression-free survival and overall survival versus chemotherapy treatment in control patients. In recent years, the interest in the prognostic and predictive value of different peripheral inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and red cell distribution width, has been increased in sarcomas, showing significant results in different soft tissue sarcomas. However, they have not been previously analysed in solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) patients. These indexes were retrospectively analysed in the typical- and malignant-SFT cohorts treated with pazopanib of the GEIS-32 trial to evaluate their predictive or prognostic value.Pazopanib was assessed prospectively in the GEIS-32 phase II study (NCT02066285) on advanced solitary fibrous tumour (SFT), resulting in a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with historical controls treated with chemotherapy. A retrospective analysis of peripheral inflammatory indexes in patients enrolled into GEIS-32 was performed to evaluate their prognostic and predictive value. Patients received pazopanib 800 mg/day as the first antiangiogenic line. The impacts of baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red cell distribution width (RDW) on PFS, OS, and Choi response were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Metastasis-free interval (MFI), mitotic count, and ECOG were also included as potential prognostic factors. Sixty-seven SFT patients, enrolled in this study, showed a median age of 63 years and a female/male distribution of 57/43. The median follow-up from treatment initiation was 16.8 months. High baseline NLR, PLR, and standardised RDW were significantly associated with worse PFS and OS. NLR, RDW, MFI, and mitotic count were independent variables for PFS, while RDW and ECOG were independent for OS. Further, NLR and mitotic count were independent factors for Choi response. High baseline NLR and RDW values were independent prognostic biomarkers for worse outcome in advanced SFT patients treated with pazopanib.

Patient and Treatment Factors Associated With Improved Local Control and Survival in Oligometastatic Bone Disease: Results From a Large Single-Institution Experience Using Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Limited data exist to guide optimal patient selection and treatment of bone metastases with curative intent despite the increasing application of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic (OM) disease control and reirradiation (Re-RT). Clinical characteristics for 434 patients consecutively treated with bone SBRT at a single institution from March 2011 to June 2020 were analyzed by OM, spine, and nonspine bone using Cox regression to determine association with local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate PFS and OS. Most patients had prostate (39%) or breast/lung (21%) cancer and 1 to 3 lesions (96%), with 651 lesions (spine 63%) treated for Re-RT (12%) or OMD (88%), including synchronous (10%), metachronous (28%), repeat (27%), or induced (23%) states as defined by The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥50 (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.96; P < .03) predicted improved LC among OM lesions and planning target volume (PTV) ≥150 cc (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.70; P < .04) predicted worse LC for nonspine bone. Prostate histology, performance status (PS) 0 to 1, and metastasis-free interval ≥2 year predicted improved PFS and OS (P < .05). Metachronous, synchronous, or repeat OM had higher PFS and OS (P ≤ .001) than induced OM. With median follow-up 25.7 months, 1- and 2-year PFS was 63% and 47% for OM and 36% and 25% for Re-RT; 1- and 2-year OS was 87% and 73% for OM and 58% and 43% for Re-RT. Acute toxicities included grade 1 to 2 pain flare (9%) and fatigue (14%). Late toxicities included fracture (1%) for OM and myelopathy (2.5%) or nerve pain (1.2%) for Re-RT. BED10 ≥50 for OM and PTV <150 cc for nonspine bone lesions was associated with improved LC. Prostate histology, PS 0 to 1, metastasis-free interval ≥2 years, and metachronous, synchronous, or repeat presentations per The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria predicted improved PFS and OS among OM patients treated with bone SBRT.