ë€ë„Žê»ì ìŹìì ìŹííì í”ìì ëČìë„Œ ëìŽì ìžê°ëłžì±ì êŽí ìČ íì íê”ŹëĄë¶í° ììëë€. ìžê°ëłžì±ì ìŽì€ì±, ìŠ ê°ê°êłŒ ìŽì±ì ìí°ë
žëŻžë„Œ ê·ëȘ
íêł ì íë 돞ì ìììŒëĄë¶í° ì¶ë°íìŹ ë€ë„Žê»ì êž°ìĄŽì ìČ íì ëìčíë ìëĄìŽ ìŹííì íŽë”ì ì ìíë€. ê·žê° ëłŽêž°ì ìŹíë ìžê°ëłžì±ì í ì¶ì ìŽëŁšë©Žì ìžê°ë€ìŽ ì¶ì ì ëì êž°ì€ì ìí ì íë€. ë€ë„Žê»ì ìŹíë ëšìí ì€ìŠìŁŒìì êŽì ìŒëĄë ìŽíŽë ì ìë ì íì ìžĄë©Žì ê°ì§ë€. ì§ëšì ììì ì믞ì ëčì¶ìŽ ëłŒ ë, ìŹíë ê°ìžì ìŽìíë ì ëì êž°ì€ìŽë©Žìë ê°ìžì ëŽë©ŽêłŒ ë¶ëŠŹë¶ê°ë„í íììŽë€. ìŽ ì ìì ë€ë„Žê»êłŒ ìčžížì ê±°ëŠŹë ê·žë€ì§ ë©ë€êł í ì ìë€. ìŠ, ë€ë„Žê»ì ìŹíì ê°ë
ì ìŽë°ìë ì€ìŹë„Œ ê°ì íë íìŽìíì êŽì êłŒ 충ë¶í ì늜í ì ìë€. ëí ë€ë„Žê»ì ìŹíë ìŹííì ëíì êłŒì , ìŠ ê”ìĄì í”íìŹ ìëì ìŒëĄ íì±ëë ìžê°ì ì€ìČíìì ìŽí©ì íŽëčíë€. ìŽ ì ì ìŁŒëȘ©í ë, ë€ë„Žê»ì ìčžížì ì íì ìŽë
ìŽ ê°ì§ë ì¶ìì±ì ìŽììë ìžê°ì ì€ìČì±ì ê°ìĄ°íšìŒëĄìš ê·čëł”íë€êł ëłŒ ì ìë€. íčí ìŹííì ì€ìí êž°ì ëĄì ì”êŽì êŽí ë€ë„Žê»ì ê°ìĄ°ë íëì ìë ì€ìŹì ê”ìĄêŽêłŒë ëŹëŠŹ, ê”ìĄì ê°ìčë ê°ìž ê·ž ëëšžì ìë€ë ìŹì€ì ê”ìĄì êłŒì ìì ê”ŹìČŽì ìŒëĄ íìžíëëĄ ë§ë€ìŽì€ë€. ë€ë§, ë€ë„Žê»ì êČœíì ëČìčì ë°êČŹíë êČì ìŹííìëĄì ìì ì ì 1ì ìëŹŽëĄ ìê°íììŒë©°, ìŹíêłŒíì ì°ê”Źë„Œ í”íìŹ ìžê°ì êŽí ê°ì„ ì íí ìŽíŽê° ê°ë„íë€êł 볎ìë€.This paper deals with the question how Durkheim proposes the problem of antinomy in human nature and solves it by sociological perspective. His approach differs from Kantâs transcendent philosophy as well as the empirical monism and the idealist monism. For him, society is indeed the superior aspect of human nature, only by which individual can cultivate all their valuable capacities in moral, intellectual, religious realms. Criticizing the abstract idea of individual separated from concrete realities, Durkheim concludes that the socializing process itself provides both the cause of human antinomy and the answer to overcome it. Despite of the apparent repute of Durkheim to any transcendant idea, his concept of society seems to have somehow similar attributes with it, in the sense that collective consciousness puts itself as the absolute standard governing the whole individual minds. Furthermore, unlike Kant, Durkheimâs society can provide empirical foundation with the metaphysical concept of reality, because his society embraces all kind of human practices, thoughts, beliefs and norms throughout the history. Besides, according to him, the place of habit in moral education is emphasized to internalize the collective consciousness, while modern trend of child centered education overlooks its importance. Even in learning subjects at school, the intellectual habit plays its distinctive role.